/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>52993237
I only have 5k prq. Will this be enough to not neck myself?

>>52993341
How does $5 million sound?

>>52993474
That would be 1k a token. Any realistic targets?

>>52993237
Im accumulating rn.
When do you think will we experience relevant price action?

>>52993536
.60-$1.2 2023. 2024 $1-3 2025 $1-6

>>52993740
We will see many 40% and maybe 2x spikes before we actually see a sustainable uptrend. Should be sometime in 2023 where we won’t ever touch 7-8 cents again

>>52993758
Would you trade BTC for a 100k stack?

what is it?

>>52993781
Btc is only worth holding during the bear market. You’re almost better off holding anything else once everything has bottomed. Bear market is 95% complete it’s time to start buying alts my friend

>>52993802
GRT BUT SUPERIOR.

Find these notes I wrote about in another thread.

“Much more value then chainlink has” - CEO of coin metro

3 reasons why PRQ > GRT

1. Speed and efficiency. GRT uses subgraphs which in turn requires constant connections between indexers and nodes and connections of data. This requires resync of the nodes and reindexing of the data. Just imagine refreshing all the time. This takes a lot of time. PRQ has already done this and has the data waiting for you in a data pool.

2. Reliability. PRQ is “mostly” centralized. GRT and subgraphs fall prey to one of their verifiers moving to a more lucrative sub graph. What happens then? Well the integrity of the data is lost even for only a short period of time. This is also why the main argument against chainlink is why would they need link if they can build their own centralized oracle? In the case for PRQ there is already a centralized solution ready for you RIGHT NOW.

3. Customizability. Data lakes are superior to subgraphs because they do everything of the same but also allow either PARSIQ or yourselves to create you customized pools of data specific to anyway you want it. This makes the job of developers working in projects 10x easier. Again, request response time is not always consistent with nodes — any Web3 developer would confirm that because nodes tend to drop from time to time they are neither the easiest nor the most reliable source of data. This is not to suggest that nodes are unimportant! Rather, it is only to point out that, when looking at the case at hand (i.e., ease for both back-end and front-end development), they are not the top choice.

THERE IS NO NEED FOR DECENTRALIZED DATA EXTRACTION WHEN THE DATA IS ALREADY COMING FROM DECENTRALIZED BLOCKS!!! The decentralization is only necessary in proving the data hasn’t been tampered with. That is why PRQ is far far superior

>>52993817
Do you trade back to BTC come mania, or are you cashing to USD I also look at monero as a crypto to move back into.

>>52994075
The other thing is if I swap my BTC on a cex for prq, I’m looking at a taxable transaction correct

>>52994013
>Our system thinks your post is spam. Please refor....
tongue my anus nigger board and see picrel

Prq is a shitcoin and OP is another copy-paste-edit fag who wants to sound smarter than he actually is.

Beware the crypto charlatan. And beware of stale coins entirely.

What price points will you start selling at?
Is Grt the closest competitor to PRQ or would Covalent be?

Bump

Parsiq has the best memes

>>52995581

prq was a good coin until the team made a bunch of retarded decisions. sell now or forever hold your bags

Why would I buy this when I can jump back into dogcoins next cycle and 5x+ with relative ease? No one cares about this shit.

>>52995980
Because this will 5x before the next a cycle even begins.

>>52995980
this
dogcoins are better investments than "tech" coins
especially ones like fartshit which have no utility
TNN
PRQ is a scam and OmegaFag is a scammer

>>52996711
I went 1000x twice looking at tech and fundamentals. You’re simply a gambling addict

>>52996844
Digits of dumbassery
DOGE will outperform fartshit
Cap this
Nigger

>>52996844
Does this have 1000x in it

>>52996895
This has every attribute of a potential 1000x

>>52998174
Could you name the attributes

>>52998713
>under 15M marketcap
>doxable and very well known team.
>proven superior tech
>99% of tokens released
>~40% of tokens locked staking
>whales averaging down and buying up the float

>>52999004
Can you link to source on last 2

>>52996844
What's the outlook on QNT nowadays?

>>52999004
Okay, but who's using this shit and who WILL

>>52999068
>>52999225
Well clearly we have people using it if projects are renting 37MM PRQ to use the service. Pic related

You’ll get more insight on exact usage numbers similar to the GRT dashboard when the team pushes the PRQ dashboard out. Which will be Q1 2023.

>>52999225
As to answer your question to who will. Everyone will use it if they need data from blockchain. If you’re bullish on Link you should also be bullish on PRQ because it’s a reverse oracle that can help every blockchain project as well as many huge corporations like GOOGLE

>>52999449
can you explain what renting means?

>>53000385
In order to use the Parsiq network you need to either stake PRQ. Or you can pay in USD and that $ will be converted into PRQ by renting out the tokens so you can use the Parsiq network.

>>53000432
Lowest we could see it go?

>>53000769
6 cents but it could also moon at any time so it’s literally not worth waiting for

Top ten reasons why PRQ > GRT:

1. It's centralized. Centralization is faster and easier than decentralization.
2. It evolves more rapidly. PRQ's team has already moved on to a completely new project, while GRT's team is still working its first project.
3. Small and scrappy. GRT has a team of dozens if not hundreds of people, with hundreds of millions of dollars of funding. PRQ has a small team and very little money, so it knows how to fight for its survival and relevance with limited resources.
4. Legality. PRQ's business confidently operates in full compliance with the law of the United Kingdom. GRT indexes the data of sanctioned smart contracts, its DAOs are incorporated in tax havens, and some of its validators run in countries of questionable diplomatic standing. It's like they don't want anyone to control it, and this is wrong.
5. Affordability. GRT makes its users pay fees for its services. PRQ just asks that its users hold the token for services, and sell it when they're done.
6. Focus. PRQ's small team is focused on lots of different projects at once. GRT is focused on one project, and it doesn't even lend NFTs.
7. For the common man. PRQ has lots of small customers. GRT is used by amoral global entities like Goldman Sachs and the WEF.
8. Economics. GRT holders have to stake to earn a worthwhile cut of fees, and risk volatility with their investments. PRQ is a real business that gets paid directly for its services without a need for frivolous nonsense like profit sharing or value accrual.
9. Marketing. PRQ isn't afraid to talk about price action and predictions on official outlets. GRT aggressively discourages it in all their official communities and communications.
10. Specialization. PRQ was built by engineers. GRT has to hire engineers, cryptographers, data scientists, financial analysts, designers, and devrels to help build their product, and that's expensive.

>>52999004
How can you say that 99% of the tokens are released when the circulating supply is 170 million and the total is like 300 million?

>>53000769
Yeah don't trust that guy on that kind of info, he claimed GRT could not go below 10c, which is why he's now shilling PRQ lmao

>>53000940
Who's meant to fall for this bait?

>>52993237
Should we buy their new token when it's released?

>>52993237
999999 other shitcoin scams claimed this retarded shit (surely your pajeet coin partnered with aws) and of course not even the most established cryptos are used in any of that.

because they don't plan to use their Reserve which is locked atm. So the Last unlock is in January afaik and then supply shouldnt increase except Team decides otherwise.

>>53000940
Parsiq have 45-50 employees. It's no longer a small operation. The CEO has said a few times recently that they have found their product-fit and are now looking to scale with those products. Possibly that could indicate more staff being added to the roster.

>>52994013
"CEO parsiq is ceo of coin metro....."
Where did you get that from??

>>53001606
From CEO of Kleros

>>53001084
>no response

>>53001833
>not an argument

>>53001833
>because they don't plan to use their Reserve which is locked atm. So the Last unlock is in January afaik and then supply shouldnt increase except Team decides otherwise.
Literally in this thread you dumbfuck.

>>53001833
>>53002998
What he said, theres only 1 unlock left within a week and then theres no more inflation, 125m tokens are locked up in reserves indefinitely. The CEO said those tokens are not going to be used until they implement some kind of decentralized shit.

>>53003488
.05 on the table?

>>52999488
I sacked up and bought 100k what am I in for

>>53003558
Doubt it, unless BTC goes lower than 15k

this shit is going to a fucking penny isnt it

zero support and APY has been stuck at 0% for the past 6 months

>>53003618
It's bottomed out, so you'll definitely make money.

>>53003870
Staking a good idea or should
I swing for a milly

>>53004152
staking APY is literally 0% since 2021. dont waste your fucking time I fell for that staking meme too and got suckered into losing my investment bleed to nothing

>>52993817
>Btc is only worth holding during the bear market
you made a good point fren

>>52993817
>it’s time to start buying alts my friend
I've been stacking Monero, Dia, Ride and Vet lately, thou BTC and eth still hold over 50% of my total portfolio.

>>53001084
Because the remaining treasury coins are locked indefinitely. There original purpose was for further decentralization. The team has decided not to go down that route anymore so those coins have no purpose anymore

>>53001606
It was a quote from the CEO of coin metro where he talked about Parsiq.

You can find the video here

https://m.youtube.com/results?sp=mAEA&search_query=prq+just+a+wallet

>>53004277
Staking is front loaded. PRQ just hasn’t got many customers during the bear. Tsunami has been out for a couple months. More clients are in the testing phase and are expected to join. You’ll see an increase Q1 2023.

Also staking will get airdrops of IQT and the hyper sea dex tokens which might even end up being worth MORE then PRQ.

>>53004552
So stake or swing….also I saw hyper sea is dropping only $60k….seems a bit far fetched to say those would be worth more….

>>53004658
I'd like to stake but I'm all on eth network

>>53004552
shut the fuck you mindless shill. Parroting bagholder cope "staking is front loaded"

mother fucker I have not seen any APY since LAST fucking year.

>>53004658
Anon's point is that the drops could be worth more *in the future*. i.e. don't dump your dropped tokens on day one.

>>53004683
More token utility is added in the future which will lead to more APY.
https://twitter.com/parsiq_net/status/1565747760841854976

Here's a question for you Omega; what is the use of that blockchain "data" exactly?

I mean blockchain data is simply transfers of internet tokens between anonymous wallets. Like for who is it valuable that wallet 0xeir838r8e sent 0.5 eth to 0x838riririr83 on march 7th 2022 at 1pm ?

>>53004850
Blockchain data can be used to track every package in the United States. PRQ can help with this. Everything link helps to do, PRQ also does aswell as it’s a reverse oracle.

>>53004832
>https://twitter.com/parsiq_net/status/1565747760841854976

More? So from 0% to 0.1%?

you know where the fuck APY even comes from? Its just profit distributed to stakers. you cant have apy without profit. APY will always be zero because parsiq hasnt turned a profit in 3 years never will

>>53005016
no it cant you stupid fuck. Everything you can get from parsiq is available for free on etherscan btw. Parsiq is just a tiny bit faster

>>53005016
>Blockchain data can be used to track every package in the United States.
Is used or "can" be used... I don't recall amazon, usps and whatnot using blockchain in their operations. And if they do it's most probably an in-house blockchain
> Everything link helps to do, PRQ also does aswell as it’s a reverse oracle
I believe link is an extremely overrated shitcoin. It's only use case is to generate random numbers for the handful of crypto lotteries out there, and its second use case is to verify and confirm the price of an asset, which is useful for decentralised leverage products such as GNS

piece of shit

>>53005057
>He still cares about APY despite all high APY models in crypto being exposed as scams and dropping dead in bear market.
IQ Protocol was set up to allow for token lending to facilitate their tokenomics of token being needed. It was never going to have high APY, as almost every single high APY model turned out to be a ponzi, and decentralized node models like GRT pay out their APY through inflation, APY has always been a meme in crypto. They have rewarded stakers for their loyalty through many different airdrops. APY is not something you should care about when you buy PRQ. Its irrelevant.
If Parsiq never released a lending platform and had no staking model you wouldnt care either, so why would you care now.

>>53004683
fuck off whiny faggot, grow a pair or something

>>52993237
I asked this last thread and never got an answer: don't companies have to pay per PRQ token/request they use? Wouldn't that mean it is in the best interest or Parsiq to keep the price relatively low?

>>53005121

>>53005164
Kek I havent seen somebody say that since 2020. No, they will adjust the amount of PRQ needed if the price fluctuates heavily

>>53005164
Na they pay cash
see >>53000432

>>53005114
holy fucking shit you telegram trannies are so braindead you dont even realize you contradict each other in every other sentence

IQ protocol was set up to give the token utility you stupid fuck. The team has said this hundreds of times. You are trying to change the narrative because the APY is zero.

Yeah no fucking shit nobody should be expecting 1000% or even 20% apy that shit is unsustainable and inflation driven. But the APY in IQ protocol is literally 0%.

and its the ONLY thing that you should care about you absolute fucking retard. High APY is what pushes the price up. There is literally ZERO fucking reason to hold the token otherwise.

If muh enterprise needs to use PRQ they can rent it in IQ, driving the APY up. If APY is 0 it is because nobody is renting the token. If nobody needs the token then it is fucking worthless. You fucking bagholders still lie about basic shit even after years of being pounded in the ass. grow the fuck up retard

>>53001198
People with brains wo know how GRT and PRQ work. GRT works and has actual adoption whereas PRQ is a vaporware scamcoin.
>fart
>shit

>>53005527
Kek never change Eric, cant believe youre even this mad on Christmas.

>>53005617
truly a fartshit. lose the argument and fall back on the boogeyman eric cope again

>>53005692
>nobody is renting it
Literally 37 million currently rented.

Like I said staking rewards are front loaded we hovered around 1-5% all 2021.

Once new customers are in you’ll see an increase in APY.

>>53005729
100k stack. Swing or stake

>>53005791
Swinging is very risky now. If the bottom is indeed in then you might get left behind any day now

>>53005886
Already have 100k stack….

>>53005895
I meant by attempting to swing. You might sell what you think is a good price and it’ll never go back to that price again..

>>53005904
Ok hodl it is. What targets are you looking at omega

>>53005928
It'll hit 5usd before 1b mc if my math is right. In a bull with this coin that's nothing. I'd start to dca out then.

>>53006759
$5 is FUD.

>>53007908
That saying is so cringe.

>>53000940
>7. For the common man. PRQ has lots of small customers. GRT is used by amoral global entities like Goldman Sachs and the WEF.
>8. Economics. GRT holders have to stake to earn a worthwhile cut of fees, and risk volatility with their investments. PRQ is a real business that gets paid directly for its services without a need for frivolous nonsense like profit sharing or value accrual.
>9. Marketing. PRQ isn't afraid to talk about price action and predictions on official outlets. GRT aggressively discourages it in all their official communities and communications.
>10. Specialization. PRQ was built by engineers. GRT has to hire engineers, cryptographers, data scientists, financial analysts, designers, and devrels to help build their product, and that's expensive.

You forgot:
11. Parsiq can fart and shit. GRT cant. Those may be considered gross by some, but any living being would die if it cant fart nor shit. GRT wont make it alive.

>>53007908
What is the highest you could see PRQ running

Assuming > value then link

>>53008282
Than* fuck I’m a retard

Yeah thanks for all the effort Im just gonna stick with dog coins. Good luck with your “use case” my little wolf

>>53008282
If prq was where link is rn at 22nd top coin it'd be with ~33usd. That's in a bear market.

>>53008429
Have fun. Dogecoin and PRQ are currently the same price. We’ll see who’s higher in 1 year

OmegaMaker what are your thoughts on Truebit?

>>53010175
Also what do you think about ICP?

>>53010200
Also, what is your stance on Kleros?

>>52993237
Yeah, nice "ecosystem". I can't wait for this to go to 0. Crypto baggies are so fucking retarded.

>>53010305
That shitcoin isn’t even listed on a reputable exchange. Why would you buy that over PRQ. Where they are listed on the biggest exchanges and currently awaiting another big exchange listing

dead shitcoin

>>53011253
What dead shitcoins get listed on the biggest US exchange for free? And soon to be listed on the biggest exchange in the world?

>>53011316
every coin and it’s mum is getting listed on coinbase these days
means jack shit

>>53011343
This is unironically true. Coinbase will list any shitcoin these days. It holds a little more weight that coin metro lists it.

So…what’s the make it stack

>>53011668
100K is a make it stack.

Considering PRQ is one if not the lowest marketcap coins listed on Coinbase says that’s BS

>>53007908

>>53011668

Bought at ten cents rode this up to $2.00 and back down to now. I wanna kill myself

>>53012164
Fear not, Mr Diamond Hands. Your opportunity will come again.

>>52994170
This desu, back when he "shilled" grt he'd either copy-paste old posts by people more knowledgeable than him or make retarded and verifiably false claims.

>>53012147
Odds that this true? If that’s the case I’ll try to get to 200k and i will be forever in debt to my biz bros

Found this also on PRQ:

https://gcg.netlify.app/

Some nice research notes

>>53012453
Opinions vary. Ask ten different people and you'll get ten different answers. Pic related is another take.

>>53012478
I find it very hard to believe I’m a whale at 100k to be honest

>>53012509
Like I say, opinions vary; don't rely on what anyone else says. If you're not confident you're holding enough you're not going to have many cheaper opportunities to add a little more. Pic related is a rough reckoning of crypto market cap vs parsiq rank.

>>52993237
honestly think this can hit 5 bil market cap, which is 300x

>>53012478
that was back when fartshit was $1

>>52993237
Nothing but retarded moonboys in here lmfao
Your shitcoin was abandoned by your CEO to go work on the most centralized VC shitcoin protocol in all of crypto (solana)
fartshit baggies in absolute shambles already delirious at their riches that will never come
Tell your mother I said hello, basement dwelling rejects

>>53012936
This. Fartshit baggies on suicide watch.
Token not needed.
Fartshit is a scam and Omegafag is a scammer.
Niggers tongue my anus.

>>53012936
>>53012973

>>53012936
Parsiq has a lot of potential to thrive - as a business. They aren't sharing that revenue with baggies though.

>>52994013
Hold on werent you a mega GRT shill?

Ok boys it’s pumping. Swing at .12 or Hodl till $50

>>53013950
Is Santa going to bring us a green dildo for Xmas?

>>53013982
Unironically bought a make it stack at the pico Parsiq generational bottom. See you in my lambo niggers

>>53014032
Based and lambopilled. Make sure to stake your PRQ so you get both the IQT and HYPS airdrops when they launch. Exact dates for these aren't available, sadly. The Hypersea DEX launch (HYPS) feels close, but the IQT will be probably be when bear is over.

>>53014060
Stake full stack? Or that risky?

>>52993237
Not a single post digging up your history inc. your larping under another trip, Marslander, inc. your failed tips, what a shame.

>>53014066
Unless you have a reason to keep it idling in your wallet/exchange? Bigger stake (and longer stake) earns you a larger slice of the airdrop.

As far as risk goes. Parsiq has governance of all PRQ on ETH and BSC. If some worst-case-scenario plays out and one of the chains goes under, they can restore your position on the other chain. Knowing what's going on on the blockchain is Parsiq's bread-and-butter business and they've previously helped other projects restore their tokens after being attacked.

>>53013401
Parsiq has actually went out of their way to create a fiat on-ramp to support the tokenomics of PRQ being used for their network. What has chainlink done or any other crypto for that matter?

>>53014115
Do you really see these airdrops having any value though…

>>53014215
Who knows, Sir? I didn't pay the upkeep on my crystal ball. Best take whatever path you're most comfortable with. Certainly though, an airdrop (any airdrop) is worth more than zero -- which is what you'll receive by leaving the tokens in your wallet doing nothing. 51 million PRQ currently staked by holders seems like a reasonable vote of confidence.

>>53014215
Airdrops are great. But you also get 50% of any staking rewards within the 1st week. Every week after it diminishes by 50%. That’s why the APY is so low currently because it’s front loaded. During the bull you’ll make so much and you won’t accidentally sell your stack away before the total full pump

>>53014493
Can you unstake at any point or is it a lock up like eth. That ended being a mistake on my part because I couldn’t sell for gains. However I may have made some poor decisions with the eth

>>53014534
Unstake anytime but you’re incentivized to hold long. The stakers who have held the longest get way more in airdrops as it’s a major factor in the calculation.

>>53014551
Fair enough, omega could I get an ETA of when this make it stack will actually make it

>>53014580
After the next halvening

>>53013982
How do you like your green dildo now lol?

>>53015286
Weekly still looks juicy. Monthly even more so.

>>53015286
I like it better than your reading comprehension.

>>53015286
Guy was trying to be a market maker. Seems like he failed and gave up by dumping anything he acquired.

>>53013982
>>53013982
>>53013982

>>53016126
It felt good

>>53016126
Looks very bullish to me

>>53018499
Bump

>>53020317
Sage

>>53012147
Omega this still hold true today? Or should I be aiming higher

>>52993237
Has IQT dropped yet? It was supposed to last year, didn't it? Did they think we'll just forget?

>>53020813
Yes it all still applies

>>53021288
How much longer in the wage cage with a make it stack

>>53021774
4-5 years

>>52993237
Shoutout to my homie DALE and CHOI SUN, Wooo!!

>>53021934
Fuck. I’ll just keep stacking Monero then.

>>53022131
I'm just going to try to keep slurping prq as long as I can. Try to get past the suicide line.

>>53022348
I already have a make it. I could aim for a million. But Monero is undervalued as well, little hard to tell if omega is yanking our chain. Anyone have caps of link and qnt calls

>>53022348
You create and post with your own tripcode as pokemon trainer or something like that

>>53022466
You should create*

Based Omegamaker, have a meme

>>53022417
Took 4 years for this.

Be ready for another 4-5 years for PRQ. You don’t make it overnight

>>53022777
Holy trips.

>>53022777
Quant peaked in under 3 years.from that time staml

@OmegaMaker, what other Low Market Cap coins are you bullish at atm?

Anyone else get Moonman-esque vibes from this Omega bro? Great call there Ill give you that one, but for nubiz he doesnt have a crystal ball. Could easily be leading you off a cliff.

>>53022777
$300 PRQ on the table m?

>>53023117
so PRQ is a scam and Omega is a scammer? Checks out.

A

Why isnt this shitcoin on Binance?

>>53023257
PRQ isnt a scam, and some dude giving people a ton of info about a decent project that's bottomed out in the middle of a bear market, and telling them to load up at the bottom is not a scam.

>>53023257
One of the only projects that are consistently building on their legitimate project. And people spoonfeeding you about it makes you think theyre a scammer?

What happened to the WAGMI culture of biz.

>>53024959
Isnt ICP also “building”? Theres been way too many scams promoted here to bring back pre’20 WAGMI culture.

>>53022777
People arguing about GRT vs PRQ in this GRT thread >>53024272
Answer to this

>>53025191
He’s right about projects using centralized solutions (100% of real life companies) that are built on top of decentralized infrastructure it’s called PRQ. PRQ is a centralized solution built on top of decentralized infrastructure (blockchain). Data coming from the blockchain is ALREADY decentralized. Only projects that look to be decentralized maxis will ever care about using GRT which will be 0% of real life companies and 10% of crypto projects.

And PRQ did pump. It went from 8 cents to 35 cents in the middle of the bear market from the Coinbase listing

>>53024959
The tripfag spoonfeeding you is a scammer that's been plenty wrong in the past. The only reason he started shilling PRQ is because he was chased off of GRT threads after he started making extremely dubious claims and got laughed off because of it.
But by all means, trust him, he's your fren. Surely no one here on /biz/ of all places would want to scam you out of your money, especially not on a low liquidity shitcoin. WAGMI BROS.

>>53025704
Hey yeah why would you want us to make it omega this guy has a point

this thread still up
bullish

>>53025752
Do you honestly think link would’ve got to the point it did without its cult like following? We help each other

>>53025704
>Surely no one here on /biz/ of all places would want to scam you out of your money, especially not on a low liquidity shitcoin

This is actually exactly what I mean though. Biz frens used to trust each other, we all wanted to make it together. But after the pajeets shilling BSC shitcoin casino coins on here the entirety of 2020 and 2021 nobody trusts each other anymore and think threads are only made to scam you out of your money.

>>52993237
Why will PRQ increase when it’s obvious that rich jews are suppressing the prices of all crypto

Anyways always DYOR, go look into the team, watch ama's with the ceo etc. And then come back and tell me if you still think its a scam

>>53026089
Why do you think they're supressing the price? And how do you think they got rich?

Load up now, then laugh at all the noobs who flood these boards in 1.5-2 years, and tell them they should have bought PRQ when it was 8 cents.

>>53026074
Real frens do due diligence and verify information, both qualitatively and quantitatively. The qualitative diligence is ostensibly possible to some degree, but the protocol is ultimately being built in private. The quantitative aspect is almost impossible because you're trying to audit a private company without access to the books, and because its financials have little to no bearing on token value.

Advice from one fren to another: due your own research, share it with the community with evidence, and ignore grifters like OP.

>>53012936
Delusional. Anatoly said he chose Arbitrium over Solana you complete mongoloid

I’m trying to help you guys make it because a low token velocity is essential for a 1000x.

If we can hold and never sell that is part of the essential formula for long term price appreciation.

Comfy holding PRQ. It's just a matter of time.

>>53026056
Because /biz/ activity is near ATL. It's a good time to buy, that's for sure... Just not PRQ. Sorry.

>>53026061
>/biz/ is able to move a coin's mcap into the hundreds of billions
Thanks for proving once more that you're completely full of shit.

>>53026074
There is people who want to help other anons make it, and believe it or not I am one such anon. Omega on the other hand is not, his track record is questionable, at best. He keeps spamming the same retarded bullshit that he got a 1000x on QNT, as if he was the only one who found a diamond in the rough instead of, you know, the most retarded fucking bullrun where every single fucking shitcoin pumped that much and then some more regardless of underlying value. Why does he only mention that, I wonder? And how many times has he been wrong again? As I mentioned, he got chased off of GRT threads because he claimed it couldn't go below $0.10 as it was written into the smart contract, which is one of the most retarded claims I've ever seen on this website. And, well, look at it now. Strangely enough, after it inevitably dumped below that price, he pivoted into shilling PRQ instead and shitting on GRT. I wonder why? My guess is that he only wants you to pump his bags to get his 2x~10x, which is actually feasible by /biz/ on such a low mcap/liq coin in the short to medium term, at which point he'll just dump on you and move onto another coin. You should be VERY wary about this guy. You've been warned and of course I can be completely wrong, but it walks like a retard and talks like a retard so...
Just for full disclosure, I own a small PRQ bag and it's likely it will pump with everything else because everything pumps during a bullrun.
But if you believe this guy you risk bagholding to zero. Stay safe anons, assblaster was the exception, not the rule.

>>53026948
Alright here is my honest opinion after due diligence:
The pros:
>The team is overall pretty good, most of them have good resumes and they're in it for the long haul, also, there isn't a single pajeet in the team
>After Jan 1st the full token circulation will be entered into the market, no inflation whatsoever for the foreseeable future
>Tom is one of the better CEOs in the space
>Anatoly
>The community is great, mostly intelligent people and some of the most loyal holders I've seen in crypto
>Evan Cheng and Stansberry think PRQ is a good investment
>Listed on good exchanges for a low cap

The cons:
>They tend to overpromise and often don't make deadlines
>IQ Protocol, despite enabling PRQ tokenomics, is a total flop, working on it for a year during bull killed PRQ momentum
>Anatoly working on a different project. Them thinking this was good marketing is retarded
>They hired too many marketing people, all the giveaways, competitions and whatnot is empty bullshit and doesn't suit a tech project
>Their revenue is not net positive yet, they rely partially on funding to survive

Hope this helps somebody make their decisions

>>53028282
Pretty good quick rundown, thanks for sharing
Overall the project isn't a scam and it's not dying, and it's moving forward, so regardless of other impediments it's one of the best choices considering the market cap

Downsides seem to be much smaller than the upsides, also considering the revenue part is the biggest problem, but revenue should start coming in in Q1 2023 so that should be solved soon

If everything goes right, it should get a big pump when listed on binance in the next 3 years.
Comfy hold

>>53022957
Prq

>>53027963

>>53028282
>Con
It's a webapp that doesn't need a token.

There really isn't any more due diligence you need to do than this.

>>53029514
I mean 99% of crypto doesnt technically need a token, in most cases an ICO just fills the need for crowdfunding. Yet here we all are trying to find tokens to invest in.
The Parsiq team has through actions expressed a lot of gratitude towards their supporters though, by always working on improving the tokenomics, making the token needed for their services and by burning 190million of their own reserve token supply as good will gesture etc.

Token not needed is a dumb argument in crypto desu.

I don't get the narrative anyway. Traditional companies raise Money through Stocks as Well and don't really offer them anything. You can buy Stocks and participate in value appreciation, that's it. And that's what we are doing with crypto - buy tokens to profit

>>53028282
Eth doesn’t make deadlines either, so there’s that.

>>53025315
Damn dude you are a fucking idiot.

The data already being decentralized is exactly why you DON'T want to use Parsiq. You are inserting a centralized layer into the final chain of custody. It literally renders the entire thing useless. Decentralized blockchains are slow and inefficient because that is the price you pay for decentralization. If you centralize the data at the very last step, it was all for nothing. Because you've lost the guarantee of trustless data.

>>53030529
Shit-tier argument. Companies would much rather want to use a service that has faster, better organized, better structured etc. data with a team backing it that they can contact for support if needed. This is the exact same reason why some projects using the Graph were complaining that it was slow and shit and they couldnt contact anybody about it and they were looking into switching services to Parsiq instead.
Trustless is a fucking meme in this situation, Parsiq has no benefit in manipulating the data and projects have no reason to distrust them. They simply want the best most efficient solution there is available, and decentralized ones are not it.

>>53030587
My argument is well substantiated. The evidence being that not a single legitimate company is paying to use Parsiq. You cannot name one non scam client. Fuck off shill

>>53030913
Alright Eric. Team confirmed it's being used atm and even hinted government usage is approaching. paying customers will come in due time

>>53030587
Based going to Keep stacking

>>53030913
Its not, you didnt counter a single one of my points. Projects have their own service to run, and they cannot afford 24 hour downtime with no ability to contact anybody for support. Centralized blockchain data services will be much more preferable than decentralized ones.

For the sake of this argument its not relevant wether or not they will end up using Parsiq or a different centralized blockchain data service. So leave that out of the picture

>>53030587
you seriously need to get your shit up to date, not only you're using stale fud about the graph being slow, but you are also assuming that there isn't anything in the works about the woes that developers have been complaining since launch. You'll get caught with your pants down.

>>53031168
Yaniv Tal is a jew. If you want to know what happens to your money if you trust a jew with it, ask FTX users

>>53031263
or Bancor users

>>53031017
and I confirmed that APY is 0.001% because zero users. Rong Wong Dong has been hinting about government usage since the day he joined. I remember the hints about novi, diem, SAP, and all the other bullshit hype jobs. Numbers don't lie. Scamming estonians do

>>53031972
Wrong APY is near zero because rewards are front loaded. 50% for the first week and it diminishes 50% every week after. We just haven’t had new clients recently due to the dead period of testing the new tech that was released. Once the clients finish testing tsunami and data lakes you should see a jump in APY.

>>53032297
Kek this is exactly what I mean, decentralized data providers is a fucking meme and no project wants to deal with it.

>>53032401
They will never learn until it’s too late

>>53028015
>prq bad but I won't say why
>Every shitcoin pumped 1000x last bullrun
>cannot understand an obvious joke about the 10c smart contract, likely due to actual autism
>I want to help you make it bros but I will contribute absolutely nothing to the discussion and only sperg about with negativity
Brilliant. Thanks faggot, just loaded up 50k fartshits because of your retarded post

>>53032297
apy was never 50%. I remember it peaked at about 10% the first day following a rental. Then 9% a day later, 8% the next day, and then 0.1% a month later. It averages out to 0% over the course of a year.

I don't understand how fucking cuckold you must be to keep repeating the team's broken narrative. They lied to you. In 2021 they said 2022 would be the year of adoption. They secured zero serious customers. Then they pivoted to Tsunami to get another hype campaign going. Now the latest cope is that everything will be better once Tsunami testing is over. Wasn't that shit released in fucking June? 6 months to test my ass. Nobody wants to fucking use it. You losers will be saying the same thing December 2023 when there is still zero revenue. I am not a betting man but I would bet every fucking penny I own that there will still be 0 APY and 0 real customers at the end of next year. It's the safest bet in history

>>53033789
Cope more and learn to read.
I guarantee you didn't purchase shit, retard.
>10c is an obvious joke
Yeah sure, it was such a hilarious joke that he kept spamming it even when every single poster in every single thread he posted it in called him a retard and told him to stop posting very obvious bullshit. What a masterful troll, truly a master of the lulz, those who don't understand such a comedy genius must be autistic.
>I was only pretending to be retarded!
Ahah pure gold, funny every time. It was even funnier when it dumped below 10c and he started shilling PRQ instead. Speaking of which, I'm glad he switched over, he fits right in and can post years old fud at his leisure so you shit eating morons will be surprised when it turns out that things change over the years.

>>53035028
>>53035369
>1 post by this id
>seething manlet
>yep its eric postin time

>>53035369
I have never seen such high dosage of seethe in awhile, this is great
You still have yet to refute anything or provide anything of value to the discussion
I'm glad you're more concerned with my investments than me, being in these threads for months

I have 180,000 prq looking to get to 250k. Will I make it?

>>53036169
>>53036309
>be in GRT thread
>have PRQ shills fart and shit in said thread
>they link to this thread
>proceed to fart and shit in the linked thread
>parkeks seething
Cope.
My provided value is calling you retards getting swindled by very obvious scammers.

>>53036466
How does 3 million sound

>>53036169
post physique

>>53036859
you cannot post something like >>53035369 or
>>53000940 and proceed to say we're the ones seething
Thanks for the bumps though I guess

>>53037186
>he posted a copypasta and he called me a retard and explained why I'm a retard
>he must be seething
Seethe

>>53035028
Exactly what I mean. It peaks the first week then drops off. You’ll see Q1 2023

Daily reminder that Omeganigger is a scamming faggot looking to pump and dump his fartshits on retarded gullible newfags.
Any of you retards buying PRQ should just rope desu. Get fucked, niggers.

>>53038242
This is a new fag pretending to be an old fag and putting way to much effort into it.

>>53038330
>t. newfag

>>52993237
Where exactly will investors get confident after seeing the chart?

>>53038377
t. Newer fag

>>53038426
>he can't greentext
>he didn't even check my dubs
You have to go back (to r*ddit).

>>52993237
Based, glad to see a PRQ thread, I've started accumulating a few months ago, don't care about fudders, a good non-meme low mc project, retards can keep buying LUNC hoping for a miracle kek

>>53038408
> I'm only interested in buying tops

>>53038242
Yes, you're the type of stable genius I would like to take investment advice from.

Get fucked faggot, you're trying too hard to be edgy. You don't belong here

>>53004341
>I've been stacking Monero, Dia, Ride and Vet lately, thou BTC and eth still hold over 50% of my total portfolio.

aside from your ETH ad BTC holding thats a terrible portfolio fren. but good luck to you.

Damn it feels so good to own 400k PRQ at the generational bottom

Literally feels like stealing link for .20 cents back in 2018

>>53038602
Monero is solid.

>>53038455
>faggot

>>53038455
Checked

>>53038533
kek my OC really got you niggers buck broken
nice dubs but fuck off midwit
enjoy Omegafag's fartshit getting dumped all over your face

>>53038850
Your attempts at being edgy are cringe af.

>>53039008
nigger

>>53038408
Looks pretty confident in hitting the bottom

>>53039019
Nice non dubs edgy boy

>>53039111
PRQueers are absolutely pathetic.
>muh so edgy
It's like you've never been on /biz/ before. Oh right, you are all r*ddit rapefugees who can't help but be Dunning-Kruger midwit cucks. Happy bagholding.

>>53039171
Stay poor pussy. You have zero balls and will remain an edgy autistic faggot while I get rich.

> t. Bigger balls

>>53039239
>t. baggie

>>53039239
>St-stay poor p-p-pussy. You have z-zero b-balls and will remain an edgy autistic f-f-faggot while I get r-r-rich....
>t. redditspacing homo

>>53039372
Nice

non dubs

edge lord

>>53039372
Why do you think about reddit so much?
Just go back.

>>53039397
>Just go back.
Not before you get in the oven, kike.

>>53039457
Woah

“Oven.”

“Kike.”

Edgy.

>>52993237
I have 10k prq that I bought around a year ago that has lost most of its value. Convince me this project isn't dead in the water and/or a scam. Also tell me if/when I can at least make my money back.

>>53039395
>>53039614
>he just can't stop redditspacing
pic related is (((You)))

>>53039637
>I have 10k prq that I bought around a year ago that has lost most of its value. Convince me this project isn't dead in the water and/or a scam. Also tell me if/when I can at least make my money back.
Just wait for Omegafag's scam pump and dump your bags on the newfags ITT. Desu it will probably take awhile though so might just be better to sell, especially if Omega fucks off and dumps early because not enough r*dditors are falling for his grift.

>>53039696
Wow dude just move on. Your fud is giving me chainlink vibes

>>53040294
Sorry I'm trying to shield well-meaning anons from your grift. You've been repeatedly BTFO yet you still are shilling this dead shitcoin. It can only be because you're in too deep and need to pump and dump your bags. It's so obvious desu.

>>53040557
Thanks for all the bumps.

>>53038408
Let's compare a Top 10 project like Car-oh shit its the same chart??

>>52993237
Got quite a lot going on in the ecosystem it seems. I don't see any payment solutions and gateways though. When is that coming through?

>>52993817
>Btc is only worth holding during the bear market.
Bear market is for catching good alts early pleb. Emphasis on those building. Not sure where you're looking but CryptoXpress looks good to me, especially the utilities on their wallet app.

>>53040557
Yeah man you're definitely in these threads fuding 24/7 out of the kindness of your heart, definitely no ulterior motive.. uh-huh sure buddy.
You're a grifter yourself

PRQ is getting fucked!

>>53042782

>>53042791

>>53042803

>>53042809

>>53042814

>>53042824

>>53042829

>>53042831

>>53042838

>>53042842

>>53042850

>>53042852

>>53042859

>>53042874

>>53042881

>>53042890

>>53042896

>>53042902

>>53042922

t/n : the other 300 pages aren't translated the second screening of the day will begin shortly

>>53042957

>>53042963

>>53042974

>>53042999

>>52998174
normies don't understand it

>>52999004
>whales averaging down and buying up the float
where do you see this? Blockchain explorer?

>>52999488
checked but grt seems more promising, not even shilling. Isn't it decentralized?

Fuck you guys stop bumping

>>53043522
I forgot to sage

>>53004479
but what gonna make this coin moon more than others considering that it is already on coinbase?

holy shit please die thread

>>53043564
People buying

>>53043522
>>53043596
Bump

>>53043891
ETH's L2 centric approach might allow minor scalability increases but at what cost.

I get that it says "it's centralized but still censorship-resistant" all over the place, and motivates the claim by saying there's a bunch of future tech and mitigations to avoid censorship... and yet at the end of the day we're still talking about taking a multibillion-dollar payments layer that's unregulated due to being decentralized and centralizing its payment processing layer (not validation/settlement), to the point that the layer becomes smaller than VISA. And somehow expecting a reg hammer to not drop on it once it goes live. I get that it's maybe possible to keep production censorship-resistant, yet all the "technically" arguments in the world can't stop a regulator with a small, finite list of payment processors to target My big question is this. Back when ETH 2.0 was first proposed, how to shard a POS blockchain was a completely unsolved problem. Now, however, there is NEARProtocol, which is in production. At least one of the following is true:
A: NEAR makes worse trilemma-addressing tradeoffs than Endgame (e.g. Vitalik thinks NEAR doesn't work)
B: ETH2 sharding isn't ever actually meant to ship and Endgame is the latest 5-year research project to placate the ETH community.
C: ETH2 is suffering from "not invented here" syndrome and won't use NEARs approach because of vanity.
I'm having a hard time coming up with other explanations.

Then there is solidity, which is still a huge problem. The pointless turing completeness, blank checks that can cause huge losses of wallet funds if dapps get hacked. L2 degrades into hub-and-spoke, with increasing centralization from desire to be on the same protocol as popular dapps and the problem with L2 technologies is that the cost of transactions on the base layer is nearly guaranteed to go up over time as the complexity of those L2 solutions goes up to accommodate more types of transactions/contract interactions.

Im a comfy PRQ holder AMA

It's only benefit is being a fast chain, it's not scalable or any more secure than your average PoS scam.
Scaling via sidechains has been tried before and was considered unworkable by the BTC folk. Having security vary wildly from subnet to subnet is silly. Nothing about it is interesting.

Same thing basically goes for cosmos,they think that each dapp should have its own entire chain, so if you want to swap something you would go to a dapp which runs on its own cosmos blockchain with its own validators (also capped at around ~150 so not ideal) but allow for interoperability between all those chains, it's how L2 on Ethereum is supposed to work, app specific. It's a realistic approach imo and it's going to be interesting to observe that ecosystem, only problem is that there is a limit on scaling, decentralization, probably security too since attacking one dapp is now easier than the entirety of eth for example, I think they are trying to work on shared security though, would be interesting to see the limits in that. Since it's PoS it's likely going to run into regulatory problems. And the token itself doesn't capture as much value because each dapp/chain will have its own main token.

Elrond or multiversex or multichainx or whatever is a total scam. Their tech is nonsense and their entire ecosystem are 3 dapps, that's less than kadena lmao

Same for harmony but they went with the EVM so people could shit up the chain with that. Their tech was never going to work and I think the chain is already dead.

another dead one in my list, but it's main technical problem was it being a single chain, scaling via big blocks and having a validator limit of around 100. I mean there is also the fact that there was a ponzi dapp integrated into the chain lol

>>53044037
>>53044088
>>53044125
>>53044143
>>53044155
Imagine being so upset a PRQ thread is up for so long that you start spamming it with offtopic shit

This one is just a centralized casino, 50% of supply owned by insiders and that's better than most chains. Also more decentralized than most chains.
>>53044187
Keep posting

Near is like a really user-friendly DHT where regions act as "shards" which can scale out the network (but with diminishing returns as it scales) e.g. the performance gain from NEAR going from 10 to 100 "shards" would be much less than 10x for real world (e.g. popular dapps/whales/exchanges exist and drive a majority of the traffic) usage patterns but would be closer to 10x for more contrived patterns (e.g. a benchmark using solely unrelated, p2p token transfers.) It's an interesting approach and since dapp devs don't have to worry about running a chain or how to scale their dapp it might make for a chain that sees massive growth. Security and decentralization I'm not sure about because right now there are currently only 100 nodes validating, their plans is that once the network is able to scale those shards up there will be more nodes that do validation. But it's proof of stake and has big VCs, which might be a good thing for some people.

>>53044187
>spamming it with offtopic shit
This is a crypto board, it's very much on topic, parsiq also wants to integrate to more chains, you're very uneducated in the parsnips anon

Another dead one, not going to bother.

Another single chain nonsense chain with less validators than actual scams. DAGs have the fatal flaw of the "small world" problem in that a killer dapp actually constricts the overall network performance. It's why a DAG's should come with a warning label that posts both their "Best-Case Performance" AND "Worst-Case Performance" numbers. This is why DAGs are not used for scaling in HFT/finance, even though the industry tried them out in the 90s... DAGs suck at scaling in production BUT they make for fantastic performance demos and POCs... which is why finance bothered to try them in the first place (this was in the era before the senior leadership at funds were tech/eng types and didn't know better)
They took an enterprise blockchain that never got adoption and converted it to a public project without changing their consensus mechanism (we have enterprise clients and designed chainweb for the shift to public because the consensus demands are inverted.) Their consensus protocol was never designed for hundreds of consensus participants so I doubt the claims that anyone can run a node (much easier to get high throughout when you limit your consensus members to 30). The “we’re patented and closed source so it’ll never fork” gives IBM a run for its money for the award for best bug marketed as a feature

Same thing.

Polkadot is similar to Cosmos just that it's so much worse. When I first heard about the 100 parachain limit I thought it was fake. But it's true, the network is so limited people have to bid to get their chain to interoperate with the network. Actual clown world type stuff. Ethereum with it's L2s might be more advanced than this chain, no clue why it has such a large mkt cap.

The supreme big block scaling chain, no idea how there has not been a technical problem with it yet but this one seems prime to fail, there are only ~100 real nodes that are the backbone of the network but shills will tell you that all the meme consensus nodes are doing something. Not going to mention the vesting and VC stuff but thats really odd, the staking "rewards" going to everyone is also bizarre. Like it should fail but it hasn't yet. The scaling is also extremely silly, it's just big blocks but no one is freaking out like they did when BSV did it.

>>53044187
Idk I’m interested and want to read more of this!

This one I am convinced is just a large scale scam, I don't think it will end up exposed like FTX though, but behind the scenes it has to be a fucking dumpster fire. Multiple Haskell devs mentioned that their development is slow for no reason and I can't be bothered to provide source because I'm just trying to 310

>>53044341
What do you think about Radix and RVP? I’m also interested in hearing about Kaspa. Please write a little bit about each one for me neatly organized in one reply with one image for each project. I need to know what L1 is best for PRQ!

Cool consensus but again also a single chain. This means it's just like eth in that it needs L2 solutions to scale out. It really does nothing besides have a cool consensus.

>>53044357
I'm so sorry, I would put more effort in but I don't exactly have the time

>>53044385
Kaspa is not an L1 in the sense that it's not a smart contract chain. There is nothing to say.

RVP is a failed scam. It's really just a grif, I mean at least I assume it's dead because they just forked some dead chain I can't remember the name of and claimed it will do 100k tps or something. I remember spending time arguing with the shills when it was worth more than dirt but they never listed.

Radix is a pipe dream as far as scalability is concerned. Distributed hash tables -- are a well-understood problem in distributed systems, and fast pessimistic DHTs simply do not exist at scale in centralized cloud deployments. When a presumably decentralized blockchain pretends to solve a problem that the best engineers at Amazon and Google can't with centralized systems, it's time to call bullshit. Now to be clear, those systems work, but they don't scale. I fully believe that a system can do all sorts of things up to some limit, but scaling is about being able to throw more resources at a problem. Look at AVAX which is now publicly admitting that they need L2s (subnets) to "scale".

oldETH 2.0 used to make the same claims by the way, that AI or ML or some other magic fairy dust will move around all the accounts to be where they need to be, "atomically". It's not credible, and therefore discussing "use cases for atomic composability" is like discussing use-cases for pocket-sized quantum computers or fusion reactors.

Thus, it's important to understand that there is no "debating" with cult followers, because ANY technology that is actually proven can always be beaten by magical fairy dust. Real engineering is about working with the tradeoffs of well-understood solutions.

Nervos is just Cosmos but backed by the People's Bank of China

Similar to Chai and ETH in that it's a single chain, but different in that it's proof of stake and really has nothing to offer besides long-standing legitimacy because it was launched earlier.
So when ubisoft wanted to launch NFTs they went with them because eth was PoW and PoW le bad! Now that eth is PoS what value is there in tezos? They claim they act more like a dao but that has been their biggest disadvantage.

>>53044357
Hes just trying to flood the thread so it reaches reply limits because hes seething that a positive PRQ thread is up for so long

This one is similar to kaspa in that it's build by randoms and that it's using a DAG, but they at least have some kind of smart contracts, not nearly as advanced as solidity but better than nothing lol.
Their goal was to be the easy platform where people would tokenize stuff but why do you need an entire chain for that. ETH is rather easy and comes with a massive ecosystem.

>>53044540
I don't see what the issue is. PRQ needs to expand to good chains. Doesn't it.

Stacks claims to be a BTC scaling solution but in reality it's just a centralized side chain. There is also more drama but I don't care.

>>53044414
So you’re saying it’s a kyspa scam?
.

what about icp fren
>>53044581

>>53044540
No he is teaching me. I am very interested.

This one had 8 real nodes last I checked lol. It's an entire chain just for NFTs and I have no fucking idea why they even bothered because this is similar to Hathor useless when ETH or any other competent big chain exists.

>>53044616
I mean what's the point? It's only a scam because the team paid market makers to pump and dump it.
>>53044643
It's just a website hosting service with a chain attached.

>>53044581
Incredibly based, keep going
>in b4 t-thanks for the bumps....

>>53044643
ICP is a centrollized scam shilled by VCs who bought at 3c and dumping tokens every month.

>>53044659
>It's just a website hosting service with a chain attached.

is that not interesting?

>>53039637
No response...very telling

5 Keys control the entire TVL on the bridge. It's hilarious. The tech is so shit but people got scammed into thinking it makes sense because the narrative was that it's an ETH scaling solution, when it's NOT.
Again around 150 nodes validator limit so more centralized than VISA

>>53044676
No the network is so centralized it's silly
>>53044666
I am saging every post I make, also you will not like where this is going, 310 soon

This one was one of the earlier sharding chains and sadly it's just transaction sharding not actual state sharding, I think it's dead but not sure. It doesn't really solve any of the underlying problems that hold crypto back from scaling out.

Oasis is just cosmos or polkadot but centralized, the max node count needs to be limited to 100 because BFT comes with a message overhead. Not decentralized or meaningfully decentralized. It being Prof of Stake is the reason for this by the way. You should blame PoS for the lack of decentralization.
Next point is scalability, like said before it's cosmos but not good. ParaTimeLayers = Parachains, they all need to settle to the main chain (consensus layer) like L2 does on ETH. This comes at a cost because the main chain has a limited blocksize, if all blocks are full, fees go up. Much like ETH.

>>53044692
Why is 5 keys so bad?
150 valudators is more than 5 times as many as Bnb

I can't remember if Ergo was also trying to be the L2 hub of some cosmos like ecosystem. Or if it was the chain that wrote in it's whitepaper that they had no idea how to scale but rest assured if they found out they would implement the solution lol. Probably both.
From what I heard the chain is barely usable because it's just so slow.

>>53044761
>it's dogshit not horeseshit
anon i...

Mina is cool, and I might be wrong, but it doesn't solve it's main thing that it was supposed to solve.
The problem with blockchains is the huge state size that grows with more transactions, hence why sharding is such a important solution.
But this one tries to use zk to make the state small enough for every node. So to run a node you just need 32kb or something. Which sounds like magic.

But the problem with zk is that someone somewhere will need to store the entire chains. So, unless i'm wrong it literally does not solve the main thing it's build for. It's just a vc scam.

Kadena might be the only chain in existence that has a solution for true state sharding. Imagine polkadot but no main chain, limit on chains that can be added to scale the network, and, most importantly all those chains retain the same level of security, unlike cosmos, unlike avax like polkadot has to limit their chain for.
No limit means no limit on scaling, no security loss means no fuckery with L2 and L2 inherent limits. It means low fees forever, it means actual reasonable decentralization. I'm saying reasonable because a scalable network will require hardware but the fact that it's even possible is preferred to a centralized single chain monster PoS network like sol. Or an economically bizarre mess like ETHL2.0
The smart contract language is also more secure than solidly.
The token economics make sense.

But it's not without it's flaws, the team is slow as fuck, their ecosystem initiative is shady as fuck, they can't make sense of how to interact with your community, not much transparency.

>>53044037 >>53044088 >>53044125 >>53044143 >>53044155 >>53044177 >>53044191 >>53044212 >>53044234 >>53044269 >>53044287 >>53044307 >>53044341 >>53044384 >>53044403 >>53044414 >>53044449 >>53044478 >>53044493 >>53044524 >>53044558 >>53044581 >>53044659 >>53044692 >>53044715 >>53044757 >>53044783 >>53044809 >>53044959
well this has been very informative!

>>53045041
Anon all of this is really low effort I'm so sorry. I was just trying to kill this thread

>>53045104
why are 5 keys bad?

>>53045139
What's not bad about it anon, it's crazy, they can run off with your money, we're in crypto to eliminate trust, that's the whole point here, if people can't understand that then what are we even doing.

>>53045177
Ah so its you again
>>53030529
>>53030913
Samefagging under different IDs, spamming threads because you got BTFO in arguments and got nothing left to say.
You must have no shame.

>>53045212
I'm pretty sure it's someone else. There were completely different reasons for what happened to this thread. If I'm not wrong 49xxxZL3 might even hold some PRQ.

>>53045212
>its you again
There are a lot of people saying the same thing

>>53045254
Please nigger its always you, and we all know it

>>53045271
Explain

>>53045286
Thanks just bought another 100k PRQ

>>53045286
Whatever faggot Ill just report all your posts and get you banned for a week. Trying to kill a thread because it doesnt fit your narrative is the single most sad thing Ive seen on this board

>>53045492
I hold prq, and I'm not breaking any rules.
This is very much on topic anon.
It is what it is.

>>53045513
>What is spamming/flooding
>What is announcing 'sage'
>What is off-topic posting

Go look at the rules faggot

>>53045513
why do you believe in prq anon? i might buy a big bag so pls shill me

>>53045592
It's not spamming I just have a lot to say.
It was hypothetical.
It's crypto related, so not off-topic.

>>52993237
Is it 2021 again

Is prq really back

Glad I held

>>53045603
It's the best data provider, tech is unparalleled and I like all their other project ideas. Just a shame about all the tokens

>>53022777
Cbecked

>>53045592
Annoncing report >>53045492 is also bannable so stop seething and just be friends uwu

>>53045606
>>53045104
>I was just trying to kill this thread

>>53045726
I did nothing wrong.

>>53044692
>5 Keys control the entire TVL on the bridge
sir i can't find any proof of this, can you provide some pls?

>>53045769
>Polygon admin key is controlled by a 5 out of 8 multi-sig contract
https://twitter.com/Justin_Bons/status/1603100139429789697

>>53045769
Polygon is controlled by a 5 out of 8 multi-sig contract, and four of these access keys are controlled by the four co-founders.
The founders + 1 retard can steal everything. Everything. There is nothing preventing them from doing so if they want to rug everyone and flee.

>>53045666
>Satan is telling me to be friends with an insincere Jew
Typical

>>53046234
prq schizo acting like an icp bagholder
bearish.

>>53046234
bearish.

>>53046259
>>53046290
Youre literally samefagging again, mistakenly replying with the wrong ID here >>53045815

God youre pathetic, I cant stay in this thread anymore Im cringing out of my chair

>>53046335
meds.

>>53046335
We clearly googled the same thing for quick reference look again >>53045815
>>53045811
meds.

>no reviews on the doujins posted
Do you have any idea how long I spent analysing tanlines before posting those two? Most stuff that contains the tanlines tag only contains one or two chapters with tanlines and finding those chapters is a pain in the ass.
I even went through the trouble of picking funny ones.

>>53046419
you dumbass bumped the thread

>>53046433
Exactly once because I wanted people to call me a sick fuck and tell me to kill myself to reach the bump limit faster.

>>53046419
I had to leave to buy stuff when you started posting.
It's too bad, I like tanlines a fair bit. Hypothetically if it contained references to the characters low age then that would have been illegal for me to read so I am glad I did not read it.

>>53046419
I've been thinking about setting up a cheap device to run a relay node for btc/xmr/tor.
Any suggestions for cheap device?

>>53046522
Stop being poor. Buy the latest Ryzen CPU and run a full XMR node with P2Pool for the good of the network without caring about making a profit.
Raspberry Pis despite conspiracy theorists claiming otherwise are happy to report that they fixed their supply chain issues

>>53046590
>Stop being poor. Buy the latest Ryzen CPU and run a full XMR node with P2Pool for the good of the network without caring about making a profit.
I have a Ryzen 7 3700x.
I don't think it would net any profit, but maybe worth mining a bit to generate heat this winter on my own bill and get some piconeros in return. The only problem is I don't want my computer to be super loud or slow when I am using it. Building a new mining rig seems a bit out of my budget right now, but it is something I have considered and planned before. Really dry air too though if I do that, humidifier to compensate? I don't know.
>Raspberry Pis despite conspiracy theorists claiming otherwise are happy to report that they fixed their supply chain issues
but have the prices come back down to reasonable levels?

>>53046488
I just checked. Avoid page 5 of the second set of images on the archive and you are not breaking the law. Really I just want your opinion on the dress she is wearing before she gets raped but the dialog is funny too.
>stay still and it will all be over before you can say rape...

>>53045104
I fucking kneel

>>53046653
>I have a Ryzen 7 3700x.
>I don't think it would net any profit, but maybe worth mining a bit to generate heat this winter on my own bill and get some piconeros in return. The only problem is I don't want my computer to be super loud or slow when I am using it.
Are you using a stock fan? It won't overheat if you have a decent air cooler and you can limit resources to stop it running slow.
> Building a new mining rig seems a bit out of my budget right now, but it is something I have considered and planned before. Really dry air too though if I do that, humidifier to compensate? I don't know.
Leaving bowls of water in the same room as a heater stops them drying out the air.
>but have the prices come back down to reasonable levels?
You can intermittently get them at rrp and that will be the norm again soon. They are permanently raising the price of the zero by 5 dollars but I don't even think that is keeping up with inflation.
Something low power will be cheaper than running a free dumpster pc long term if you aren't mining.

>>53046788
>Are you using a stock fan?
No. My CPU is running decent temps, but I'm not exactly mining or gaming either.
I think I would mine at a loss it looks like due to electricity costs, but I'm already paying for heating so being able to slightly reduce the heat would probably compensate it to break even-ish. Plus you get some piconeros that you can just kinda sit on, not like I'd sell them for fiat anyways. I wouldn't want to mine on my personal computer so would need to build a mining rig if I was going to.
>Something low power will be cheaper than running a free dumpster pc long term if you aren't mining.
That's the plan. Figured a Pi 4 or some alternative will be enough to run a relay node for Tor at practically no cost. Don't know if it would be powerful enough to run a btc or xmr non-mining node though, or storage (usb 3.0 flash drive? idk)


>A non-exit relay should be able to handle at least 7000 concurrent connections. This can overwhelm consumer-level routers.
Unsure if my router or a Pi 4 would be capable of providing a good service.
Doesn't seem like something that would be easy to find out.
I'm not sure if this is true, but I've heard running a relay node at all times is advantageous as it blends in with your own traffic?

Unrelated to me since I moved on from drugs, but I just thought of something cool.
Illegal grow operations could mine monero whenever their lights are off so they are less suspicious on the electrical grid if they are using legal electricity and not diesel aggregators (added benefit of producing co2 for plants though).

>>53046997
It can do all those tasks separately but maybe will have issues multitasking. If necessary just run two at the same time.
>>53047062
Why not just have a 24 hour light phase and split your plants into an A and B group for the dark phase?

>>53047216
because that would make too much sense, duh

It's really a blessing that no one just made 10 posts in the other one to kill it as well

megumin cat

>>53047264
Speaking of things that make no sense POW with centralised mining is still an unsolved problem. How can a mining network claim to be decentralised when two pools contain more than 50% of the hash rate? How have people been brushing this under the rug for over ten years? How can any network besides Monero where people are happy to mine it at a loss ever hope to have decentralised mining? Even if it is only 10% and not at least 50% after a year of P2Pool being live I think it will continue trending upwards. Why do the Monero general unofficially support Wownero when it is leeching network security from Monero which it desperately needs when they attack unrelatedworthless garbage like Piratechain?
The thing that initially interested me in KDA was the whole multi algorithm mining which is another alternative but that seems to be vapourwave.

>>53047512
I am not attracted to the number 5 at all and don't understand the autism behind keeping the thread up. If it was going to reach 7 or 10 days I would get it.

>>53047546
>vapourwave
aye but the fact it's possible is pretty wild

In theory.
>>53047571
I'm not in the day 5 gang, I'm in the longer than prq gang.

prq staying up and the other one dying would have been unacceptable, xmr being the last one standing is how it's supposed to end

>>53047546
XMR has a serious security issue in that it would be potentially profitable to rent computational power to attack it so not necessarily. On the other hand it hasn't happened yet so it will never happen bro.

>>53047546
>How have people been brushing this under the rug for over ten years?
Because it's fine if it's PoW, bro.

>>53047698
Meant for >>53047642