3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
linkpool bros get in here, theres something i need to share
>>49866847as you can see, we still have 277k LPL unmigrated from the OG token. we have 98.6% staked on the linkpool app. And then we have two bancor wallets that totaling 227k LPL.
>>49866922im the one who was tracking the liquidity providers of LPL on a spreadsheet since the inception of the LPL token. if you recall, the majority of LPL liquidity comes from 1 person, and nearly all of it comes from 6 people
>>49866966If you've been following this bancor situation, you know that there is a 7 day wait period for withdrawals from bancor v3 (and you cant withdraw from v2, you have to migrate to v3 and then withdraw and wait 7 days). They recently created a new coupon token called bnLPL which makes tracking liquidity providers infinitely easier than how i was doing it before. bookmark this>https://etherscan.io/token/0x5d74b268d60d70cb35487f8c7a2def58c13b5a36#balances
>>49867011And now we arrive at the reason why i have brought you all here. The largest liqudity provider of LPL has initiated his withdrawal from bancor. YOU HAVE 7 DAYS LEFT BEFORE YOU CANT BUY LPL ANYMORE
>>49867057181k LPL pending withdrawal. 146k LPL of that from a single person, who now has to wait 7 days before he can actually withdraw - with no impermanent loss protection.
Bump
>>49867057Won't they still be the other 5 wallets to buy from?>>49867102Will this whale even get his full stack? What happens to the LPL he doesn't get.And wtf is bnLPL? Linkpool is certainly not going to accept some worthless minted shitcoin.
aye cheers fellapool's fockin closed innit
What's the implication for anybody wanting to sell?
>>49867057can he not stop the withdrawal within the 7 days?
>>49866847johnny rims horses
>>49867143If people keep buying LPL from the market, no he won't get his full stack back. There is simply not enough to go around and right now you can just buy this whales LPL on Bancor for the next 7 days and he has to watch you do it.
>>49867130based>>49867143so bancor has 227k LPL in their possession, 181k pending withdrawal, which leaves 46k LPL on bancor after this is complete. but you're right, we have no idea if they will get their full stack back, and im fairly sure this 146k LPL withdrawer will not be able to get his entire stack back. we'll have to wait and see but my point is that if you are thinking about buying Linkpool, now is the time. Now that this bancor situation has happened, and staking so near, no one will ever provide LPL liquidity to bancor again, so its basically the last LPL for sale. bnLPL, just like bnLINK or bnETH is something bancor started using quite recently, just think of it like a receipt. if you had provided liquidity you have this receipt token and then when you go to redeem it, it gets burned and you get your LPL back
>>49867243I've got 10k LPL I want to sellWhat does this mean for me?
1 LINK = 1 LINKNot falling for this
>>49867171pools closed in 7 days>>49867173if you want to sell, use bancor to swap for whatever other token you want. no real implication right now. My theory is the original OG dex will be revived, as that worked really well imo for Linkpool because linkpool is a token that the majority of holders will never sell because its going to provide us the passive income and allow you to do whatever you want in your life. >>49867183absolutely, after 7 days he will be presented with the details on how much of the LPL he will actually get back. for example, people withdrawing their LINK from bancor right now are getting 53% of it back, with no impermanent loss protection, they are just taking a 47% haircut on their LINK stack just to get it back. Similar with ETH. And after that 7 days, he can cancel the withdrawal and leave it on bancor if desired
>>49867243why in the world would i want to buy LPL if the liquidity comes from 6 individuals?
>>49867057>implying he won't just park his liquidity on Uniswap now Bancor is implodingyawn
Interesting. Thanks for the research OP.
we only have 1 successful withdrawal from bancor v3 so far. That person was made whole on their 5k LPL, so they suffered no loss. Thats all we really have to go on right now . time will tell, but i think people are going to suffer some loss, just as LINK and ETH withdrawers are suffering
Lmao the level of cope in this thread. There was no real liquidity to begin with yet LPL didn’t moon. Not even on staking news. You know why? Because the token is literally useless, there will plenty of space to stake at all the dozens of nodes that make at least as much link as linkpool. Meanwhile the lack of liquidity means there’s absolutely no way to sell your big bags of 1.7% apy. Good luck linkpoocucks
Nice OP. The lpl situation was what made me avoid bancor as it was clear that a massive pump of link would make their IL protection untenable - but though I was wary of it I never expected it to implode as bad as it has. Whoever this is deserves to take the loss, liquidity providers sold out the singularity
>>49867305Ngmi>>49867385>Lpl didnt moonNo one bought LPL because we thought it would "moon". That's why 99% of the circulating supply is locked in lpl staking. You just don't get it.
>>49867327you're right you probably shouldnt buy lpl then.>>49867330he was retarded enough to provide liquidity to bancor in the first place, im not going to bother speculate on what he'll do next>>49867365based thanks fren
>>49867243>if you are thinking about buying Linkpool, now is the time.Lol. Lmao. Low liquidity tokens are *always* over-valued, never under. Unless you are buying OTC at a DEEP discount now is absolutely not the time.
>>49867307>for example, people withdrawing their LINK from bancor right now are getting 53% of it back, with no impermanent loss protection, they are just taking a 47% haircut on their LINK stack just to get it back.will be interesting price wise if he goes through with this. :)
>>49867385kek thats a funny argument to try to continue to make. You gonna stake your link on Celcius? Bancor? maybe run your own node? where exactly will you stake?>>49867397based and same for me, LPL helped me realize the ponzi that bancor is/was>>49867420based
>>49867464right now LPL is at its highest liquidity point in the history of the LPL token. im saying that it will be at the lowest point in 7 days, once the guy withdraws. if you dont already own some linkpool this thread isnt for you. >>49867468sure will be fren
>>49867420What I get is you sunk your money in a token you can’t sell due to lack of liquidity and that will need to earn you yield for 40 years before you get your initial back out, ignoring inflation>>49867483On any of of the dozen nodes that have the same daily rewards according to market dot link
>>49867507>right now LPL is at its highest liquidity point in the history of the LPL token.Yes, which liquidity is still absolutely pathetic. Liquidity going to zero is not bullish lmao. It has the market profile of a literal scam coin.
Just bought a little with what liquidity I have easily available. Not much, but whoever provided it isn't getting it back
>>49867057Pool will be closed forever.We made it Linkpool bros
>>49867629Haha me too, maybe this will be a fun time killer while we wait for our dteaks
>>49867293Cope, you're never getting your pooled LPL back, son.
>>49867330What liquidity? He doesn't have it anymore, it's being fire saled in front of his eyes and he can't do shit.
>>49868398What are you talking about, they're sitting in my wallet, faggot
LINKPOOL UNOFFICIAL ARE A BUNCH OF FAGGOTS AAAAAAAAAAAA
>>49867575It's amazing how you know nothing about link and linkpool yet you still spew that nonsense from your mouth.
>>49867057Another way of saying you'll have no one to sell to even if the token moons
>>49868821>Selling lplAnon that's not how it goes. Seems you lot are seething you misses out.
>>49867057Brainlet here. Is Bancor the only place to buy LPL right now?
>>49866847test
>>49868839>1.7% yearly return's
>>49868908There is >Around 1300 LPL in uniswap V2>700 LPL in uni v3>225k in bancor which may drop by 180k if this whale withdraws in 7 days
>>49869038Yeah you're seething alright. >Instead of having 100 candies later ill instead have 1 candy now
>>49867607>Yes, which liquidity is still absolutely pathetic. Liquidity going to zero is not bullish lmao. It has the market profile of a literal scam coin.Do you realize that the wet dream of this board is to see LINK mooning due to its supply shock caused by massive staking profitability right? Only Bancor cucks use low liquidity coins as something bad
>>49869047linkpoolyachtparty.eth has been dumping 16k LPL in the last week in Bancor, are those 16k getting added to Bancor liquidity pools?
>>49869226They have been already, this address was only selling LPL to shore up his liq price on Aave as he has 50k link on there. Sad times for this dude.
>>49869288>>49869226His hand was so strong. Until Mark got him.
>>49867057Ah geez too bad my mom left for a trip recently, I’d tell her to buy a bag of 1,200 to go with her 550 link.
>>49867385BruhLPL had a $.02 ICO and is at $2.73 USD (136x)LINK had a $.11 ICO and is at $7.39 USD (67x)If you've strictly held onto tokens and not been a swingie, you'd literally be better off as a pooler right now. Where we are now, LPL has mooned more than LINK.LINK is still the purer asset but you're retarded.
>>49870483I bought my old man 10k LPL to stake his link. He sold off all his link and only holds his LPL becuase he doesn't understand how to unstake. He'll probably make it as he'll look in 5 years and LPL will be $100+
>>49870483>>49871249Based anons, you’ll make it
>>49871244And if you staked those same x136'd ICO LPL tokens you would be getting x14 your initial investment on a yearly basis. There is no point in selling LPL unless you need urgent liquidity>>49870405F for him
>>49868726This whole thread feels like a bunch of poolers who lost their ass chasing yield trying to trick the gullible to provide exit liquidity.
>buy linkpool instead of PMs>walk into grocery store and shop for an organic beef as poorfags outside protest>approach checkout>emaciated woman rings up my item and gives me my total>"that will be $289,638 and 71 cents s-sir">never takes her eyes off my 6oz organic beef burger patty I plan to grill later>seems like she might have been pretty before the collapse>"sure thing babe">pull out my chainlink wallet>"heres 1/100th link, keep the change sweet tits. Just need the stores address">she looks confused>says they dont take whatever that is, they only accept Fed Coin, USD since there is still a few months left to turn them in for Fed Coin, or Gold and Silver>try to argue with her>security comes and takes my beef away and kicks me out of the store>walk back in and demand to see the manager>start yelling at the woman and the manager who calls security again>"Excuse me, what is going on here?">everyone stops, I turn to see what silenced them>see a 6'2" gentlemen in a suit with a cart full of whiskey and steak packages driven by multiple young virgin women>"y-your eminence! this man here tried to buy his burger patty with something called..link I think? he is causing a scene..im so sorry">the man in the suit chuckles as he looks at me>"Here you go fren">tosses me a small weird looking dime, seems old>everyone in the rooms is wide eyed, manager looks at me>"shall I ring up your 6 oz burger patty, our dear customer" he bows his head as the woman goes to the register>"Not so fast" speaks the well dressed man in the suit>I turn to him confused>"He needs to earn that Mercury Dime" he says with a twisted grin>the girls to his side giggle to each other
>>49868908Just quick googled it You can literally buy it with a coinbase wallet its not muh sekrit clubhouse. Buy eth then choose swap for erc 20 tokwn and choose linkpool. But thats a quick google DYOR. I dont know this shit sounds shady af frfr no cap on god kinfoke. real talk.
>>49871735Hahaha retard. Where do you think the linkpool comes from, thin air? No, it comes from Bancor . You can but it on pancakeswap, waffleswap, whatever fucking swap site you want but it’s coming from bancor if you are buying lpl>he googled itTop fucking kek, take a lap son
>>49871417I'm fully staked, as one should be.>>49871735Coinbase wallet just defaults to using Bancor for LPL, so it will have a quarter the available supply next week too.
>>49871719
>>49871735This can't be real
>>49867195So we need to buy LPL to prop it, and this guy will get to choose whether to complete the sale or not.>Thanks OP for telling us about your withdrawal
>>49867385>just give it to Fiews bro, I’m sure it’ll be fine with a hard cap limit of 10 link per neet that stakes there
>>49867397>>49867436>deserves it>retardedit's a team wallet you retards
>>49869157LINK toucan needed, lpl no sneezed. That's the difference. Yours is a false comparison
>>49872728You will pay a fee to LPL stakers if you want to stake your LINK, whether you like it or not :*
>>49872793>link pool will be the only pool>trusting your stinkies to a nascent tech like lpl or bancor You'll never get my stinkies you stupid kike
>>49872793the 99% will all soon learn fren.
>>49872864>comparing Linkpool, the top performing node of the last three years with bancor, a ponzi scheme>>49872411The more lpl people buy, while the still can, the less that person who withdrew will get. You think I provide liquidity to bancor? LOL newfaggot gtfo
Giga brainlet here. So do I buy LPL or not?
>>49867143bnLPL is akin to something like aLINK- a token made to represent what holdings you have in the protocol>put TOKEN in, get bnTOKEN in return>take token out, your bnTOKEN is burned and TOKEN returnedbut, seems, only half returned now, due to the bankrun
>>49872662No way is it a team wallet, its either MB or some twitter clown. And if I say they fucking deserve it they deserve it and fuck you too not your protocol not your crypto
>>49867629>>49867959based>>49873547probably just a clown. not MB though. people are learning quite the expensive lesson, but thats how you know its a good lesson. kek just checked the guy withdrawing 140k lpl also has 130k link on bancor... or had i should say
>>49873625>had 130k link on bancor>will lose 1/2 of thatjesus, what a slaughter
Let's all buy it while he's waiting for 7 days. Deplete his 140k LPL.
>>49866966uh oh, 45 mins ago another liquidity provider from this list initiated their withdrawal of 14k LPL. this is going to be glorious lpl bros. >>49873740based, very based.
>>49873659and he isnt even trying to withdraw his LINK, so he will either lose all of it or none of it. quite a gamble
>>49873740we're reaching levels of based that shouldn't even be theoretically possible
This is pussy juice, this will also be another irritating pussy juice. I'm big on NFT based projects now.Every problem that we have in society has a suite of relative solutions that are also business opportunities.Depression is a problem. But solving that problem is a business opportunity for perfect misfit and an opportunity to reach out to the community. Perfect misfit is a decent NFT platform, here to redefine the sphere
>>49866847i own 2k unswapped lpl tokens waiting for link to moon to touch that wallet
Why the hell would anyone buy this blatant scam not even affiliated with Chainlink Labs when they can just buy the OG token (ticker: LINK)? Srs question.
>>49874527You can buy both or neither at all, and it's up to you who you trust, but lpl is explicitly designed to extract value from the link network and give it to you with minimal effort. Link itself has never had that explicit purpose.
How many LPL do I need to make it?
>>49874572>Link itself has never had that explicit purpose.Anon, I... Good luck with your third party tokens. You'll need it.
>>49869006Failes
>>49874604The link project's purpose is to create their network, if its profitable then fair enough, but it has never at any point had the stated aim of being a profit machine. That's a secondary purpose at best. Lpl has only ever been a profit driven project.
>>498745751000k LPL suicide stack25k LPL Make it stack100k LPL god stack
>>49870405>>49869288What happened to him?
>>49874947>1000kPost hands
i have several hundred thousand, what does that make me
>>49874604Good luck setting up your node and not getting a power failure causing your stake to get slashed. Half of LINKies will be too lazy to even set up an uninterruptible power supply, Linkpool's NaaS will get them in with a nominal fee for LPL stakers.
Linkpool isn't a scam, but the desperation for lpl holders to cash in on the ridiculous prices right now is apparent. For it to be worth buying LPL over pure link right now, you'd have to get insane APY for probably years just to break even. Even if you hold a large amount of link you'll still almost guaranteed outperform any LPL purchase by just buying link and taking profits on whatever you bought today in 2-3 years from now. Note I'm not saying LPL is a scam, its just wildly overvalued and the reason there is shill threads posted here almost daily is likely because LPL holders are attempting to find buyers to squeak some out. Notice the curry style messaging (stay poor), nobody says shit like that about link, in fact the opposite, they just fud you and tell you not to buy it.
>>49875733It's the opposite.Fuders want to buy more LPL but the holders are not selling them anything.The reason 98% of LPL is staked is because the LPL holders understand the real value of Linkpool and that what we have now is nothing compared to their future.
>>49874527>not even affiliated with Chainlink Labs>Chainlink Labsthe founder of linkpool has worked for chainlink for years, and they received money from chainlink for development. but you know this>>49874947based, feels good with god-tier stack>>49875155checked and makes you better than me. very nice fren
>>49875925Nobody cares about linkpool, if there was a market for it people would be trading it, there's no liquidity at all. Its a safe way to guaranteed stake your link, but if you think its going to be the only mechanism you got fed a line, and its currently massively overvalued compared to the simple play of purchasing link tokens. Shilling lpl over link right now is actually nuclear weapons grade link fud, because if lpl is actually a better purchase than link, it means link is going to remain worthless for years and lpl is going to give out 80% staking rewards or something.
>>49875733>under .4 LINK/LPL = underpriced>over .4 LINK/LPL = overpricedLiterally that easy we're moving to a post dollar future start thinking in terms of post dollar ratios
>>49876055>nobody cares about linkpool>posting in a linkpool threadyou should value yourself more highly anon, you arent a nobody are you?
>shilling your own LPL bags
>>49876055a 25k stack of LPL will get ~8k LINK if LPL gets 10% of the jobs and in turn 10% of the 350,000,000 staking incentive LINK to divide out to holders.How do you beat inflation? Suckle from the teat of inflation.
API3 makes this shit obsolete
>>49876171Actually we're shilling someone else's bags itt; read the thread. Bags they were dumb enough to donate to bancor for us to buy
>>49876110I'm posting in the thread because I own chainlink, the token that linkpool claims will have an early monopoly on staking (which was already debunked by sergey with the staking news 2 weeks ago). And also because the board is mostly dead, its this or one of the bancor/celsius threads, or one of the random offtopic shitpost threads. I have nothing against LPL either, this anon at least gives a fair assessment>>49871244>>49876090of course he also sort of btfo's himself by admitting holding lpl from initial release makes it a better asset...which also more or less proves that its overvalued relative to link right now.
>>49876192yes if lpl has a monopoly on staking for the first 10 years or so>inb4hedoesn'tknowsergey already btfo you with the staking announcement, lpl shills were nowhere to be found funny enough that week.
>>49876260It's been bouncing around over and under the .4 LINK ratio all week. But it hasn't been a bad hold, and that's not saying LINK is a bad hold either you proselytized retard.
>>49876192> 10% of the jobsNot even a top 5 node operator
>>49876284Will a company hire a back-end to make a node, use a more likely less reputable staking pool and still pay a fee, or use the most trusted blue chip pool's NaaS service? Idk maybe usage and reward is actually higher than just 8k LINK in the 10 year period given that possibility.
>>49876462kek, lplcels on life support
>>49876462I'll get my fingers in the pie of Inotel, DexTrac, Fiews, LinkForest, and Chainlayer if I can, but I don't need to sweat about it because it's not like anyone else can get shares in them.
how much LPL to stake 10k link again?
>>49876695There was literally a Fiews staking post a couple of days ago. They're ready. LPL's value proposition isn't as big as everyone is making it out to be.
>>49876748Literally nobody has a value proposition on people using Fiews other than the Fiews team.Seems like the pool wars are here, it'll be fun.
>>49876828Correct. Fiews' value proposition isn't relevant to users because it isn't going to make a token. It doesn't need to :)
>>49876890Oh no, a company in the blockchain space using the blockchain to handle ownership, call fucking Satoshi we've gone too farFiews will do it someday retard
If you think, that LPL is only for staking allowance. You are a brainlet and you deserve to stay poor.Linkpool will be one of main player in the staking game. Backed by the marines. You are entitled to Linkpool profit.Ethereum staking will be available soon. If data is the new oil, and Link will be bigger than BTC. Linkpool is the oil well.
>>49877022Imagine not having any other logical argument and resorting to the brainlet reply of "it will happen someday retard". Omegalul and omegacope
>>49876260>I'm posting in this thread because I shit on the streets of Calcutta. No one finds that surprising at all.
>>4987673625kIt's a 0.4 ratio
Imagine that out of all nodes. Only Linkpool will be open for the public.You will stake with LPL. If you don't like it, stake with calcutta stake and lose your LINK.
>>49877115Who the fuck invests in blockchain and doesn't think the efficiency gains justify tokenizing real assets like ownership once the space gets more organized. Fiews will do something in that vein someday.LPL is just already there.
>>49877132Yes only lpl shills allowed in lpl threads, funny enough I probably have more link than anyone you'd be shilling lpl to anyways. I already said lpl's not a scam, but the shilling is fucking tiresome and you can't have a legitimate discussion about lpl because anons who don't want to admit its overvalued reee for dozens of posts if you suggest otherwise.
>>49867575Yeah, and those nodes on market.link will use LPL staking infustructure instead of launching their own token, you stupid stupidy dumb dumb idiot nigger
>>49877231>stay poor stay poor!>no anon you are the indian!
>>49876055>there's no liquidity at all.Yeah because people arent selling
>>49877242Do you even know how smart contracts work? You don't need a token representing ownership to tokenize "stake". Spouting off brainlet advice without doing any research that a token is needed is literally room temperature IQ. You can do trustless staking in a smart contract without tokens.
>>49877317or buyingwhich is why there is a thread advertising for anons to buy the ones withdrawing from bancor
>>49874131Holy fucking shit
>>49877339But the company is going to have the backend, that place that runs the computers with the necessary infrastructure and the developers maintaining things? That will just exist on paper books forever right?Also Fiews isn't free they say they are "affordable". Linkpool says it's affordable for NaaS too.
>low supply>high demand>staking announcedSimple economic, anon.
>>49876090More like >under 2.5 LINK/LPL = underpriced>over 2.5 LINK/LPL = still underpriced
>>49877393I don't even know what you're talking about at this point. You don't understand the chainlink network, how trustless smart contracts work, or that you don't need to tokenize every single piece of infrastructure to operate in a trust minimized manner. Stay poor retard
>>49877231based>>49877289incredibly accurate and based as well>>49877376we are going to cross 200k LPL pending withdrawal very shortly. this is like the end of summer and the local pool is having the end of season pool party. after that, pools closed
>>49877480Fiews is offering NaaS, where you stake tokens and they handle the backend shit so you don't need a server rack on your house. That isn't free retard.
>>49876890hei jonas
>>49877491Going to be exciting
>>49877514Yeah neither is NAAS retard. And Fiews beat LinkPool to NAAS at $10/month. Cope harder
>>49877580I'll stick as much as $10 a month let's me in there, you hit every pir you can, but yeah it's not going to be my breadwinner and I hope it won't be yours.
I have one simple question: should I go all in on this?
>>49866922Wait, am I supposed to stack my LPL? It has been sitting in my wallet since the day I bought.Hiw do I even go about stacking?
>>49877805Retard go to the official STAKING site
>>49875733>>49876055>>49876171>>49876227>>49876260>>49876284>>49876626>>49876695>>49876748>>49877268>>49877295I guarantee some of these people have been monitoring the threads as they have LPL locked up. They are shitting themselves that they are going to be left with 70%+ illiquid loss very soon
>>49878213so dont buy LPL right now?
>>49876748source? not seeing anything on their Twitter or Medium about this
>>49878661bumpcan anyone give me qrd on other staking pools or where i might be able to learn more about them?
>>49878686sure try bancor or celcius. theres no other link node operator with a staking pool right now. period. when people say 'there will be other options im just going to stack link you retards' they are just fudding you out from buying linkpool>>49877549the things we are watching happen in real time, i mean there will be stories and movies about this shit. its nuts>>49877805https://app.linkpool.io/poolsive earned around 250 LINK since jan 1st, dont miss out on your cut of LINK anon. when you dont stake it on the linkpool site, your LINK just gets split between everyone else, and we all get more because you didnt stake. dont give me free link fren
>>49878870I think it's naive to assume linkpool will be the only place to stake.
>>49877805Proxy IP test
>>49878926You will be staking on other nodes, yes. But you will be using LinkPool's staking infrastructure if you want to do so trustlessly. I have no doubt that retards will use centralized staking platforms and we'll see some Celsius-type situations all over again.
>>49877805>>49878870 This anon gave you link to the staking app.Annoyingly it's kind of retardedly hidden on their site. Just go to pools, connect wallet and stake your LPL. The rewards are paltry at the moment but that's all about to change.Also bookmark the site and be extra cautious with what you do and who knows you have it
Also high IQ anons help me out pleaseIf I have far more LPL than LINK for the required staking ratio and I have about 5k left to spare for this marketDo I: buy more LINK or LPL?Link will still be available but LPL surely going to dry up. But I have more than enough LPL for my LINK stack.Also considering you can probably rent your LPL out in the future to a more public nigger pool.
>>49879025agreed, bookmark that shit>>49878926okay, thats fine. i own linkpool, im staking there i quite literally have no concern if/when other options eventually come about. you really want to be waiting on the sidelines when staking is live for other options to show up? imagine the fomo. also >>49878997
>>49878997I won't worry about it too much then. Wish I had got my LPL when I had more LINK. I could probably get 25k LPL but it would leave me with barely any money to live I'd have to get a job.
>>49879205Yeah what others have said about needing an insane apy to justify the price makes sense. Link holders and people staking will both win, I'm more excited about the link supply drying up and a mega pump that is to follow. Going to pay my parents house off and figure out my life I don't care if I make 1 million or 100 million. More to life than money fren.
>>49879177Since you have a fat lpl stack I would just add to your linkT. Holder of more lpl than link
>>49878870How often do you have to redeem them? Can you just stake and leave it alone for a year or two?
>>49879177checked. you'll 100% be able to lease out any unused staking allowance and earn dank APY on it. Thats what the 3rd party owners pool is in pic related. Im in a similar boat and i want income vs. just buying LINK. Remember, when ETH staking is live, you'll get airdropped ethLPLA and be able to stake eth with linkpool, or lend it out just as described above. The good thing is : you are in a win win situation. its good to have money on the sidelines for times like these
>>49879275There’s no point in dreaming other than to help you not panic sell or do stupid things on leverage. Just ignore it and live your life for the time being. Look at GME generally and sub for people wasting their energy on “what may come about”, and just further depressing themselves more.
>>49879275very based, you're a good man. link holders will absolutely inherit the earth>>49879312you dont have to redeem them at all, i just did it at the start of the year to see how many i earn per year, and its only a small transaction fee to claim. you can leave it alone for decades if you want
>>49879292>>49879319Thanks anons, though if I just fucking stable coined months ago I'd have over 200k for this situation. Fuck!Since LPL gonna dry up and become rare. Think I'll get the last I can of it. Will always be able to DCA more link
>>49879831This little lady thinks she's got it all figured out.
>>49879831based>>49880959thats really cute bro
>>49867057About timeI've never wanted it in the first placeWhy would people care about a couple of jonny's insecure terraform templates?
>>49881286no one has any idea what you just typed. congrats, seriously.>I've never wanted it in the first placewow insightful, let me count how many times ive gone into a thread about an asset i have 'never wanted'. ya, its nearly zero. welcome to the thread nigger
>>49881241Thanks anonNot to mention holding LPL will get you more link but holding Link won't get you more LPL>>498809591 post by this tranny ID
>>49871249Nice, I might just buy some lpl for my mom now and she can get me chicken tenders in return a few times when I feel hungry.
>have a grand to put into crypto>already have 15k Link and 3k LPLWhich would you chose?
>>49876192how much allowance will linkpool get with this first SLA? 75,000,000 link staked for ETH/USD price feed, at 10% that's 7.5 million or 0.075 link per linkpool, at 5% APY that's 0.00375 link annual per link staked. not bad for one SLA
>>49882112LPL
>>49882369Have you ever thought about how well you'd do trading companies that actually produce value, instead of falling this deep into scam after scam?
>>49876462ChainlinkP and the P stands for Pussy Nice cherry pick. Enjoy waiting until 2023 to stake while we absorb the first 75M
>>49882972sometimes yeah
>>49882112You need 33k lpl to fully stake you link on link pool
Pool's closing. I wonder what bancor will do with the lpl they steal.
>>49882112link fo sho
>>49884768Sacrifice it to Baphomet.
>>49867102I bought 1500 LPL from this fag today. Any one else buying it up just to punish liquidity fags? I have a couple thousand link I could trade for LPL. should we bring him pain?
>>49882972LolPeekabooLmao
>>49885296Depends on who you want to punish. If the whales withdraw the 200k that's pending then there's only 55k lpl left to buy. If that gets slurped up then the pool is officially closed. Otherwise right now it's 255k lpl to buy. Either way i suspect the whale will lose a lot of his lpl due to bancor being greedy jews.
>have 10k link worth 70k >in order to stake this you need to buy 60k worth of a completely third party token, this is just laughableSorry you guys are totally delusional if you think that this is how its going to go, the fact that link is the main commodity and Lpl needs link not the other day around, I cant imagine any scenerio where you shouldn't just buy more link. There is no way sergey is gonna allow a random third party to completely middle man and gatekeep staking. The entire premise is that the nodes will need more link in order to secure better paying jobs, that means all the nodes will be competing with eachother to incentive link holders to stake their link in their nodes.. Link is the scarce commodity here, the job of Lpl can be replaced by any node provider, nodes are not even hard to run. Guy guys are really bragging about there not being any Lpl for sale? Sounds like youre coping because youre in a rugpull situation, since none of you can even sell and cash out because there is no demand for your shitcoin, it typically has something like $50k daily volume, thats worse then a low tier jeet rug.Volume comes directly from demand.. Link has a billion in daily volume, because it has demand.
>>49886289How much lpl are you about to lose to bancor?
>>49867243I had 500 LPL on bancor and couldn’t get my full stack back. Got about 350, had to sell BNT and buy the rest. No fucking way he gets everything back, not even close.
>>49886535>Sold bntThey won't even get bnt because the jews turned it off.
With the pools closing in a week, how will matt beale feed his family?How will he pay his taxes?What if the majority lp that's about to take a 50% haircut is none other than Matt beale. Won't someone please think of matt beale.
>>498864220 I never used bancor, or hold Lpl. Debunk my post Why would someone pay money just to stake, when the nodes get paid proportional to how much link they have, meaning its in everyone's best interest to get as much people to pool their link together as possible, to get the highest paying jobs. Show me ONE coin, where in order to stake, you first have to purchase a third party shitcoin which has no official relation to the coin youre trying to stake.
>>49886608>Debunk my postThe entire thread debunks your post. Maybe you should read it instead of lying on the internet.
>>49886608it might be an idea to read through this:https://talk.linkpool.io/t/linkpool-faq-feedback-welcome/130the main thing about buying lpl is having a cut of all of their revenue (their node, naas, managed nodes, market)having prioritized staking access to their node is really just a bonus
>>49886289You don't understand LPL any more than you understand a toilet.
>>49886608to help a low iqer here's a good bit from the faq that it's important to understand with link staking:>Will there be a maximum amount of stakeable LINK within the LinkPool ecosystem?>In the Chainlink context, “staking” is the ability to collateralize job requests as a Chainlink node operator in order to be eligible for jobs that require it. That means that there will be a very specific demand for LINK collateral, and once the demand is met, the rewards won’t increase despite increasing the LINK collateral of a certain node. This applies to any Chainlink node operator. That is the main reason that inspired us to create the LinkPool Allowance token, in order to provide the ability to any potential LINK staker to secure their ability to stake LINK in the LinkPool node and those nodes participating in their trustless staking microcosmos.
750 link here. Was gonna buy another 100 link this week, i used to think id never get to 1000 but now I just might. Should a linklet like me even consider buying lpl instead?
>>49887153Link is oil. Lpl is a well to draw oil.
>>49866847Today OP was NOT a faggot Well done anon
>>49886588They were warned multiple times. They could have staked on the actual protocol and been comfy all this time.
>>49887548yeah pretty based
>>49867143DO NOT REDEEM
SERS PLS DO NOT DO THE REDEEM TRUST BANCOR TRUST CELSIUS LEAVE YOUR TOKENS WITH THEM
>>49887858Ranjesh Smith? Please do the needful.
>horsepool will be the only place to stake>uhhh ok there's other nodes too but they won't be for retail>uuuhhh ok there will be other retail nodes but they'll use lp infra because... BECAUSE THEY JUST HAVE TO OK!!>POOLS CLOSED STAY POOR IM NOT SEETHING YOU AREwhat will the next cope be?
thank you OP for the findings
>>49888521The fact that all of you cunts will be using node services that take fees out of your pockets anyway which makes you less economically threatening to us.
>>49871671thats because it is
>>49888881This. Linkpool is more than just early link staking. Pool's closed.
>>49889646It's a blockchain company with true ownership shares, one of many to come in many other service fields which may well be using Linkpool's services.Exciting times honestly.Captcha DKNWA
Those that are likely to make millions during the AltSeason2022 begin their planning now. I'm hunting more WAVES, ETH, and, most importantly, Syscon ATM. This provide BTC merge mining and security, as well as an ETH bridge with extremely low costs.
>>49885296He's gonna lose half to Bancor anyway. Might as well twist the knife.Slurped 2.5k LPL, all I had left in me. Even traded some link just after it fucking crashes fuck me
>give your valuable tokens and keys to a third party in exchange for their promisory tokenWhat happened to not your keys not your coins? When staking rolls out you can just loan out your linkies via smart contract to some node operator for a defined return. This is a million times safer than getting some third party token on which the issuer gives you a promise of some % of his profits while you give him the golden egg that is LINK token.It's like linkpool "investors" miss the whole point of smart contracts. Truth, not trust.Absolute brainlets, the lot of you.
>>49872911Checked
>>49878213I bought some to add to my own stack.But more seriously we need a platform to buy and sell LPL.The original system allowed buy and sell order for LP against ETH.Could we at least get something with a basic buy/sell functionality?
>>49876260You’re an idiot. My link stack sits there. My LPL prints Link. Which ones overvalued again?
>>49886289>>49886608love how in every lpl thread there's retards like this that fundamentally do not understand what lpl even does and still tout their absolute mouth breathing smoothbrain opinions like they're facts
>>49889874Ngmi. You contradict yourself because you dont know what you're talking about.
>>49887164Might even go deeper than that, LINK is a well to draw oil, LPL is the land oil barons have to rent in order to draw their oil.
>>49889874Good luck anon, genuinely. You remind me of me in 2017. If I were you i'd do some more research, I had time to work it out, you don't have that luxury. Pools' closing early this summer.
>>49866847I don't know what linkpool is but im 100% sure it's a scam. I can tell just by the logo alone. i'm also high iq
>>49890344Checked and mouthbreathing pilled.
>>49891637Oh look who is posting, it's flannel-the-cuck
>>49881418I used to bombard linkpool threads warning people about what the project was, I literally worked with jonny for years and I know the attitude he has to operational security when it comes to provisioning infra (terraform templates)You're right, it's a bad habit I need to kick, I no longer give a shit about any money any anons loseGood luck, it will blow up in your face
>>49892987kek nice larp faggot
>>49889874i lost IQ reading this posthow can people be this retarded? you realize linkpool isnt a centralized exchange right anon? you realize you need your own wallet to use it right anon? oh wait, of course you dont realize, you are literally braindead
>>49886608You can stake in LinkPool without LPL. Your fee will be just a bit higher
>>49892987Hi, Mat. Nice of you trying to fud.
>>49893260How many link have you got left my little stacklet? 500? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
>>49887548>>49887672>>49888592thanks frens
>>49893069Ok let me, rephrase this for you so you understand it, boy. You exchanged LINK token (the oil of 4th IR) for LPL tokens (???). Chainlink oracle nodes get paid in which token? Let that sink in a little.
>>49879319Moderately intelligent anon, shill me more about this airdropped ETH that we'll be getting
>>49894805smoothest of the smoothbrains allow me to put this as simply as possible so that it may hopefully absorb into one of your two brain folds...LPL is fractional toptier node ownership.You will get a % of all fees/Linkpool rev streams proportionate to your LPL stack which is paid to you in LINK.I probably lost you at proportionate.
>>49889874Yeah those other staking pool schmoes are totally just gonna let you keep your tokens in your wallet and give you node collateral in good faith right
And oh shit we've overpriced LPL against LINK again, don't buy LPLCaptcha TXNNN
>>49893260And oh fuck if that 180k is Mat, getting him to take more than a 50% haircut on his LPL severance because he wanted to try to market make a project that offed him, that would be a treat
>>49896239All I'm seeing is a trust based promise in a world of upcoming truth based systems. You finna get scammed boy.>>49897395>this nigga don't know what smart contract be
>>49898005Nigga they need tokens for collateral how else they gon run the jobs, sayin smart contract in this context don't mean shitIf they just be usin their own collateral why the heck they gon be a pool too
>>49898263Is u dumb or is u just pretending nigboi? You can loan out your linkies via a smart contract to a node and in the smart contract you can for example define the time of the loan, the % of returns, which addresses your linkies can go to as well as a specified time when they go back to your wallet. All automated, all definitive, no trust needed.Meanwhile you switch your LINK for LPL for a PROMISE on a return.That shit weak.That shit contrary to the whole point of smart contracts.That shit gonna get you scammed.In fact you better get yo LINK back because once staking goes live linkpool kikes ain't gonna give you shit back.
>>49894805You exchange LINK (oil) for LPL (the established well).
>>49898770cringe
>>49898785for now...
>>49898770You're forgetting that most of us LPL holders also bought LINK under $1 and can fill out our LINK allotments without buying more of anything.Literally all the things you stated are going to be a part of every LINK staking pool, including Linkpool. You're retarded.
>>49900018chink nig kike spic jew whqtever the fuck you arehear this: you are not exchanging LINK for LPL your staking LINK on the Linkpool node and getting paid in LINKYou own your LINK and own your LPLJesus fucking christ i'm done.
>>49895962check out this post from them from 2019https://medium.com/linkpool/creating-trustless-pools-and-staking-for-all-266451277e3f>ctrl + f "eth"
>>49900357>>49895962>https://medium.com/linkpool/creating-trustless-pools-and-staking-for-all-266451277e3f>This means that in the future, rather than our staking app being a central place to stake tokens on LinkPool for Chainlink, you’ll be able to browse many pools. Pools that could be for ETH, pools that can be for DAOs or ICOs like mentioned above. The staking app will become a hub of everything that is poolable, giving a catalogue of trustless implementations that any user can see as an opportunity.>The staking app will become a hub of everything that is poolablepools closed
>>49900357I see.So shill me this: If Linkpool is the "pool of pools" then technically staking v0.01 could be opened up to multiple nodes each getting a portion of the initial 25m LINK stake allotment. This means that not only do LPL holders get a portion fees from Linkpools own jobs we will alos get a portion of the "pooling contract" fees and NAAS right from the start.
>>49900298NOOOOOOOOOOO its one or the other you can't just win on both!
>>49900541 that is why i own a bunch of linkpool. seems very plausible to me fren, and we dont have to wait much longer to find out
UPDATE- the person cancelled their withdrawal of 146k LPL. (remember they also have 130k LINK on bancor). Looks like the think bancor will survive this situation, time will tell
>>49900541Tes, but what %age? And in the long run, will it be more profitable than simply holding Link? Also remember that the Link token will likely moon. Is there any reason to believe the LPL token will match this? The numbers aren't clear at all, and who's to say competitors might not move in swiftly and destroy Linkpool's function? Very risky desu
>>49901678>move quickly to have direct ties to the Chainlink team for over two years
>>49901530they will
>>49901530So it was a nothingburger as usual/thread
>>49902356We scared Mat into keeping his risk with Bancor instead of taking a haircut. LmaoGood on OP for bringing light to it, the advantage of the transparency of Blockchain, and the community's reaction.
>>49901530Lmao just gives me more time to buy, and I'm not gonna sell it back
>>49903231based, and looks like he canceled the withdrawal in response to bancors latest update. Bancor seems to think they can come back from this... LOL