/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>28769183
>year 231
>ethereum is cheap and fast
>uses tornado.cash and money dissapears
>gov tries to track wallets
>fails

>>28769183
>2031

Your logic is more sound than it should be

>>28769183
>the year is 2031
>AOC gets elected as 48th POTUS
How is there an election taking place in 2030 or 2031?

>>28769327

You will have 10 years retard start DCA'ing

>>28769305
LOST

>>28769183
Monero is going to be worth at least $10,000 one day. Screencap this please.

>>28769183
I am

its a minarchist’s wet dream

>>28770004
10,000 wont be worth much in the future. How about .1 BTC?

>>28770004
>Monero is going to be worth at least $10,000 one day. Screencap this please.

With growth towards $40K if the fintech analysts are correct in the long-term.

>>28769183
>AOC gets elected as 48th POTUS
>happy anons living in their mansions
If AOC became president the only people in mansions would be government officials. We'd all be living in huts or sectioned housing complexes.

>>28770237
That's the point. But she would need a year or two before passing her BS stuff and destroying everything.

>>28769183
There can only be one PoW coin, and that is bitcoin. All others will fail and be easily attacked in the future. Miner wars will come. Just a matter of time, and all other PoW coins will get fucked up.
Mark my words.
ETH will also die btw. Shitchain. Will take too long to roll smart contracts on ETH2 out.

>>2876918
Any risk of it getting outlawed?

>>28770183
I'd say that even if Monero was to increase to 0.1 BTC it would still be undervalued

>>28769183
>the year is 2031

>>28770407
Yes feds will kick down your door later if you buy any so leave them for me instead

>>28770370
Monero is asic-resistant and not so easy target

>>28770544
idk. Post atomic swap implementation .1 sounds like a good ratio, not sure about the distant future

I lost half my stack swinging. There's no way I'll ever make it sorry

>>28770976
Atomic swaps are vapor ware change my mind

>>28770407
I'd recommend Daniel Kim's talk yesterday regarding why a ban isn't something to be concerned about.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REC5V7d3pqM

TLDR if you don't want to watch youtube:

1) to be successful a ban would have to be implemented globally, and any nation that defected from the prohibition policy would get an influx of money.

2) Governments don't like private transactions, but if they allow exchanges to sell monero they at least have a better idea of who owns XMR. If they ban it outright everything happens in black markets and they have 0 clue.

>>28770191
What an idiot. Do you see the price of the other assets? XMR would be 6k. Cardano is roaring. ETH is way up. And XRP will be $1+ when the SEC drops their case.

>>28769183
Monero isnt fast enough. There'll need to be a successor built on better protocols.

I literally can't see why this coin is so undervalued. It's THE cryptocurrency. If crypto were to be adapted mass-scale so you can pay with it in every store this has to be the one. Or maybe another privacy coin, but that's about the only competition. I can't imagine people ever using something where any retard can look up how much money you have, what stores you go to, how much you spend, etc.

>>28771804
Because you cant buy it on coinbase. There's no buy pressure.

>>28771591
They're basing this analysis on fundamentals, not what retarded degenerate gamblers are likely to pour money into for no reason. Needless to say the current bill run is not based on fundamentals

>>28771591
>What an idiot. Do you see the price of the other assets? XMR would be 6k

Irrational market = tentative timelines. But their core estimation i.e. that criminal adoption and black money influxes will drive future XMR growth is pretty much spot on.

In other words, less likely to be accurate in the short-term, more likely to be accurate in the long-term.

>>28769183

>>28770191
How many XMR for her?

ADA and XRP targets are spot on. Too bad they got ETH wrong.

>>28774004
5 XMR (paid to you)