/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>4925449
~I believe I told you that most of my calls are long term holds.

*Hai hai!~*

Sorry, there was a cable outage at my place! I spent my morning reading a book and catching up on minor chores.

As for ICO pitches, I'm going through a list of promising stuff and sorting out the good and the bad. Most are long-term things and/or still missing white papers, and not much is happening soon (ie, within two weeks). Plus most of my pitches are long-term holds (3 to 6 months if not longer) which /biz/ is not used to.

But there *IS* something that landed on my desk that is short term.

>https://blog.decentraland.org/decentraland-whitelist-a5129c29a8fa
Decentraland (basically a virtual Second Life that is also a DNT district) held its ICO last month on the 18th for its token, MANA. A lot of people wanted to buy in, including whales. It sold out within minutes and left a lot of people here on /biz/ upset.

HOWEVER, because of the People's Bank of China ruling, they're going to be refunding Chinese ICO investors. That means that their loss is your gain, and we might have an opportunity to buy up some MANA and flip it (or hold it long term if you believe in the project. Check it out!) when it starts trading on the 15th (the same day as the Kyber ICO, if I'm not mistaken).

The blog post above details the process. There is a white list, so you need to get invited to their slack between now and the 10th (Sunday).

>>3284003
Glad to hear! And if you used the ChainLink link I provide, I am happy to confirm now that the pre-sale is closed that you *will* be getting your LINK tokens. And I think that the people who went over will also be getting LINK, since it didn't go over 10%.

>>3284068
>>3284116
I am pretty sure you need to set up an account first. Don't really recall. These guys have a weird set up process!

>>3223408
>>3223438
>>3223459
*Hai hai!~*

There seems to be a misunderstanding: I did set up a pool, but that was for myself and real life friends so we could get into ChainLink's pre-sale. It isn't an open pool for /biz/ to get into, sorry!~ Besides, I doubt people /biz/ are ready and willing to trust other people they barely know with their money, unless its done via smart contract.

That said, I'm really excited for ChainLink, as I explained earlier what it does >>3183937. You should see of the founder's videos, such as this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DrlL5v78FtA

Hai hai!~

So I did end up partnering with some real life friends and buying into the pre-sale. I guess I'm firmly on the ChainLink train now!

Though I will admit that I am *surprised* that some anons are pooling their money together to buy into the pre-sale. I guess that's how much people are willing to value what LINK will do!

>>3155662
>>3155663
Well~ There *is* a version out, and it has plenty of detail, but it just reads as if it were put through Google Translate.

What is there though does seem interesting though.

>>3155706
I've mentioned Science before, but I'm still waiting for their term sheet.

>>3146801
My own (rather conservative) estimate is $1 around years' end/the spring. Some in the Telegram group are far more optimistic than I am.

I can't *quite* predict how much it will trade for after all the upcoming listings, but given that it's only on Etherdelta, and I think it's safe to say assume a rather nice bump from the current $0.21.

But it's entirely up to you anon. Personally, when I make my investments, I want 5x minimum.

>>3147006
Currently trading? I'm looking into one, but it's far too early. Plus, most of my attention is on the ICOs next month. I'm not joking: they're going to be insane.

>>3147221
As I said above, I'm trying to avoid staying in one single place. By default, if you want to talk to me, try the /biz/ discord (https://discord.gg/gAUAVV)) or the smaller 0x discord (https://discord.gg/bQNnMh).). You'll know me when you see me.

>>3147245
>>3147345
No joke anon-san, if people did that, I wouldn't be doing this. Everything and anything I post to back up my arguments is open source information.

>>3147319
I have high hopes for Enigma, though some of the other ICOs coming next month are also rather intense. As >>3146614 pointed out, Science seems rather promising.

>>3147336
As >>3147417 says, if this hits Bittrex along with the other ecosystem tokens, then the price could really shoot up. Though right now, the main dev of MBRS' communication on that was:
>Bittrex is not a matter of money.
>We must "qualify" and I cannot speak of that process. We must wait and see
(ie, passing the latest regulation compliance)
We're still moving forward (last I read on Wednesday) with Cryptopia and HitBTC. Yobit I think is also on the list. Oh, and Radar Relay, that new decentralized exchange based on 0x that comes out this month. I don't think it will be a mistake though.


And no matter what, I stand by with leaving my ETH address visible so that you know I'm not moving my 100k MBRS any time soon:
>0xb7aA88f43e1Ad3D745D02587Cf9a55A87eC31937

>>3128501
Wow, I made a few mistakes on that one sentence. It should look like this:
>Also, a quick update: Drake (the CEO and main dev) said last night that we're good on the number of DOT tokens that we (MBRS holders) we need for a listing on Cryptopia.
...because Cryptopia asked for them as a sort of fee.

>>3128554
In good time, anon-san! I'm probably considering holding an ICO week even where I go all of them.

Though for now, let's just saying I'm trying to figure out how to raise a lot of money so I can invest is as many as I can starting on September 7th (ChainLink's ICO date). As for Enigma specifically, it is definitely on my radar!

Wow! A lot of people seem to have bought in! How exciting!

Just two quick words of advice guys:

1) While some of you are excited about the current bump in the price, I still *do* regard this as a long-term project. So urge patience.
1a) As an addendum to the above, please note that I regard the current bump as possibly temporary. We still have to get listed on the exchanges after all. Though it's going to be some two interesting weeks!
2) If any of you joined the Telegram group, please try to be nice and courteous! Not everyone is a 4channer or knows what Pepe is, and I like it when dev channels remain solid communities. It helps the project out!