/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>29737715
As a serious investor, the OCR announcement has me extremely worried. According to the devs themselves, OCR introduces 10x the efficiency when it comes to gas fees, which means 10x less of the amount of needed Eth, and 10x the amount of data a single Link can process. If you multiply 10*10, you get x100 less need of the Chainlink token, which was already not necessary to begin with. This of course means 100x less value, which would, in it's current state, place the price of a single Link token at $0.25. I'm really worried, should I consider selling?

>>29737765
the OCR announcement has me extremely worried. The LINK team has done a huge U-turn on the token economics since their unveil at smartcon last year where Ari went in depth on the node incentives. According to the devs themselves, OCR introduces 10x the efficiency when it comes to gas fees, which means 10x less of the amount of needed Eth, and 10x the amount of data a single Link can process. If you multiply 10*10, you get x100 less need of the Chainlink token, which was already not necessary to begin with. This of course means 100x less value, which would, in it's current state, place the price of a single Link token at $0.25. I'm really worried, should I consider selling?

>>29737715
I'd rather look at pumpamentals like Apollo Protocol now

the OCR announcement has me extremely worried. The LINK team has done a huge U-turn on the token economics since their unveil at smartcon last year where Ari went in depth on the node incentives. According to the devs themselves, OCR introduces 10x the efficiency when it comes to gas fees, which means 10x less of the amount of needed Eth, and 10x the amount of data a single Link can process. If you multiply 10*10, you get x100 less need of the Chainlink token, which was already not necessary to begin with. This of course means 100x less value, which would, in it's current state, place the price of a single Link token at $0.25. I'm really worried, should I consider selling?

>>29737715
>worried

>>29737715
You worry too much

>>29737715
Yawn

Guys this is serious. Without sergey subsidising the network, there would be no way for Link to maintain current price with OCR now live, reducing the. Value as described.
Sergey has to dump to maintain the price, but it also means he kills any buy pressure by dumping so much link also. We will be forced to crab for years

the OCR announcement has me really excited. The LINK team has done a slight U-boat on the token economics since their unveil at smartcon last year where Ari went in depth on the oven incentives. According to the devs themselves, OCR introduces 6,000,000x the efficiency when it comes to gas fees, which means 10x less of the amount of kikes, and 10x the amount of kikes a single oven can process. If you multiply 6,000,000*10, you get x6 GORILLION less need of the Jew, which was already not necessary to begin with. This of course means 6,000,000x less kikes, which would, in it's current state, place the price of a single oven token at $1488. I'm really excited, should I consider buying?

>>29738201
based

>>29738069
typing that nonsequiturs would make me retarded, reading them almost did

As a serious investor, the OCR announcement has me extremely worried. According to the devs themselves, OCR introduces 10x the efficiency when it comes to gas fees, which means 10x less of the amount of needed Eth, and 10x the amount of data a single Link can process. If you multiply 10*10, you get x100 less need of the Chainlink token, which was already not necessary to begin with. This of course means 100x less value, which would, in it's current state, place the price of a single Link token at $0.25. I'm really worried, should I consider selling?

>>29738069
>>29738274
that many*

the OCR announcement has me extremely worried. The LINK team has done a huge U-turn on the token economics since their unveil at smartcon last year where Ari went in depth on the node incentives. According to the devs themselves, OCR introduces 10x the efficiency when it comes to gas fees, which means 10x less of the amount of needed Eth, and 10x the amount of data a single Link can process. If you multiply 10*10, you get x100 less need of the Chainlink token, which was already not necessary to begin with. This of course means 100x less value, which would, in it's current state, place the price of a single Link token at $0.25. I'm really worried, should I consider selling?

>>29738351
>race mixing propaganda
>pajeet ID
yeah, just go straight to the gas chamber, please.

OCR announcer got me super duper shook. Head linker fucked around on the money since they put that shit on blast at the party last year where that nigga Ari went in depth on getting paid to mess with computers or some shit. No cap, devs said it swear to god almighty that fire OCR cheap as fuck. What I’m not likin is that us n the homies not gettin our cut NEARLY with sum Eth, data or some other linken log shit. 10x10 is 100 dawg and that means we don’t need that nigga link. He dead to us, ghetto ass always lyin anyways, not worth a single dime. pshhh I'm really worried, should I consider selling?

>>29738431

>>29737715
>you get x100 less need of the Chainlink token, which was already not necessary to begin with
Where is the issue then? If it was already useless before and still pumped, it very well can continue to pump while being still as useless, no?

>>29738606
huge buy signal

>>29737715
>>29737765
>>29737869
>>29737948
>>29738039
>Yawn

This is literally another holocaust.

DR