/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>15148394
I remember reading the original post, it really stirred up my guts as it's so unbelievably accurate

>>15148412
Same

DELET

>heart racing, birds singing outside
>Oke one more line, or how long time ago did i rail the last one ?
> Cant go down to pee or mom will know im still awake
>Post on 4chan: we are all going to make it frens
> Fap to increasingly degenerate porn
> Link 0$ eoy, start applying for Mcdonalds job
> Profit

>>15148440
Based

>>15148412
What's the original post?

>>15148394
This is literally my first time looking at this board.

What is a 'link'?

>>15148509
it is the god protocol.

>>15148509

link anon

>>15148519
>>15148546
No, he says 'is 300 link enough to make it'.

Whats a 300 link in this context? It's obviously not a link to a website.

Thank you all for your patience.

>>15148565
its a cryptocurrency that was predicted by epic digits to multiply in value 500 times

>>15148565
Go back

>>15148565
Welcome my friend. It is not by mistake that you have stumbled across this thread or landed on this board. You are one of the chosen ones. Buy Chainlink.

>>15148394
DELET THIS NOW

>>15148565

I'm a developer and I looked over the Chainlink white paper and documentation, as well as the blog post by Google. Here's a few reasons I would not use Chainlink for my own apps:

The current "mainnet" is not decentralized. there's no way to decentrally assess if an oracle is any good or not.

It took them 2 years to basically build centralized oracles, which is extremely unimpressive (and already exists). I do not have much hope for the future or the competency of their engineers.

The white paper doesn't coherently describe how they plan on making their centralized design decentralized one day. They broadly go over their "decentralized" reputation strategies as if creating sybil resistant decentralized reputation is something of an afterthought, when it's actually an unsolved computer science problem. They've had 2-3 years and 30mil in funding to actually publish technical specifications for this and instead they decided to build trivial centralized oracles. Extremely worrying. It kind of reminds me of IOTA "we'll remove the coordinator later". No you won't. You don't know how.

News outlet and journalists keep reporting on "partnerships" with Google and Swift. But if you actually read the source for the "partnership", it's just a blog post by Google Cloud that promotes their own service (BigQuery) and shows an example about how Chainlink users can use Google Cloud if they want. In no way is Google partnered or planning on using Chainlink themselves. The Chainlink codebase is extremely trivial to rebuild if Google wanted to get into the blockchain oracle space.

While there's certainly profits to be made by trading Chainlink, I recommend you do not HODL it with the hope that one day developers will adopt it as their source for decentralized oracles. That certainly won't happen.

>>15148565
https://imgur.com/a/HS9hIfr

Buy as much LINK as you can afford and hold. Heed my advice and you will be rich beyond your imaginations.

>>15148604
>>15148586
>>15148582
>>15148577
Thank you all
>>15148579
Not you.
For your help

>>15148577
>77
Praise!

Is 41 link enough to make it?

>>15148489

>>15148586
>That certainly won't happen.

FALSE.
That certainly might happen.

>>15148577

What is LINK's value if it actually multiplies in value 500 times.

500 10x pumps, followed by 500 50% dumps.

>>15149497
based tamaposter