/biz/ - Business & Finance

Listen up actual people in here
>Who would buy my shares if it reached 90k?
Hedgies owe us the shares, because they borrowed them, that's what a short is
Honestly if you didn't know this yet wtf are you doing
They literally are taking INFINITE RISK by shorting
In fact, there are currently more borrowed shares than actually exist in the market, that can happen legally, but there is very likely illegal counterfeit shares, the mess is just too big
Look here >>30304224
>% of float held 135.95%
And that's only by institutions, retail isn't even accounted for and there's already more shares than actually exist
Literally who gives a shit about 50% price drops, they'll take my shares only when everyone else already sold, there's plenty they owe, then I can name my price.
>Gamestop can issue more shares
It would be against their interests.
>>30335041 >>30320113 >>30325834
>10k-100k per share is going to crash the market
Yes, and?
But actually no, if you somehow honestly care about the economy read >>30307782
>They already closed their short positions
Did melvin tell you that on the hearing?
What about the 60+ short interest in the finra-markets.morningstar link in the OP and 135+% in bloomberg term?
What about FINRA hiding the true Short % of float on their table and removing "days to cover"?
Also >>30392013 >>30392228
>>29947795
And I didn't even talk about shorting ETFs containing GME, those will be recalled when those release their dividends around before the 24th
>The government or SEC won't let it happen lol
SEC is useless cmon, now for the government? Do you think they would pass up on the opportunity to get that sweet tax from you?
More here >>30309175
>Gamma squeeze
Look at the ridiculous exposure MMs have, 25 million shares, the float is 45-54M btw
This will make for a crazy Gamma squeeze if GME gets to the strike prices
>>29947221 this is complicated, I suggest you read some actual material about Gamma squeezes
We are robbing banks here

Listen up actual people in here
>Who would actually buy my shares from me if it reached 90k?
Hedgies owe us the shares, because they borrowed them, that's what a short is
Honestly if you didn't know this yet wtf are you doing, they literally are taking INFINITE RISK by shorting
In fact, there are currently more borrowed shares than actually exist in the market, that can happen legally, but there is very likely illegal counterfeit shares, the mess is just too big
Look here >>30304224
>% of float held 135.95%
And that's only by institutions, retail isn't even accounted for and there's already more shares than actually exist
>10k-100k per share is going to crash the market
Yes, and?
But really, if you somehow honestly care about the economy read >>30307782
>They already closed their short positions
Did melvin tell you that on the hearing?
What about the 60+ short interest in the finra-markets.morningstar link in the OP?
What about FINRA hiding the true Short % of float on their table and removing "days to cover"?
>>29947795
And I didn't even talk about shorting ETFs containing GME, those will be recalled when those release their dividends around before the 24th
>The government or SEC won't let it happen lmao
SEC is useless cmon, now for the government? Do you think they would pass up on the opportunity to get that sweet tax from you?
More here >>30309175
>Gamma squeeze
Look at the ridiculous exposure market makers have, 25 million shares, the float is 45-54M btw
This will make for one ridiculous Gamma squeeze if GME gets to the stike prices
>>29947221 this shit is complicated, I suggest you get some actual material, but here >>30233789
The basic theory is that shorters will try to use calls to cover a portion of the shorts, by abusing the MMs who fall for it and sell them contracts
Literally who gives a shit about 20% price swings, they'll take my shares only when everyone else already sold, there's plenty the owe, then I can name my price.
We are robbing banks here

Listen up actual people in here
>Who would actually buy my shares from me if it reached 90k?
Hedgies owe us the shares, because they borrowed them, that's what a short is
Honestly if you didn't know this yet wtf are you doing, they literally are taking INFINITE RISK by shorting
In fact, there are currently more borrowed shares than actually exist in the market, that can happen legally, but there is very likely illegal counterfeit shares, the mess is just too big
Look here >>30304224
>% of float held 135.95%
And that's only by institutions, retail isn't even accounted for and there's already more shares than actually exist
>10k-100k per share is going to crash the market
Yes, and?
But really, if somehow honestly care about the economy read >>30307782
>They already closed their short positions
Did melvin tell you that on the hearing?
What about the 60+ short interest in the finra-markets.morningstar link in the OP? 60+
What about FINRA hiding the true Short % of float on their table and removing "days to cover"?
>>29947795
And I didn't even talk about shorting ETFs containing GME, those will be recalled when those release their dividends around before the 24th
>The government or SEC won't let it happen lmao
SEC is useless cmon, now for the government? Do you think they would pass up on the opportunity to get that sweet tax from you?
More here >>30309175
>Gamma squeeze
Look at the ridiculous exposure market makers have, 25 million shares, the float is 45-54M btw
This will make for one ridiculous Gamma squeeze if GME gets to the stike prices
>>29947221 this shit is complicated, I suggest you get some actual material, but here >>30233789
The basic theory is that shorters will try to use calls to cover a portion of the shorts, by abusing the MMs who fall for it and sell them contracts
Literally who gives a shit about 20% price swings, they'll take my shares only when everyone else already sold, there's plenty the owe, then I can name my price.
We are robbing banks here

>>30218107
>pick different girls
unbased, I'm loyal

>>29832714
>gamestop having a large amount of retail investors holding shares makes the short squeeze potential weaker, not stronger, because of the prisoner's dilemma issue.
completely agreed, while the stock was still coming down from the first bump in january I said how good it is that retail was being driven out.
relevant past posts I could quickly find
>>28391493
>>28293161
another thing I have in mind is this huge attention and volatility on the stock brought up a lot of swing traders, like you, who fuck up the squeeze...
hopefully entropy is fast enough and a majority of stocks end up in holders hands for the squeeze to happen.

>>29680980
the market won't survive this circus