/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>20506400
kek, checked

How people doesn't realize that if they started clicking on the ads of things they don't like they could ruin companies? For example to protest against Coca-Cola everyone that sees an Coca-Cola ad clicks on it so they spent their entire quarterly budget in one week, or if they set a limit, that their ads were online for just a 10% of what it's used to be. Following a basic game theory this is what I think it would happen

>nike release ad
>angry sjw cunts that wants to end child labour goes full raid against them clicking on their ads and not buying shit
>nike runs out of budget, so they allocate more money
>current relevance—based slog would actually show nike ads to the same people, or they could start a fresh session, type some keywords, get some cookies and enjoy getting targeted in your local online newspaper
>nike runs out of money and speaks with Google account manager
>google to stop nike from pulling out makes a deal to make them pay less as their conversion is shit and bad press up as the angry mob knows their tactic is effective
>google stops growing as their biggest revenue source gets attacked and we prevent the end of the freedom

By doing this we could have enough leverage to make them pay taxes in your own country, imagines how crazy would that be

Best of /biz/

Add me to the screencap

>/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>7015427

>>6222274