/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>50472008
See smoke no fire
One day

>>50472008
If it's so special then why does the price always go down?

>>50472364
nobody wants retail having any significant stake in one of the crucial pieces of the foundations of the base of the future global monetary system

>>50472364
To give assholes like you more time to accumulate so you might move out of your poor mother's house one day

>>50472416
This.

LINK cultist just can't grasp this.

Price supression to make the LINK token more attractive for institutional purchase to be used for the token's true use; collateral and transactions.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O8rrRFtNBoM

>>50472364
This
#Rekt

>>50472364
>I'll only buy after the price has gone up
a true /biz/poster

>>50472611
Its coming all together

>>50472819
but what does it mean

>>50472859
we are gonna make it

>>50472949
This is what biz looks like by the time we make it

>>50472859
chainlink network in cooperation with swift delivering encrypted messages from apis to blockchains

>>50472416
and yet they have to. They have to let us in because that is the basis of the cryptoeconomic security guarantees. Its why they had an ICO, why they trade it on the open market. Without us the network isn't decentralized and it doesn't work. Obviously some of them are doing their best to shake us out and get a larger slice of the pie, but thats it. They can't shut us out entirely because if they do they break the system and it becomes worthless and they're left holding a bag of shit. You often hear things like "the link team doesn't owe you anything" but thats utter bullshit. Without us link is worthless, just a thought experiment. Its is the network of nodes and stakers that act as a self-organizing truth machine, the code just facilitates our group action. They can't shut us out, we're going to be obscenely rich, and there are going to be political consequences of that fact that many are only now realizing.

>>50473028
This
Kaiko won #5 btw
Unsure if other winners have anything to do with link

>>50472364
Because Bitcoin shits itself every time Link gets big news.

>>50473165
What do you define as obscenely rich?

>>50473272
when people try to value a crypto they look a success stories like ethereum and bitcoin as the gold standard examples of what a project can achieve. if link were the price of ethereum i'd be wealthy and retire and have money to pass onto my grandchildren. If link were the price of bitcoin i would have the ability to engage in state level politics. But people forget that bitcoin and ethereum are brand fucking new. They each have a rediculous amount of upside still because they aren't really being used for anything important yet. Most people even in first world countries don't own any crypto at all after ten years. Each bullrun we get more and more usecases and more and more users, but its still a very small number of people involved. I don't think theres any reason bitcoin and eth can't 10x from here in the next 5 years, and i don't think theres any reason link can't pull an ethereum in that same time period. Its my belief that those with suicide stacks will have 6 figure passive income by 2025.

>>50473252
look on the slide 3 in this video >>50472611
what oracle you think they might be using?

also: https://www.finastra.com/press-media/finastras-hack-future-4-opens-focus-sustainable-and-inclusive-finance-baas-and-defi

> A number of partners are also supporting this innovation on a global scale. These include Betacube, BNP Paribas, DeFi: Chainlink, DeFi Pulse, Google, Hong Kong Cyberport, Lloyds Banking Group, Mastercard, Microsoft, Scotiabank and Societe Generale

>>50473252
What are the pies chainlink doesnt have its fat fingers in?

>>50472008
Is it also the ICC token?

>>50473520

>>50473165
>have to
they don't have to do shit. they will carry out the selection process as long as necessary for the deserving to prove themselves and for the wastrel deadweight to eliminate themselves. elite culture is built on this selection process, the FUD in 2017/18 was just the first challenge.

>>50473467
>>50473474
Good stuff anons
Thanks

>>50473346
I hope you're right but I highly doubt LINK reaches anywhere close to 1k$+ in just 3 years, sounds delusional desu

>>50473833
Gains network currently needs on average 300 Link per day to run its leverage trading on chain, pancakeswaps keeper consumes 50 Link a day on average. the target by everybody in the central bank world seems to be 2024 for live releases, 2023 is going to be interesting as a test year

>>50473559
way to prove you have no understanding about how the node network operates retard

>>50473833
it only took 11 months for ethereum to go from 7 dollars to 1000.

>>50474037
the only people who earn high income from operating nodes will be those who were selected early for their ability to play the pre-staking game in a trustworthy manner, those who can afford to buy a big enough stack to get decent jobs after all is said and done, and the few well stacked (10k+) bizraelis who can hold their shit together long enough to become proficient at administering enterprise node infra as staking rolls out. There might be 10 /biz/ native linkies with the nuts to survive the process, by design.

>>50472364
Because institutional investors got the memo that the token is primarily held by low cash flow lone wolf neets and they can get more LINK from them with price action like this

>>50474148
>what are staking pools
>what is exponential adoption and network growth

damn you're dumb

>>50473346
this is my understanding as well

>>50472008
Video should be titled something like
>1984: Under the Hood

Okay, so basically LINK tokens have value because you will soon be able to stake them to earn more LINK tokens which are valuable because you can stake them to earn more LINK tokens which you can use to stake more LINK tokens. That is why the LINK token is valuable.

>>50474203
>staking pools
are diluted income streams. how many miners who point to, e.g., f2pool, are swimming in it?
>exponential adoption and network growth
when has this not funneled into a small elite oligopoly like the 5 telcos that own most internet infra in a given country or twitter/fb?

>>50474344
>no goy stop you can't make money without my permission its never happened before!
>ignore all the bitcoin and ethereum millionaires they aren't real!

>>50474303
no. Link tokens have value because there is a demand for services priced in Link token which can be earned by providing services to the chainlink ecosystem, staking is just an additional security layer that is rather questionable at the current stage, but who cares, the supply is capped and rentseekers are going to seek rents

>>50474380
that's not what i'm saying. the dream is that we're all going to be bigdick passive income node operators just because "they have to make it this way bro just hodel xD" but the reality is few of us will be because that is the nature of the competitive selection process. by all means give it your best shot, but never for a second think it's a foregone conclusion.

>>50472008
Hello newfags. This is Ari's DECO scam which Sergey bought from his own employee for millions (?), applied for worldwide patent in 2019 and was never heard from again.

>>50473252
they don't. but 1/5 isn't bad and we should see the results maybe not this smartcon given the july end but next smartcon 100%

>>50474478
DECO is also coming this year
https://blog.chain.link/zero-knowledge-projects/

https://youtu.be/KSS8Gk5UxE4?t=939 at 15:39

>>50474344
Checked now check this. 1 billion tokens. 1 billion tickets to entitle you proportional share of revenue. You wont need 10k link to make it. You wont even need 1/10th of that.

>>50474633
Current distribution among 608K holder
1000 on average
50 in the median

>>50474447
you really don't understand the cryptoeconomics of the node network. This isn't going to be used for simple proof of work or block consensus. Each validation will be for things that actually matter, such as trigger conditions for real world contracts for derivatives, insurance, credit swaps, proof of reserves ect. Trillions of dollars. The selling point for smartcontracts is that they're immutable. Once the contract is agreed to there is nothing that can stop it short of branching the chain. Thats why its inevitable. Think of all the money spent to weasel out of contractual obligations. The classic example was banks suing banks to prevent paying out on their credit default swaps in the 2008 crash. Just stalling long enough for the other entity to go bankrupt and die. That was possible because their contracts were based on legal and reputational contracts, and each bank had sole control of their assets and could hold up payments in court for months or years. We saw the same thing in the movie the Rainmaker with insurance payouts. In a way the current financial system is very similar to chainlink. each major player is a node, and they base their reputation on their node performance. But if it comes down to survival or reputation, they will choose survival.

the reason that the chainlink network will be trusted as a truth machine will be because of how decentralized it will be. A healthy, mature network will require tens of thousands of nodes and hundreds of thousands of stakers those nodes have to compete for on a payment and reputational basis. Without that system of economic incentives and disincentives the network has no value. Without all of us contributing to the network in terms of staking decisions, node operation, and api streams, there is no value and no security. It becomes no different than the current system.

So yes, they absolutely need us. Theres no getting around it. If all link is owned by a few entities, link becomes worthless.

>>50474625
>Currently in development, DECO
More soonposting

>>50474709
300 active kycd nodes
on average 15 nodes reply to a query
it could be more decentralized

>>50474758
staking isn't live retard

>>50474148
>There might be 10 /biz/ native linkies with the nuts to survive the process, by design.
oof this is a retard take if i've ever seen one. the past 5 years was the selection process. we'll see $5 one more time and then never again. conditioning you to think that because it's always been difficult to hold link from a psychological perspective, it will always be difficult is exactly why they run the psyops/fud; to take advantage of weak minds.

>>50474776
i wonder how many of them are newfags who haven't held with the rest of us, and how many are bitter swingies that have to fud us to cope with the fact that they lost their stacks. Imagine the horror of losing your golden tickek, and what that would do to an already unstable mind.

>>50474775
and while everyone waits 1M Link per month are split among 300 kycd nodes

>>50473165
Bullshit. The network can be sufficiently decentralized for all intents and purposes such as smart securities, without 4chan neets cutting in to their profits. If Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Federal Reserve, Google, Pizzahut all decide to run their own node then their is more than enough implicit and explicit staking for each and all of them to keep the Chainlink network running flawlessly due to each participant having their own selfish interests in mind. Any neet that just so happens to hold on to their linkies until this happens will be rich. But by no means do they NEED us specifically. That is unrealistic hopium.

>>50474815
which they are selling on the open market to cover operating costs. Remember? Thats the dump fud dumbass.
>>50474830
posts like this make me realize i'm casting pearls before swine

>>50474858
1 Million Link at lets say 6.5 makes $6.5M to gas costs around $2M, still makes a nice $15K profit on average per kycd node

>>50474909
and how is that any skin off my teeth? If anything it destroys any point about nodes being unprofitable. The link goes back into circulation and will be bought off the open market to pay validation fees. Its a license to print money and i own it.

>>50474944
Averages aren't the median and cockblocking the money printer with kycing is jewish, sergey betrayed

>>50474830

>>50475011
Once again, staking isn't live. the network is essentially in a test and debugging mode, and these nodes are kyc'd because, you know, they were specifically chosen for this.

How much of your stack did you lose swinging?

>>50474858
>I can now see that you are dumb and I am smart. Im not even going to bother disproving your argument even though I totally could if I wanted to.

Token is needed.
Retail( this includes you) not needed.

all the evidence is out there that chainlink will take over the world and somehow i'm still poor

>>50475103
>test and debug
rather insider trading and getting a head start instead of stress testing the network.
Non, added massively to the stack at these discounts

>>50474858
>posts like this make me realize i'm casting pearls before swine
spoonfeedanon?

>>50475293
no, i'm just an link oldfag. Anyone who's been here long enough and has actually thought through what the mature network would look like, what the applications are, and what the implications are could make the same points as me. Most of us just don't bother anymore because either you get it this point or you never will. Take a look at pic related for an example of what the nolinkers and swingies will act like in the near future.

>>50472008
>CBDCs can do everything that crypto can... except for money laundering and ransomware attacks haha
The absolute audacity lmao.
Great talk, though, thanks anon. Once he got past a solid 10 minutes of fudding crypto he starts talking about DECO, smart contract execution, money legos (composability), tokenisation, tokenised assets, fractional ownership, basically all the shit we've been talking about for years.
Kind of seems pretty disingenuous to shit on crypto so hard when it has been the petri dish for pretty much all of these concepts.

>>50472364
Because BIS is Jewish dogshit. Nothing lasts forever, not even the Rothschilds.

>>50475714
Lold at this part too

>>50475714
>money legos
Didn't he straight away stole that line from sergeys sales pitch on defi.

>>50475756
Not sure who originated the term sorry anon, I've seen it used by a bunch of people at this point.

>>50475714
>Kind of seems pretty disingenuous to shit on crypto so hard when it has been the petri dish for pretty much all of these concepts.
The nerve of that dude, unless he considers Chainlink separate from the crypto world.

>>50473165
They are letting others in to create the ‘dapps’ for their interoperable cdbc app store around the world.

nice thread have a bump

>>50474830
What is a free market? Those entities would have to buy up enough link to secure a reputation, link that isn’t even readily available on the market with our causing a ungodly pump and liquidations. LINK is a currency, it is also a ticket to stake and it is a yield bearing asset. You also forget that LINK is available on nearly every chain, and that node operators are also active on nearly every chain. Now here is something I seriously need you to understand, those nodes are not only able to communicate via on chain, but they can communicate amongst themselves creating an entirely new network. The term middleware works pretty well here, but not in the sense that you would think. Rather it is literally in the middle.
>ETH - LINK - AVAX
>ETH - LINK - ETHL2
>ETHL2 - LINK - AVAX SUBNET
>chain X - LINK - chain Y
>DATA(communication) - LINK - CHAIN
I could go on and on. But in a free market, if you’re a participant, you have an opportunity to capitalize on selfish interests. In this particular scenario, you know that LINK is a currency, it will be staking collateral and it earns yield. It is a currency, because smart contract devs that Chainlink their contracts need to pay Chainlink nodes in LINK. It will be staking collateral because CCIP is a PoS consensus mechanism. And lastly, some idiots have been lending their link for meager APY, and certain groups with money have been actively shorting for free pretty much. Anyways, long story short, staking changes everything because there is absolutely not enough LINK tokens to go around.

>>50475151
you're not poor, you're pre-rich

>>50474110
In full Bitcoin bubble cycle
Chainlink has now gone through 2 cycles without breaking 3 digits
It is the same price it was 2 years ago

>>50473951
Any way to check these numbers?

>>50474110
1000$ ETH was 100B cap, for the top L1 with all the ICO mania happening forcing people to buy ETH.
1000$ LINK would require over 500B cap (since they are releasing an additional 50M tokens) and I just don't see the same kind of catalyst as ETH had, there is 0 reason for retail to buy the tokens like there is with ETH (or even other L1s actually).

Oh cool a Chainlink thread about banks, must be over 50 by now

>$6
>A wallet containing 100,000 LINK is worth less than $1M

>>50477866

>>50477610
>there is 0 reason for retail to buy the tokens like there is with ETH

retail buys eth for gas fees for shitcoins. the purchasing pressure for chainlink is for node clients to pay validation fees. Its an entirely different structure. The buying pressure comes from corporate, not from retail. Retail purchases will entirely be for speculation or passive income. The primary buying pressure will be from node clients.

>>50478279
If retail never buys LINK, we will never see the kind of pump ETH has had, it will be a slow grind up and LINK ogs will be repeatedly outgained in bull runs. I guess as a safe investment it's decent but damn, long road ahead

>>50478437
Retail usage of Link has never been a factor in discussing Link price anon.

Did you look at the video in the OP? All the tech discussed in there will be powered by Chainlink.

>>50478492
Yeah yeah I know all this already, but I'm trying to make it before I reach the age of retirement thanks

>>50472008
It’s common knowledge that 90% of LINK OG’s came from /pol/, and are thus unironic Nazis and extremely racist. This is evident when you look at the chats whenever Chainlink presents at conferences such as consensus or smartcon. It’s always N word this, N word that.

I personally don’t want to put my money into a project like that and keep that sort of company. Moreover, I question the intelligence of people who shill LINK given their backwards and racist political views.

>>50478511
i'll retire if link hits 100. Its not my fault you're a newfag or a swingy who made bad bets. Take your negativity elsewhere. As we've already established, we aren't counting on retail buying pressure. I don't need you to buy in and pump my bags. The only reason i post is in the hopes i can save one more anon from wagery. You clearly are unreceptive. Go hang out in the xrp thread.

Yes, sergey is manipulating the price of link. It is for the simple reason that an overvaluation before staking comes out could be harmful for the protocols security. Its similar to if a startup has a downround or growth slows, it basically dies.

>>50478757
You can't retire with 1M$ unless you live in a 3rd world shithole, and even that would cost over 60K so I doubt any anon in need of saving from wagery would have anywhere near that amount of capital to invest

>>50478958
Links goin higher than $100 dummy dum dum dummy dummy dum

>>50478958
lmao, who said i'd only have a million if link hit 100? Are you really and ESL shill?

>>50478511
You say you know this but then you say we won't ever see the kind of pump ETH had if retail never buys Link. Did you fucking watch the video in the OP?

>>50479096
don't get emotional. I'm replying to him too, but i know he's either paid to be here, literally retarded, a lying swingy trying to make his short more profitable, or all of the above. You get a feel for these things over time. You and I are probably similar in a lot of ways because we have a compulsion to speak the truth and correct mistakes. But the people we're dealing with don't have that restriction.

>>50478757
>The only reason i post is in the hopes i can save one more anon from wagery
Realistically, how much would a newfag have to buy to be saved? I know the usual suicide and make it stack numbers, but given the developments of the last two years or so, I find it hard to properly anchor expectations of future price.

>>50479150
1 link is enough to make it

>>50479159
this but unironically

>>50479159
shut the fuck up faggot
>>50479150
i've recently gotten back in touch with my step brother. He's had a hard life and a divorce and he has child support payments because his whore ecuadorian wife never loved him and just used him for citizenship.

I've advised him to just dca as he can and not look down on himself when he can't. He's made it to 500 link in the last year and i'm very proud of him. I expect him to hit a suicide stack before we pop, or even higher if we are further delayed.

>>50474303
Wow. So token is actually not sneeded?

>>50479087
You literally wrote:
>The only reason i post is in the hopes i can save one more anon from wagery

You're telling me there's an anon with what, 600K+ in disposable income that needs saving? Get your story straight at least

>>50479096
>did you watch video
he has seen it, but the purpose of his posts is fud and he's trying to steer the narrative to influence those who haven't watched it. many such cases.

>>50479261
what are you trying to say? that no one will be saved if they dca for the next ten years of their working life? with 5% as the expected minimum annual staking return which they can then reinvest?

Yes, a lot of newfags are too late for wondrous wealth. But they are not too late for meaningful wealth. As i said in my last post my stepbrother just recconected and has acquired a 500 stack in the last year. If he can keep a similiar rate of acquisition in the next few years even with apreciation making his money worth less, he can retire comfortably and make it for himself and his children.

What is you objection to that?

>>50479269
Resort to ad hominen attacks because you perceive my posts as some kind of conspiracy paid fud campaign, the absolute state

I'm just salty I was out gained by a bunch of zoomers buying Shiba, Safemoon etc as well as CT rotators buying the L1s while my bag did absolutely fuck all and still has been doing fuck all in the bear despite muh fundamentals

>>50478761
>an overvaluation before staking comes out could be harmful for the protocols security
what a lot of garbage. it makes zero difference to anything other than the amount of shit people like you talk

>>50478547
Thanks. Just bought 100k Hitlercoin.

>>50473346
whats the suicide and make it stacks?

>>50479352
>Resort to ad hominen attacks
imagine at thinking ad hominen is a logical fallacy in this year of our lord 2022. We've learned that yes, your bloodline can and shall forever be duplicitous you sniveling jew. It isn't a logical fallacy when reality backs it up.

>>50479319
Ok I think we just have widely different goals and expectations, good on your stepbrother (truly) but no way in hell I can wage for 10 fucking years and dca into something like crypto just for the hope of making some boomer gains while newcomers out gain me again and again

>>50479195
You ok bro? Seems like u got mental problems

>>50479373
0.1 link and 1 link

>>50479373
>whats the suicide and make it stacks?

no man knows when the lord will come. likewise no man knows the path to wealth. All i can tell you is that chainlink is without a doubt the next ethereum and there has been this consensus on biz for 5 years straight. any discord as to this assertion has always been emotional. Whether that be anons who are actual schizophrenics who believe in xrp or craig whright. I believe that if you dca in at this point in history you have a wonderful chance to buy the best asset in human history. that is all i can tel you.

1k and 10k, respectively.

>>50479434
what mental problems specifically? Nigger?

>>50479428
listen, if you think there is going to be a better peforming asset in this bullrun based on historical data, please tell me. If you think there is a better asset that is closer to erruption than link, please tell me. But if all you have to say is that link is not bitcoin, please go away.

>>50479525
*bear market

>>50472008
two more weeks!!!!!!!!!

>>50474148
>10k+
>well stacked

>>50479525
You should invest in Jesus because you're best bet is the Rapture.

>>50479319
Could you tell us about your brother in law just one more time, please? It's a great story.

>>50479354
thanks for your retarded take. maybe respond to the content instead of saying something something that makes 0 sense.

>>50479755
my big brother got me into link. Rather he dragged me into it. I thought it was nonsense. My brother is a chef and i'm a scientist, so i know better right? And then i paid attention to what he was telling me. I researched it. I realized i wasn't as smart as i thought I was and that my brother had a better gut instinct about real wortld things than me. My brother has the gut instinct, meaning he is the belly, and i have the better intellect, meaning i am the brain. Together we are pinky and the brain and we get things right.

My stepbrother and i don't actually speak. He speaks to my big brother. But i'm still proud of him for listening to my brother the way i did.

You don't have to be smart to make the right decisions, you just have to listen to the right ideas, like i did. And my step brother did that. And so i am proud of him.

>>50477563
chainlink is currently bitcoin circa 2015. plan accordingly

>>50480099
Absolutely nobody gives a shit. Now take your fucking meds and go to sleep, boomer.

>>50480419
Stop being a rude nigger you jealous bitch. You'll never have a real step brother in law who listens to you. Hswkdn

>>50480419
literally the only reason i told him is because he asked. Now suck my fucking cock and eat my cum you nigger.

>>50474776
It's not that retarded given how many have been rekt by cefi and liquidations over past two years. Particularly because it keeps happening

>>50475747
We can only hope

>>50478437
>retail never buys LINK
Wtf would we hold it if the singularity relied on retail. You should go back

>>50478761
You're retarded, 18 decimal places you stupid faggot

Anyone going to watch this nothing burger?

>>50485018
Should be one later tonight as well

>>50485047
in 3 hours 45 minutes.

>>50478437
>buy my eth bags
>Pllllllease buy them
meth heads on their unscalabe gen 1.5 chain are the most annoying tech illiterate cry babies the industry. Worse than btc maxis or ponzi hype fags

>>50478437
Retail never bought ETH for the gas fees, they bought it because of narrative and Number Goes Up. LINK will be the same, the narrative will be "this is the gas token for all oracle data" and speculators will push the price up 10x harder than any real usage will in the short term. We didn't hit top 5 in marketcap in 2020 because of token demand for price feeds.

>>50485089
just a surface level overview, nothing new

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8yZdJ-ZTlM&list=PLhM7rBgpVV-JnmRLUbd10ELntN3LFfmKH

>>50476942
>Not enough Link to go around
But enough decimals to make me stinking rich ;)

>>50472424
damn, he struck a nerve

>le orchestrated buzz word shilling made to sound smart and mimic organic discussion.
Nice script you have here.
Prepare for another dump.

>>50486198
/thread

>>50472008
>>50472416
>>50473474
>>50474909
I am not bullish, I am beyond bearish.
Chainlink is a globohomo shitcoin of the highest order and is going straight to zero.
Your days of shitting up biz with your astroturfed psyops are over. You've been found guilty of using DARPA bots, paid shills and sybil attacks to push the WEF agendas, and for that you will pay with your miserable life.
You shills and bagholders will be financially EXTERMINATED and there is nothing you can do about it except watch in horror as it all comes tumbling down. The ride ends here for you linkies, the game is over.

>>50472008
>cope: the thread

>>50472008
>Link is the BIS token
too bad Bitcoin makes BIS not needed which makes I suppose Link not needed

>>50472416
if that was true, they would priced you out already and it would have gigamooned after ico to prevent you from affording a staking bag
retards
the redpill is that it is just shit and nobody is buying it

>>50486689
This is probably the correct answer. They're not letting retail buy 10k for only $60k which is nothing for any competent investor. If LINK was $450, retail could only afford but so many after half a decade

>>50486847
The thing is that retail on aggregate will own less LINK by keeping the price low for years and demoralizing holders. That's exactly what we've seen, big wallets continuing to accumulate while small wallets capitulate. It's a minority of people who see a low LINK price and think "buy," that's just a basic fact. If LINK was top 2 or top 3 in marketcap then it would be in everybody's portfolio, even if they couldn't afford as much.

>>50472416
A sadder cope with each weakening utterance. If the buildabear group didn't want you owning it they'd have bought out smartcontract and forked it, or they'd pump the price early to price out retail. Not keep it at an extremely cheap price for over half a decade.

>>50487059
so much cope, look how libra was gonna launch, zuck was offering a stake for a price tag of $10million
a lot of them would be buying a super sekrit steak bag of le chainlink for $1-$10milly without even blinking if it was so good and it would be plenty decentralized through the amount of bilderburg members

you are just simply deluded and nobody is buying it

>>50487081
They have mentally priced people out by keeping the price low. You don't feel like buying Link, right? That's because you've been mentally priced out.

>>50487059
I don't agree, there are more and more link wallets but when Robinhood listed LINK, that was the normie indicator. They're not letting shitheads on Robinhood buy for $6 if it's going to $180

>>50487324
Normie robinhood fags don't have $60k to spend

>>50486689
>>50486847

Nonsense. I’ve talked with 4-5 people pretty well into crypto while playing poker. Someone brings it up to someone else then I jump in the convo. And I’ll be like all you need to get is chainlink. Half don’t even know what it is. And the others have absolutely no clue and think it’s just another run of the mill shitcoin. Then when I explain it to them their eyes glaze over. There is virtually NOBODY who would drop 60k on chainlink outside of /biz/, and even most of us got those big boy stacks for less than 10-15k back in the day. I was talking to this total douche Reddit style normie about crypto the other week, and he’s like I’m all about NFT’s… he’s immersed in the crypto community… I’m like get RLC and LINK. He hasn’t heard of either.

I know have a poker friend who is smart, in the tech industry, and is in crypto to a degree that I have shown probably a dozen juicy breadcrumb /biz/ screenshots on chainlink. And I like him and I’m like DUDE… all you need to do is buy 1k link which is 6-7k which he can relatively easily afford. And he keeps saying yeah I’m gonna but he isn’t going to I can tell. This is someone with the capability to get a 10k stack too, and there is no way that I would ever try and shill him to get 10k link because you really have needed to be here on /biz/ and followed it yourself and have gotten excited about it yourself to get that many. Even if link was at 1$ and it’s only costs 10k to get a make it stack… he and virtually nobody out there would get it outside if this South Dakotan tomboy poring forum.

You guys are delusional. If Sergey is in fact thinking to himself; we can’t have too many normie anons getting 10k stacks there’s no way he would have to pump the price to price people out. The amount of new normies out wanting to buy 10k stacks is probably zero. Hell, go on YouTube and read comments on chainlink videos, most of them are like I hope I can get to 200 or 500 at most

>>50487406
100% agree with this whole post. LINK could be ANY price and normies simply won't buy (although they will FOMO at the peak of a parabolic pump) The goal isn't to price out normies, it's to demoralize current holders, who almost exclusively are on /biz/. Therefore the best strategy is to keep the price low for years to get them to sell, which is exactly what has happened both in terms of price action and wallet movements.

>>50487472
>The goal isn't to price out normies

It’s just something they don’t have worry about is my point.

>>50487472
There’s actually 1 other person I met in the wild while playing poker who has a 10k stack. When he told me I was like oh are you on 4chan? He said he wasn’t. So I don’t know how he found out but if there is 1 group of people outside of crypto with the highest concentration of crypto holders it is definitely the poker community by far. If any of you were on the 2+2 poker forum way back in the day they were way ahead of the curve as far as discussing bitcoin and alts. If you go to 2+2 and go to other topics, then go to business/investing threads… they still have the same running bitcoin thread back from 2010 when it started. Hundreds of thousands of posts. Also an alt thread too.

>>50487783
post the etherscan link please

>>50480472
>>50480487
So you aren't capable of seeing that this is a slide thread to demoralize link holders while pretending to be a breadcrumb thread? Its not going to take 10 more years to take off. Cope and seethe faggots.

>>50488009
the address is in the filename you lazy nigger, and its on matic

>>50487406
I convinced a boomer to buy 30k LINK. He's rich so he's upped it to 40k. Total boomer but rich and savvy to swift

Not sure where that puts us but there are many with bigger stacks than you think

WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER!

DO NOT UNDER ESTIMATE THE POWER OF POSITIVE THOUGHT! ESPECIALLY COLLECTIVE POSITIVE THOUGHT!

THIS SHIT IS GOING TO REACH $1,000 EASILY!
HOLD THAT THOUGHT AND VISUALIZE IT IN YOUR MIND EVERYDAY AS OFTEN AS POSSIBLE STARTING NOW AND IT WILL MANIFEST INTO REALITY. DO IT! I'M NOT JOKING!

VISUALIZE AS OFTEN AND AS DETAILED AS POSSIBLE!

>>50489721
You are a MANIAC!

>>50487406
I've gotten nine people to drop 4-5 figures on LINK, each with stacks in the 1-4k range. I think this might be more of a sales technique issue you're running into more than anything.

>>50490045
Tell us your secret, jew.

>>50488756
>>50490045
Nice larps

>>50490086
Without going into detail, it was clear to them that LINK had made a big positive economic difference in my life. Normies are not persuaded by facts and logic, they are routed into submission by social stressors. Nobody buys LINK because someone quoted a /biz/ post at them in a bar they buy it because they'd feel like an idiot fucking loser for not buying it.

Comfy thread

>>50472819
Not sure what this is about tho. To lazy to dig in the etherscan link since im already all in, so what difference does it make am i right..

>>50473165
This delusional talking point has been going for 5 years. Holyshit

>>50490394
I looked into it, it's just the GNS contract on polygon. It spends ~60 LINK per day which is quite a decent amount of fees for one dApp.

>>50476640
Absolutely delusional.
The level of intellectual dishonesty in here is fkn out of hand. Imagine believing that globohomo kikes would trust their cbdc global ponzi in the hands of some fat Slav and a bunch of neet nodes. This is some xrp levels of delusion.

>>50478437
Retail bought LINK in 2020 and they got fuck8ng rekt by sergey dumping and cefi kikes shorting it.

>>50485330
this. so much this.

https://medium.com/@DeHealth/dehealth-announces-cooperation-with-chainlink-to-fulfill-worldwide-demand-in-structured-and-3077bc53d745

>>50472364
Because the markets are as dumb as shit and only really react when they're absolutely sure that something big is happening. When the pieces finally start coming together and they big switch is thrown they'll clamour to buy in.

The FUD is pretty funny.

Everything is finally coming together within the next year, the price is lower than ever, and yet people are selling?

The absolute worst case is LINK goes to 2-3 dollars before the moon mission but who fucking cares? Time is almost here. Extreme short term should be the least of people's worries

>>50493871
Either /biz/ makes it from LINK, or there will be rivers of blood on Sergay's hands.