/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>57873660
Sure will. I remember far too many things on here, anon.
That one post of yours did piss me off but I do genuinely hope we all make it.

>>56881405
I still remember this anon often. He sold pretty much the absolute sats top in August 2020. Incredible to think, over three years later, we're caught at a resistance which is roughly (below) his sell price and, for any unfortunate anons as retarded as me, completely JUSTed. I remember it because I was losing sleep over whether to sell through August, and I sort of knew I should, yet just couldn't pull the trigger. It was an awkward price and I wanted higher, but I couldn't see the forest for the trees. Wish I didn't have to learn those lessons.

>>55836879
>I never fudded
Neither did I until in Jan/Feb 2021 when I made the point that the PA was seriously out of position and time was running out to catch a wave and was met with nothing other than contempt and complacency and denial. "Fuck retail" was the gist, total midwittery. You can't be the project that expects explosive PA from delivery and adoption alone (i.e. to prove to the world you are a genius), when there's nothing substantially delivered on the first WP yet beyond scope creep and we're already halfway through the shortlived part of a cycle when Elon Musk is shilling DOGE on SNL and Logan Paul or whatever other dipshit is tweeting about PooPooWeeWee token. Meanwhile you're "fud4fun", daydreaming about your fantasy of joining the NWO after the 4th Industrial Revolution. It's simply not clever. It's self-sabotaging, nonsensical.

That's the beginning of the LINK cuck meme imo. Pure 4chan neet autism failing to understand the social and psychological aspects of what a hype market and retail frenzy actually is. Too many were spoiled from LINK eating sats for years that they got too big a head. So I realised a massive shakeout was in order and cheered it on. It's the biggest regret of my life so far that I didn't sell more.

I have tamer price expectations than everyone else's itt who seem to take triple digits as given.

>>55840136
This definitely accounts for a good portion of the fud motive.

>>54233631
>>54236856
Encourage you and all anons to re-read this thread: https://archived.moe/biz/thread/21557620/#21557620..

It demonstrates the importance of not just being able to form a thesis but be able to follow through on it. He basically played the past few years perfectly. He rotated 85% of his $1.2m LINK into 900 ETH and 50 BTC at the pair tops in August 2020, when all of us ignored our better angels.

I think about that motherfucker all the time. It is probable that he is now a multi-millionaire from that decision. The play would probably be different now with LINK basically in the toilet against everything, but that's the conviction you need. What I find amazing about it is that it was actually the humility and control of greed which allowed him to sell at an awkward price - as I certainly felt, not quite enough to make it completely but plenty to do so within a few years' time - and make his many millions. Out of everything, I think the biggest lesson is just to tame your expectations. Some call it "paying your tuition to the market". I'm sure you're up big, as am I. The thought now should be adapting from mistakes.

>>54234967