[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.18861921 [View]
File: 2.77 MB, 640x360, 1578379175416.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18861921

>>18861813
I know that /biz/ is kind of isolated - and people from here hardly go to other boards.
Hey guys,
unite together in a single thread - if the thread is not under the replies cap it means it stays on first page - considering how active you are... which means even more people join the discussion.
+ You are around 100 active posters in each thread.. imagine if you all united under one.

>>>18861447
>>18861447

>> No.4827954 [View]
File: 2.77 MB, 640x360, someone dies at the end.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4827954

BTC will stop mooning any day now.

>> No.727845 [View]
File: 2.77 MB, 640x360, korean efficiency .webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
727845

so I sell a consumer product

competitor businesses sell the same product either in store, or online, but not both
there is a serious price disparity between the two

this presents me with a serious problem:
if I lower my prices online to remain competitive, my "brick and mortar" section could be venerable to people demanding the online price, which by Australian law I would be obliged to provide them

but if I keep my prices the same online as they are in store, I'l sell nothing because I'l be undercut

it seems vastly unfair that I cannot operate in two market spaces in the way existing operators do, just because I am in both at once

what should I do?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]