/biz/ - Business & Finance

>muh sats

Hahaha OP never touched a womans pussy

>>24472611
>btc will pump without carrying link with it, meaning approximately $23.5k btc in a week or two
Did you faggots even see what happened november? Btc went from 12k to 20k, while link was $14 and went to $13 lmao

keep holding and sniffing copium

>>24472656
zoom... out

>>24472611
>Final shakeout

>>24472611
>sgt armadillo

>>24472611

six gorillion$ link eom, based op

>>24473066
Checked

>>24472611
>SAT
quit using faggot talk

>>24472611
nice digits don't make you a real woman

>>24473066
>>24473088
umm hello based department

>>24473066
>>24473088
checked

>>24472611
>Chainlink will experience a final capitulation in sats
Based on what?

Don't listen to OP almost every major crypto is winding up for a breakout, including link. If things go to plan expect more tests of the 20k resistance for btc with 20k becoming the new support when/if we can break it and stay there. If this happens and btc doesn't go on an insane run, i think alt season is officially open for business. If the btc run happens, it will only delay the enviable alt season but some nice swings will be on the table. Look for the crab. Btc crab will set you free.
Failing that we're going to bounce off 20k again and into the cold embrace of the bears. I think this is the only way we'll see the 22% sat loss OP mentioned, link already retraced over the last few months fool.

>>24474553
Thing is, if link breaks 65k sats, it will lose its form and trigger a cascade of sells. Link will never recover stas wise if this happens. And I mean, even if BTC starts crabbing and link recovers some sats, it'll never be able to get back to 100k sats, this happened during a bear market, it was easier for alts to gain sats back then

Your graph is wrong because it doesn't take into account btc dominance, Your graph assume 65% BTC dominance.

>>24474553
>>24474642
Why do so many in crypto go purely of their voodoo TA charts? How do you explain Chainlink's huge rise already. You're trying to treat Crypto like traditional stocks or assets. The truth is that it's network usage and fundamentals which make Link move, and that is what will happen. T-sigs and Steaking are around the corner and it's just going to go up and up. This time next year Link will be way, way higher than it is and you'll STILL be bleating on about all that TA stuff. You lot NEVER admit to it being horseshit.

>>24474642
This is all assuming no fundamentals, which link has a bunch of. Thinking about the bigger picture, the hype bubble is over and now link is being put to real use. Remember these days with eth? It used to float around the £10-20 range just as network usage picked up pace, then it mooned far beyond its previous ATH and strongly established its sat value.
This is the most risky time for future regret, take your profits but getting shaken out just before the real bubble is weak. Look at all we've been through marines, don't get cucked at the last hurdle.

>>24475729
Yo why the anger my guy? I agree with you somewhat, fundamentals and TA should be combined. One without the other is some low IQ shit fren.