/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.16449536]

I haven't seen BCASH shilled on here in like....months? Is now the time to buy BCASH? Maybe just 1 or 2 of them in case it overtakes BTC core?

[Anonymous No.16449736]

Hmm slid to page 4 with no replies. Really makes you think.

[Anonymous No.16449768]

>>16449536
bcash supporter went to bsv

t. former bcash shiller

[Anonymous No.16449788]

>>16449536
No crypto has more adoption in actual payments than BCH. BTC has more but is crippled by fees.
Cashshuffle makes BCH reasonably private without overdoing it. Its fast and cheap to transact and has a cultish following and you can buy actual stuff for it.

BSV has a cultish following as well. BSV is right now primarily attacking the storage niche and storage of apps with metanet. Whether this will gain real industry adoption remains to be seen but it is HIGHLY shillable since you can just send somebody a link of a website or app "hosted on muh blockchain". They have great PR and paid shills and the most delusional real shills of all. highly agressive. Unwriter is a real asset as well

- They are competing for different markets for now
- They both will have a halving soon
- They have absolutely delusional communities and nicely shillable products


Anons who do their research hold both bad aussie and deluded ancap Bitcoins. BSV and BCH will be the largecaps with the hardest pumps this bullrun. They are the perfect middleground between high risk shitcoins and boring largecaps. Higher gains and higher risk but not suicide shitcoin risk. They aren't going to die anytime soon and have deluded shills and are usable for things.
Its the perfect storm for massive gains.

TLDR; Buying both corn forks is the perfect choice if you want to outperform BTC and dont go for shitcoin-level risks.

[Anonymous No.16449792]

>>16449536
Most of the decent "shills" (95% bagholders) moved to BSV.
In the Venn diagram of things done right BSV is 99,9% correct, BCH 58% and BTC 32% correct. Anyone with half a brain, charisma and motivation jumped ship, a handful of slow, mildly vocal holders is all what remains.

[Anonymous No.16449929]

>>16449792
>In the Venn diagram of things done right BSV is 99,9% correct, BCH 58% and BTC 32% correct
You sound like a retard pretending to understand shit, kek.

Anyway OP I think people who support BCH are busy building an ecosystem for permissionless digital cash instead of shilling on a Mongolian basket weaving forum. That's why you don't see shills here, but every now and then there's a discussion about bitcoin cash & a few people seem happy to discuss it. I don't think most supporters are in it for speculation though, so you probably won't get too many people trying to convince you to buy.

[Anonymous No.16450093]

>>16449929
Could have added more, however suck my dick faggot.

[Anonymous No.16450178]

BSV shilling actually made me interested in bcash. Have you listened to Peter Rizun? There are a lot of unironically bright people on the bcash team. The problem is, BCH is more of a boring nerd coin while BSV is a drama coin. Previously, BCH was focused on boring things like merchant adoption which are, well, not particularly exciting. Now the focus is slowly shifting to more interesting things. My careful estimate is that it will explode in 2020 (much more than BSV did in 2019).

[Anonymous No.16450189]

>>16449536
I left BCH for BSV in the Spring.

>>16449788
Nobody uses Bitcoin for payments.

[Anonymous No.16450194]

>>16449929
>I think people who support BCH are busy building an ecosystem

Yeah that sounds like the people who frequent this board.

[Anonymous No.16450202]

>>16450093
Based

[Anonymous No.16450588]

>>16450178

>The problem is, BCH is more of a boring nerd coin while BSV is a drama coin

The utter state of cashies

[Anonymous No.16450987]

>>16449536
One bcash is 0.02915261 BTC
One bsv is 0.01322770 BTC

Both dead shitcoins

[Anonymous No.16451933]

>>16449768
based same here

[Anonymous No.16452022]

r/btc is the place to look at and keep an eye on, that's the only thing you need to know.

[Anonymous No.16452027]

You’re all so gay. BTC is and will remain king no matter what you broke ass hopium junkies want.

[Anonymous No.16452113]

>>16452022
For all things BCH.

[Anonymous No.16452757]

>>16452113
Reddit is so fucking retarded.

[Anonymous No.16452799]

>>16452113
/r/btc is for all things Bitcoin.
I was against BCH when I first heard of it, but if you take the time to see what has actually been done, BCH is amazing.
(nano is better for p2p currency, though)

[Anonymous No.16452832]

>>16449536
Well, let's see.
Roger Ver is still a billionaire.
Jihan Wu is still a billionaire.
Haipo Yang is still a billionaire.
ViaBTC owners are still billionaires.
>so what?
If they wanted to, they'd force the flippening today, and there's nothing you can do about it.
That said, they're smarter than that, and they'd rather invest in infrastructure.
>how so?
Roger Ver just announced that $200,000,000 of his pocket money will go to a BCH investment fund for infrastructure and whatnot.
Jihan Wu just retained his position as a CEO of Bitmain, while his MatrixPort startup is also doing fine before he even started marketing it.
Offline bitcoin cash debit cards have just been developed.
SLP tokens are just getting started and the first 5 were all moon missions.
...
And this shit is $215. Obviously this is not for long, as time is of the essence - if major adoption doesn't happen within 5 years, regulators would be in a position to completely destroy payment cryptos. Those billionaires know this and would do anything to make a lasting effect FAST, this might include a fake pump.

[Anonymous No.16452845]

>>16452022
>>16452757
>Reddit is so fucking retarded.
That's literally where all scientists, devs and investors gather though.

[Anonymous No.16452848]

>>16449768
>>16450189
>>16451933
Why did you all switch from BCH to BSV?

[Anonymous No.16452859]

>>16449536
btrash? is it still 2016?

[Anonymous No.16453028]

Join us, frens!

Memo.cash

[Anonymous No.16453040]

>>16452832
Fuck off glow trotter

[Anonymous No.16453098]

>>16452848
BCH is trying to alter transaction ordering, changing signatures, not renabling all the OP codes, enabling OP codes that weren't in the original protocol, etc. It's also not scaling. BSV is simple. Scale the ever living fuck out of it and lock down the protocol.

[Anonymous No.16453103]

>>16452848
BCH devs and "leaders" fucked up the protocol. BSV didn't want a split, remember Wright's acoustic rants? But it's really hard to run any project, especially a software project, when not all the noses are pointed in the same direction. So they had to move on, and so did many of the investors / gamblers.

Basically what matters most is the architecture of the code and how the tech interacts with consumers. Best UE by a wide margin is currently found in BSV and the gap will only widen over the years due to the strength of its foundation.

[Anonymous No.16453117]

>>16452848
BCH devs and "leaders" fucked up the protocol. BSV didn't want a split, remember Wright's acoustic rants? But it's really hard to run any project, especially a software project, when not all the noses are pointed in the same direction. So they had to move on, and so did many of the investors / gamblers.

Basically what matters most is the architecture of the code and how the tech interacts with consumers. Best UX by a wide margin is currently found in BSV and the gap will only widen over the years due to the strength of its foundation.

[Anonymous No.16453863]

>>16449788
This is the most relevant post Ive seen on biz in weeks, and I dont hold nor bch nor bsv but link.
I just like to follow the gossip girl csw drama