/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>20632428
Why do you care about finding his wallet?

>>20632862
He's a larper and I don't believe he actually has any LINK, I think he tries to shit up Chainlink threads

You guys could be onto something

>>20632428
Tell me why and maybe I'll help

what if his fund is safu with binance?

>>20632954
We'll still be able to track it back to the original transaction and find some info. His mistake was posting a non generic amount on a specific date.
>>20632916
No reason other than to potentially verify if he's actually balls deep in link as he claims. "He" could very easily be a bot with the aim of shitting up and spamming link threads with auto responses

>>20633077
Checked yeah fuck that cunt mate he doesn't seem real to me

>>20632889

You are retarded. He's just bored like the rest of us who have been holding for 3 years. The technicals were broken down over and over all through 2018 and into 2019. Most of the integration breadcrumbs are coming to fruition. The potential esoteric connections behind LINK and the team are entertaining and obvious. Its worth talking about to some degree. If you actually ask him about the project outside of that he will generally do so but as I said its already been covered ad naseum. If you weren't here then it sucks because it was a Golden Era for Chainlink. Its why many of us are literally never selling, just diversifying staking dividends into tangible wealth. The discussion gave a real sense of what LINK was trying to accomplish and the infinite possibilities if they did so. People heavily underestimate LINK's potential. It will be the best asset of the decade, in addition to all time most likely.

Is this some kind of new FUD? 42 is just a guy like everyone else here.

>>20632428
42 is the most annoying fuck on /biz/ right now. He is worse than peterschiff, and assblaster combined.

>>20632428
Why do you think this is his stack?
From his personality and way to ignore questions and facts he doesn't want to answer he is comparable to the crowd of twitter linkies who have smaller stacks of less than 40k.
You could say he is overcompensating for his small stack with his message spams.

>>20632889
I still don't get it, what would be the point of shitting up chainlink threads at this stage in the game? If he ever gets to be too much I usually just ignore him.

>>20633271
That's an interesting question.
Why is he spamming hard to read messages on a board full of logical thinking persons who prioritize the result over the form it takes?
He either got banned from another place before coming here where he had some followers he managed to get with his elusive and self suggestive messages.
Or he can't keep up a conversation on /x/ without getting destroyed with no arguments and came here after he saw the Link memes and strong cult like behavior of the marines.

>>20632428
I like 42

From what I can tell he's schitzoid, my guess is he's got around 10k link, and he's definitely no pump n dumper or larp, he's just taken too many red pills. Mostly harmless but definitely benevolent. I got love for em, retarded as he may be.

He seems harmless but derailing actual discussion and threads is tiresome. I’m interested in esoteric shit but there’s a board for that.

>>20633446
Anyone who has a make it stack got it years ago. At this point he's just keeping newfags from getting a suicide stack before even that is priced out. Either way I don't really mind him, don't know why people hate the guy so much.

Bro LINK will be more than $80.000 in 2026. 42 told us and he is legit cause he got a quantic message from the future. They still use Windows 10 in 2026 bro. He got a pic of a screen that has glare so it’s legit. He could never had photoshopped it and then taken a pic of the screen bro. He’s like the reincarnation of Tesla, he feels like these electric horns coming out of his forehead and shit.

>>20633446
You glow a little bruh,

>>20632428
I unironically love his posts lmao. Brings spirituality and good vibes about taking the power back. If you don’t like him legit just ignore him lol

>>20633943
Because of his writing behavior.
Extremely elusive.
Imagine calling a customer service to solve a problem and you get a crazy maniac starting to talk to you of a completely different subject for hours.
But every time you make a comment or ask something he ignores you and continues his ramblings.
It makes sense you would feel extremely frustrated to talk to someone who is absent or doesn't recognize you as present.

Now imagine you discuss something with a friend and this crazy guy comes and derails completely the discussion with the same behavior...

>>20633943
I hate him because he derails decent threads with 50 schizo posts talking to himself.

>>20634274
If I was glowing I wouldn't need to make a hypothesis.
Everything goes directly to multiple letter agencies including the used IP addresses...
They also have access to 4chan's servers directly to monitor all of 4chan.

Hiroshima has a track record of selling user data from 2ch to a japanese political part who had paid janitors.

>>20634273

Dude no one actually believes that screen shot is real, its just fun. The potential for 81K is possible though ironically. When you account for staking locking up 95% or even more of the circulating supply(350 Mil, the rest are spoken for on nodes already).

We are supposed to see at least 8 Trillion MCAP by 2025 of all crypto according to the experts. Klaus Schwab mentions this in his book.

I think we will see 4-5 Trillion at the peak of the next bullrun easy. That will probably be early to mid 2022. Next peak bullrun will probably mid to late 2026 which could easily run 16-20 Trillion MCAP of all crypto. In the scheme of things that is only around 18-25% of the global GDP. Its honestly not that much.

Now lets say LINK network protocol captures 4 Trillion by 2026 peak bullrun. At even 80% staking saturation (70 Million circulating supply) the price is close to 60,000 per LINK, around 57,000. At 15% circulating supply, its 52.5 Million LINK with a 4 Trillion MCAP is 76,000 per LINK.

This numbers sound ridiculous but again when you understand what LINK is/does its honestly not. We are buying a share of the fat protocol that will monetize Web 3.0. I mean think if HTTPS would have been monetized, now that would have been fun!

>>20633077
If he is a bot, he's some kind of sentient AI dude. I like 42.
I think about him as a friend. Don't fuck around with him just cause your some goddamned newfag stacklet that wants to feel better about your dumbass holding xrp and vechain for the last three years.

I'm gonna say it one more time. Give it up, or you'll earn esoteric wrath. Heard?

>>20634967
>Give it up, or you'll earn esoteric wrath. Heard?
of course the only people who like 42 are fellow schizos. figures

>>20632862
Because he's a luciferian gnostic saturn worshipper larping as a christian to fool stinkies, probably has a hooked nose too

>>20634967
i found 42 here he is

I hate 42 because he always shits up link threads with his MIGA trumpfaggotry. He's basically Q but for /biz/. Chainlink is a White Nationalist coin to be used for financing the overthrow of ZOG.

>>20634967
You’ve lost your god damn mind

>>20635229
Probably just 42 defending himself anonymously. No one likes that schizo kike-lover.

>>20633943
>open /biz/
>hey a promising like thread with 200+ replies
>its mostly 42 rambling to himself/shitting up a discussion that started decent
Also, he started tweeting his shizo/link stuff to famous people on Twitter making us look even more like shit there

>>20635476
>like
link*

>>20634967
I don't think he's fudding the coin lol, and I've noticed XRP, Link and religion seem go go hand in hand. He seems genuine and reminds me of the XRP schizo's who are just as bad. Plenty of tripfags have come and gone. They're not difficult to psychoanalyze, they're just looking for a little human contact, I would guess he doesn't have a lot of people to talk to. If you try to argue with him you'll go mad as he isn't open to traditional discourse, so just think of him as entertainment. Who gives a shit.

>>20635476
Absolute worst feeling, especially when he's not there for the first 30-50 posts and the discussion is really enjoyable. Then you scroll down and see the first reply from 42, then more and more as people stop replying to the thread. Eventually it's just 42 and 1 or 2 guys who show up late to the thread who tell 42 to fuck off and stop ruining good threads. 42 then schizoposts at (rather than talk with) these angry posters for the remainder of the thread.
I'm a Christian, I'm a Nazi, and I'm a commissioned officer in the Linkmarines and 42 does NOT represent me!

>>20635519
He's a schizo autistic german electrical engineer who's obsessed with Zion Don. No one would care if he didn't shit up threads, just as no one cares about /ptg/ MIGApedes as long as they stay in their containment thread.

>>20635476
Actually not a bad idea if you want to control the narrative. 42 schizo ramblings are used to discredit us if we ever speak against the narrative. They can't control us financially after all

>>20632428
hows is this thread still up jannies

>>20635757
Yeah but doesn't Link have enough threads?
There are so many fucking Link threads I look at them as advertisements now.
And be honest, most of them, probably 95% are utter dogshit. Absolutely fucking no one talks about the fundamentals or technicals. The holders just tell people to check the archive or that they're not going to waste their time spoonfeeding. Fine. Enjoy circle jerking. It's literally just a bunch of teenagers talking about price action, it's fucking dreadful.

>>20635903
>And be honest, most of them, probably 95% are utter dogshit. Absolutely fucking no one talks about the fundamentals or technicals.
Because of 42. He'll find a good chainlink thread with 30 posts and he'll proceed to completely derail it. It's gotten so bad that I simply ckose the thread if I see 42 post a single time as I know if I keep scrolling down I'll only meet with more disappointment.

>>20633137
we will make it.

>>20634762
Why not assume 1bn circulating supply at this point?

>>20636088
Checked and based

>>20636088
checked we will all make it

>>20633148
You weren't around for Assblaster. You never read AB's posts either.

>>20633137
>You are retarded. He's just bored like the rest of us who have been holding for 3 years.

42 came in late. Probably around 2019. His stack isn't that big unless he was loaded beforehand.

>>20636088
Checked.

>>20637463
Yeah he bought out bags kek kys 42 faggot

>>20635903
>Link
>Fundamentals

HAHAHAHAHA

>>20632428
https://etherscan.io/tx/0xa2d6baf5295194c81df0c4e90f2c5d003642acaff6af9b398ae0880518e2a4d4

>>20632428
I wish you could search etherscan by specific ranges of transaction amounts

>>20637407
You want to bet on that faggot? I’ve been on /biz/ since march of 2017.

>>20636088
>>20636688
checked, and makeitpilled

>>20639063
Based

>>20634316
50 would be a modest estimate. its usually 80+

You’re an absolute brainlet if you can’t find the wallet in the first few minutes of searching

>>20634434
i'm aware of all of this, you still glow. your intentions are framed as harmless but the effects would be threatening. wolf in sheeps clothing