/biz/ - Business & Finance

Nice. Go men!

>>26056705
I'm gonna buy lots of hookers with my crypto fortune, so I'll be doing my part.

>>26056705
We dont

>>26056705
Lol employers have the fire under their ass right now and it’s making them see how worthless HR and other women dominated job positions are

>>26056727
lmao delusional retard , crypto ain't worth shit

>>26056705
offer free anesthesia

>>26056705
Something doesn't add up there.

The female bubble is coming to an end.

>>26056705
Great. These ladies can now focus on producing and raising white children.

legalizing street prostitution

Western women are in a bubble right now.

>>26056741
marketing costs of lipservice to muh gender equality is no longer profitable

140000 women replaced by just 16000 men proving that men are 875% more effective

Maybe they should get a real job. How many women are applying to be leathernecks?

Women are debt, not assets

>>26056705
confiscate all wealth from men and use it to subsidize female employment

>>26056705
I thought this was a joke article mock up, especially with the "particularly women of color line" at the end. It seemed it exactly like a just-slightly-too-over-the-top parody some anon would have editted. It's not.

No way these numbers are true. I remember in the 2008 recession politicians and the media harped on constantly about how much harder women were hit, but if you looked at the actual data men were completely decimated while women were barely affected at all.

>>26056845
Debt, gtfo

>>26056913
>but if you looked at the actual data men were completely decimated while women were barely affected at all.
What did the "actual data" say?

I'm just interested in the specifics. For this count, does a guy losing his job and getting another one in the same period count at net zero for jobs gained and lost?

>>26056705
>be woman
>choose easy, inconsequential job
>be surprised im easily expendable

>>26056904
>I thought this was a joke article mock up, especially with the "particularly women of color line" at the end. It seemed it exactly like a just-slightly-too-over-the-top parody some anon would have editted. It's not.
Yeah I just checked. This is running on abc, CNN, and more.

Absolute LOL

>>26056845
We already do that, it’s called tax

>>26056705
what kind of backward math is this?
16k jobs gained by men which actually means 170k jobs gained and 154k lost by men.
Virtue signaling media,"Women accounted for all job losses"
The media really is trying to erase men from existence.

>>26056705
The pandemic has proved to a lot of corporations that a lot of roles they have are actually worthless and can be done from home or scrapped all together, most of those roles are dominated by females

>>26056765

>>26056756
They said a net loss number. Men gained 16,000, but women lost 156,000, so in total 140,000 jobs were lost

>>26056705
>women forced to return to child rearing, their original purpose

Is this supposed to be bad?

>>26056705
Posting a tweet, a CNN tweet, should be a bannable offense and the person should be publically lashed. The pain teaching him not to do it again.

>>26057448
>in total 140,000 jobs were lost
False in total 140,000 net jobs were los

>>26056705
Leave it up to the kikes at Communist News Ne work to sow division between the people at all times
By way of deception, we wage war

>>26056765
>the past was female

>>26056904
>the "particularly women of color line" at the end
Seriously? You've never seen this meme before?

"World ends; women, minorities are hardest hit"

"War in Iraq; women, minorities, most affected"

and so on and so forth.

James Taranto at the WSJ used to have examples of this in his column every single (business) day.

>>26056705
Good. Roasties btfo

>>26056705
>Oy vey we lost jobs because of the lockdowns
>we can't have anyone unite against this
>it's men's fault

>>26057785
Media propaganda is a huge problem and women of color are most affected by it.

>>26056765
Most based post today

>>26056705
>How do we fix rising female unemployment?

>>26056705
Build your own business and never have to deal with this. Wagies get fucked.

>>26056961
Worse. It counts only net jobs. If a man loses a job as a businessman who supports his family, but an old boomer gets a job as a walmart greeter, there is no change to male employment, as measured here.

>>26056765
You know what they say: what goes up must come down

On this dick

>>26056705
dudes rock!

Does this finally mean a discount on feet pics? or even free?

>>26056765
The time is now

>>26056705
World Debt Reset program

>>26056705
>140,000 of which 156,000 women

>>26059299
Dumb ESL double-digit IQ retard who's ngmi

>>26056765
Just opened a short on women

>>26056705
we don't

It's good

>>26059894
>spotted the fired woman
yes

>>26056705
Plenty of work in the kitchen for them.

>>26056705
Am I retarded or does this math not add up?

>>26056845
This is already literally all state work, including shit like the NHS.

>>26056705
It's probably because women realized that in this shit economy it's better to stay at home mom than go to work wagecuck and spend their wage on babysitter/prek

>>26057453
to the gender confused lesbos yes, men should suffer and women should work till they;'re aged out of reproducing and become lesbians too

>work for the government for 70k/year so I can keep putting money into link
>most of my team is made up of mid 40s-50s women who do nothing but take phone calls all day and don't do anything proactive or analytical with immigration data
>they're on less money in the tail end of their career than I am at 23 due to >dude contracts lmao and yet they don't seem depressed or unhappy about this or their mundane unfulfilling work
How the fuck does this work out? I'd rope if I spent 20 years doing that sort of shit

>>26056705
great news. raise your kids you whores.

>>26056705
forced marriage

>>26056810
correct

>>26056835
liabilities rather

>>26056961
what it really means is that women lose jobs and get UI or mooch whereas men actually go find another job because they need to earn money.

>>26057448
and 100% of them are women?
and 100% of the jobs gained were men?
How fucking naive are you to believe those numbers?

>>26056705
Make female jobs legal.

They had 100 years

>>26057680
underrated

>>26060143

Normies just yolo all of their money away for temporary happiness instead of thinking of the future. It's how they make it by day by day, but my generation is heading for a massive retirement crisis. My friends minds get blown when they find out I have 80,000 in stocks and think I'm rich and should be in Maui when that will barely cover a house downpayment, closing costs and other expenses

>>26060047
why even bother assuming the likes of CNN pajeet/femtard writers understand math at all?

>>26056765
Based, just shorted women at 125x leverage on Bybit.

>>26060211
>there's some math, must be true!
>look, numbers!
>i can make an addition and a subtraction!
>wow that's so true now!
because they're fucking retarded of course

>>26060211
Nobody said I believed them you turbofaggot. They probably just looked at the type of jobs and realized "Yeah nobody is hiring men for grocery clerks or secretaries"/

>>26060319
> Bybitch

>>26060294
Buy land then build your own home as your gains increase. It'll make you happier long term and depending on the lot size you can build homes for your kids there and eventually have a nice little family compound. A family friend of hours did that. next to the main house (fathers) they had a pool and grill area, had a field for sports. Really nice set up and always had people over on most weekends for a bbq swimming etc.

>>26060382
>>26060375

>>26056705
If the state gave women a ”housewife salary” then at least half of them would quit their jobs in an instant. Women hate working. My wife complain about it all the time.

>>26060382
you replied to "something doesn't add up here" with your simple ((net)) job loss reply, implying you thought that was what didn't add up
retard

>>26060143
I also spent some time working in government. The work was unsatisfying and mindnumbing. I couldn't imagine doing that shit for years and yet I was surrounded by women who had been doing the same shit job for decades and they seemed content. I think most people would probably be able to cope being slaves.

Biztards tend to have higher aspirations such as freedom.

>>26060248
>escort
That's leticia from tpi, not an escort.

>>26060444
This is how you win at life

>>26060539
Yep they even build a pond in a side of the property that had some sketchy neighbors and put in cayman's in it lmao. We'd toss raw chicken at them

>>26057863
kek

>>26056705
Most women's jobs are low level white collar positions like administration and accounting that are in the process of being replaced by software. Similar to how low level blue collar work was destroyed by automation. UBI is going to become an inevitable necessity.

>>26060878
>Most women's jobs are low level white collar positions like administration and accounting that are in the process of being replaced by software. Similar to how low level blue collar work was destroyed by automation.

This, 2008 destroyed primarily the manufacturing jobs in the Rust Belt traditionally occupied by men. 2021 will destroy all the retarded data entry/bullshit HR jobs in services.

>>26060522
Should I give a fuck about a $200 meat?

>>26060878
fuck off back to /r/ with that basic bitch shit

>>26056705
>>26056765
President Harris will save them!

>>26060878

>blue collar work destroyed by automation
Fuck off with your retard Andrew Yang meme. This is the BLS manufacturing jobs in the US by year: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES3000000001

Now tell me, did manufacturing jobs start to drop off when automation became prevalent which was around 1980? Or did the see a rapid drop off around 2000, when China became a member of the WTO thanks to the US-China Relations Act? Use your brain now, try it.
>but economic effects take time, Dr. Shekelburg said ten yea-
You can fuck right off with anything like that, just see it with your own fucking eyes

>>26061052
>2008 destroyed primarily the manufacturing jobs in the Rust Belt traditionally occupied by men

Someone's fucking young & new. Yeah millions of people lost their jobs in '08 but overall number of manufacturing jobs bounced back to their pre-2008 levels before COVID happened.

US-China Relations Act is what caused manufacturing to die >>26061294

>>26061370
>Someone's fucking young & new. Yeah millions of people lost their jobs in '08 but overall number of manufacturing jobs bounced back to their pre-2008
Who care that the absolute number grew back to 2008 tier while the population went from 300 millions to 330 millions in the meantime, it's still a decline in proportion.

>>26061638

>it's still a decline in proportion
No it isn't

That's a 10% increase in population. Manufacturing jobs increased by about 1.4 million in the same period from 11.2 million, a little more than a 10% increase. It's proportionally keeping pace with population. Also consider a good 10-20 million of our population including some working in manufacturing are non-citizens that should be expelled to their countries of origin but aren't, thanks Obama!

Look 2008 certainly made a dent I'm not gonna be retarded and argue against that too much, but the outsourcing of jobs especially to China was the single biggest reason for the decrease in manufacturing, it's in your own picture.
>Muh GDP
Doesn't matter anymore we've been printing funny money since 2008.

>>26061638
>>26061969

More like from 11.4 million to 12.8 million I can't fucking read without my specs but my points stands, that's not an industry sector that was "killed" by that event.

>>26056705
who makes the maths in CNN? wtf

>>26061267
how is that not considered discrimination?

>>26060294
Never share the actual size of your stack with financially illiterate friends.

>>26057444
checked

>>26057444
Go to Belle Delphine's Twitter posts and read through all the replies
There's hundreds of whores shilling their onlyfans and shit, it's hilarious. Women acting like scam bots because they are desperate to sell their body for cash because they're too fucking dumb to make it in life without a man.

>>26060047

Yes you are retarded. 156000-16000=140000

>>26056705
they will realize how useless they are and their jobs are mostly filler

>>26060294
how does it feel to have friends

>>26056913
that's not true, I don't know what politicians or media you were paying attention to.

the consensus among economists was that working class men were the hardest hit, because of the decline in sectors such as manufacturing and construction. But women fared better because of continued stability in sectors such as healthcare and education.

It would not surprise me if women have fared worse during covid because of their concentration in industries such as leisure and hospitality.

>>26056705
Females are not supposed to be employed.

>>26062211
>all jobs are equal.
>The people losing their jobs are the same people gaining their jobs
You must be American educated.

>>26056705
Probably prostitution, that seems to be the default for uncontrolled neoliberalism (see: Jeltsin's Russia)

>>26056722
bless up kings

>>26056705
hire them to shill more of our shitcoins. they can stand in front of booths and shake their money-maker while we reap the benefits. gonna get a ho on the arpa rounds right now and her name will be bella

>>26056845
Congratulations, you just mooned BTC and monero 10,000% and women are still poor because they make poor decisions and have the time preference of a nigger

>>26056705
Unironically if you send them back to the kitchen their unemployment numbers would drop

>there are people that think automation has destroyed manufacturing in America despite the fact it's been 25 years and we can barely automate a cashier

Kek I love these mental gymnastics to pretend that the last 50 years hasn't been a direct extraction of wealth from working westerners to asian and latino peasants

>>26060878

Bro all healthcare related fields are dominated by women nowadays except for doctors and even that's like 50/50 between men and women. My field is 90% women and requires a master's degree. Women are much more adaptable to job market changes than men are nowadays.

>>26056705
cheaper blowjobs ought to do it.

>>26063671
>Women are much more adaptable to job market changes than men are nowadays.
not much of an achievement when white and asian men are actively discriminated against and men of other races are on average far less capable.

>>26061267
Ironically coddling them with free money is just going to reinforce bad business decisions and further cripple them

You don’t. They must go back to their roots ;the household.

Covid has proved their “jobs” are unnecessary and stupid real work is still being done. Companies with good business models and proper balance sheets have survived taken people home or reduced unnecessary staff or simply automated processes

HR, Restaurant, Hotel workers, secretaries,l etc all this rude oversupplied staff we’ve had to deal with for years that it turns out the world would be fine without must go find husbands and stay home

Hope we have Covid for the next 5 years desu

Women be look after the children. This is the change that’s needed

>>26061370
>>26061638
industry has been dying because of offshoring (in china) AND automation
you guys are both right
you also have to look at the general trend over more than just two decades, look at it from 1980
it's been going down big time
automation is definitely significant, how can you even argue against that lmfao

>Invent the deadly coof
>Turn office workers into WFH NEET-lites
>Be surprised men adapt to NEETlife better

Onlyfans

>>26063615
bro, just look at manufacturing factories videos on youtube or look at robot arm manufacturing statistics...
you are delusional, you dont know the real world
robot arms are a huge thing in manufacturing ffs

>>26063615
>we can barely automate a cashier
what? Those self cashier machines work well, you need a security guard and you can automate cashieers
it just works
mcdonalds has those self cashieers too, idk what youre talking about

>>26064665

He’s retarded those McDonalds machines are a dream and have rendered moody fat black women useless

>>26056705
As long as white men are still winning in spite of the current forced memes, who cares about 140k waitresses and sex workers?

>>26059997
This

>>26056705
So you're saying 172k jobs were lost.

>>26064665
I think the point he was making was: it's easier to automate highly skilled and trained white collar professionals like lawyers, accountants, and soon doctors (legalzoom, turbotax, and burgeoning telemedicine co's) than it is to automate an overnight walmart associate.

>>26064733
i always use those self cashier machines when at fast foods or the supermarket, i wish they fired all the snooty bitch cashiers.
I dont even look the workers in their eyes whne they give me my food or groceries.

I wish all these meaningless low iq jobs would just dissapear, they are automating stuff but its a pretty slow pace.

With covid big business is understanding how unreliable it is to have humans do the work , the robotics industry was already growing quite a bit each year but they're expecting it to go much faster now.

Relying on machines that dont catch the flu just makes sens.

UBI will come when enough jobs get lost due to offshoring and automation.

>>26064829
Its easy to eliminate jobs in HR and management and other white woman jobs and replace them with absolutely nothing. Nothing of value was lost.

>>26060460
You may be right. My wife works and homeschools. She doesn’t bitch about work though. She thinks it’s easier than staying home and raising/homeschooling kids. And from the days I’ve stayed home with her, she’s right, my job is easier than what she does. I actually don’t like it when the kids insist on me helping with their classes. They’re honestly hard to get settled and pay attention it’s very patience intensive and overall frustrating work. But when they get it, it’s all worth it. She says she can’t wait for a good school to reopen. She wants to go back to work. Says she doesn’t know how people stay in an empty house all day. She’s excited to earn money we don’t need so she can learn to invest in crypto and put money away for colleges and retirement.

But she’s got a different history than most women I was ever involved with. She got dumped on hard when she was younger and kind of had the scarlet O’Hara mentality of “God as my witness I will never go hungry again’ thing.

>>26064911
The self check out isn't automating anything. They just figured out a way to trick the customer (you) into doing more work for free lmao

>>26064829
>lawyers, accountants
these are unironically super duper hard to automate, law and tax laws are super contrived, cant automate the actual work that gets done by the experts here

maybe the low tier stuff though

>doctors
yeah, doctors are just people that remember loads of recipes in their minds (symptoms) and give you the likely outcome (the illness)

their jobs will be automated quite soon

also tel-operation stuff meaning one surgeon can operate from a great distance with more ease (the tele operated arm does the cutting etc very precisely etc)

doctors are truely low iq scum (look at the placebo effect vs normal prescription drugs, there's no difference in a lot of cases LMFAO, prescription drugs fail the double blinded studies)

>>26064942
Absolutely! Those jobs shouldn't even be counted as lost in the grand calculation... They're a drag on productivity regardless of the state of automation.

>>26064829
also we totally could automate the low iq peasant jobs like walmart associates or people the pick up lettuce in the fields etc but we dont simmply because its cheaper to import juan and his cousins to do it than to invest in the machine for it

automation actualluy solves the immigration problem

slavery/cheap labour has been the one main factor that has kept civilised man from really advancing

>>26056751
>>26056727
allready doing this, just got home. what a timeline

>>26065025
Ok, I don't want to do the whole arguing on the internet thing here, but please acknowledge that I did actually provided examples for law and accounting being automated and consolidated.
Yes, those services don't automate all law and accounting, but they've grabbed the lions share of low hanging fruit.

>>26064975
>She got dumped on hard when she was younger
so sloppy seconds? she settled for u basically
why even bring this up

>>26065118
thing is people bring these exampls up when they talk abotu automation but its just wrong
your examples are the low tier stuff, sure some of it can be automated, but we still need and will need lawyers and accountants far longer than many many other jobs that will be fully (or close to) automated first
its a meme to say accountants can easily be automated away, its just not the case

>>26064911
>mfw I always search out the cutest cashier so I can interact with her

>>26064975
>But when they get it, it’s all worth it.
i wish my husband would feel that way. he just sees the first part of what you said about how kids are frustrating and annoying and he just can't see the good parts.

>>26056705
dont let the fucking jew do two things to you:
A: Make you actually antisemetic
B: make you hate women
C: create division and unrest

they want u to hate women
they want u to hate jewish people
they want u to hate black people
dont do their job for them.

>>26056705
Why would you want to "fix" this?

>>26056790
Literally literally, unironically.

>>26056705
How would they even figure out that every single job belonged to a woman?

>>26066801
Benefits claim process?

>>26060143
Are you me? I'm considering leaving once I hit $5M+ and the whole department is toast because no one there can replace me.

>>26065025
Incorrect. If AI surpasses every and maybe the species i.e. all humans together in playing Go,
it can replace useless bureaucrats (redundant).
In fact, AI is the apex threat to the very existence of the Central Intelligence Agency as far as jobs are of any whatsoever relevancy.
They aren't.

>>26066989
I quit my job yesterday. Shekelstein took me for granted so now they have to figure shit out for themselves.

>>26064285
This is called "keeping them on the plantation"

>>26065070
Incorrect. Solution mistook for problem. Sabotage is neither accidental nor incidental.

>>26056722
Fr bless up

The plan of the elites is to turn all women into sex workers.

>>26064975
Either get a pederast wife or she'll be away from the kids and with Tyrone or Kikestein.
If not both if she's hot enough.

>>26067496
and we are trying to stop them...why?

>>26056810

>>26067688
The all part.

>>26056705
Women lose most jobs because they work unless non essential jobs. Geez who would of thought?

>>26056765
The only way the female bubble pops is a reset of civilization and a return to the natural order. This is warned through most ancient text, that women are the destroyers, but modern humans ignore it.

>>26063671
>more women in illness care
> global pandemics

>>26068150
Domestic isn't civil. Evolve. Had pharma sold a sex drive kill pill women and children would be nearly extinct.

>>26062359
So... this ought to be the biggest ad lesbians ever had.

>>26062240
>women
>realize

>>26067992
>fucking Minecraft built a food temple
Can we chat about the way she ate the hotdog?

>>26068966
Sex subliminal. It's TV.

>>26069074
I think she was going to just suck the whole thing down like water and realized she was on camera, so she bit it off half way down. Imagine needing to basically freebase hotdogs to power your massive frame?
Poor thing.

>>26057863
yeah, unironically. women of color is obvious because of the low average iq for blacks but
for women
its evolutionary. women are inherently more brainwashable by media and etc. because of the whole peer pressure shit.

>>26060294
>>26060143

As your net worth keeps increasing I find that you aren't stressing to put out 110% just to stay on payroll (unless you're a gov worker anyways)

And then in turn being silent, non dramatic, useful when others fuck up (the only time you'll really need to display effort) then I find it typically gets rewarded more so than people trying to wage slave through so many hoops.

>>26064975
That's what happens when you don't hit your kids

>>26066547
Meds

>>26065022

Nonsense. It’s automating the work of angry black women who were too lazy to go to school.

Why have some moody person impatiently punch in an order when I can do it myself at leisure minus the attitude....

There’s nothing like it !

>>26056705
>How do we fix rising female unemployment?
We don't, time to speed up the wagon!

No brakes.

>>26066547
Finally someone on this board with an inkling of actually thinking for themselves.

>>26056705
women are so shit that we'd rather hire men even though we can pay women 25% less

>>26069319
totally useless

>>26067577
>a pederast wife
wtf

>>26056727
Good guy, helping our women like that

>>26070145
>Obama was a huge failure.
Funny way to say that Yang.

>>26066547
>Goys, sit back while we flood your country with shitskins that don't even speak your language.
>Also goys, women are on the same level as you. Don't hate them just because with the same amount of effort in the workplace they get more out of it

>>26070431
Sir this is a capitalism board we do capitalism here I suggest you go to pol if you want to whine like a Reddit woman

>>26056722
i knew men had it in them

>>26070552

>>26070731
Whatever it takes to make the line go up-/biz/

>>26065022
Yep, in fact there used to be people in grocery stores who got all the stuff off your list as well, before they got customers to do it. That is coming back now with more deliveries, but you pay for it.

>>26056722
>Whites
>Men
Kek

>>26070821
gtfo lib

>>26056722
Feels good to be a winner.

>>26069319
Psychologists are the dumbest thing. Women and homosexuals mostly.
What a coincidence.
Maybe they'll conduct a study on that...

>>26057444
>Why would I want to talk to women
BASED

>>26056705
black lives matter

>>26056705
The way they phrase this suggests that 100% of job losses were women, while men managed to only gain jobs in the same period. I know women are pretty shit but how is that possible?

>>26057444
>Hello! Oh yeah, Based Department? He's right here, let me go get him.

>>26056705
And those 16,000 men will be more productive than the 140,000 women combined.

>>26056751
you must be under 40 to post here sir

>>26060211
>>26060375
You guys are fucking illiterate retards that should also lose your jobs. NET JOB LOSSES AND GAINS YOU FUCKING RETARDS. if men as a whole lose 1 job but gain 2 somewhere else, Men add 1 job. It just means there were more men hired than fired. Jfc I can’t believe I have to explain this on a finance board

>>26070001
You are scanning and bagging groceries, that is literally what cashiers do

>>26062519
Nobody ever said the jobs are equal and it says nothing about who is gaining what jobs other than if they are male and female. You’re just too dumb to into basic math and net gains/losses. If you lose a dollar and I give you two, does it matter that one dollar has a different serial number than the other dollar?

>>26071067
>corporate bootlicker

>>26071643
Women lost more jobs than they gained, men gained more jobs than they lost. Please grow a brain

How is that even remotely possible? Is it another liberal propaganda piece?

>>26060522
?

>>26057337
it's net change
men as a whole gained 16k jobs even if in some industries and areas they got crushed, women were just more present in unimportant jobs, while even in a pandemic many male jobs remain critical

>>26072998
What he said is true though

>>26073182
It's a trend you should expect to continue. Basically all my cousins were educated and got jobs for a while but eventually settled down as housewives.

>got bp.

>>26073720

>>26073886
No it literally isn’t. Nowhere does it say that 100% of job losses were women. It says NET losses were women. NET as in total after subtracting losses from gains. Because apparently I still have to explain this to you smoothebrains

>>26066547

>>26074601
>>26072998
>It says NET losses were women
It literally does not say that. It says women accounted for ALL the losses.

>>26074897
>losing 156k while men gained 16k giving a 140k loss
So it's 140k net loss. You can assume the 156k is the net loss for women both because the article is using those terms and because the other interpretation is retarded.