The future currency of the Machine to Machine Economy

[Anonymous No.15981878]

If the predicted value of the M2M economy is to be in the trillions, and IOTA is the default value and data transfer of this ecosystem, then it's reasonable that IOTA will be worth $1000 easily. How are you not all in Anon?

[Anonymous No.15982288]

>>15981878
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aiHz6FMBPqo

[Anonymous No.15982299]

>>15981878
Because of deluded faggots like you

[Anonymous No.15982326]

>>15982288
Wat?

[Anonymous No.15982361]

>>15982299
Hey man, if you know a network ahead of IOTA or more promising than them, i would love to hear it.
Genuinely interested in the tech and economics of the 4th industrail revolution.

[Anonymous No.15982371]

>>15982326
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQc7clBueqo

[Anonymous No.15982379]

>>15982361
0/10 bait topkek

[Anonymous No.15982407]

>>15982379
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkrPFPn_F-I

[Anonymous No.15982438]

>>15982361

Bait 100%

[Anonymous No.15982477]

>>15982438
Shiiiiiiit, is this the state if biz now. Wanting to discuss a economics is classed as bad bait? Fuck me.

[Anonymous No.15982508]

>>15982361
Hey I think NANO might eat a bit of the IoT pie just because it's simpler and works now.
I support IOTA but txn throughput needs to scale up to make confirmations more reliable and quicker.

[Anonymous No.15982517]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=de3ZqA4TssY

[Anonymous No.15982571]

>>15982508
I have no faith in NANO i'm afraid, if IOTA can handle both data and value transfers in one then why use a second layer payment solution on a network that already has one?

[Anonymous No.15982748]

>>15982571
- address reuse won't lose funds
- design is extremely simple
- less complication on a protocol level
- designed for humans not robots
I like IOTA but we are a human economy right now.

[Anonymous No.15982929]

EVERYONE GET IN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

worst idea in crypto vs most usless idea in crypto

Nano vs IOTA brawl

Its like paraolymics !!!!!!!!!
/grabs popcorns

[Anonymous No.15983091]

>>15982748
I don't think the address reuse is enough of a problem to warrent a completely new over layer.
IOTA is just as simple.
Less complication is also another way of saying, less capability, but i can understand, not everyone wants to use C++.
Correct, we are NOW, but we won't be, preparing for the future could be the benefit of IOTA, rather than NANO being designed for right now.
>>15982929
I keked

[Anonymous No.15983208]

>>15981878
Totally obsolete. Is anyone that matters even building anything on IOTA?

A team from Bank of America that built on Algorand just won the Barclays/ISDA global hackathon. These are the kinds of projects you want to keep an eye on, not ancient 2017 shitcoins.

[Anonymous No.15983231]

>>15982361
0/10 bait, you are better than that

[Anonymous No.15983262]

>>15982361
Kek, you came here from reddit, didn't you?

[Anonymous No.15983265]

>>15983208
The IOTA foundation has over 100 employees, they are partnered with Jaguar, land Rover and one of the biggest investors in sesory development and automated machinery, Bosch.
>Bank of America team.
>Won an award from their parent company.
Shit man that's like get a worlds greatest son t-shirt.
Also why is the fact that it's older and been developed for a longer time go against it? Shit, age is all Bitcoin really has going for it now.

[Anonymous No.15983278]

>>15983265
Sorry i meant sensory detection
>>15983262
Nah mate, i came from 2016 biz

[Anonymous No.15983291]

>>15983091
Ok, I'll give you a hint faggot.
Feeless transactions without centralized overhead can fundamentally never work. Iota will either buckle and introduce fees in some hidden way, or come up with some even more complicated and exploitable overhead, like they did with their coordicide.
Mana, lmao

[Anonymous No.15983352]

>>15983291
Incorrect. I can hand gold to someone feelessly without a third party. But i suppose that is a pedantic example.
I guess it could be argued that confirmation of other transactions is the payment that you are talking about.
As far as i'm aware coordicide implementation is going well and is predicted to have a success chance of 99.99%

[Anonymous No.15983390]

>>15983352
Lmao.
Yeah ive even heard as high as 99.999999%
It's guaranteed money, buddy, go for it!

[Anonymous No.15983430]

>>15983390
I'm serious, it could be bullshit but if you want i could find the link

[Anonymous No.15983441]

>>15983390
Here mate, could be false confidence but it' a legitimate source

[Anonymous No.15983497]

>>15983441
Sorry to break it to you, but you belong to a special kind of people : You can see future but no one will believe you. Just like Cassandra, the in the greek mythology (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cassandra).).

Don't worry, Cassandra was alone, but we are many. Just let time show those tards we are right. Time is our best ally, on parwith hard work.

20GI marine reporting in. All in IOTA. No concession.

[Anonymous No.15983520]

>>15983497
wtf i love IOTA now

[Anonymous No.15983860]

You iota fags have no issues they literally invented they own crypto algo AND want to do shit in ternary way?

Like im overpayed dev and its fucking it's hilarious even for me ...

[Anonymous No.15983955]

>>15983497
Top class
>>15983860
How dare bill gates create his own operating system!
Honestly the reasoning for ternary is convincing. If this economy takes off then ternanry will use 33% less energy than binary. The cost on the energy used to run this will be massive.

[jj No.15983973]

>>15981878

Takes a lot of trust in a government not to screw that up or expand the programmers. You’re looking at the intent of the program, where I’m looking at the taxes required in the first place and the way gov screws up whatever it touches. Lots of power being handed over.

[Anonymous No.15984007]

>>15981878
Thanks to iota I made a shit ton in the 2017 bull run. I too thought it was a great project.

The problem is, that the tangle is shit and iota is officially a shit coin that will die out.

Anyone on this board who isn’t all in link is very stupid.

[Anonymous No.15984095]

>>15983955
>how dare they code for something that cant work on any todays consumer hardware
>how dare they work on new crypto algo after whole fucking planet spend 60 years battletesting and fixing existing ones

ok your just tech illiterate lol

Gl anon

[Anonymous No.15984134]

>>15984095
Nothing ran on windows until they made it. Sometimes you have to take risks.
Can i ask what you believe is the frontrunner at the moment?

[Anonymous No.15984167]

>>15984134
It was matter of pluging in aka fucking drivers lol world not gona swap everything for fucking iota

Nah im not here to shill my bags just make fun of you

[Anonymous No.15984359]

no one cares about transitions feeless especially if there is network security. It is feeless but to get this feeless it sacrifices the security of the net because tangle is attackable without coordinator. They still have the coordinator

[Anonymous No.15985311]

>>15984167
Are you serious? The infrastructure doesn't exist, the same as when windows was created. The infrastructure will be built with IOTA in mind.

>>15984359
An attack on the IOTA network only makes it stronger and faster as it just makes more transactions to verify futrue trandactions.

[Anonymous No.15985377]

Oy vey, finally some goys with some sound financial minds in this thread

[Anonymous No.15986445]

>>15981878
IOTA is the worst POS coin ever devised. No one wants light crypto. Niggah do you drink cola light? No, so fuck off.

[Anonymous No.15986504]

>>15981878

Fucking scamming piece of vaporware shit by the same group that scammed you with NXT and JINN. Fucking hell ho stupid are you to get scammed a 3rd time?

[Anonymous No.15987237]

>>15981878
kek dag wannabe