[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 52 KB, 108x108, blackhole.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
26977460 No.26977460 [Reply] [Original]

>388.00 +194.40 (100.41%)
>Before hours: 4:10AM EST

I suggest if you don't know what a short squeeze is you should learn now.

https://isthesqueezesquoze.com/

>> No.26977524

>>26977460
I've seen this being posted but how do we know it's not a psy-op by hedgies? For example, it could send out the notification early and make everyone sell early accordingly.

>> No.26977639
File: 8 KB, 235x215, penis.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
26977639

>>26977460
>before hours

>> No.26977693

>>26977524
Don't follow a notification alone you idiot.

>> No.26977801

>>26977524
I may have started the thread you're talking about. Not a hedgie psyop. The short data in this link is from S3 and Ortex.

>> No.26977848

>>26977639

Yeah it's only up 194 right. Call me when it's 500.

>> No.26977868

>>26977524
Don't sell until you are $1k + at least

>> No.26977886

Its pumping rn.

>> No.26977927

>>26977460
Jesus this damage control is hilarious. They are so unbelievably fucking rekt.

>> No.26978007

>>26977927
That isn't really an argument against the data.

>>26977886
Premarket activity doesn't always mean much in regards to the movements during actual market hours. But the price as is seems to be around where it was traded in the Euro market.

>> No.26978078

>>26977801

What did they do with AMC after they jewed us? Did they get rid of their shorts or did they hold and just trade with each other to scare us away?

>> No.26978180
File: 48 KB, 594x304, Screen Shot 2021-01-29 at 3.16.46 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
26978180

>>26977460
We are crushing the shorts on silver too!

>> No.26978420

>>26978078
You can't really just walk away from a short position, if that's what you're saying. As far as I know, the % may have not been high to begin with. I also believe there just may have not been enough momentum in opposition to the bids for AMC. I haven't looked at anything related to volume or historical short interest for AMC, sorry.

>> No.26979325

>>26978420

They couldn't have just bought at $6 to get out of their shorts? Everyone was saying it was 60-70% now it's 11%. That's a pretty big amount to be off by.