/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>13987916
Hey Assblaster how are you? I solved the puzzle and figured out your connection but don't worry, I'll never tell biz. Your secret is safe with me.

See you on the other side.

>>13547584
>I'm just telling you what I know. What part of what I'm saying do you think is incorrect?
The part where you "know" anything. You're just another sad shitposted like the literally hundreds before you who have made wild predictions and faded into the nothing.
That's why you post anonymously, because you are a coward.

Do you have this file on your computer? Would it be enough to just show that the date created was earlier than your post?

Ari Paul is assblaster.

I’ll just leave this here.

WHERE THE FUCK IS ASSBLASTER?

Do you guys really, unironically, believe in tripfags like Assblaster?
You do know that trips can be cracked, right?

>>7710241
>>7709940
I get the logic. It is a long-shot for big corps to "partner" with a startup. But let's go back to the fundamentals. We all use the term "partnership" like it's the be all and end all in the crypto space. What does it even mean? This is why normies get burnt with shit like TRX. "Partnerships" in crypto don't mean shit except endorsement, or working together to build a product. But if the product delivers for end-users, and LINK gets into the hands of corps that actually want to use it and pay node-operators, and the kickstarts the network, then that's what will get us to moon.
As soon as that starts, we're kickstarting a network effect of customers, data providers, node-operators, payment solutions, speculators, and developers; all reinforcing each other. This is the kind of shit that sky-rocketed BTC.

So, in short, fuck the "partnerships" in the way we always talk about it. What is the product in development, in collaboration with whom, and who are the end-users who are going to derive value from it and when? Then you see that the "two-man team" FUD doesn't mean shit

>>7595845
I somewhat agree, but if you have legit info to share, fucking share it. If you want to have some keks, make a meme thread. This is on a knife's edge of being an incredible joke, or one of the best investments of the decade, after or along with ETH and BTC, and these potential tidbits are a critical piece of the puzzle. So expect some backlash if someone is going to troll like that

APOLOGIZE

I know most of you guys won't believe me, it's been a crazy month, I changed jobs and I just didn't have time to post. I'm very jetlagged right now so I'm tired, but I have an inside scoop: screencap the top wallets on etherscan now, then check back in a week. Someone is about to make a decent acquisition, best part is you'll know it isn't a pump and dump because it'll be a cold wallet you can observe forever.

Can't reveal who this person is but it's pretty exciting imo. Not telling you to buy LINK, just saying be on the lookout.

Assblaster was right again:
>>/biz/thread/S6331621

>XRB will be single digits in Q2, screencap this.

>CONSOLIDATE YOUR POSITIONS. If you've been holding on to a shitcoin hoping for one last pump SELL IT, TAKE YOUR PROFITS. MOVE INTO YOUR BLUE CHIPS AND YOUR PROSPECTIVE COINS. DO NOT STAY IN ANY QUICK PUMP COINS

APOLOGIZE RIGHT NOW. You motherfuckers that doxxed him, too, APOLOGIZE

ATTENTION: This information doesn't just apply to ChainLINK this time, I recommend everyone read this.

I am currently in Brussels, just got back from a meeting with several clients. We discussed in part PSD2 but the information that caught my attention even more was after dinner one of my clients said that they were trying to move 500,000 euros into GDAX and were being forced to wait up to a week. This is bizarre because normally exchanges provide high end services to wealthy prospective clients. I asked a few more of my acquaintances who were discussing buying crypto (it still feels surreal to talk about crypto especially with older clients) and they're having similar issues.

My understanding is that exchanges are intentionally cutting off the flow of money over these next few weeks, I assume to consolidate their positions/positions of any whales doing insider trading before letting the flood gates open. I told you guys to watch the next two weeks regarding LINK but now I am telling everyone CONSOLIDATE YOUR POSITIONS. If you've been holding on to a shitcoin hoping for one last pump SELL IT, TAKE YOUR PROFITS. MOVE INTO YOUR BLUE CHIPS AND YOUR PROSPECTIVE COINS. DO NOT STAY IN ANY QUICK PUMP COINS. I will answer questions for another 30-60 minutes before I start packing for my train journey.

>>5997440

I TOLD EVERYONE TO PULL THEIR SELL ORDERS. DONT SELL.

>>4940312

Then just explain why an Enteprise blockchain company like Chain.com, is built on Go? Chain openly works for/with Visa and all the companies I mentioned above.

>>4804197

I'm very excited by this. Again I haven't worked with Sergey directly, and this may start to sound like borderline idolisation, which depending on your point of view might make me more/less credible in your eyes, but he's starting to have very much the reputation of someone who always has something else up his sleeve, by this I mean that he seems to have a very healthy balance of ideas and ambition. Basically if LINK succeeds, (I really hate this buzzword but unfortunately it's the only appropriate term) expect a lot of innovations. I'm going to leave at that because I don't want to come off like I'm hyping LINK.

>>4804320

I agree, thanks for the advice brother.

>>4804345

Personal opinion is that most of these platforms operate on extremely flimsy platforms and will never be able to deliver on their promises. Invest at your own risk.

Going to be up another hour, thinking of compiling some highlights from this thread and others and post it on the weekend. Keep the questions coming if you have them guys.