[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 3 KB, 181x129, Udklip.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17358455 No.17358455 [Reply] [Original]

Just face reality you'll never make it

>> No.17358542

It’s 1 you fucking retard. i don’t know what communist timeline you are from, but it’s not 16. 8/8= 1

>> No.17358564

>>17358455
>>17358542
You’re both wrong - it’s 6 (six)

>> No.17358568

>>17358542
Are you scared?
Does the calculator scare you?

Use a simple google caluclat- oh wait i guess Google is lying and run by jews that ruin your life huh? Guess their calculator must be infected with it too huh?

Sit down and go back to high school

>> No.17358587

You don’t go left to right when there are parentheses. This is what fucking Obama did to math. It wasn’t enough he ruined the USA for decades, he had to shit on our ability to measure numerical values

>> No.17358592

>>17358455
>>17358542
>>17358564
PEMDAS, with multiplication and division being equal, so proceed left to right

The answer is 16

(2+2) = 4
8/2 = 4
4(4) = 16

Now stop posting this old, gay bait.

>> No.17358598

>>17358542
despite the popular acronym PEMDAS, there's no priority of multiplication over division, nor of addition over subtraction; thus after applying the parentheses you apply the operations left-to-right, first dividing 8 by 2, and then multiplying the result by 4, all the steps as follows:

8 / 2 * (2 + 2)
8 / 2 * 4
4 * 4
16

>> No.17358615

>>17358587
>You don’t go left to right when there are parentheses.
Someone really needs to shoot you. Arithmetic is always left to right, parentheses first.

>> No.17358616

>>17358568
Yea google is a kike funded operation which gives optimal search engine results to people who pay the kikes at google . I don’t know why you kikes are trying to psyop /biz/ with this math problem and the false answer of 16

>> No.17358618
File: 79 KB, 800x812, Your meme carried the day.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17358618

>>17358587
>Burger can't do math
WHAT A SURPRISE

>> No.17358634

>>17358615
Ya parentheses first meaning you ether add 2+2, the. Multiply by 4= 8, then 8/8= 1, OR you factor 2(2+2) = (4 +4). You foreign fucks are absolutely wrong.

>> No.17358644

>>17358634
>Multiply by 4= 8
WHY RETARD. WHY WOULD YOU MULTIPLY BY 4. AFTER THE FIRST OPERATION YOU HAVE
8/2(4)

SO WHY THE FUCKING FUCK WOULD YOU DO MULTIPLICATION

>> No.17358646

>>17358542
lol u said its 1 and you called everyone a retard but it's actually 16 so your actually the retard lol

>> No.17358647

>>17358634
Burger then pull out a trusted calculator and show us and write down a timestamp to prove us wrong

>> No.17358654

>>17358644
YOU ARE FUCKING WRONG GO ASK A MATHEMATICIAN PAJEET

>> No.17358676

>>17358654
I literally am a mathematician at one of the top universities in the US

>> No.17358698

>>17358654
Listen it's okay Anon we forgive you. Just admit you're wrong and we'll sweep it under the carpet. I know it's hard to own up on the internet but it's okay to be weak anon. We'll accept you

>> No.17358705

der ewige burger

>> No.17358706

>>17358644
How would 8 divided by 4(2) ever = 16???? That is 8 divided by 8= 1. No wonder /biz/ is a shit hole we are bombarded by low IQ shitskins.
>>1735864
It’s like you weren’t taught anything at all. It is a KNOWN fact that calculators can not calculate complex equation accurately with PEDMA or whatever. It is up to the human to split the equation up so that the calculator can not give you a false answer. You fuckers are absolutely retarded.

>> No.17358710

>>17358455
You're right OP. Unfortunately it's not 8/[2(2+2)]

>> No.17358721

>>17358455
there is no correct answer, the error is in the way humans write it down and it's ambiguity. what do you want to represent? 8 thing divided in 8 parts, or 4 things repeating 4 times. also if you switch the /2 to *(1/2) then the order doesnt matter and its 16

>> No.17358734

>>17358706
Anon let go of your anger and just admit it. It's not gonna help fighting it- everyone will think better of you if you just own up to it

>> No.17358735 [DELETED] 

>>17358698
you absolutely sound like a PNK shill

>> No.17358736

>>17358706
>How would 8 divided by 4(2) ever = 16????
If you could read, you'd see I actually wrote
8/2(4)

But you cannot read

>> No.17358738

>>17358710
With the square parentheses added for clarity. Whoever answered 1 assumes that 2(2+2) are below the 8.

>> No.17358739
File: 3.06 MB, 4032x3024, DD9084BD-B4B3-4184-8EBE-4A7CFD8DC400.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17358739

>>17358542
Low IQ

>> No.17358748 [DELETED] 

>>17358734
why was that one anon's comment regarding calculator deleted? You fuckers are WRONG. The answer is 1. Stop fucking larping that you are mathematicians or engineers. You are street shitting shitskins that apparently never received an arithmetic education.

>> No.17358749

>>17358738
>the square parentheses
You need to eat a bullet too

>> No.17358766 [DELETED] 

>>17358739
what the fuck? Where did you magically create the addition sign in (8+8). You fucking retard i swear. This is hwy /biz/ is such a shit hole. You idiots don't know basic math. Even from your handwriting, I can tell you are low IQ

>> No.17358772

>>17358706
first you do the parentheses
8/2(2+2)
8/2*4
then you go left to right
8/2*4
4*4
16

>> No.17358784

>>17358766
>what is the distributive property

>> No.17358785 [DELETED] 

>>17358772
WRONG. Go ask any fucking professor you fucking pajeets. You do not divide first. You factor the parentheses first, then proceed to the division. YOU ARE WRONG COPE

>> No.17358786

>>17358739
Why do you do this, you can clearly see the last step is supposed to be multiplication to get 16 but you change it to addition for no goddamn reason.

>> No.17358803 [DELETED] 

THE 2 BELONGS to the (2+2). YOU CANNOT DIVIDE 8/2 to receive 4 first. THAT IS WRONG . You have to first get rid of the 2 THAT BELONGS TO THE PARENTHESES .

>> No.17358809

>>17358766
>>17358786
Fucking low IQ idiots. Remember learning about the distributive property?

>> No.17358814

>>17358809
Okay sure but why even bother with that shit when the only thing in the parenthesis is two goddamn one digit integers

>> No.17358821 [DELETED] 

>>17358809
nah fuck you buddy. the 2(2+2) cannot be split by the 8 / 2. You cannot separate the 2 from the parathenses like that. This is a CALCULATOR ERROR. It is up to the human to understand that you MUST first factor the 2 that belongs to the (2+2), then proceed to divide 8 by the resulting solution = 8 / 8 = 1.

FUCK YOU PAJEETS

>> No.17358823

>>17358748
>>17358766
>>17358785
>>17358803
>>17358735

>>17358706
>>17358654
>>17358634
>>17358616
>>17358587
>>17358542

Calm down burger and use a calculator. Timestamp it to prove us wrong then you'll be right.
Come on burger just prove you're better than us indians which apparently seem to do better math than amerimutts

>> No.17358839

>>17358814
Left to right just like you read

>> No.17358843

>>17358803
its doesnt belong to the parentheses, things dont belong to parentheses if they're outside of the parentheses

>> No.17358851 [DELETED] 

>>17358823
USE A CALCULATOR
holy shit how low iQ are you? GO ASK ANY MATHEMATICIAN and he will tell you a calculator is unable to give you a correct answer if you load it up with too many symbols. YOU ARE FUCKING WRONG PAJEET. Or are you a kike? Is this a kike having a schizophrenic episode that you dont know basic math? which is it bud?

>> No.17358870

>>17358721
It isn't that ambiguous though, there's clearly a correct solution if you follow the rules exactly as written. A truly ambiguous problem would be something like

Let x = 5. What is x/3x?

In this case the problem can be interpreted two equally correct ways, either was x/(3x) or x/3 * x

>> No.17358871

>>17358766
>what is the distributive property

>> No.17358873

>>17358851
Do you invest in link by any chance?

>> No.17358892

>>17358851
mental midget

>> No.17358893 [DELETED] 

>>17358843
IT DOES YOU BRAIN DEAD NIGGER HOLY SHIT. Look up what factoring is you fucking low IQ subhuman.
>>17358843
HOLY FUCKING SHIT you could not be more wrong.
>"thing dont belong to parentheses if they're outside of parentheses"
ABSOLUTELY FUCKING WRONG. do you even math?

2(2+2)- the the parentheses act as multiplication symbol to the outside 2. But since there is a 2+2 in the parethenses, you have to distribute the 2s to the outside 2.

Either:

2(2+2)= 2(4)= 8

OR

2(2+2) = 4+4 = 8

You are absolutely wrong and the fact that you are so confident in your delusional math skills just shows how /biz/ has been invaded with low IQ indians, kikes, and chinks.

>> No.17358910 [DELETED] 

>>17358892
>>17358873
funny how these same tactics are used in shitcoin threads when anons come along and give anons the TRUTH (FUD). You guys just double down on your lies and ignore reality. Fuck you faggots. I hope /biz/ gets flags because you faggots are fucked when that happens.

>> No.17358915

>>17358803
Not it fucking doesn't.
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=8%2F2%282%2B2%29

>> No.17358922

>>17358893
Lmao just because something next to parentheses means multiplication doesn't mean you suddenly need to sperg out, drop everything you're doing, and do that mulitplication immediately.

>> No.17358926 [DELETED] 

>>17358915
fuck your fucking link faggot. Did you just change your IP? Fuck you.

>> No.17358930

people saying its not 16 are literally trolling, don't even respond to them.

>> No.17358932

It's 1, plain and simple. You didn't use a multiplication sign in the calculator which threw off the code interpreter.
The correct answer is 1.

>> No.17358940

>>17358851
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaitsBUyiNQ
https://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2019/07/31/what-is-8-%C3%B7-22-2-the-correct-answer-explained/

Here is literally a article and video about it
Or maybe you're too BASED to read MAGAPEDE

>> No.17358946 [DELETED] 

>>17358930
no dude... these are literally the low iQ shitskins we have to deal with on /biz/. Just check the writing of the pajeet ID's, broken english.

>> No.17358959
File: 30 KB, 655x339, wow.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17358959

>>17358932
>It's 1, plain and simple. You didn't use a multiplication sign in the calculator which threw off the code interpreter.

>> No.17358965

>>17358455
the way a compiler would resolve this expression is
8/2*(2+2)
8/2*4
4*4
16
where i understand this could get confusing is whether the absence of a multiplication operator proper implies that it behaves as a function taking 2+2 as an argument, which would take precedence to be resolved first and end in a 1 result. and treating it that way seems like it would be the least messy way to tokenize the expression, too. but this kind of bullshit breaks too many rules either way, which is why you don't get away with omitting operators in programming in the first place.

>> No.17358966

>>17358870
it's x/3*x

>> No.17358974 [DELETED] 

>>17358940
AHAHAHAHAHAH assblasted kike gets fucked by anon who knows his math.

MANY SUCH CASES. Low IQ kikes. Must be nice you got an entire world to propagate the "high IQ jewish" meme when in fact you faggots are all idiots just given special privileges because daddy gives you $20k when you turn 13

>> No.17358977

>>17358940
How can someone dedicate so much time to a high school math problem and still be wrong?
Someone should send him a high school teacher to explain the answer is 1.

>> No.17358979

>>17358455
I don't get it, what's hard about 4 * 4? You idiots realize PEMDAS actually is PE(MA)(AS) right? MA and AS are equal, so when both exist they are just executed from first to last

>> No.17358990 [DELETED] 

>>17358959
you can't fucking type this complex equation into a calculator and expect an accurate answer you low IQ shitskin. HOLY FUCKING SHIT.

>> No.17359014

>>17358455
are you niggers for real? no symbol always means multiplication.

>> No.17359016

>>17358990
You're right it's too complex, my PC nearly started smoking just from this computation. Fuck we need to design a new type of computer to handle this problem.

>> No.17359018

>>17358959
Someone coded this calculator wrong. Guess it can't handle the basic order of operations. Shit, I can probably code a better one in an hour.

>> No.17359021 [DELETED] 

>>17358977
FUCKING CHECKED THANK YOU ANON.

>> No.17359032

>>17358974
>>17358977
You two are prized gems honestly
I have a rare time finding people like you who'll entertain me for an entire evening with this retarded shit.
"YOU*RE A KIKE, PAJEET, JEW,"
What happened did you buy in at 4.80? oh wait you don't invest in link do you MAGAPEDE
Based Burger bro
High School dropout
>whatisadegree.mp4
Literally look it up and you'll NEVER find anyone saying it's 1

>> No.17359037

>>17358979
I put a PEMDAS in your mother last night.

>> No.17359038 [DELETED] 

>>17359016
i can't even deal with you idiots how stupid you are. You literally suffer from Dunning Kruger syndrome. Face it, you are wrong.

>> No.17359040

>>17359018
Shit, someone coded my casio, Texas Instruments, and 4 different calculator apps wrong too! Argh what are the odds!

>> No.17359052 [DELETED] 

>>17359032
I called you a kike because you called me magapede. Only kikes use that term on 4chan. you fucking parasitic semite that doesn't know basic math.

>> No.17359058

>>17359032
I literally found one other guy right on this board.
Checkmate.

>> No.17359062

>>17359037
>Your mom
Oh i see you haven't even reached the point of learning this

>> No.17359074 [DELETED] 

>>17359040
ahh look the circle jerking kikes.
> Lets jerk off one another about how our calculators are coded wrong because we are wrong about a simple math equation.
Also why the fuck are you even needing to bring up LINK? Does your schizophrenia make you do this? How heavy are you bags kike? are you angry that anons on /biz/ exposed your JIDF scam to push chainlink? ARE YOU?

>> No.17359086

>>17358749
Brackets. I bet you will before me, fren

>> No.17359091

>>17359058
cHeCkMaTe AtHeIsT

>>17359052
You called me a kike before
check: >>17358893
>>17358851

>> No.17359101

>>17359074
I actually never brought up LINK, that was probably the voices in your head. But which do you believe is more likely, all the calculators in the world from the most reputable manufacturers and scientists are wrong? Or that you are wrong?
>>17359086
Yeah maybe but the context will make it seem really cool so it's all good.

>> No.17359104

>>17358455
This is a flawed question from the start. Its formatted properly. And thus it has 2 possible ways of solving it.

>> No.17359107

>>17359040
You're just using the wrong input.
To put the problem correctly in a calculator you need to type "8/(2x(2+2))". Never learned to properly use a texas calculator huh?

>> No.17359116

>>17359107
But that's not what the math equation is called so that would be incorrect.
If you change the equation then you change the answer big brain

>> No.17359117
File: 18 KB, 474x321, pinkwojakwithmask.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17359117

>>17359104
Its not formatted properly*

>> No.17359126

>>17359107
Ah so I can just change the problem into whatever I want huh? Wow they never taught me that in school. In fact they taught me you couldn't just write your own problems and answer on homework!

>> No.17359136

>>17359116
No that's how you're supposed to put it into a calculator. Like this guy says>>17359117 the original question is not formatted properly.
Lol, back to highschool you go.

>> No.17359158

>>17359136
Literally the guy you're replying to is taunting you and you're acting like he's on your side i love you so much please keep feeding me (you)'s and get this thread up where it belongs on the top so everyone on this board can see how dumb you are. Oh and good look on "holding" those links.

>> No.17359169

>>17359091
What is wrong with you? Your reading comprehension sucks as well. In that comment I said kikes/ paneers have invaded /biz/. I didn’t call you one specifically . As soon as you called me a MAGAPEDE I knew you were a kike because that’s a shareblue/ JIDF term .
Are you in awe of an actual high IQ anon like me? DUNNING KRUGER- that’s you bud

>> No.17359170

>>17359136
>question given on an exam
>clear set order of how things are to be done is fully codified for you to follow
>just refuse to answer and claim "it was asked wrong"
>fail anyways

Math is about persevering and learning why you were wrong and why the correct answer is actually correct.

>> No.17359174

"Suppose it was 1917 and you saw 8÷2(4) in a textbook. What would you think the author was trying to write?

Historically the symbol ÷ was used to mean you should divide by the entire product on the right of the symbol (see longer explanation below).

Under that interpretation:

8÷2(4)
= 8÷(2(4))
(Important: this is outdated usage!)

From this stage, the rest of the calculation works by the order of operations. First we evaluate the multiplication inside the parentheses. So we multiply 2 by 4 to get 8. And then we divide 8 by 8.

8÷(2(4))
= 8÷8
= 1

This gives the result of 1. This is not the correct answer that calculators will evaluate; rather it is what someone might have interpreted the expression according to older usage."

LITERALLY BOOMER MATH TECHNIQUES HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA

>> No.17359191 [DELETED] 

>>17359170
>Math is about persevering and learning why you were wrong and why the correct answer is actually correct.
I already explained in detail how the correct answer is 1 and the only rebuttal you gave me is "HURR DURR LOOK AT WHAT MY CALCULATOR DID" "OH AND HERES MY SHITTY HANDWRITING CONFIRMING IM A RETARD".
Just stop anon you are an embarrassment to /biz/'s collective IQ.

>> No.17359194

>>17359169
>Actual high IQ anon like me
Oh i'm sorry i should've treated you as a king
A TRUE SKEPTIC
I bet Sargon applauds you when you step forth and talk about the blue haired SJW and how Jordan Peterson saved you life and you learned true philisophy

>> No.17359199

>>17359170
Exactly so persevere a little and learn the answer is 1.

>> No.17359200

>>17359191
You can't even tell the difference between me and other posters. Kind of just digging your own grave at this point.

>> No.17359206

90 replies

>> No.17359217

>>17359194
>>17359200
To be fair your IDs are very close

>> No.17359219 [DELETED] 

>>17359174
go talk to any fucking math professor and he will tell you, that you cannot rely on a calculator to give you an accurate answer when you give it a complex answer. It will fuck up the order of operations. That is why it is up to the HUMAN to split the problem up into manageable equations for the calculator to comprehend. Whats so miserable about you kikes is you can never admit you are wrong. This is your tragic flaw as a species.

>> No.17359226

>>17359174
>>17359191
>>17359174
Not gonna read that? Not gonna act like it's not a changed and outdated way of solving mathimatical questions?

>> No.17359231

>>17359217
To be fair if you can't tell the difference between clearly different strings of characters you probably shouldn't be dabbling in fields that require precision.

>> No.17359239 [DELETED] 

>>17359194
what the fuck are you saying? Going off on kike tangents with a literal crypto kike who talks shit on christianity and couldn't control his medication addiciton? what the fuck is wrong with you kike. You kikes are literally malfunctioning. You fuckers aren't' even human are you? You fail to solve a math problem correctly so after all this you somehow accuse me of being a leftist? While you called me a MAGApede earlier? WHAT IS FUCKING WRONG WITH YOU KIKE?

>> No.17359247

>>17359219
>you cannot rely on a calculator to give you an accurate answer when you give it a complex answer
Ten million IQ big boy right here. "Give it a complex answer" lmao

>> No.17359253 [DELETED] 

>>17359226
>outdated
Why are you kikes suddenly trying to subvert math? what is literally wrong with you faggots.

>> No.17359256

>>17359231
Nah it's just that you're the only two retards in this thread who think the answer is 8 and your IDs are very close.
Everyone else has long ago been convinced that it's 1.

>> No.17359268

>>17359256
Ah yes just go with the herd, no not the herd of mathematicians with degrees no just a bunch of anonymous shitposters on the internet.

>> No.17359272 [DELETED] 

>>17359247
you clearly never took advanced math. Just eat shit and die I will not reply to you faggots anymore. You should lurk this thread more though and see how many anons tell you the answer is 1. Be sure to get really sad and ask your rabbi why your high IQ and high IQ calculator failed to implement order of operations correctly

>> No.17359283

>>17359239
Are you honestly claming to be a christian?

Think carefully about what you've said before you answer

>> No.17359287 [DELETED] 

>>17359256
they think the answer is 16 anon. Kek.

>> No.17359304

>>17359272
>see how many anons tell you the answer is 1
>no don't listen to math profs
>listen to anons!

>> No.17359306 [DELETED] 

>>17359283
Holy fucking shit. The kike is now trying to subvert my own faith? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL you faggots truly are Satan's minions.

>> No.17359315

>>17359306
Go on answer the question yes or no

Are you a christian or not?

>> No.17359316
File: 193 KB, 920x896, 272-2723550_troll-trollface-funnyface-funny-sad-cry-laugh-pepe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17359316

>>17359287
16?!?
AHAHAHA that makes even less sense

>> No.17359320 [DELETED] 

>>17359283
i'm going to go shoot up a synagogue because of this thread. You did this remember.

>> No.17359328

>>17359320
Are you claiming to be a christian or not?

>> No.17359366

>>17359306
abrahamists are molochist kikes and trump is a radical zionist jew worshipper

>> No.17359386

8/2(2+2)
8/2(4)
left to right with PEMDAS
8/2 comes first=4
now multiply comes next 4(4)
16

>> No.17359399

Why do people treat "left to right" as some sort of divine rule like it's part of the order of operations?

If you look at this equation as a fraction with 8 as the numerator and 2(2+2) as the denominator then left to right doesn't even make sense.

It's bait because it's not unambiguous anyway. It would need to be written 8/(2(2+2)) for it to make sense.

Anyway fuck you all the answer is 1

>> No.17359424 [DELETED] 

>>17359366
Wrong. the kikes killed Trump's friends on 9.11.Trump is getting revenge on Israel for planning 9.11 while shifting the blame to Saudi Arabia (all apart of the kike plan).
Mossad with help of CIA killed JFK as well. RFK is still alive and is on the Q team which outted mossad agent Jerome Corsi long ago. They have called out Mossad and other alternative kike think tanks. Nixon hated the kikes and commie professors too, and guess what? The CIA hated him too. You really need to lurk more.

>> No.17359434

>>17358455
PEMDAS, with multiplication and division being equal, so proceed left to right

The answer is 1

(2+2) = 4
8/2 = 4
4(4) = 1

>> No.17359438 [DELETED] 

>>17359399
anon these idiots think you can type this answer into any ordinary calculator from left to right and get an accurate answer. They literally are subhumans who never got an education. Its fucking pathetic.

>> No.17359441

>>17359328
>>17359320
>>17359306
Smart choice
I'd be pretty dumb to try and justify being christian and saying what you've been saying to the people in this thread and calling people kikes (derogatory term for jews) when you literally believe God came to earth as a jewish man and you worship a jew and the first people that recorded his life along with the people who wrote letters about him were jews
Not a smart move anon to try then and claim you're a christian and bring a bad name over them.
Isn't it Hebrew's where it says that you're the representatives of god on earth and if you bring a bad name on christians then that will surely lead to punishment?

>> No.17359455
File: 40 KB, 358x199, Thank you anon.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17359455

>> No.17359477
File: 144 KB, 640x623, 1578133594270.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17359477

>>17358542
I too learned of the truth in school when I found out that 1+1 = 3 and not the false 1+1 = 2 they were teaching us !

>> No.17359506

>>17359434
/thread

>> No.17359525

>>17359506
Both 1 and 16 are correct because of the way the equation is written is ambiguous.
also THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS LEFT TO RIGHT IN MATHS

>> No.17359559

>>17358455
no anon, the computer is wrong

>> No.17359676

>>17359434
>4(4) = 1
You realise 4 x 4 equals 16, right?

>> No.17359821

LOL

this question got me even. I have math creds too, I got a 1 on my Putnam math exam and even I got it wrong. In my math curriculum this isn't even tested...it is trivial nonsense designed to fool people and that's about it

>> No.17360144

The correct answer is that the problem is vague and whoever wrote it needs to rewrite it. With love, /sci/

>> No.17360149
File: 44 KB, 1056x696, 1536185949695.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17360149

It's 16 on a technicality, but on paper you wouldn't even write it autistically like that you would have a numerator and denominator and it would either be a 2 on the bottom or a 2 on fucking top and that would settle it immediately you cro magnon fucks

>> No.17360678

these bait threads are tiresome.
Just pick one:
(8/2)(2+2)
or
8/(2(2+2))

Now lets all buy some spy calls. I need this shit to go up.

>> No.17360704

Non whites arguing because they lack abstract conceptualization skills. there are many ways to skin a cat.

>> No.17360912

>>17358592
This.

>> No.17360946

>>17360678
KYS

>> No.17360966

>>17358455
>there are actually a sizeable number of people on this board that don't realize addition and subtraction are the same operation, as well as multiplication and division

Holy shit, how do i short this board

>> No.17360987 [DELETED] 

>>17358587
>he thinks PEMDAS is a common core invention
Seriously just kys

>> No.17360989

8/2*(2+2)
Distribute
(8/2*2+8/2*2)
Multiply
(8/4+8/4)
add
=
8

>> No.17361003

>>17358455
Lol, why the fuck was I taught to do the distributive property first if it’s incorrect?

what the fuck, did they just change math or something after I got out of middle school? We were literally taught to distribute that 2(2+2) so it would be like 4+4. That’s incorrect apparently, so why the FUCK did they teach it?

>> No.17361011

>>17358455
Anyone who knows anything about math knows not to leave shit ambiguous like this. Worthless argument. Also it's 1

>> No.17361019

>>17361003
Distributive property isn't for mathematical expressions you retard its for solving equations

>> No.17361038

>>17361019
It can be used for whatever you want

>> No.17361064

>>17361038
Kek just fucking die retard. I literally am telling you you are wrong, while you are seeing proof you are wrong, but you are still convincing yourself you're right. GG, I bet you hold PNK.

>> No.17361091

You dummies the 2 next to the operation exsists as its own entity separated from the 8 by a division symbol. If the 8÷2 wanted to be (8÷2) they would have put parentheses.

>> No.17361118

>>17361064
The distributive property is exactly that, a property. It's the simple fact that a*(b + c) = a*b + a*c. You can use it however you want.

>> No.17361142

>>17361118
Ok, you must be right, google needs to apologize for being wrong.

>> No.17361163

>>17361142
>da gewgle is always right!
>gewgle needs to apologize for being wrong?!?!

holy fuck, I wasn’t even replying to your stupid ass but you just revealed how fucking retarded you are LMAO

>b-but google says it

holy fuck, how do you even breathe?

>> No.17361172

>>17359676
yeah i misstyped

>> No.17361199

>>17361163
Google is wrong, as well as every calculator that has ever been made by any company ever. You fucking did it man, you found a huge mistake in the matrix, you're gonna be rich.

>> No.17361212

>>17361118
>>17361163
BTW, please tell me what coins you hold, seriously. I'll even pay for this information.

>> No.17361213

>>17361199
Don't be ashamed to not know something

>> No.17361219
File: 40 KB, 759x500, Airbus-Beluga-XL-759x500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17361219

>>17358455
8÷2(2+2)
8÷2(4)
8÷8
1
Im brainlet?

>> No.17361232

>>17361212
0x93c7A150733a098225F0d1bcF2d8089Fc8F00376

Send $500 of ethereum and I'll tell you

>> No.17361234

>>17361219
No, you just don't realize 8/2(2+2) is syntax sugar for 8/2*(2+2)

>> No.17361245

>>17361199
Your reading comprehension is so trash that you can’t even realize my original post wasn’t claiming to be correct. I was merely stating, “why was I taught this, if it’s incorrect?” — an honest question.

Then your fucking sub room temperature IQ ass launches into a “GOOGLE SAYS IT’S CORRECT” tirade like a fucking dipshit. Pathetic cretinous fuck

>m-muh Google says it’s right

just lmao for making that retarded point like it holds any weight whatsoever. You really thought that was a smart thing to write. You’re so goddamn stupid

>> No.17361248

>>17361219
Yes unfortunately. Just because the 4 is inside parentheses does not mean that takes precedent over the 8 divided by 2. At that stage it is a division on the left and a multiplication on the right, and you always go left to right.

>> No.17361251

>>17361219
Actually nevermind you're retarded, you also did order of operations wrong, multiplication and division are the same precedent, you do it from first to last, not always multiplication and then division

>> No.17361252

8÷2(2+2)=?
2(4)=8?
8=8?
1=?

>> No.17361269

>>17361252
Based. Only chads no quantum mathematics advanced enough to move that 8 to the other side of the = sign.

>> No.17361278

>>17361245
stay 90 iq nigger

>> No.17361282

>>17361064
>>17361212
Laughing my ass off at the retards getting BTFO that the answer is 1

>> No.17361291

>>17361269
dude based. Did you just google quantum mathematics? Did you just google the equation? did you just google ‘based’ to find out what it means?

very based. Wow, Google is wrong??? Apologize! Fucking faggot lmao

>> No.17361305

UH HELLO? JUST GOOGLE IT! IDIOTS!

YOU’RE REALLY GOING TO ARGUE WITH GOOGLE??????????????? SERIOUSLY?

>> No.17361314
File: 15 KB, 644x800, d90.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17361314

>>17361291
yikes. were fucked as a species.

unironic oof and cringe

>> No.17361330

>>17361314
sure thing Google nigger. Move along

>> No.17361342

>>17361330
>d-distwibutive pwopety

fucking kek

>> No.17361396

Retarded niggers on this board thinking anything other than 16.
> This is why you will never be successful and never make money. You will chase the next hot thing and get burnt out over and over. Kill yourself.

>> No.17361400

>>17361342
That was me actually retard maybe you should google how 4chan IDs work. All my money is in BRAP, XVG and DOGE btw.

>> No.17361442

>>17361400
>implying i dont think all of the ids here are one fucking retard

Kek, there is no way /biz/ is this dumb

>> No.17361495

Anyone who think it is 16 is wrong.

>> No.17361900

how are you fuckers still going at it holy shit

>> No.17361955

>>17358455
I already made it, and am just making hooker and blow money when UND blows.

>> No.17361968

>>17361172
okay all good brother :)

>> No.17362560

>>17358979
>>17358455
Because its 8 divided by the function of 2×(2+2). Writing it like that will make a calculator think its 16 but its really written as

8
-----
2(2+2)

Which gives you 1. As anyone who took advanced math will tell you.

>> No.17362591

>>17362560
That's not a function bro lol. There are only operators and operands here.

>> No.17362615

>>17362591
No one cares what the proper words are you commie its 1 either way.

>> No.17362625

>>17362615
It's not bro, I wish I could help you but I don't know where your gap of understanding is.

>> No.17362693

>>17362615
Do you agree/disagree That PEMDAS is actually PE(MD)(AS), and that mult/div are the same precendent, and addition and subtraction are the same? Because that seems to be a common misunderstanding here. IF it is, its easily fact checkable by you, and you're not a retard, but if it's something else, I can't know.

>> No.17362752

>>17361495
The amphetamines just kicked in and im feeling some empathy. Let me help you discover your gap of understanding, tell me where exactly it is the first spot you disagree with me. I am going to be extremely explicit.

8/2(2+2)=
8/2*(2+2)=
8/2*(4)=
4*(4)=
16

>> No.17362840

>>17362625
>>17362693
IT'S 1. YOU CLEARLY DID NOT TAKE ADVANCED MATH CLASSES SHIT FOR BRAINS

>> No.17362864
File: 30 KB, 710x577, 1581315393601.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17362864

>>17358542
>>17358634
>>17362840
Do americans really?

>> No.17362871

>>17362840
Alright then pal, just tell me the first spot you disagree with me here >>17362752

If theres more than one disagreement, don't worry, ignore it for now, we'll get to it, just point out the first part in the first line you disagree.

>> No.17362877

where's that fucking guy that is always posting about him having a phd in mathematics, get his jew ass in here

>> No.17362882

>>17362864
Yes they do, I'm an american and I know that a large amount of people only know memorized phrases and mantras that were taught by their single mother teachers to pass standardized tests, and were never actually taught an understanding of the underlying concepts. I want to help my bros learn, it's not their fault.

>> No.17362906

>>17362877
You don't really need a phd in math to understand this. I was a CS major and coincidentally wrote an n length operand math expression parser including mathmetical functions as well as operators, but you definitely do not need to be a cs major to understand basic arithmetic.

>> No.17362987

>>17362882
Everyone understands why mult and div are on the same echelon as each other. They're opposites.

>> No.17363002

>>17362987
Yeah it should seem obvious they're opposites, but I don't think everyone does, as there are tons of people jumping from:

8/2(4) to 8/8

>> No.17363036
File: 166 KB, 615x177, pemdas.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17363036

>> No.17363348

>>17358634
JUST KILL YOURSELF. YOU LIVE IN BURGUERLAND IN EASY MODE YET YOU CANNOT DO A FUCKING SIMPLE OPERATION

>> No.17363360

>>17358706
>complex equation

Please tell me you are trolling

>> No.17363375

>>17363348
>>17363360
Bro, i want to believe it's all 1 troll phoneposting, switching on and off wifi and getting new 4G IP's, but then I remember my classmates at my american uni

>> No.17363405

>>17363360
You low IQs are so iewaome. Yes it’s complex for the calculator. You have to type it correctly for you to get the right answer “8/(2(2+2))”. If you don’t understand this, you did not take trigonometry or advanced algebra equivalent classes. SORRY PAL

>> No.17363431

>>17363405
That's a different expression than the one posted in the OP bro. I don't know what you mean type it "right". Its literally not the same expression anymore.

>> No.17363536
File: 10 KB, 698x339, e016e4d692bf0a73adc443222312e219.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17363536

jesus christ stop getting baited by this same shit all the time you fucking brainlets

if you actually went to school you'd know how to find a proper calculator

>> No.17363561

>>17363536
That's not the same expression as the OP, thats 8/(2(2+2)) like >>17363405 posted

>> No.17363712

>>17358592
>PEMDAS, with multiplication and division being equal, so proceed left to right

They are equal thus the answer is ambiguous. multiplying first is just as right as dividing first.
"left to right" is bullshit

>> No.17363735

Distributive property
a(b + c) = ab + ac

8/(2(2+2)) = 1

Without the parentheses, a calc just goes insane.

>> No.17363784
File: 214 KB, 699x919, brainletwojacktoendthemall.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17363784

>>17358455
>left to right

>> No.17363787

>>17363735
The distrbutive property is a thing.. yes you are correct. But you don't just apply it whenever you feel like, you have to follow the order of operator precedence.

>> No.17363797

>>17363561
goddamn it fag, just admit that your autism is wrong

>> No.17363807

>>17363712
>They are equal thus the answer is ambiguous.
It's not lol. It's read from first to last. How ever calculator and computer's parser is programmed to calculate it in existence, because that is how math works.

>> No.17363818

>>17363797
You literally are adding parantheses to it, changing the outcome, and saying its the same expression.

>> No.17363819
File: 429 KB, 916x648, 1564155752536.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17363819

>>17363787
>you don't just apply it whenever you feel like
You also do not ignore it whenever you feel like. Lmfao fucking harvard mathematician

>> No.17363835

>>17363819
PEMDAS bro, there is nothing to distribute, because by the time you are multiplying, the insides of the parantheses are already added to 4.

>> No.17363837

>>17363818
You go by the form, I follow the spirit. Parentheses are only added because of the shitty calc.

>> No.17363848
File: 83 KB, 277x376, Chad4.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17363848

>>17363835
>PEMDAS bro
No, Parentheses first.

>> No.17363849

>>17363787

PEMDAS

Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication and Division, and Addition and Subtraction.

As you say, multiplication and division come together, no one before the other. But there is a parentheses in this equation, which has first priority.

Just recently, we ended up talking basics and the distributive property came up in discussion. This is how we're taught, no exceptions.

>> No.17363858

>>17363848
Yes lmao. So what do you not understand? Why are you not calculating whats inside the parantheses first?

>> No.17363873
File: 26 KB, 545x478, brainletjew_8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17363873

>>17363849
Apparently mathematicians from glorious mighty harvard learned it differently, jews don't math

>> No.17363876

>>17363849
Right.. so you do whats in the parenthes first. What is your misunderstanding?

8/2(2+2)=
8/2(4)=
4(4)=
16

>> No.17363891

>>17363858
>>17363876
division has two different forms.

>> No.17363902

>>17363891
What on fucking gods green earth do you mean by this mad lad?

>> No.17363918

>>17363876
>your misunderstanding
When accounting for distributive properties the result is corrected.
>>17363902
tell me what a fraction is

>> No.17363931

>>17363918
I'm starting to begin to understand where your gap is here, but it's so deep. It would help me if you point out where you disagreed with here.

8/2(2+2)=
8/2(4)=
4(4)=
16

>> No.17363951

>>17363931
just write it as a fraction and see how this doesn't make any sense

>> No.17363959

>>17363876
8/(2(2 + 2)) = 1

The distributive property still remains. In order for the equation to come out correct, you need to add in parentheses for the calculator to separate each step.

These are the steps used to this day where I'm from, with books published as early as 2017.

No need in pointing and screeching jew on eachother.

>> No.17363993

>>17363951
This is what I meant as your gap is deep, "Write it as a fraction" makes no fucking sense at all in this context. I mean is your understanding the "/" sign is different than thedivision sign with a line and 2 dots? They're the exact same thing, different syntax. If you want to input a fraction into a calculator, you have to do that separately with the calculators fraction function, or you surround a number divided by another number with parenthes and that parenthetical grouping becomes its own entity, equal to that one number divided by another number, AKA a fraction.

>> No.17364000
File: 156 KB, 884x1200, Gigachad.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17364000

>>17363959
>No need in pointing and screeching jew on eachother
disagreed

>> No.17364006

>>17363959
Bro I'm not gonna bother readig that unless you point out where you disagree with me, or you show your work like i did so i can point out our area of disagreement.

>> No.17364007

>>17363993
Your autism is as deep as a canyon. Write it as a fraction

>> No.17364017

>>17364007
Okay, I'll bite, write what as a fraction?

>> No.17364052

>>17363959
You added another set of parentheses, I don't understand, are you trolling? I'm putting in time here to actually try to help some of you miscreants.

>> No.17364062

>>17364017
You deserve a brainlet reply. I'm out

>> No.17364152

>>17364052
>>17364000

To protect your pride as the baby troglodyte you are, I looked up the reason why this is even a debate on JewChan.

Turns out 16 is an updated answer used in some <100 IQ nations where as 1 is considered as the "former" version. So this is nothing but a battle between former and newer.

I take it back about not screeching jew, those fuckers are dividing our fellow autists with triviality.