/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>9601793
1 cent incoming

>>9601793
still have my buys between 1-3 dollars.

>>9601793
fucking cuck devs taking forever to release a decent wallet they been saying "soon" for months

>>9601793
Useless coin, nothing backing up the network

>>9602506
nano is literally the only coin with real use

>>9601793
Bag holders literally more deluded than Arkies.

bought at bottom bichez

>>9602613
Yeah me too, $0.11 off bitgrail. It's in my 3-5 year retirement plan boooyyyy.
Deluded as fuck and having a great time yyee nano googo nanon nanonanoanoanonaan

>>9601793
a "currency" that's more centralized than EOS

>>9601793
How much Nano do I need to make it?

>>9602672
EOS is equally spread among 21 different block authors who are voted in. It's not completely decentralized but it's not centralized either.
If you look at the spread of created blocks (not block participants), EOS is more decentralized than bitcoin.
NANO will get a lot more decentralized with the new wallets I think.

>>9602751
Completely untrue. Bitcoin blocks are in fact mostly mined by pools, but those pools are composed of miners who can switch loyalty to other pools in an instant.
BTC functions the same way you'd expect a DPOS coin to - though the governance is effectively entirely off-chain and dominated by profit incentives.

>>9601793
I went all in around $8, feel fine about it, just going to hold of course. Same thing I did with NEO and there was all that China banning fud, cut to it 10x for me just by waiting it out for a few months, whatever, easy game

Unironically NANO will be a big player against IOTA next bull market.

TRX will go to shit.

Screen this

>>9602893
> Untrue
> Mined by pools
Pool percentages are not uniformly 1/21. All I was trying to say. Cheers

>>9602543
It's also literally the only coin without a working wallet kek.

>>9603094
>big player against IOTA next run
Can you transmit data using NANO? It's my impression this is impossible and is a choice due to speed > everything. How are these two comparable other than both being DAGs, seriously?

>>9603172
Love both IOTA and NANO. I tried to use the IOTA api and got 10 MIOTA stuck in a non attached wallet address. Can't find out how to attach it.
Cool project but holy crap is it a more complex abstraction than NANO.
If I want to send money to someone p2p, nano is the obvious choice (once wallets are released). That's a pretty big market, maybe comparable to IOTA until fuckable robots.

>>9603172
IOTA nodes disagree with each other

>>9603204
>>9603211
That's cool but neither of these responses answer my legitimate question...

>>9601793
Bought at and been holding since 10.50... iron hands, hope this comes back

>>9603239
No, NANO uses UDP packets that are optimized for value transport. There is no arbitrary data (that I know of) that can be attached to these packets.

>>9603264
So they aren't really in the same ball park at all in terms of project goals. NANO is better compared to BTC and other pure currency coins. Nothing wrong with that, I just don't get the comparison.

>>9603299
IOTA could assume NANO's use case but NANO is better tailored for it. EOS could also eat NANO but it is more about dapps.

>>9603239
Well we are speculating on price... I never talked tech or fundamentals son. People shill coins here and make predictions it isn't reddit!

>>9603130
You forgot iota

Fuck this shitcoin. I thought I bought the dip and it keeps on dipping, what the hell bizbros.
Any news in the future that can help pump this up?; otherwise I don't see why I should be holding dead bags..

Dumped 150k between 5$-35$ USD on the run up. Lost 20k in the Bitgrail hack. Bought it all below 0.50 cents so I don't give a fuck.

Will rebuy at $1 and hopefully get something back from the Bitgrail class action lawsuit in 5 years.

>>9603130
theres a ton of third party wallets, like canoe