[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:

View post   
>> No.50054325 [View]
File: 36 KB, 443x604, taleb.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50054325

chaos is lindy

>> No.30412372 [View]
File: 37 KB, 443x604, nassim taleb.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
30412372

>>30412287
>it will lose money until it doesnt
so you're basically betting on low probability high impact events

>> No.30364853 [View]
File: 37 KB, 443x604, nassim taleb.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
30364853

>>30364788
>we only need to be right once

>> No.30326521 [View]
File: 37 KB, 443x604, BKsPNKu7A9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
30326521

If Nassim Nicholas Taleb had ETFs I'd go all in.

>> No.12970831 [View]
File: 37 KB, 443x604, Nassim Taleb.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12970831

I'm sure most of you are familiar with Nassim Taleb's book on Black Swans, comes from far left of tail of distribution, They are major impacts that are a surprise to everyone, cause more of an effect than things with a normal distribution, and are rationalized by hindsight.

Would UBI result in an antifragile environment?

Would the disorder from giving a bunch of people money result in unplanned disruptors having a positive effect while 90% of the UBI recipients just stay at home and smoke pot?
Or, would it be just as likely to cause positive disruptions as negative ones?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]