[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 24 KB, 333x333, 7E064DF7-4257-4F05-AA7D-6837EF41D881.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
25143890 No.25143890[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Is Adam Back , Satoshi Nakamoto?

>> No.25143943

yep. ZKS.

>> No.25144020

no, I am

>> No.25144037

>>25143890
He's a faggot.

>> No.25144053

>>25143890
Probably but I don't know or care even as a bitcoin holder. I'm glad it's a mystery.

>> No.25144083

>>25143890
Is that the guy who made Nintendo?

>> No.25144142

It’s a VERY HIGH candidate of being Satosho. If not , at least confirmed to be considered to be one of the “bitcoin creators” to have worked with “Satoshi” along with Hal Finney

>> No.25144526

Satoshi Nakamoto is an AI system

>> No.25144678

>>25143890
just a pretender, the funniest thing is I don't believe Satoshi would be a maxi

>> No.25144716

>>25144678
A shitcoiner has shitcoiner beliefs what a surprise. You probably thought it was a fool like Craig Wright for awhile.

>> No.25144738

Delete this now!!

>> No.25144741

>>25144678
i think at first he wouldn't be but after witnessing the sea of fucking scams he would conclude shitcoins are all shit.

>> No.25144766

No. Adam Back is a Bitcoin maxi just looking to pump his own bags.

Satoshi wasnt a Bitcoin maxi, in fact he said he would be moving onto new things after Bitcoin, probably started working on Chainlink. More likely Ari Juels

>> No.25144793

>>25144716
nah, I've always thought it was Hal if anyone. Go read the old bitcointalk posts, Satoshi repeatedly references other cryptographic applications and use cases in the field that bitcoin can't easily provide or requires different focuses than Bitcoin's (legitimate, useful) aims

>> No.25144893

bitcoin creator was a cypherpunk and there were only a finite amount of them

>> No.25144900

most likely candidate.
watch some of his interviews.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQPoSt90HV0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEaulpPo7iM
also watch the prt3 of barley sociable nakamoto unmasking. but ignore the big block fud. and blockstream fud.
but mainly watch interviews of adam back. and tell me this guy might as well be satoshi. even if hes not, he pretty much is from all the shit he invented bfor btc.

also most likely was halfiney that coded, and also nick szabo that was part of the team too.
adam prolly was under the sudo of satoshi.
all 3 are very based wei dai too.

tho adam invented hashcash. the first proof of work system. he also found the nsa backdoor from looking at binary, before he was even in college.

>> No.25144938

>>25144142
this is pretty much a fact, as he is the only person that is mentioned on the Bitcoin whitepaper. he was very close to satoshi

>> No.25144948

>>25143890
SN=SN

>> No.25144954

doesnt matter who it is now tho. and prolly much better that nobody find out who it ever was. and satoshi never comes back.
thats best for btc.
dont need a figure that everyone glorifies and comes to for everything, that goes against the ethos. adam is very humble you can see from the way he talks in interviews, and anyone that ever met him also say hes a very calm humble guy.

>> No.25145053

Adam ignored satoshi's e-mails and wrote Bitcoin off, and didn't even get involved talking about Bitcoin or joining BlockStream and crippling Bitcoin until the price had already gone over $1000. He is a follower not a leader.

>> No.25145174
File: 14 KB, 300x230, 1606704541391.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
25145174

>>25144526
Satoshi Nakamoto is an anagram for:
AI Kata moonshots

>> No.25145177

Nick Szabo + Hal Finney + potentially Adam Back.
Satoshi was not a single individual

>> No.25145283

>>25145177
de definitely was. you can tell by the code. and by the same reason we know it was not hal nor nick.

>> No.25145321

>>25145283
also few people know this but nick szabo made a whole crpyto himself called bit gold. he can code just different style. hal too. he actually helped satoshi with the code previously worked on rpow implementation.

they both had the capability to write bitcoin just didn't. adam back is not satoshi but with his hashcash he is the grandfather of bitcoin.

>> No.25145365

Satoshi was a man of principle, he wouldn't have sold out to (((Blockstream)))

>> No.25146023

>>25143890
no Sergey Nazarov is Satoshi.

>> No.25146382
File: 145 KB, 638x960, tumblr_8c61165ecbee893072a829efadd3d3be_e75d30c5_640.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
25146382

>>25143890
Yeah probably.

Along with Hal Finney and Nick Szabo.

>> No.25146495

>>25143890
It was Hal Finney
/Thread

>> No.25146682

>>25143890
thats like asking if sergey invented pnk

>> No.25146784

>>25146495
It's probably Hal, but Back and Szabo are good suspects. As the initial mined block remains unclaimed, the probability that Hal is Satoshi approaches one.

>> No.25147145

>>25146382
>Nick Szabo
no

>> No.25147171

>>25143890
Back is a scammer
>FUCK OFF

>> No.25147190

>>25143890
Nope. Peter Schiff is.

>> No.25148437

>>25143890
No
Santa is

Saint Nicholas = S N
Satoshi Nakamoto = S N
Sergey Narzarov = S N
Properties:
Not seen often if ever, Fat, Gives gifts to mankind

Think about it

>> No.25148473

Jollen Chen

>> No.25148516
File: 239 KB, 610x517, 1590370277564.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
25148516

>>25144766
yeah, right lol

on ethereum

fucking pajeet

>> No.25148756

>>25146495

Is there any other proof other than just being the first recipient?

He denied being satoshi nakamoto if I recall correctly.