/biz/ - Business & Finance

its that ugly ass interface. God why cant they stick to the typical uniswap look.

Link TG ?

>>30331259
Can you read fud faggot?
Better luck next time
ngmi

>>30331455
Rubic UI/UX is suboptimal and needs improvement for sure. The team has listened to the community and acknowledged it. Vlad and the Rubic team have pledged to do a complete overhaul soon. They just hired a new developer to help with it. They also hiring two more devs as we speak.

>>30331259
This is XSN all over again, except they got like 12 orders.

You niggers are in for a BUMPY ride.

biz gave money to this kek!

>>30332089
Fud Faggots better invest in rope
Rubic $10eoy
Rubic Still Cubic

Keep holding this and forever miss on easy daily 3x-10x on BSC. Another warning for newfags, don't invest into this dead coin.

>>30333200
You'd be a quadrillionaire by now with those kinds of daily gains

Seethe harder priced out jeet

WHY DID THE PRICE DUMP HARD WHEN THEY RELEASED THEIR PROJECT AND PROVED THEY WERENT A SCAM

I BOUGHT 41k OF THIS SHIT

>>30333315
Based

cant we just doxx their names and addresses so these niggers cant just rug pull us

>>30332089
looks like a cute community manager to me

you faggots will be poor forever

>>30331259
Feeling comfy
When I bought RBC I thought that it would hit 0.1 somewhere around spring and it's already in the steady 0.3-0.4 range.
My Rubic stays cubic
Rubic $200 eoy

>>30332089
I like how they put pepes on the wall

>>30333636
that is some high quality OC rubic art

>>30331259
>Another garbage L2 ethereum coin
What were you expecting exactly? Anyone buying this coin is a newfag who got into crypto late 2020

>>30331259
>but wait! ... It'll moon.... Next time!!!
>L2!!!
>anonymizer!!!
>$200EOY!!!

>>30333477
yes ill call Anonymous

>>30333636
Same anon kek. Got in at 2 cents and didn't actually expect it to hover around 40 cents for another month or so. I'm not worried, all of the fudding retards will fomo as soon as the exchange listing is announced. We'll unironically never see anything lower than $1 after that and the board will be filled all day with pink wojacks saying they're financially ruined by not buying earlier.

KEEEEEEEEEEEEEEK
BTC WAS 48K WHILE YOUR TRASH WAS DUMPING
I WAIT FOR MY GRAPHENE DISTRIBUTION AND DONT GIVE A FUCKK ABOUT YOUR TRASH
AND YOU CAN’T EVEN TALK TO ME BECAUSE YOU ARE STUPID AND DIDN’T INVEST IN PHR

>>30331720
Fucking midwit, XSN literally started stress testing for BTC <-> USDT (ERC-20) trades today. They've done $211,883 with only 3618 trades TODAY ALONE in their closed beta. They are literally the first DEX ever to have native BTC to ETH/ERC-20 trading with lower fees than any exchange in the world, CEX or DEX. These threads are pure fucking cancer.

I bought Rubic at .65 cents

>>30331720
>this is the same as scamnet
Rubic devs defrauded people before with earlier project then literally just changed the name to do it all over again?

>>30335687
Well, you can buy some more end of next week at $0.30 to lower your entry point.

>>30334768
it's not 2016 anymore, rubic is being shilled massively 24/7 here and yet price is still crabbing despite the long awaited for 'revolutionary' features being implemented.
You guys got in sub 0.01 and still feel that adrenaline rush? You're missing the point, which is nobody cares about this project apart from you

>>30335188
Mention to a XSN schizo how shit their project is and they come out the woodwork to angrily defend their shit project. You faggots never cease to provide quality entertainment

>>30336681
Great argument. Really made me change my mind about XSN. I guess you're right. You didn't really explain why it's a scam but in hindsight it was obviously too good to be true. A CyBeRpUnK DEX that claims to be ANONYMOUS and allow BTC to ETH trades? Really? That shit is impossible and everyone knows it. Thank you for saving me from a huge loss. I just sold my stack.

>>30336994
Why do you XSN shillers always manage to find the word "Scam" in a statement where it was never said. It seems like your subconscious is telling you something. Literally EVERY time.

>>30337175
Why do you midwits consistently fail to grasp the importance of a product such as Stakenet? It's is literally THE industry standard DEX. No project like it. Yet, midwits like YOU always find some fucking way of fudding themselves out of a good investment and fall for dumb shit like RBC.

>>30337261
If its the industry standard, why does nobody use it? You cant make a statement like that without widespread usage.

>IT WILL BE TRUST ME
>SOURCE
>MY ASS

>>30337338
Holy shit, how fucking retarded are you?

>wHy DoEs NoBoDy UsE iT?

Because it's in closed beta. They've been stress testing XSN to BTC trades and have done $18,000,000 in transactions for that pair. They just now started BTC to USDT trading and today alone they've done more traffic on this pair in a single day than they have compared to other pairs single day volume. Once this works the next token being added to test is LINK. If you think that a DEX that lets you trade REAL BTC via lightning network, ETH via connext for ZERO on-chain fees, and only a .25% trading fee won't succeed then you're fucking hopeless. The DEX is already working, the only thing missing is some stress testing and final touches which are being finalized as we speak. You'd be a fucking idiot to compare this to any current DEX that exist as they are all fucking centralized pieces of shit that are compromised by their website hosts.

>>30337523
>Its closed beta
>But it works already
>Source
>Just trust me bro

fck this shillers! if they do think im so stupid to follow their links for a scam, they will defin die from schizo
we don’t need your shitcon when we have the upcoming graphene distribution, lol. the only legit way to get graphene is the airdrop

woah never saw that coming

>>30337566
Source is check the open beta and 3 years of development and tell me that now after 3 years they're gonna fake fucking progress. Literally go and ask the devs on discord and they'll answer anything you ask. They're ridiculously responsive.

Also, fuck you retard.

>>30337523
they don't even support the open beta just now. you know, the product which you're trying to get people involved in? it doesn't work, even the users on stakenet discord are saying it's okay it doesn't work because the 3 devs should be focused on the beta. you've no proof that the closed beta is working apart from a landing page showing trades. look at the console for that landing page. where is it pulling the information from. the orderbook? the orderbook has no fucking trades. the landing page showing the traded amount is running it's own script lmfao.

>>30337704
So you have nothing to support your claim?
>200k Volume
C
O
P
E
>>30337745
In 5 years when they arent done, maybe he will realize that he missed out on EVERYTHING.

I tried it and it didn't work. Unironically. Still have a bigger stack than most but I sold some.

>>30339206
Idk if you saw but I was the anon offering a 1 ETH bounty for anyone who could link a successful limit order, sorry to hear it didn't work, has the team responded to this at all? Pretty insane they "release" a feature that doesn't exist

>>30339297
Yeah, I did. Actually tried it because of that. No, but it's the weekend so I'll wait until Monday. Made a lot of % profit just from selling a portion. The price will FOMO up purely due to listings and new wallets alone due to volume. I'm not going to FUD or anything, I'll just wait for clarity. I'm open to the idea of me having done it wrong.

>>30332089
how do i get a gf like this

>>30339393
Just had a look at what I think are your transactions.
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x7b8a5fb231e1c5c76296156be24bab57c26f34900e749f83efbacdb731d4ddf4#eventlog
1500 RBC to 0.2 ETH right? I think it's plausible it didn't actually meet the conditions they laid out, they need to pay the platform fee and the gas fees out of the transaction, so your 1500 rubic needs to buy the 0.2 ETH you want, an additional 0.15 ETH for the platform fees and however much ETH gas is at that moment. At the time you made the transaction it was right on the borderline, 1500 RBC would have bought like 0.375ish ETH, so maybe couldn't cover gas?

>>30340307
The team needs to explain how any of this works. UI gives no indication if or not your order qualifies for as a limit order or if it will sit in the orderbook until someone manually fills it, not user friendly at all

>>30340307
That was my thoughts as well, as I honestly told other Anons in the general. Although I'd prefer it if you didn't post my address around, thank you. Yes, yes, they're Anonymous. But they're also kind of not. Could you delete the post?

I'll be making sure when they're available to answer questions.

>>30340487
Yeah, it's really not intuitive and I can't just let it slide that it's like that with no proper guide. The MyWish guide does not suffice as it is for another, manual order. If there's a difference, it needs to be clearly shown in their explanation--at least.

>>30340307
This is a complete shitshow. Why doesn't it just work without users having to apply quantum mathematics?

>>30340487
The way they state this all orders are limit orders, as in they will be automatically filled if they can be. The issue is the conditions for them being filled are not obvious. Small orders (you are selling less than ~0.2 ETH of tokens) can *never* be automatically filled as it is impossible for the platform+gas fee to be paid out of the transaction, no matter how favourable the exchange rate is, even orders of ~1 ETH total value require the exchange rate to be ~20% better than what you would intuitively think is required.

This is assuming the feature actually works, I have still not seen a single automatically filled limit order.

>>30332089
Would breed

>>30340681
Yeah. At the very best it has no QoL. At the worst they lied. But it needs to be made abundantly clear by the team on how it works and the clear, smooth-brained steps people need to take. Also, thank you for your sincerity and courteousness.

>>30333362
Kek. Welcome to crypto. You need to sell the news around here. Buy the hype

>>30340681
>>30340860
should i sell?

>>30341082
For full disclosure I still have a make-it stack which I am keeping for the (likely) inevitable pump up, if not purely due to the market, exposure, listings, partnerships, and the way the daily MACD is looking to cross relatively soon. But I've taken one foot out of the pool.

>>30340860
The team isn't stupid, they will be very much aware that with the 3 ETH volume limit they've imposed and the 0.15 ETH platform fees, the only way the feature gets tested in it's current form is if someone either:
Places a order very close to the current price and the price then moves by > 20%
Or
Someone decides to burn a few hundred dollars testing the feature by placing a order at vastly under market rates so it can instantly fill while covering fees.
Having the platform fee be so high for the first pair you're "testing" with such a low volume limit just screams that they don't actually want this "feature" tested by the public.

>>30341164
>>30341187
so its a scam?

>>30341293
yes

>>30337801
>>30337745
>>30337704
wtf is this thread lmao, scammers call other scammers scammer
ridiculous

>>30341293
It's not a scam, it's just that the team has to work their asses off for Rubic to become a succesful DEX. When you buy the token that's what you're esentially betting on.

>>30341523
No excuse to release limit orders when they don't even work.

>>30341557
Has anyone tried to buy/sell Rubic way above the market price to see if it automatically fills? I would try it right now but I'm away from my laptop

>>30341523
>it's just that the team has to work their asses off for Rubic to become a succesful DEX
which they wont.

>>30341653
Also, make your order invisible so someone doesn't fill it manually in the order book

because those internet tokens are worthless. The only difference is now you can limit the price you pay for a piece of nothing.

>>30334768
Lmao, delusional fucking retard

>>30331645
>They just hired a new developer to help with it. They also hiring two more devs as we speak.
I do webdev partly and let me tell you, that UI would take like 2 days to implement.
And if they want to switch over immediately, at least put it under a new url like "new.rubic.exchange", until you are 200% confident, that everything is working flawlessly.

>>30341293
No it's not a scam, it works. I don't see how they could scam, or what they would get from it considering their other, successful, project would also suffer. They've just just delivered to expectations or clarity, or it doesn't work. I don't suspect malicious intent or I would have sold everything right away. I'm going to wait until they're around to ask them.

>>30341653
Please do when you're available. I've already reinvested. And yes, if it doesn't work in private mode then I really don't know what to say. I left my sell order, which I think should have filled (although like I said I may have miscalculated the gas), open to the public for 10 mins. Didn't fill.

>>30342518
>They've just just delivered to expectations or clarity, or it doesn't work.
Just not*

Also, their other features do work. Although maybe not all-there.

Oh look, it's dumping again. POS deadcoin. Selling.

>>30341187
ill take the bait on testing it if someone can tell me exactly what to put in, and what the expected outcome is.

i have no idea how to use that shit, and dont want to burn 0.15 eth for no reason.

>>30343518
Their medium page has an article on it but jannies have disabled links to medium articles.

Based and rubicpilled.

>>30331259
ArRRRRgGHHHHHHHHHH

WHAT THe FUcK BIZ you TOLD ME LIMIT ORDERS WAS EVOLULTIONARY IN THE CRYPTO SPACE

>>30332145
Two of those guys are devs, the rest sit shopping pepe rubic memes on their macbooks to post on /biz/ and make sammiches

>>30333200
Bruh... rubic is making a bsc version Rubic to put on bsc... it is gonna pump hard when BSC nigs decide to pump it. Fucking retard. We've stagnated because we have no new money coming in, basically only uni volume wasn't going to get us to 1 bil mc.

>>30344188
This is why I'm keeping a stack.

>>30343518
Unfortunately to test it you're going to have to burn eth.

To be safe and sure. Take the amount of eth you have, subtract 0.3 from it and try to trade the eth you have for the amount of rubic you'd get for 0.3 less
So say 1 ETH buys 1000 rubic
1-0.3 eth = 0.7 and would buy 700 rubic so you put your order for 1 ETH to 700 rubic, make it private.

i tried adding one, and I cant even click the button to add it.

i tried as many different parameterizations as i could and just got no feedback on what errors or issues i had and couldnt submit

pic related

>>30344461
the profit from the contract needs to be in excess of 0.15 for it to execute, and the most it can execute with it 3eth currently

that are their limitations due to their beta
so it would not execute with what you have, according to their guide

>>30333636
It astounds me how little patience people have. Even though shitcoins are mooning all over the place, those are only missed opportunities in hindsight. In reality how likely is it that you would buy into any random shitcoin at the right time, and then sell at the right time? Not very likely at all. If all you do is chase pumps, you are not likely to be the 1% that buys low and sells high. You’re going to be the 99% that buys high and sells low.

Time in the market is better than timing the market if you can find a good project with a good team that consistently delivers and listens to their community. That is so fucking rare in the crypto space. Either hold RBC knowing this will take a few weeks or months for the platform to start gaining momentum, or sell it all and start gambling on shitcoin pumps.

Ask yourself this. Is the team behind Rubic likely to be here a year from now? Two years from now? I think yes. If that is the case, how likely is it that they will deliver a great product within that timeframe. Very likely. If they manage to deliver on a product with liquidity pools and incentives for their token, will the token price go up? Almost certainly. Therefore I will make the assertion that Rubic is going to go up, and I am going to make it.

Fuck redditors, fuck swingies, fuck jannies, and fuck the CCP.

>>30344983
See what happened to Lition. Checked all the right boxes with a transparent team and still failed catastrophically. Not eveything is a sure thing just because you like their team lmao. This is massive cope

Buy dip. Do for my village. Do the needful sirs.

>>30345044
Lition failed on their mainnet. From the beginning Lition failed to deliver a product. Rubic had a working product. Lition was not a transparent team at all. Richard was constantly reassuring people that things were happening. With Lition, the whole project was a meme. There was know need for the blockchain solution from the beginning, it was a marketing gimmick, them hopping onto the 2017 blockchain hype train, failing to deliver, and being unable to back out. Also, the team had no successful projects behind them. Lition was radio silence at one point for almost a year after the mainnet failed. It was a fucking joke.

>>30344536
wew, thanks anon; im retarded, and too poor to even use this.

they need to make this thing easier to use, and if there are restrictions on how to use it, make it clear in-app. Kind of shocked they didnt do that as part of the feature, and instead of building a proper UX, just wrote the extra info into a medium article.

>>30344983

>Is the team still going to be around

Look at their other project - it's been around for a while and they still support it. The Rubic team won't randomly abandon ship

Let's assume the worst case scenario that Rubic doesn't manage to be THE dex that everybody wants to use. In this case, listing on Binance and volume on BSC will still make this a $5 token. You'd be stupid not to have a bag.

Two more weeks. Trust the plan and HODL!!! Diamond hands!!!!!!

>>30345494
Tell me anon, where in your crystal ball did it say it was a sure thing Rubic was going to be listed on Binance? Even a project like Kleros which has had full Vitalik endorsement and shilling on numerous occasions still isn’t even on Binance yet. You have no basis for your copium claims.

>>30345573
I think it will be April before we realistically start mooning. We need liquidity pools and L2. Token doesnt have a use yet. Who gives a shit about limit orders anyway? Meaningless if there is no volume.

>>30345668
>Even a project like Kleros which has had full Vitalik endorsement and shilling on numerous occasions still isn’t even on Binance yet.
They refuse to apply, that's why.

>>30345836
Kek

did they give legitimate (i.e., GTM-based or practical) reason for why they are using RBC and ETH for limit orders as opposed to any other combination of tokens?

it seems like an odd play to me to do that, instead of focusing on a pair that has higher volume and could drive more traffic to the product.

I'm guessing it's a lot lower risk to do ETH <-> RBC than ETH <-> token_people_care_about

since if they fuck up, they can always reimburse people with equivalent amounts of rubic, and rubic volume is low so scalability problems are unlikely to occur.

>>30331645
I kind of like that UI... Uniswap always seemed lazy and unprofessional to me.

>>30345973
Probably because if something were do go wrong with it, and they needed to do something, it was their own token that was fucked, not another company's. Which is fair.

Jannies are nuking Rubic threads again

>>30346857
what are the implications of this?

>>30345244
A "working product" that not a single person has been able to prove worked in the past 24 hours since it was released.
Is the dev team outright lying and saying a feature was released that doesn't exist "transparent" ?

>>30346879
Implications are that people are shit at posting and just scam.
>t. rubichad
I've seen shitty FUD threads get nuked as well, honestly.

>>30347049
>and just scam
I mean spam. Hilarious slip, though kek.

>>30346879
It's catalog spam.

>>30345668
Except the CEO of My Wish is the same CEO of Rubic. My Wish was solely responsible for helping CZ get smart contracts and token creation working for Binance Smart Chain. My Wish's token WISH, is both on Binance Exchange and Binance Smart Chain as BWISH. So no, not baseless. There is a 99.99% chance that RBC will be listed on Binance and on Binance Smart Chain as either WRBC or BRBC before the end of April. Screenshot this. When it does, I give it 1 month on Binance and BSC before RBC hits $5.

>>30347401
alright, bro. i trust the plan

>>30347004
You are the same person(s) spreading this fud and false rumors all over /biz/, telegram and other places. I'd bet money that you are either MassEffect, Pistol Pete or Comma, or any combination of the three. You fucking faggots are such childish retards.

>>30345244
Don't forget the part where he was dumping team tokens without telling people and it took an autist from biz to figure it out.

>>30347587
I have no idea who those people are, my first post in a rubic thread was yesterday after I took a look at the new "limit order" feature and couldn't find any evidence of it working. Still no-one has posted any evidence of a automatically filled limit order, it's been 24 hours. You can instantly make me look like a fool and earn 1 ETH if you can provide a single transaction that was automatically filled, if these are "false rumors" it should be TRIVIAL to demonstrate.

I understand you're holding the coin and like the project, I'm not trying to FUD it unreasonably, just pointing out that the new "feature" doesn't exist, I'm not shilling for any other coin or saying the project is dead or a rugpull, just pointing out to biz that the dev team has very likely lied about delivering a feature and are relying on the fact their platform gets no use and the restrictions and fees they've put on the "feature" to make sure no-one actually checks it's working.

>>30348090
There is ZERO logic behind paying someone more money to check something you could check yourself for less money. You claim to not want to connect your wallet to the exchange. Fine. But you are willing to pay someone 1 ETH to prove an automatically filled limit order would work? So why would you not send 0.5 ETH or 0.75 ETH to a new wallet, connect that to the exchange and test it yourself. You would get the same answer you're asking for at less cost to you. So this leads me to believe one of two things: 1) You're a childish troll just trying to get people to "waste" ETH on transaction fees so you can say 'oh my God, I can't believe you fell for that, I was never going to pay you 1 ETH you idiot', or 2) You're a disingenuous asshole who is fudding the project while trying to seem sincere. No strangers sincerely go out of there way to offer $1,500 to someone to "protect" them from a bad investment. Either you're the fucking Mother Theresa of /biz/ crypto, or you're a piece of shit with ulterior motives and an agenda and you are funding Rubic for those means.

So which is it? 1 or 2?

>>30348326
fudding* Rubic for those means.

>>30348326
3) I know the feature doesn't exist and the 1 ETH bounty is me putting my money where my mouth is and hopefully getting some people who otherwise would ignore me to at least look at what I'm saying seriously. I'm not asking anyone to test it for me, I already know it doesn't work.

I'm not trying to "protect" anyone, I haven't once said dump RBC or it's going to zero or anything. I'm giving biz information about a project a lot of biz is bought into, again, if I am lying it should be trivial to prove, a single filled limit order makes everything I've said worthless.

>>30348490
What data in etherscan.io are you looking for under the transaction data to indicate an auto-execute limit order swap, or rather, lackthereof?

>>30348595
It would be incredibly obvious, it should execute against uni liquidity and take the platform fee of 0.15 ETH

is this the future fate of a coin like $CAKE?

>>30348422
RUBIC GENERAL
GET IN HERE
IGNORE FUD FAGGOT THREADS
COORIDINATED DISCORD TRANNIES
FULL OF RUBIC SWINGING RATS AS WELL
RUBIC STILL CUBIC

>>30349003
shit wrong thread

>>30348818
The platform fee is 0.015 ETH. There is a typo in the FAQ. It is not 0.15 ETH. And if you look at RBC transactions on Etherscan, you'll see plenty with platform fees of 0.015 ETH.

>>30348326
He is a troll, don't feed. Yesterday someone did it and this fag never paid him.

>>30349199
No. The fee to interact with the smart contract to create a order is 0.015 ETH, the platform fee is 0.15 ETH. These are two different things, the platform fee is skimmed from the transaction. I can see plenty of regular orders being placed and paying the 0.015 ETH fee, there is not a SINGLE filled limit order since this "feature" went live over 24 hours ago.

>>30349278
Read my response to the post yesterday, they had the order filled from the order book, just like you could have done a month ago. That is not a limit order, it is impossible for it to be filled as a limit order as the value of the transaction was less than the platform fee.

How the fuck are people who actually hold this coin less informed than me who spent 10 minutes reading the smart contract and FAQ yesterday after this revolutionary "feature" was released?????

>>30349381
>>30349320
whats your point

>>30349381
I'll pay you 2 ETH to prove it doesn't work.

>>30349807
What evidence would satisfy you beyond the orders you can already see made on that smart contract that filled the conditions to automatically execute but have not automatically executed?
If you scroll up you'll see links to a deleted post, this was my showing exactly that but an anon asked me to delete it. I'm not going to repost that as he asked me not to but you can look at the contract yourself

Context: OP missed LINK train and now gonna miss RBC because he's a faggot.

>>30349980
Make a 100% filled on your end limit buy order for RUBIC at $0.34 even and set it to private so it doesn't show in the order book. Do it for 0.5 ETH. Record the price movement on dextools.io and record it passing $0.34, then see if you order had been executed.

>>30350148
That wouldn't execute anyway. Hopefully this convinces you I'm acting in good faith because I could do that "test" and it would fail and maybe convince you but it wouldn't actually be proof it doesn't work.

The platform and gas fees are taken out of the transaction. So with my 0.5 ETH @ $0.34/RBC I'd be placing a order something like
0.5 ETH = 2230 RBC
However because the fees are taken out of the transaction, the exchange rate it would need to hit to actually execute is closer to
0.3 ETH = 2230 RBC.
So the price would have to fall to ~$0.20 dollars for it to execute. I'm saying it won't even happen then as the entire feature isn't live/real/working but your test wouldn't show what you think it does.

>>30350469
Ok, then set the buy price for $0.50 and do the exact same thing.

That would buy you ~1,500 RBC, and with the transaction and network fee, would put the actual buy price around $0.34.

>>30350681
There are already transactions with the contract that have done exactly this. I linked one earlier like I said.

>>30350750
So then it does work.

jan jan deleted rubic general & all pro rubic threads to leave this fud OP thread up

>>30350788
They weren't filled. They placed the order at a rate that should have been automatically executed and nothing happened. This is what I have been saying the whole time, it doesn't work.

>>30350823
Jannies be jannies. Should never delete a general to be honest.

(Rbc/eth 24hr chart) oh no no nooooooooooo

>>30350868
Posting 24h charts is retarded.

>>30350845
>Should never delete a general to be honest.
agreed
more will soon take its place

>>30333362
nobody gives a shit

>>30350823
When the jannies do this, it means they are accumulating said coin.

>>30349049
Jannies just deleted the perfectly good new Rubic General
They are allowing this Fud Faggot thread up though
I wonder why
A mystery

I keep buying

>>30350978
It has been obvious for weeks that the jannies of /biz/ have been accumulating Rubic. Whenever the price dips, they delete all pro-Rubic threads and let the FUD threads go, like this one. The FUD is evolving too. They're going with the "I'm just sincerely trying to help" angle now. Gotta give them credit. Its working and paper hands are selling. We're going to see threads in a week or two, just like we already have, of people saying "THAT WAS ME FUDDING RUBIC!! I WANTED TO BUY ANOTHER 50K CHEAP AND YOU PAPER HANDED FAGGOTS LET ME!! HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!". In fact, we've already seen like a dozen of those threads so far, and we'll see a dozen more I'm sure.

This massive bull flag gives two fucks about any of this retarded fud.

>>30345044
>comparing rubic to litocin

kek, retard.

>>30350978
They're deleting any thread with bog fud and banning anons who talk shit about the obvious scam.

>>30331259
team still delivers

>>30351254
They'll be delivering pizza EOY

>>30351221
when will it end

>>30351298
Sorry, Rajeesh. Its your job.

>>30332089
qt

>>30331259
shit dex. tried to do a cross-chain swap and it told me i already had too many orders. i've never used it before.

>>30351370
when you least expect it

>>30351559
like now?

>>30351556
>in beta
>didnt bother trying to find the solution
ok retard

I am not supporting anymore.

>>30351556
You have shit public IP

>>30351613
no worries ranjeet I bought your bags, hope you feed village today sir

>>30350978
>>30350964
>>30350845
>>30350823
>>30351164
>>30351253
Fuck the Jannies
That Rubic General was A-Okay
I thought that was bullshit and just a myth that they manipulate
It appears to be true, they manipulate this board for personal gain
What a bunch of unethical faggots
My Rubic Stays Cubic

>>30351647
I am brazilian, my friend.

>>30350978
It seems to happen in a cycle.

>>30351556
Clear the cache + hard refresh the browser

>>30351772
does this mean rubic is about to pump?

>>30350868
Heres the actual non-retarded 7 day chart. We're just crabbing. Don't know what all the fuss is about either way. All you retards need to relax.

>>30351858
No, they never buy enough to pump it. Accumulation has to be done silently, or risk a pump.

>>30351882
sorry 14 day chart.

>>30351858
The massive multi-week bullflag that has formed is an indication we are getting poised to launch to $1+ within the next 2 - 4 weeks.

>>30341473
Wow, biz really is hopeless... Stakenet is easily going to easily going to take over Uniswaps daily volume and you fucks are going to be left wondering what the hell happened.

Being extremely conservative on rewards and assuming this only reaches uniswaps volume. Which mind you, can accomplish easily due to it's api and bot trading capabilities. The rewards are set to be $5,000/month.

Here is a community made site that also links to the teams medium article explaining the fee/reward structure and how they plan on making it a reality. If you are too lazy to read it and come to your own conclusion as to whether it's a scam or not then you were never going to make it in the first place. https://stakenetmasternodecalculator.web.app/

>>30351246
>he’s actually this delusional and emotionally attached to an internet coin to not see the similarities

Lmao. The absolute state of coping retarded bagholders

>>30331259
The more jannies delete rubic threads, the more cubic rubic gets.
10 eyo, check em

>>30354501
>going to
yeah call me when they fucking have it working retard, you just don't fucking get it
not to brag, but I've already made it by investing in projects that already have working products (prq)
stop investing in vapor and buy low cap projects with working products, the risk is 0 and the reward up to 19,000%

Genuinely surprisingly how little people seem to care that the devs would fake releasing a feature.
Quick reminder that not a single "limit order" has been filled since they "released" it, despite multiple orders being placed that should have been autofilled. No-one has offered an explanation for this and it seems half of you are still in denial.

>>30355482
I literally have done the same fuckwad. 90%+ of my port is utility tokens with working products. The whole fucking point here is that is they actually have a product which is already fucking working you damn retard (beta tester here). The only step missing now that the DEX is WORKING is to upgrade to Hydra to start rewarding masternode owners with trading fees and not just block rewards like now. If they accomplish this there will be no central point of failure in the entire Stakenet DEX system. I only have ~2% in the project. WHEN the hydra upgrade finally occurs, a single node will be worth more than the rest of my folio. You'd be fucking stupid to not at least get 1 node if you can afford it comfortably. Though I agree with you that if the $4k it costs to get a node is over ~20% of your folio value you shouldn't risk it.

>>30355827
THIS. Stakenet is already accomplishing trades and RBC is stuck trying to catch up with their false promises. Every other L2 DEX out there relies on a website hosts meaning even if they are 'decentralized' they still have some central point of failure. Biz isn't here to help you. If you constantly see shit like RBC being shilled and working projects like Stakenet being shutdown are you midwits not even gonna question it? I'm feeling generous so hopefully these words knock some sense into you fucking idiots.

>>30356200
Fuck off shilling you shitcoin in unrelated threads.

>>30356200
>they actually have a product which is already fucking working you damn retard
>(beta
pick one

>>30356328
fuck off, I'd rather talk about stake than some obvious green cube scam

>>30339297
>>30340681
>>30341187
>>30347004
>>30348090
>>30348490
>>30348818
>>30349320
>>30349381
>>30349980
>>30350469
>>30350750
>>30350838
>>30355827
Fuck off Fud Faggot
You are a liar. The Limit order feature works perfectly fine. You put up a bounty and got proven wrong.
Than failed to pay up like the rat you are. If you had a good faith concern. You would take it up with Rubic Support or the Telegram Admin. They would assist you with your inquiry. But you don't. You are just fudding
Keep bumping this thread you Schizo Discord Tranny

>>30356476
Repost the transaction that "proved me wrong" If it happened yesterday it should be easy to find and if it's a legit limit order everyone will see that I'm lying.

In reality the transaction was a regularly filled order placed on the order book. The value was less than 0.15 ETH and this means it could not have been filled as a limit order as it would be impossible to pay the fees for it. Instead of saying I lied and didn't pay a deserved bounty, prove it, post the transaction that I should have paid out for, it'll show everyone here RBC is legit and I'm full of shit.

>>30356328
Kek, confirmed MN holder who doesn't want more MNs to be bought up as it dilutes rewards.

>>30356411
The beta is working really fucking well is my point. Already doing BTC-ETH trades and just started stress testing USDT. Next token is LINK. If that isn't more progress than RBC has shown then idk what the fuck to tell you. Stakenet is making obvious progress and seeing what they are offering it just doesn't make sense to trust any other DEX once it's released.

>>30356831
>seeing what they are offering it just doesn't make sense to trust any other DEX once it's released.
I'm not pro-some other dex, i think most if not all of them are shit
I'll keep tabs on stake but like i said, unil its out and working for everyone, its vapor.
simple as

>>30356907
Fair enough fren.

BUT if it does take off and works this shit will shock the entire industry.

Not this RBC shit.

>>30356651
Poorfag calm

Major exchange listing EOM.

This fud surprisingly worked, well, whoever sold is going to get fucked. I have insider info and I know which top 5 exchange RBC is getting listen on in the next 14 days, and you don't wanna miss out. Have fun

Holder-made Rubic NFT
"My Rubic Stays Cubic"

https://app.rarible.com/token/0xd07dc4262bcdbf85190c01c996b4c06a461d2430:218699:0x5f188d5cf48ac6edc6ff769f8fa2f80e9ba1c2a1?tab=owners

>>30346046
fucking this

>>30358401
Any hints?

This could dump to 10c and I wouldnt care. I'll just buy more.

>>30331645
that UI is a trainwreck desu

>>30356461
Then go to your own street to shit on, fuck off.

>>30359401
same