/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>51508613
they won't give any information on this but my assumption is that other nodes will use their framework for a fee
it seems that the chainlink staking implementation will enable nodes to stake link but not trustless third party staking (ie. retail staking)

>>51067286
people are not buying the token for access to the node... they're buying it for a cut of their revenue... which could be substantial as they monetize their services (naas, managed nodes, staking platform, market)
>>51067304
yeah, it's pretty depressing really in terms of discussion these days. i think everyone from back in 2017/18 is either retired, has gone into jobs in industry or is thoroughly demoralized after missing bullrun last year. but even worse is the fact that people can't be angry with themselves for holding it due to the ongoing good news, the quality of the hires is ridiculous.
i do think the initial staking release will get eyes on the project though. people are looking for reliable yield. v0.1 will the potential.

>For retail users, LinkPool has developed a set of pooled staking contracts. When staking goes live in the Chainlink Network, retail holders will have the ability to explicitly stake their LINK in a trustless manner onto a node, and payouts will be made proportionally to the total amount of staked LINK each user has put up for collateral in the node based on the specifics of the underlying service agreement.
https://chainstack.com/linkpool-on-chainstack-facilitating-chainlink-entry/

>>50688873
i'll take that as a no
kek
i have already got two 150xs from link and lpl so yes, i am

>>50599117
the token isn't needed for staking. it's just used to gate access to linkpool's node and to give a cut of revenue to holders
anyone can make a delegation system. but who are nodes going to trust?

>>50201612