/biz/ - Business & Finance

FUCK THESE FUCKERS

ZRX is coming soon, I’m without doubt.

>>11342033

DYOR with BAT. If you're not prepared to hold/swing trade it for 3 years, don't even fucking bother buying it.

I'd bet you $1,000 it won't be over $1 EOY, but that doesn't matter because it's one of the most important cryptocurrency experiments to EVER EXIST. If you aren't 100% invested in the idea of Brave working, don't even hold a bag of BAT, because you're going to lose all your money.

>>11342033
i memba when som1 say you'll be punished for buyin theise shitcoin

>>11342033
Zrx got leaked in the tax calculator and it was confirmed by plenty of people. Latest rumor is this but not confirmed yet. https://twitter.com/LordOfTheChain/status/1049638455871979520?s=09

Anyone surprised that zrx is first is retarded considering 3 of their advisors are 2 former coinbase project managers and the co founder of coin base.

Tax calculator leak http://twitter.com/optionlotus/status/1048998134582583297?s=09

Also pic related for the same leak before it was fixed

>>11342033
fuck coinbase and fuck those shitcoins. It'll be a simple pnd and everyone will go back to their daily lives, coinbase has no power to affect this market, it's just another exchange, normies have left and they all deleted their app from their new flashy iphones anyway

>>11342859
I was sure ZRX was first because they purchased Paradex.

>>11342859
So now that it’s clear ZRX will be added... what are yalls most *optimistic* scenarios for 0x going forward?

>>11342033
>CAPS PLS NOTICE ME

As i said last night, your posts are quite annoying and t b h, kind of sad. It'll be added when it's added you cuck.

>>11342939
Relax bro, it might feel like that now but you obviously need to learn what a "bust cycle" is. This time 2020 maybe even 2019 we will see another bull due to the next "halving".

>>11343379
ZRX will continue to grow as one of the most used coins on the market. Blue chip of crypto you could say.

>>11342033
Nano is going to get listed way before any shittoken.

>>11343474
It’s because of this that I believe long term $50 or even $100 isn’t impossible, but actually very possible.

>>11343474
>This time 2020 maybe even 2019 we will see another bull due to the next "halving".
a btc bullrun, yea sure, but you can't only fool people so many times into buying useless shitcoins.

>>11343513
>shitcoin

I agree that 80% of the market are shitcoins but ZRX is not one of them my dude. You seem to undervalue the importance of governance.

The ZRX token will drive a governance process that allows stakeholders to securely execute these protocol upgrades. ZRX as a fee token enhances governance by ensuring the token distribution converges on a representative sample of protocol stakeholders over time. 0x protocol’s transition to community governance will occur in phases that shift control to ZRX holders.

They will list ZRX and XLM at the same time, and will be the first additional cryptos they add.

>>11342348
listen to this anon

You stand just as much luck begging at the genesis address.

It’s pumping. COINBASE TONIGHT.

ZRX will moon in the short term
The rest is shit

>>11343804
Thursday is listing day for cb going off past listings

>>11343359
Paradex is going to be reskinned/renamed to be used for cb's erc20 market. All fees paid in zrx. Listing moon will have nothing on the moon that will happen once that goes live

Is ZRX done? Isn't it possible they are testing all wallets and it won't be a lone ZRX listing?

I just fomod and bought 500 ZRX

>>11344028
Yes and maybe.

>>11344029
check out the ETH / BTC ratios on all the touted coinbase listings. A few weeks ago ETH became the dominant pair. Accumulation at its finest, trading BTC / ETH to ETH / ALTS

that 90 BTC buy order on binance

Assuming it has to do with this..

>>11344189
I'm too much of a bitch but I really want to fomo

>>11344189
And Coinbase owns paradex.... this should be huge

>>11344189
This is good. If it's listed and cb announces plans to use zrx as the basis for their erc20 exchange it's going to get wild

>>11344224
Buck wild? Double digits ? My body is ready

BAT WILL GET LISTED FIRST AND ZRX AFTER

510 million XLM just got moved out of cold storage by the Stellar Foundation. Prepare your butts boys. They're going to launch a free giveaway to Coinbase users when Coinbase rolls out XLM support.

Radar relay dex
Selling all the Batties

mooning..

>>11343501

Except you could buy the fees with ETH and ZRX could turn into the next ICN.

>>11342348
Brendan Eich
>"in the long run it doesn't matter if it is BAT or another coin"

>>11344833
When did he say this? I know its true in the long run but in short term launching ur own token makes sense for the ugp and fund raising (basically getting off the ground)

>>11344933
I could fill your mind with FUD right now but I'm busy.

Here's the link, btw: @ 1:07:27
>https://youtu.be/OV3c58DqFdk

sell this fucking token and gtfo while you still can. Brendan is not CEO material. It's sad. I wish he was but he just isn't. This project is all over the place.

>>11344933
I've found no mention of anyone saying this anywhere on google or twitter. nice FUD.

>>11345062
fucking idiot

>>11344991
Wow actual FUD. I'm impressed. Those faggots have some answering to do over on r/batproject.


>>11345062
Its true brah, what the fuck is this nigger thinking saying that shit.

I'm punching out as soon as this thing hits $1 again.

>t.50k BAT holder

all the tokens attached to dapps that don't do anything will be thrown to trash sooner or later even if the dapp is successful. Shitcoins are going to 0 like they deserve. People buying shitcoins that don't do anything special and can be replaced with any other coin will wake up 1 day and have a bitter surprise

>>11345355
not without a good pump first ya dingus.

>>11345225
$6 -12 range. You're only selling at $1 because your bagholding. I remember.

>>11345201
you dumb nigger, he's talking about possible future web standards when he says that. BAT is meant as an fraud prevention/remediation token.

Brendan mentions trying to position BAT for possible future use in the web standard but at the end of the day it isn't up to Brendan. That's the W3C's purview.

Again, nice FUD.

>>11345420
>"i think it could benefit from being even simpler, but it's a great idea"
>https://twitter.com/naval/status/1048866235474038785
>https://twitter.com/davecraige/status/1049403401803464704

Brave is so fucking stupid. They can't even get the basics down. VC's are getting fed up.
And then think about about the economics of a token which was created out of thin air and will be dumped every single month for cash or BTC at the end of every month. Not to mention the fact that Brave has over 300 million tokens that will be just given away.

I'm so fucking tired of this shitty project. They don't even have a functioning release yet. It's been almost 5 years and they STILL don't have a non-beta browser.

I'm not even talking about Brave rewards. I'm talking about just a fucking v1.0 browser. What a fucking joke.

>>11345503
At first i thought you were providing legitimate FUD, but it turns out you're just retarded. That's my bad my dude.

It was the 1.0 browser comment that gave you away btw. Just for future reference.

From wiki:
>Brave is developed by Brave Software, which was founded on May 28, 2015 by Brendan Eich and Brian Bondy. On January 20, 2016, Brave Software launched the first version of Brave with a partial ad blocking feature, and announced plans for an ad replacement feature and a revenue sharing program.[13]

>>11345575
Oh man.... you're gonna get fucking rekt. Everything I said is true. If you want to use Brave browser you can either download the obsolete Muon build (lol) or you can download the "dev build" based on Chromium. Neither browser is currently functioning properly. v1.0 release is still en route.

Do you have a bittrex account? I will sell you 20,000 BAT at current prices if you want. I still have another 310,000 BAT after that.

>>11345608
I'm using the Linux dev build at the moment. I've had all of one crash since I installed it a month or so ago. It's been no less stable than chrome or firefox has been for me. My old chrome install had the nasty habit of locking up my system as its RAM needs got of control.

I'm sure it's not the case for everyone, that's just been my experience.

Literally every claim you've said here today has been brought up in the past, and refuted by official and unofficial sources. I'm frankly surprised you didn't reach into your bag of shit and pull out the "Why even use BAT? Why not BTC? Why not USD?

Not on bittrex, I do all my purchasing on Binance, but if you're so convinced BAT is going to crash and burn why not market sell your stack? I'm DCA'ing my BAT purchases, but i'm of the mind that it'll increase in value. You know, voting with my wallet type of deal.

Sell your stack if you're so sure i'm going to get REKT by holding.

>>11345706
>Literally every claim you've said here today has been brought up in the past
How the fuck is that possible? The tweets were from this week and the video as well.

>Sell your stack if you're so sure i'm going to get REKT by holding.
I already said I was selling. As soon as this fucking shitcoin pumps up to 6000 sats I am fucking gone. I'll keep about 80,000 in case we enter a blow-off phase to 30,000 sats.

But I am fucking out. I am selling and I am not looking back. I can't wait to use the Brave browser when it is fully functional (it isn't now) because I absolutely love the zero-knowledge proof aspect and despise google.

But I am fucking selling and I highly recommend you sell as well. Do not try to hold this shit. When we pump you really need to sell. The token is G-A-R-B-A-G-E made up out of thin air.

It's obvious you've been defending this token for a while (which is weird) but you have got to wake up. You have zero rights as a token holder and absolutely no legal expectation of a profit.
Be smart with this one.

>>11345706
brave is crap.

it's faster than chrome but like 20% of websites bug out and you waste way more time than you gain.

It'll always be behind chrome since it literally uses chrome.

stay away from this shitcoin.

>>11345503
>created out of thin air
Like most cryptos
>will be dumped every single month for cash or BTC at the end of every month.
Itll be dumped constantly, everyones month is on a different day
>Not to mention the fact that Brave has over 300 million tokens that will be just given away.
Nothing in the grand scheme of wider adoption.

>>11346231
I wouldn't even waste your time on this guy. He sold his ethereum for $10. Hes going to sell his BAT for $1.

If theres one thing i know, its that this guy is good at being wrong.

>>11346260
What's the sell price for BAT then and what do you see the price trajectory being?

>>11346231
>Like most cryptos
Which is why most cryptos are shit. Is that seriously your argument?
>Itll be dumped constantly
Yes, now think. Who is going to provide all of that liquidity? The ad firms? Why the fuck would they want to enter the business of providing liquidity and speculation?
Airlines have to put up with this shit when purchasing oil and it's a huge pain in the ass. They are able to use oil futures to smooth it out but it's still costly.
Now why on earth would an advertising firm want to submit itself to this type of costly business? It's insane.
>Nothing in the grand scheme of wider adoption.
My God man. The UGP is a massive percentage of the total amount. Imagine if today a single entity had 7 million BTC that it was giving away. Think about what you are saying.

>>11346298
$5-20

Leaning closer to $5-7

Will play it by ear.

>>11342033

>500 million stellar just moved out of the giveaway account to a new account.
>it comes out to be nearly $5 per coinbase account
>mfw

>>11345608
I don't see any single wallet with exactly 330k, I don't see why you'd keep it in different accounts so I'm going to assume you're #258. .02% of the market, you could probably market sell with minimal impact to price. Also looks like you're swing trading it so I'd be surprised if you really were prepared to sell your stack.

Someone predict ZRX price EOY 2019

>>11346638
~96,000 on Bittrex wallet if you really want to know

Honestly I just want my BTC back. I also hold XLM and LINK and those two used to correlate nicely with BAT. All three capitulated to under twenty cents back in August/September. But guess which one is still dead in the water?

>>11346539
Youve fallen into my trap. I wasn't defending it merely correcting / adding to your comments.

>>11346696
>Youve fallen into my trap
based and redpilled

>>11346539
See: MTGox

>>11346665
$0.60

>>11346583
How do you justify those numbers? Not being hostile, just curious.

>>11346928
Theres only 1.5B tokens. The supply is fixed, and user growth will increase. Tokens will be sold, but a lot of them will be lost, hoarded, and distributed betweens millions and millions of wallets. The circulating supply will just get thinner and thinner, and advertisers will pay more and more for each token.

>>11347159
You are aware that BAT payments occur on Brave's centralized servers and NOT on the ETH blockchain, right?

>>11342939
This. A lot of new bagholders were made when they listed ETC

>>11347181
He still has a point though. There's bound to be some level of users who create an account never to use it again. And for your other point it is facilitated by the moneyskelly's shitcoin. Finally, got a little clarification on the video you posted, the consensus as of now is that he was referring to how users could convert their BAT into other crypto or fiat. That's been known for a while tbqh senpai.

>>11347159
What's your projection for this? I feel like we'll see the peak after a (probable) coinbase listing packaged with a v1 release and ad integration. Honestly if they don't do all three in a single release, or close to it, they're really going to fuck over bagholders. Not like they care but still, it would make sense to build on the momentum of any one of those three.

>>11347314
>who create an account never to use it again
and Brave Inc. can clayback the funds from that account. I don't think you get it yet.

>>11347376
*clawback

>>11347376
I thought that was only for the promo stuff because they're using the UGP.

>>11347443
nah they can actually get BAT tokens from publishers that never claim them (after 90 days).

No idea about user wallets though. I don't think they can remove them from users that have purchased/earned via watching ads.

>>11347443
Any BAT on the Brave browser is under the control of Brave Inc. If you were to fund your browser wallet with BAT from your personal ETH wallet you will not be able to get your BAT back unless you go through a KYC compliant third party company like Uphold (actually Uphold is the only one).

>>11347503
It's me, just phoneposting now. Ya I get all that, honestly I'm here for the money not the tech so the kyc compliance isn't an issue. Hopefully when more fiat onramps become available uphold cant go fuck themselves. But honestly my bags will be gone long before that. What's your price prediction though? You said you had like 300k right? Like I said I have 50k bags so I'll at least get my investment back and then some when it goes to $1. But I think the other anon was right saying that $5-$7 isnt impossible. Retarded maybe but not impossible.

>>11347935
I don't really care about USD price. I will sell a major portion at 6000 sats and then another portion at 15000 sats. Maybe keep a little bit just in case.

>>11342033
Saged. Almost every single coin is down around 90%. Enough with complaining about them individually. They all suck right now. All of them.

>>11344352
Source

>>11347935
$5-$7 is reasonable. It's what Brendan envisions for the token price to be at (price of coffee at the airport comment)

>>11347181
They dont create tokens out of thin air. The tokens are still a unit of account. If an advertiser runs 1mm worth of ads, they are going to need 1mm worth of BAT tokens to hand out. They have to come from somewhere.

>>11348109
Someone gets it