/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>30185457
that's awesome too...they can basically build a nice little ecosystem around this, which goes far, far, beyond the lame 'muh farming' protocol. this should set the bar for future projects, because why would you choose something with no utility when you have BOG, which not only demonstrates proof of concept, but has a genuinely clever, talented dev, who gets things out FAST. Glad it is being fudded by the whiny plebbit betas because this is eventually going to become the new /biz/ coin

The reality is that Chainlink makes a tool that is absolutely necessary for smart contracts to function. They are the first to market and absolute light years ahead of any competition when it comes to securely feeding data to smart contracts.

If you think that smart contracts are going to be a big deal (and honestly I don't know how you can't think that) then the tool that Chainlink is building is going to be a core part of that.

So partnership x or namedrop y becomes immaterial to the fundamental fact that people who want data fed securely into a smart contract, or payments triggered, or data trustlessly moved on or off chain, need Chainlink. It's only a matter of time before the number of projects using this tool are so many that there are no more "partnerships" announced. People don't announce a partnership with Amazon when they use AWS, and they don't announce a partnership with Google every time they use Google Cloud. They just use it.