/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>19650538
>despite all evidence, historical, biological, to the contrary.
I have showed you all of the examples you even provided for me, that indeed, humans are matriarchal. Its simple law of nature that women are more important than men. I dont know how much clearer it can be.

The problem is that you and many others take it in a political manner. You get insecure. You get angry and lash out and say "I'm a strong man, men are patriarchal! We OWN women!" It's funny stuff. I dont think any of you had relationships on here.

I got a much better reaction when I made several threads about this on /x/.

Women are more important than men. its literally the law of nature. One man can repopulate an entire village of women. If there was one woman with a village of men, there would be war and chaos. It just wouldnt work.

>I'm not the one inventing some situation where men are submissive to women.
You are taking this literally. Men serve women through leading them. Why do you think men opened doors for women? ITS AN ACT OF SERVICE. HERPA DERP!

But the morons on here would say its "men capitulating to women".