/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>58351523
>30:01
Oh, you done did it now.

Thirdies are now begging for 4 figures in gibs. Inflation is absolutely out of control.

>>58268186
My way.

>>58214086
I know. I fuckin hate those assholes.

>>58075968
>fall to 2019 levels
Anon, I...

>>58005799
>It isn't scalable
Bitcoin's scalability is indeed a challenge, but the community has implemented solutions like the Lightning Network, which enables off-chain transactions that are fast and cost-effective. This second-layer protocol can handle millions of transactions per second, significantly improving scalability.
>it isn't programmable
While Bitcoin's scripting language is not as flexible as those of some other blockchains, it is intentionally limited to reduce security risks. However, upgrades like Taproot have enhanced its smart contract capabilities, allowing users to execute more complex contract-like functions while maintaining robust security.
>it has exactly 0 utility apart from being able to send BTC to others
Sending BTC to others is a fundamental utility, providing a decentralized, permissionless way to transfer value across the globe without the need for traditional banking systems. Moreover, Bitcoin is seen as a store of value, and its limited supply can be a hedge against inflation for many investors.
>it's incredibly power intensive
Bitcoin's energy consumption is high, but it's important to consider the context. Much of the energy used for Bitcoin mining comes from renewable sources, as miners are incentivized to use the cheapest available energy, which is increasingly renewable.
>it has centralised into mining pools
Mining pools do centralize hash power, but they are made up of individual miners who can switch pools at any time, preventing any single pool from gaining too much control. Additionally, the distribution of mining power among several large pools provides a level of decentralization
>it has no method of governance, a history of forking
Bitcoin's governance is intentionally decentralized, relying on community consensus for upgrades and changes. While this can lead to forks when consensus isn't reached, it also ensures that no single entity can unilaterally control the direction of the network. Forks are a feature, not a bug.

>>57934572
This guy Jordan has a little shit fit on Twitter every once in a while because senpai didn't notice him enough. True he wrote Kyber but nobody uses that shit. I guess I would be mad too since all the pros are developing in Rust anyways.

Anyways Rosetta for ICRC is coming soon. That's exciting.

>>57774151
Hmm qui indeed.

Lynchposting

>>57599452
Your bull thesis on CRWD? I'm tempted to buy crwd but Iooks like the price is currently way too high

>>57596214
What do you know about, anon?

>>57546462
>>57546415
My bad , my eurobroker didn't mention the local top at 5000. im using degiro but it's getting shitty...should i go to IBKR instead?

>>57517664
I guess that's how VCRs beat Betamax, isn't it?

>>57510575
Goldman sachs is bullish on nvda

Apple is gonna beat just like LVMH.
I just went long on AAPL with a x20 leverage ( factor)

>>57458330
Are you ok anon?

>>57456296
So you were among the ones who bought the top? You still have time to inverse your position anon

Went long on Super Micro computer with a x5 leverage before close. is it really going to $1000 ? Thoughts ?

>>57411568
The heeming is already ripping mumus apart and its only just the beginning

> he went all in on AMD at $174

>>57314379
> muh amd make no profits
> muh even my father's business is making more money

Imagine not going long on AMD and NVDA at OCTOBER'S ULTIMATE DIP. instead these faggots invested in muh CHINA muh SAVE and got heemed so hard .

>>57291829
Depending on the length of the loan, it can take half the loan term to pay anything toward principal. Like literally 15 years of nothing but interest on a 30 year.

>>57185641
I went from +$500 during the day to -$70, both unrealized, but what the fuck.

>>57175231
It's fuckin over.