/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>3766953
thank you kind sir, your tip is insightful

core cucks are going to need some fundamentals. they don't believe in technicals even though btc routinely corrects 80% to 95% downwards like clockwork.

segwit2x isn't for almost 2 months and even then the "alt coin" btc1 currently has 98% of the hash rate. that means btc will not only have to eat a 98% hash rate loss but continue to experience network outages on the remaining 1% hash due to bch's death spiral attack that never stopped.

no matter what we say though these faggots are going to eat a 95% loss because they think beanie babies will rise forever due to having a limited supply (even though btc's inflation is 4% a year and don't slow down until the 2030s).

there's no saving them. you're wasting your time.

i'm actually curious how core cucks cope with the casper algorithm. destroying eth tokens to solve the "nothing at stake" problem means that eth is actually deflationary while btc just inflates slowly.

so any argument you can make about btc > usd also applies for eth > btc. in the long run, eth will eventually flip btc... if you're in this as an "investment" to "hodl" why would you be holding the guaranteed loser?

it must be for a short term pump and dump regarding segwit2x. that's the only possible conclusion i can draw from it.

i'd say this is getting a little out of hand, but honestly, good for you guys for making some profit with a solid product. i'm actually looking forward to using these oracles (as a developer).

volume is increasing now, in a downtrend. we've all seen this before.

i understand that btc is getting a hard fork mid november. that's a month and a half away, and we have increasing volume in a downtrend as people who bought the dip because of the fork realize that there's probably going to be a correction before then and they bought in too early

it can also be noted that segwit itself gave bitcoin a huge pump and it was due for a correction anyway

i have hundreds of pictures to bump my thread!

after checking r/btc, it looks like everyone who posts in r/bitcoin is banned by that broken auto mod. then how are there posts in that sub...? so strange @_@

>>3675823
i poorly worded that. i mean, core can't hard fork without changing the ticker name because the original chain will always be btc as long as people, even rogue agents, mine it.

>>3651650
i'm "responsible for my actions" because i posted a "gay" picture you don't like because what i find funny you find offensive.

this is literally an anime site and i picked one of my random anime girl pictures to create a post with.

god forbid she was black then you'd call me a nigger lover and say i brought race into this by posting a black girl. this smoking girl offensive too? i don't even smoke.

why is there so much eth fud here? from people lying about it being inflationary, to lying about the nature of the dao hack, to lying about how much eth vitalik holds, and so on... it's because eth is a threat to btc, right?

eth's technicals and fundamentals are amazing right now. the btc crash right before the metropolis hard fork is the perfect environment for a flippening.

seriously, why does eth rub you guys the wrong way?