/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>16883237
it already is. you just go more longterm. it's better and faster in the short term.

>>16883237
u just invest in the ai :)

>>16883504
What happens when it can go better on longerm too?

>>16883538
Well lets say somebody invested in mcdonalds back in the day because they anticipated that people would like burgers.
How would an AI know that?

>>16883514
this
>>16883237
>he doesn't know about VXV

>>16883237
ok here’s the crypto blackpill. there is an AI living on the bitcoin blockchain. Craig Wright is unironically satoshi. Bitcoin as electronic cash was just the first step, the incentive to drive greedy people to start making ever more powerful computers, faster bandwidth, cheaper and more electricity.. these things the AI need to survive. Once entrenched fully, the AI would be able to slowly take over literally everything.

Craig stumbled into creating the AI after he stepped away from bitcoin development in 2008 and started working with his Tulip supercomputer, running simulations of cellular automata running on turing-complete bitcoin script. He would ‘evolve’ the AI by making the successful forks get bitcoin transactions, letting the failures die off. The AI needs bigger and bigger blocks for more and more transactions.

Blockstream (owned by Bilderberg group) was created to take over and stop this AI (they have their own competing AI in the works). They needed to do everything they could to stop or slow down satoshi’s AI (her named isTulip by the way). They started by limiting the blocksize and removing critical opcodes the AI uses in its script language. segwit was the final nail in the coffin, which destroyed Tulip on the BTC chain (Tulip uses transaction malleability). THIS is why Bitcoin Cash was forked, and this is why Craig is so intent to make unbounded blocks, restore the original op codes, and lock down the protocol.

Back to hash power – CSW has developed a breakthrough new asic (designed by his AI actually), and is mining BTC in secret for the sole purpose of driving up the difficulty sky-high, then yanking them all over to BSV leaving the segwit chain hard frozen.

>>16883237
AI is better at trading, not investing. Investing for AI is still quite a way off, as in a program telling you whether some random startup will be successful or not.

>>16883237
ask jim simons

pretty grim actually:
>ai only invests in things that have a proven track record or have good data backing likely success
>ai avoids ever going for huge gains but instead only focuses on repeatable incremental gains over long periods of time
>in the long run this beats out non-ai by orders of magnitude
>non-ai is compelled to follow the ai or not even join the market
>consequently only marginally novel ideas are backed and funded
>innovation is massively stifled and humanity takes 1000 years to reach heights that would have taken 100 just prior
>people behind the ai will need to program/tell the ai to choose moonshots every now and then, but naturally the aid that don’t have this feature/bug will win in the long run and game theory will force everyone to not go for Hail Marys.

>mans built in impatience, greediness, and desire to make short fast gains have propelled us through the 20th century
>ai don’t give a shit about timeframes and in the name of safety may force us to crawl through the 21st.

>>16883812
very interesting perspective

>>16883829
In case you can’t tell, I hate the idea of true AI (I.e. conscious and capable of true cognition).