/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>29959385
This is why they bought VIDT
They can offer vidt for fiat, which anchors through LTO anyway

>>28716966
This will happen fast tho, they have a policy for new clients to start their own node,
Some older clients are starting to run their own nodes
And finally theres also VIDT for anchoring as a service, for clients who dont want to run a node. I guess thats what they meant with front end from pic rel

LTO buys vidt for their tech and company.
>Vidt token no longer needed
Vidt Holders seething

From here there's 2 choices.
Vidt token gets consumed by LTO
Or both tokens exist and get bought by clients for their services.
Rick can pump both bags easily through business adoption, imo

Discuss.

I will remind them again

>>27821048
Here you go fren
El Tio consumed vidt

>>27767755
Yea
I'm thinking the fudders are former VIDT holders

"The only thing I ask from you is accepting that Marnix(VIDT CEO) won’t come back and I’m taking over. I have build LTO on fundamentals not on hype. I will do the same with vidt as that is lacking in my opinion." - Rick, LTO CHAD CEO
Btfo

Info scooped from todays vidt ama

>What Fortune 500 companies do you plan to seek out into the future?
"The magic fortune 500 companies. We have some in the pipeline. But very preliminary. Im speaking to a founder that has 2 fortune 500 companies"

>Marketing
"We are definatelly open for online marketing jobs

>About why projects take so long.
"The projects need to go through a whole procedure and get approved / authorized by multiple parties which can take weeks / months.
It’s hard to give an estimation because it does not lie in our hands.
The larger the org. The more time things take to get it live."

"I understand the need for regular updates in this context.
But the number of tx really speak for themselves.
If a project is scalling up we are definatelly posting about it.
Never waste a good PR moment"

>possible lto vidt token merge
"To put it simple. We wont merge tokens if it doesnt benefits the hodlers from both communities"

All I found interesting and LTO related
Rest was about vidt roadmap and their eth staking

>>27415557
I'm convinced this dutchie is salty about
VIDT getting outright bought out by LTO and his coin dumping
Funny how I can recognise his Dutch writing style every thread

>>26604224
Actually it could be a former vidt holder butthurt about getting acquired by LTO.
Seen it happen before.

Merger shook things up a bit, but I think both can work in symbiosis. Vidt for verification and lto for anchoring

>>26271168
Nah, not really. There is a merger and acquisition fund, but they're saving it until at least 1b mcap. Then they acquire other teams and projects like they did with VIDT, which will result in more growth

>>26142120
LOL what a sad cuck.
Otherway around, LTO bought VIDT outright

>>26086087
I honestly find their tokenomics interesting. VIDT has a much smaller supply and they do some kind of burn and buy back mechanism. If I had more fiat I'd buy a suicide bag, but I'm also a bit skeptical about mergers (tomo - lit). Looks like LTOxVIDT are making sure both parties benefit

>>25565805
Chad flex

>>25565603
most certainly BASED and redpilled

>>25542084

The vidt merger is very bullish imo. They will share clients and resources together. And with the start of UN land registry around the globe the transactions will spike in 2021. Very bullish for staking rewards

Bought this and LTO too, joint staking coming soon.

LTO network
- Top 10 tx blockchain (http://coinstats.network)
- No spam tx, all real paid by users
- 8% staking APY, all paid by fees, no supply inflation
- Partnered with IBM, United Nations, European Government bodies
- Under 30 mill market cap - legitimate 100x potential