/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>29941500
what have i done

>>29590334
1

why number go down

>>29342716
hahahaha im the anon that posted response
i still think about that guy. hope he's doing okay

I bought EGG at 100$ and yesterday it was at $150, according to my calculations it would have taken just 10 more days to become a millionaire, so I quit my job.
Today EGG is at $80, I didn't know the price of an EGG could also go down.
It must be just a graphical issue, right? Who should I contact to get a refund?

Is it still worth buying in?

>>28079599
you mean my funds are not safu?

>tfw I realize what I've turned my life savings into

>>25295407
You literally gave up millions for a quick dump

>all those poor souls in the schizo threads
>who bought even MORE when it dumped

What do you guys think 1 btc will be worth in 2035?

>>25204289
>januari.

>>25149374
HAHAHAHHHAHAHAHA
same tho

>mining is considered a taxable event in the USA

>>25138852
anon dont confuse me i dont want to be confused if it's true

>>25136124
the things i would do to your wiener for some of that...

Why isn't anything making BTC dump. I need to buy in.

I'm a programmer, not heavily into crypto and testing one for a coin that's got a $2 million market cap. It looks like it works. Should I buy?

>Mom found the silver Mercury Dime stash

>cash out
>doorbell rings

>>15680216
>2029 great depression

>>14552360
>TFW this post made ne realize that weather people give us shoddy statistics and predictions so that people can't make bank trading derivatives on agriculture and instead they keep all the good math and knowledge of government cloud seeding schedules to themselves

With LINK I understand that the key point is to get off blockchain data onto the blockchain so that duplicate distributed smart contracts can verify success or failure and determine where to allocate funds. What I dont get is the security part. Obviously the distributed part of the smart contract stops people from being able to lie and say that the stipulations of a contract were met or missed when the opposite is true, but what stops people from lying/hacking at the point of entry into the blockchain? Won't smart contracts that publicly record big money deals and include specification on things like data type and IP origins for data inflows open up these entrypoints to attack? Whats stopping someone from doing something as simple as placing a sed filter on a datastream that feeds into a LINK API so that the smart contract fails/passes erroneously, or is even open to a SQL injection like attack?
Like in the future, a prankster could do something ridiculously easy like hacking their neighbor's IOT eletricity meters that feed into a LINK API and adding a 10x multipler on usage right before its fed into the blockchain so that their neighbor gets charged an irreversible bill thats verified by everyone else on the network. Basically garbage data in leading to terrible contract results.

What happens in a world like this, and is there anything LINK can offer to stop normies from allowing themselves to get rekt like this so that mass adoption can actually happen?

>>14480006
>are we up?
>we
ahhh... Oof... Yikes... um... uhhh..