/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>3283710
*Hai hai!~*

I'm actually in on Blackmoon, anon-san! I've put in 4.9 ETH and plan on adding more before the day is out!~

Basically, Blackmoon wants to be a platform for investment managers to build tokenized funds. In other words, a way for fund managers (think the company Vanguard and how it has various stock market funds) to issue tokens for their own funds. So if I built a fund that is composed out of several cryptos, I could an issue a token for it and people can just buy that.

So basically, it's Iconomi but actually *more* useful! And it wants to bridge crypto and traditional finance! So we'll get access to fiat funds, better compliance with legal regulations, a more experienced team, and so forth! If this thing takes off, it could eat up USDT and some of the gold-backed cryptos, plus more. It's been flying under the radar for now, but a lot of people are buying in. One of the Obsidian devs said he'd "bet the house" on it via the /biz/ discord group.

Anyways, this is getting attention NOW because Pre-Order closes in 22 hours and 50 minutes or so due to huge investor interest. So I'd get in soon if I were you and I wanted to buy in!

Here is the white paper, which is meticulously detailed:
>https://blackmooncrypto.com/bmc_whitepaper_170819_v1.14.pdf

>>3183937
Anyways, with ChainLink, people set up nodes that act as individual data/payment providers (Like SWIFT) and create single oracles for use in dapps. In exchange for this, they node operators get paid in LINK tokens for the data access they provide to smart contracts. So the token does have utility!

Even though the white paper isn't out yet (it's being peer reviewed), I don't think I can miss this opportunity. Especially since the token distributes right after the ICO (0x, anyone?).

The problem is that I'm a bit short on funds and can't meet the 100 ETH min needed to enter into the pre-sale (with that 20% bonus they're offering!). I mean I could, but there are some other cool ICOs coming up. So I'm thinking about reaching out to real life friends and associates. That way we can pool our money together and buy in (it would also help with the restrictions on US investors). Hoping that goes well and we can get the ball rolling by tomorrow! Otherwise, I'll miss the bonus wait until the ICO.


Oh, and I suppose you can consider this the unofficial start of ICO Festival everyone! We've got a lot of cool deals coming in, so spend your money wisely!~

>>3183957
Right here, anon:
>https://link.smartcontract.com/

>>3150066
>Please find the information to get on the whitelist via Telegram:
>https://blog.kyber.network/2nd-update-on-our-token-sale-procedure-934a5e1f3ef

You need to be signed up for the white list to partake in Kyber's ICO.

For Science, their pre-sale is in September. But I'm assuming it'll fill quickly because of heavy interest. I'm waiting on their term sheet to know more. Not seeing anything about a white list yet.

For the other 4 ICOs, I'm fairly sure you don't need to get onto white lists for the crowdsale (I'm checking again to be sure). Though some of them *are* in pre-sale (though that usually means high barriers to entry cash-wise). I won't say what they are, as an incentive for you to go look.

>>3150007
Haven't investigated real estate blockchain ICOs/projects yet. Sorry!~
Plus I'm a bit adverse to the possible regulation/legal issues having to do with such.

>>3150177
April. But I started studying the tech almost a year ago.

It's been a wild ride since!~

>>3143971
Aside as in I'll pass. There are actually better things out there.

Here, I'll drop a big hint for free: Science Incubator.

>>3144040
Discord.

I'm in the main /biz/ discord as the main place where you can find me (https://discord.gg/gAUAVV)), and in a few others here and there, such as the 0x one. Still debating about making my own.

>>3132374
Actually, ChainLink just recently landed on my desk, so I haven't had a chance to look through it yet. Sorry!

But from I hear from others it's supposed to be one of the better ICOs coming out in September.

>>3096244
(Oh hey! You also noticed anon! Nice!)

>>3096268
...so to summarize anon, I'm into MBRS for the long-term anon, at least until next year. It might now much seem like much (especially the website, though I read that it *is* getting a revamp soon but has been delayed because of other things), I like how it's run and where it's headed.

Anyways, I've bought 100,000 tokens, and am looking to buy more as soon as I cash out from other investments. Apparently, this makes me one of the top 50 holders! And since this *is* still a small cap company (around $3.5 million) with ONLY 50,000,000 tokens in circulation! If this token enters into high demand, then the value of the individual token should moon too!~

Right now though, a whale that bought in below $0.01 is apparently dumping his tokens now so he can come out with like 7x profit. That's why you have huge sell walls right now on EtherDelta. Though because of the incoming exchanges, I've being eaten up rather quickly. So you might want to consider buying soon if you want to join in!

>>3088097
Bought into both early! Happy to see where we are and knowing where we're going!~

By the way guys, in case you haven't heard, we're already getting our first new decentralized exchange built off of 0x protocol. It's called Radar Relay, and it launches sometime later this month:
>https://radarrelay.com/

No more having to use EtherDelta! ZRX tokens will gain value from usage! Holders rejoice! Yaaaaaay~

This is why I suggested this token, guys. Much profit today and the next few days~

I'm also moving onto the next big opportunity. For those interested, I suggest looking into Obsidian and MBRS.