/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>30362776
It was in the telegram, should have been obvious anyway
you wouldn’t have these kind of tokenomics if your goal wasn’t to keep the price low

GRTrannies unironically believe this is priced in already lmao
Buy PRQ while you still can

>>29357042
no

I’ll be able to get plenty dirt cheap in a few months

>>28699003
Look at where that supply increase is actually going. The public grt sales are all done. The supply increase are going to early backers and advisors, i.e. indexers who will be using their gritties to index. Delegation rewards for us public investors probably drop as a result but there's not going to be a glut of new token sales that caused a cratering of price

This is nothing compared to what’s to come

Reminder that early investors got in at under a penny and then at around a penny. These are many orgs and VC that have huge stacks in the tens of millions. The market cap would need to be absolutely massive for it to ripple to the smaller stacks who are paying 200x - 600x as much per token and have much, much less money to boot.

$5 EoY is bullish. $10 max ever is bullish.

>>28427869
This. Smart money got in at a third of a penny, and less smart money got in at a penny. Imagine buying at $2.

Once their stacks unlock they are dumping their 600x bags on you.

>>28418265
Cope. Smart money got in at fractions of a penny with stacks in the millions. This would need to be so fucking overvalued for it to ripple through enough that the small stack FOMOers (anything under like 200k) actually make a decent chunk.

Does this not concern anyone else?
Will delegation and burning really offset this?

>>28390587
>Why didn’t you?
That's why, grt is a great product, but an absolute shit tier investment, sure it might pump in the short term, but I only care about long term, and PRQ is /our coin/ and your vc shit like de Graph will never be anywhere close to being /our coin/