/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>27686728

Weak post. Something being big doesn't mean it isn't a wasteland. Sahara desert is huge, doesn't make it not a wasteland.

>Trading fruit and vegetables

The resources in Africa mean they should be exploring space and pushing the boundaries of technology. But they aren't. They're a shadow of what they were and what they could have been if whites had kept control. Both blacks and whites would be objectively better off.

Maybe if they hadn't been terrorizing it for years trying to wrestle control from people who were doing a better job it wouldn't be bankrupt. If you think colonialism did "damage" to Africa you're retarded. Bringing a 3rd world nation sanitation, infrastructure, education and medical care is not damage. It's progress. They should have been grateful.

>Look at the bloody wars that was fought in Europe and the genocide by whites of indigenous people in North and South America and Australia.

And are those nations now better off? Britain sent their worst to Australia and they've done more with it since then than the natives did in 1000 years. If they didn't go there, it would still be nothing. Same with North and to a lesser extent South (North American colonizers brought their women with them and created the US, Spanish didn't bring their women and turned the natives into Mexicans). Colonialism was a net benefit to all.

>>25792333

>This just kicks the can of conflict down the road. What I said is much much better, but how? Well basically you need to uplift the shittiest, poorest places with the lowest life expectancy honestly, not like how it's been done because we all know how corrupt this has all been. They never really ever help the poorest people of the world, they just use them and say it's help.