[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.56295646 [View]
File: 96 KB, 333x360, 1621335478129.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56295646

What if we alternate each thread between logo and no logo? That way regardless of which one is more damaging we ensure we're pissing someone off half the time, and anyone who brings up logofaggotry from that point on can be saftely shit upon for being a thread slidding nigger.

Hedging our bets, so to speak.

>> No.56237674 [View]
File: 96 KB, 333x360, 1621335478129.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56237674

As an unaffiliated third party, this thread is strange. There's of course gonna be some normal kekking given the cancelling, but there is definatly shilling going on in here too. But if it were over there'd be no reason to shill, and if weren't over, there would also be no reason to shill since the shares are cancelled. You can't convince someone to sell their nonexistant share for $0. Regardless of outcome the need for BBBYQ shilling should be over. Are they just paid for month long contracts and just have to keep going til october?

>> No.54374905 [View]
File: 96 KB, 333x360, 1621335478129.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54374905

so assuming larper anon was right the SEC was the one who told them to fudge the numbers. Does this mean they're legally forced to act? I can understand them doing fuckall when the corruption is obvious yet nebulous enough that they can pilpul it away, but this is an offical set of numbers coming from a business. Hard factual data from official sources. Should the SEC still refuse to address this is gamestop not well within their right to make public very clear dereliction of duties?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]