/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>9025254
Likewise. I put $50 in that is now $1000. So i kind of got my $1000 eoy. Im just trying to help everyone else fren

>>7962318
Prepare your space gear, we moonwalk now.

Jesus Christ, do you really love being poor? Stop being a fucking retarded, just buy a few links, I don't know, at least 3000, and you gonna be fine. If you can't see why this fucking project is long-term moonish, just gtfo crypto, you piece of shit. It isn't that hard to understand.

CORPORAL SMELLY REPORTING IN SIR

WHAT IS YOUR RANK, SIR?

LINK MARINES:

PRIVATE: 500 LINKIES
CORPORAL: 2000 LINKIES
SERGEANT: 5000 LINKIES
GUNNERY SERGEANT: 12500 LINKIES
MASTER SERGEANT: 20000 LINKIES
LIEUTENANT STINKY: 25000 LINKIES
CAPTAIN LINKY: 40000 LINKIES
MAJOR LINKY: 75000 LINKIES
COLONEL LINKY: 125000 LINKIES
GENERAL OF THE LINK CORPS: 250000 LINKY LINKIES

>>6979336
August last year. I love seeing retards larping to day trade. I honestly hope half these retards arent serious

>>6457034
I will let them have an equal share of one linkie when it hits $10k usd eoy 2018

LINK is blockchain agnostic, a huge advantage over the 'competitors' who are limited to a proprietary blockchain. The use case is completely different, don't be dumb.

Of all their weaknesses, Mobius has their biggest problem with their team members. Blockchain technology is such a specific software sector that you simply can’t find and hire blockchain engineers that will be willing to work with your project and also be competent enough – you need to have them on your team from the outset. The scope of Mobius also means that this project is likely one of the tougher applications of blockchain, and it puts even more stress on the team to deliver a top notch product.

Secondly, the scope of Mobius feels like it’s far too big. Are they primarily focusing on their DApp Store, their oracles, or their Smart Markets? In a world of specificity and niche solutions to complicated problems, Mobius attempts to be a generalized solution that tries to solve everything at once. This has historically not been possible, or has taken an extremely long time to get any groundwork done – as examples, you can take a look at projects such as ARK and MAIDSafe. Their roadmap also feels like it has unrealistic expectations – they intend to release almost all parts of their project goals within the first 6 months of 2018. For a team of this makeup, it almost feels impossible that they will reach their goal.

Finally, the token sale economics aren’t ones that I am very impressed with. They are raising 40 million dollars which is already more than Chainlink has raised with their own project while lacking many of the advantages that Chainlink enjoys. Comparisons between these two projects will be clearly made, and Chainlink simply wins out on almost all of these.

>>5858136
Believe in our lord and saviour the Serg. Hodl this shit like a mofo. So happy now

/comfy/ LINK thread.

No-linkers and pink wojaks not allowed.