[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 13 KB, 300x300, 309621-LINK.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12341252 No.12341252 [Reply] [Original]

Been away from the markets since mid December. What news was released to cause this Chainlink spike today? I didn't see any headlines?

>> No.12341268

>>12341252
nothing, this rally will fail like the rest.

>> No.12341465

>>12341268
You sure? Not sure why something so substantial could happen for no reason?

>> No.12341474

>>12341268
tt-this rally is real

>> No.12341475

>>12341465
Of course he's not sure he's mad he's not on the gravy train. Probably a swinger who got BTFO

>> No.12341513

>>12341475
This isn't much of an argument

>> No.12341515

5.1k BTC volume

>> No.12341518

>>12341252
MIT Tech Review published an article about Chainlink and claimed 2019 would be boring. CCN posted an article about the MIT Tech Review article and cited all their claims, except anything about ChainLink. Today an anon cried about how expensive it's getting to bribe news sources not to publish articles about ChainLink. If you're curious about this development don't bother asking Rory.

>> No.12341525
File: 12 KB, 239x211, download (16).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12341525

I bought LINK at $1, I still want to kill myself

>> No.12341627

>>12341518
>If you're curious about this development don't bother asking Rory.
This sarcastic? Should I ask in their telegram? Been in link since last November.
I'm OP btw, just on mobile now.

>> No.12341647

>>12341627
Of course it's sarcasm you hillbilly. He won't admit any part in suppressing information. His response may be interesting though. Sometimes it can be fun to poke the bear but it's not productive.

>> No.12341672

>>12341518
my team has also stopped trying to suppress LINK news as well

>> No.12341729

>>12341672
Why? Node profitability and staking rewards is still far from being understood. You've got plenty of webs to weave and suckers to lead astray.

>> No.12341789

>>12341729
We're hands off and not actively shilling. Are resources are focused on other endeavors and it's no longer worth it to suppress

>> No.12341947

>>12341525
i did too, but then i also bought at 70c, 60c, 50c, 40c, 30c and 18c and now my average by in is at 40 cents so i'm up right now

>> No.12342971
File: 1.94 MB, 159x146, 1533225312793.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12342971

>>12341268

>> No.12342988

since when does a coin need "muh news" to pump. this is brainlet tier thinking. people are buying link because it's fucking good compared to everything else. and it should never have collapsed from 60 cents when BTC crashed a couple months ago. simple as that.

>> No.12342989

>>12341513
Neither was >>12341268. Are you ok bro? Like can you get yourself dressed in the mornings?

>> No.12343083
File: 444 KB, 640x477, 1546606546622.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12343083

>>12342988
This. Not sure why everyone here is surprised, LINK was way over sold.

>> No.12343142
File: 1.74 MB, 472x264, 1546628753362.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12343142

>>12342989
>>12343083
How naive can you be? Thinking a could could arbitrarily pump 25%+ on no news is the thinking that caused all good to come crashing down you ragging faggot.
Link is my biggest hold cause I'm aware of the fundamentals, but thinking this jump is "heathy" is retarded.

>> No.12343352

>>12341518
>>12341672
>>12341729

So if I hypothetically owned a semi decent looking crypto website on wordpress would it be a good idea to post a /biz/ made article on chainlink?? I would of course shill it afterwards.

>> No.12343361

>>12343142
Where's your jetpack, Zuckerberg?

>> No.12343375

>>12341475
>not recognizing the meme
kys, thanks

>> No.12343380
File: 85 KB, 1024x609, 1544986183877.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12343380

>>12343361
U wot?

>> No.12343408

>>12343142
>price moving towards actual value is unhealthy
>no news
Kys
P.s. get your ducks in a row before you do that

>> No.12343434

>>12341474
>W8
>1k
>ey

>> No.12343540

>>12343352
I wouldn't stop you. Most groups are tired of suppression and are aware of what's coming this quarter. Best to have tactics already shifted.

>> No.12343564

>>12343142
dumb bearmarket newfag
shit used to go 100% all the time in bull market and LINK just broke ath in sats. if anything this pump is weaker than it should be.

>> No.12343616

>>12341252
It is because of Nick szabos 03.01 "announcement"
And because we have our Ducks in a row

>> No.12343631

>>12343352
I say yes do it. I'm going full throttle on shilling Link, starting with Twitter first

>> No.12343675

>>12343631
>>12343540
Okay I eventually start my own thread and get all the /biz/ info dumps

>> No.12343697

>>12342988
Based

>> No.12343720

>>12343434
1234 34 34 not sure what that means but I like it

>> No.12343734

>>12343616
What is this you speak of?

>> No.12343766

PUMP

AND

DUMP

>> No.12343810

>>12343564
You're a fucking retard. I've been into crypto far longer than you. Good for you, being around long enough to see appc get listed on Binance.

>> No.12343872

>>12343734
What do you mean exactly?

>> No.12343906
File: 3.82 MB, 196x388, 1543438355679.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12343906

>>12343766
Shhhh. People are only allowed to acknowledge this for other projects.

>> No.12343920

>>12343810
>You're a fucking retard. I've been into crypto far longer than you.
>doesn't say how long he's actually been in
"I'm not a newfag, I've been here all summer!"

>> No.12343968

>>12343872
Where did Nick say he was announcing something?

>> No.12344008

>>12343968
In his twitter Profile he wrote the Date 03.01 And a lock into his name

Doesnt mean he means link
But some people think because of some larper that he told us the Date when all the btc whales will Change their btc for link

Sorry for the grammatical errors im drunk

>> No.12344111

>>12344008
Perfect, thanks, I hadn't seen this. It will be 10 years since the Genesis block of Bitcoin on 3/1

>> No.12344317

>>12343920
You got me kid

>> No.12344702
File: 365 KB, 2000x1153, 1543158947192.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12344702

WHY ARE YOU FAGGOTS LETTING THIS CRASH

>> No.12345011

>>12344702
Hello

>> No.12345337

>>12344111
You’re right on that part
>>12344008
No no. It’s the day you transfer all crypto to your own wallets as a celebration of the original intent of not having third parties control what is yours