/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>22438176
isn't it unironically OVER for Beecash? I used to believe but. it seems OVER>

>>22438176
Roger, give it up. Adam was right. Just move on.

>>22438176
I was unironically a bcashie up until this year. It's over.

>be scamming when others are building

>>22438276
until this year???

>>22438450
I didn't hold much but I still believed it was superior to bitcoin cucked, and that it would flip one day even if it took decades.

BTC still has not solved the fee problem which was 18 months ago 3 years ago

>>22438527
which was 18 months away 3 years ago*

>>22438527
No one cares anymore. BCH was the last holdout but then the drama happened and it forked again. It's over.

>>22438503
So, what went wrong? Did Rogen not live up to the expectations?

>>22438571
its not over aslong as the fee problem is not solved, people wont be paying 50$ to move the new digital gold around

>>22438600
https://twitter.com/rogerkver/status/1300908197113458688

>>22438276
same.
Not that it isn't the real bitcoin, it's just a total mess with the infighting, and its cap is too large for an actual moon mission.
Sold it and bought RSR at 20 sats, and AVAX at ICO, pretty confident I made the right move.

>>22438611
People only use crypto for speculation and moving from one exchange to the other, and XRP/XLM are just superior in that.
Those very few in 3rd world countries who need crypto as cash will probably start using RSV instead of BCH anyway.

>>22438176
Is beecash a bitcoin fork you use with bumble or what? Roger Very made it, right? How many bitcoin fork scams are there? Bsv bgold, bitcoin unlimited...

>>22438611
It's over, there's new fintech that allows normies to move money around more cheaply than before in centralized fiat land and programmable money is much more exciting and promising in the future. Fees are high but it's incredibly useful.

>>22438622
WAT

>>22438622
THE FUCK

>>22438527
>imbecile
The majority of the "fee problem" was bugs in wallets fee estimation algos, they were effectively just guessing and not taking into account what was really clearing in memepool.

This led to an arms race of fees. Notice fees haven't even really gone above median 40 sats since those bugs were fixed. 1 and 2 sat fees are still clearing as we speak.

>>22438200
>I used to believe
Anyone who was around for the split and cares about big blocks moved to SV years ago.

>>22439079
so you think we wont see higher fees at the next peak? XD? either you are trolling or giga delusional 3000 transaction per 10min while visa doing 72 000 per 10min

It's Bitcoin Cash, not BCash. Bcash is a term used by bitcoin fanatics. BCH is not dead, in fact it's more alive than ever. Next year will be amazing.

>>22439106
Not with Craig being Craig and BSV being blacklisted from exchanges.

bcash is dead, buy xmr

>>22438622
jfc

Roger just need to admit he was wrong and join SV.

>>22439130
hi 90iq tard. i will explain the world to you.

banks / btc = settlement network
visa / ln = payment network

>>22439135
XMR is the only coin anyone should hold besides BSV.

>>22439134
Don't be racist, it's "Blocklisted" now

How, how did this all happen? Lads...

>>22439179
>visa / ln = payment network
die

>>22439179
answer the question insted, do you think we will not see 50$ transactions in the next peak?

>>22439179
>lightning
Failed project.

>and that's a good thing!

>>22439179
Why are we modeling capable new technology around an old crumbling banking system again?

>>22439497
Because by crippling Bitcoin banks can retain their power structure over the new monetary system with something like Lightning. Luckily for everyone it literally doesn't work.

>>22439627
>banks can retain their power structure over the new monetary system with something like Lightning
that's a pretty huge partnership

>>22439732
>partnership

>>22439627
yeah. imagine losing thousands of your own capital to get a node on a network no one uses and getting no money in return

>>22439219
sure, ppl that want 10min transactions will pay $50 next week. Most people will be content for 1hr conf and will pay $5...some that are content for 24 hour will pay .40

>>22439217
you dispute those are payment networks? how low iq are you?

>>22439750
is this partnership symbiotic or parasitic? hmmmm

so.. what will happen to bch now?

>>22439627
you can't even safely keep bitcoin without insurance and storing it in banks. bitcoin currently is very dependent on legacy system. it literally can't compete fundamentally, it's a mere speculation vehicle.

>>22439769
I feel no sympathy for them.

>>22439800
>Most people will be content for 1hr conf and will pay $5

FUTURE MONEY

Meanwhile Bitcoin transactions are instant and fractions of a penny.

>>22439828
Satanic

>>22440041
Continue to lose value. This is the best thing to happen. Now big blockers can reconvene on the only big block Bitcoin, which is Bitcoin SV.

>>22440181
tf are you talking about? I have Bitcoin stored on paper in my safe. Also I never stated that Bitcoin makes extinct banking. Exchanges already act as banks in many cases and there is nothing wrong with custodial services if desired.

>>22440274
what if someone will come to your house, and ask for your keys slowly and painfully? imagine buffet keeping all his money at home.

>>22440351
Banks can be robbed too. It's a dangerous world. Besides I never said you can't do both.

>>22439179
>90iq
>hi
Sure it's above average but I wouldn't say it's hi

>>22440507
>Banks can be robbed too
today you need total social collapse for that or foreign military maybe. it's literally safer by a huge margin. indisputable

>>22439826
You know exactly what I'm disputing you fucking nigger