/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>57143728
thanks!

when I started in the biz, silver was $5 and gold was $280.
As far as I'm concerned they've already mooned and are going to keep right on mooning.

kek apparently op is sincere
as a chainlink killer it's old news
orcalize -> witnet -> band protocol -> api3 -> pyth (we are here now)
all have no chance ultimately but might be good to have small bags if an oracle narrative takes hold at some point (probably as chainlink staking expands)

when the fuck with BOIL start simmering again. I have been bagholding since 11 a pop

Took me 1 hour to find pic related

Never forget those who doubted you

>>28573944
We are all in the same place here smart guy

>>28186099
Beware those who come forward after you make it.

>>28165386

What will be your response when your exs find out you hold XRP after moon schizos?

blessed thread lads

It's gonna dump on open, isn't it?

Truth.

alt season hasent even started yet. This is link season right now just like last summer.

>>24942953
It's about time

2017 all over again

>>24865459

10% daily returns on an initial $200 in equity will equal $211mil after 220 days.
All you need for 10% return on equity is 1% return on asset, using 10x leverage.
Lurk the BTC 15min chart until the market's in a clear uptrend and the price hits a triple touch on an upwards support trendline.
Sell just before upper resistance is reached.
Take your money and call it a day.
Repeat tomorrow.
Don't be greedy.
Don't be a pussy.
It's possible.

>>24525694
u talk bout this one?

>>24462616
Are there going to be minorities in the pleasure domes or is there a mechanism for confiscating their gains?

So I showed this to my gf and was like lol.
She said well, she doesn't think that the girl breaking up with James was wrong. And that real estate is proven profit. I stated that well, if a job's point is to make money, I don't care if they are investing in bit coin, or ant farms. If they have the foresight to know what the next big thing is, then good for them.
anyone care to weigh in?

>>24395554
>not all in
Anon, please.