/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>18285132
Very likely to be bailed out. BULLISH.

i dont remember the eternity before me
will I exist again? unlikely I was unlikely to exist now yet i am, unlikely is meaningless for eternity

>but, what if it actually does hit 1k eoy

So when did /biz/ begin looking like /pol/?
Wasn't like this 3 months ago.

>>18000127
Are you sure about that? All the bad news floating around, we've already reached the bottom. Dems won't let their Obama put into an embarrassing position, would they?

Reposting from other thread:
Honestly, I expect the S&P to try to stabilize around 2300; if it does, it could bounce up to 2650-2800. But if it breaks below 2300 decisively, there is no meaningful support until 2000-2100. Even then, the market might not hold there, given the dismal action in bank stocks. I would not look for a meaningful bottom to occur until the number of stocks making new lows shrinks, and more stocks begin to trade above their moving averages at various time periods.
With 10-year Treasury yields bottoming and the Treasury yield curve steepening, bank stocks should have gotten a lift, he says. Instead, monthly charts of the group’s benchmarks, such as the KBW Bank Index, have broken down from a nine-year trading range. That tells me we’re going to see big loan losses, which makes sense, given the devastation we have seen across the economy.
During the secular bull markets of the 1950s, ’60s, ’80s, ’90s, and 2010s, market-cycle lows often developed around their 200-week MAs. For instance,the 1957-’62 market cycle—which also saw a near-30% decline in the S&P 500, or a 62% retracement of the prior bull market, and a drop below the index’s then-200-week MA. We have to respect the market’s recent break below its 200-week moving average, but the precedent for a recovery is there if you look at 1962 and other cycles.

Reasonably, if you're playing spy puts, monday and thursday are your last good days.

>>17941481
Yes.

>>17922600
i just went and watched the first episode. Damn you were spot on

This is gonna be a very special Monday, markets are collapsing everywhere and we might even see the DOW hit -13%. So I have one important question for you /biz/, what will its nickname be?

Is chilliz the next chain link?

I'm trying to incorporate volume analysis into my trading, but the only issue is, that I understand how volume affected trends in retrospect.

Everytime I try to get into trends I get whipsawed, and when I wait for confirmation, I miss out on the trend

I had a stack of RLC that I sold once the Google pump hit link and I ride it in time for nice gains. I've been thinking of buying back into RLC again.
Would it be a good idea to hold both link and RLC or stupid?

Now that LINK has failed and proven to be a scam, what do we buy next?

>>13718435
Why does bobo look so smug right before his impending death?

>>13673925
Why not just skip the middleman and marry your bro?

>15000 LINK
>$3000 dollarydoos
What are my chances of surviving long enough to cash out on the LINKgularity

Should I sell all my HOT for more? It's doing nothing and I have more faith in RLC.

I havent checked my blockfolio in a week. Is this capitulation?

Okay I bought 1 BTC with NEETbux, which 3 altcoins should I diversify into?

>>13211743
i dont believe you

>>12985191

What if he’s a noLinker that wants you gone?

get your ducks in a row

where is the whitest place I can move to in the US?

>the rich leave the country
>"we have to stop the rich from leaving!!!"
>people have really suggested this
so i guess you get human rights unless you're rich