/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55504111
post livestream

Yeah, (You). I know who you are. You're that guy who posts frogs on /biz/.

YOU are a Big Frog.

How much money do YOU have in total?

Hard mode:

No LARPing

You're a big frog.

>>55095355
>BTC
>ETH
One shittier than the other.

Fuck you

>>54679103
No. These niggers never told us
It's absolutely bullshit that we, the pepe creators, were not told about the very shitcoin that represents us.
I'm here every day. EVERY FUCKING DAY. And not ONCE did I see a pepe shill in the beginning until It was wayyy too late
I fucking hate this board

ADMIT YOU'RE A FAGGOT
DO IT NOW

>>54636254
FUCK you.

>>54615252
Yes you did, several.

>>54588922
ETH, AVAX, LINK... All these options and you chose that obvious rip-off? You did retarded.

Tell me your story.

>>54582678
YOU are a jew!

Why are you still not a millionaire?

>>54525010
YOU !!!!

Is gold going to retrace lads? Thinking of getting myself another nice cheeky 1oz Britannia, dunno if I should hold off or not.

Why should I pay you $300,000 per year when I can get someone from Uganda to do the same thing for some rice and a pack of cigarettes?

Is ebay still a good place to pick up junk silver or is it not worth the time and effort? The premiums on bullion silver coins / bars are brutal because of VAT.

>>54377049
Mumu and bobo are the ying and yang. Mumu is the reaching out, the investing, the expectation of profit. He is the question "where do I go?"
Bobo is the drawing in, the dumping, the expectation of loss. He is the question "where have I come from?"
Snib is comfort; he is ignorance; the rest between mumu and bobo, the "nothing is changing".
The black swan is recognition of the market as a market, as contingent; the dissolution of mumu and bobo - they are ripples on the surface, at which one looks. One looks at the waves on the surface, and one forgets that there is a surface. To look at the content is to forget that there is a medium. That is why the map is not the territory: it is the same content (at least the same partial content), but on a different medium. The map is just the map.
The chart exists because the underlying transactions exist, but it is not the underlying transactions. If the underlying transactions cannot exist, then the chart cannot exist (or rather, its existence is meaningless). If - and I'm not saying that this will happen, just as a hypothetical - Binance goes down, liquidity in crypto drops by 90% (colloquially, I don't know the exact percentage). Then all the transactions have to happen OTC or via some small exchanges, that'll be like the eyes of needles through which everything tries to squeeze. It'll be insanely volatile, but the volatility won't mean anything because it'll reflect reduced transaction volume, and the volatility itself will make everyone HODL on the buy- and sell-side.
What I described is liquidity-risk, and it's applicable in general, and it's related to transaction volume: if the transaction volume goes down, there's less liquidity, and if there's less liquidity, there's less possible transaction volume. Of course, by transitivity, the less liquidity there is, the less liquidity there is. It's a feedback loop. It's not an unstoppable feedback loop, but it is a feedback loop.

How did YOU escape the wage cafe?

>>54350569
FROG (PEPE)

>>54251150
>>54251232
You're not doing it right, anon
>>54251192
He's right
Figure out how to get it on one page

>>54062503
>keep these threads up they give me hope
Hope?
>grow weed and sell it
Did unironically think about this.