ZNN

[Anonymous No.18914387]

Do not FOMO, you still have 4 months to accumulate, put buy orders at 12k sats.

[Anonymous No.18914410]

>>18914387
>oh nooo pls dont fomo goys I still try to fill my bags

[Anonymous No.18915354]

Cocksuckers pajeets scammers just found this on bitcointalk :

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4281633.msg53796085#msg53796085

"- zmnscpxj (squarecrypto confirmed account working on lightning network) confirms that Squarecrypto has nothing to do with Zenon Network. he even posts a weekly log that that can be verified
- Team lies about non-ICO, isn't transparent about how much money they raised in ICO
- calls premine -"personal investment"
- bans people that ask non welcomed questions
- has an explorer with no rich list
- has a roadmap full of wallet updates
- coin is listed on some exchanges known for listing shady coins

https://twitter.com/sqcrypto/status/1204815615678177280
https://twitter.com/CryptoQuestor/status/1225184642141167616
https://zmnscpxj.github.io/activity/2020-01-30.html
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4281633.100
https://zenonnetworkscam.com


Why wont they provide full details about the two hacks? 1. Minting 2.5 million ZNN out of thin air. 2. Staking exploit that made the hacker an undisclosed number of coins.
- Exploits used
- addresses involved and coins blocked
- how many coins did the hacker managed to sell on exchanges and OTC before they blocked his coins from the second hack. In the first hack the hacker sent the coins to the team's addresses. I wonder why he would do that ? Did he got payed to do that? He says he got 30k ZNN as shown in the evidence above. Seems that some people in the zenon tg want others to believe that they made an update for the first hack and this is how they blocked the coins. Clearly a lie and the team bans you if you ask the right questions as shown above in this thread."

[Anonymous No.18916023]

>>18915354
>>/biz/?task=search&ghost=yes&search_text=Cocksuckers+pajeets+scammers+

[Anonymous No.18916171]

>>18916023
Address the information in the post

[Anonymous No.18916519]

>>18916171
address what? that square hired some guy that retards incorrectly assumed was a Zenon dev? yea real strong FUD there faggot

[Anonymous No.18917538]

1. This was purely speculative by a Zenon supporter because of the name resembling a Zenon wallet address. I thought it was an example of seeing something where there is actually nothing. The only thing he ever said in response is that he's a lightning developer and doesn't speak on behalf of Square for anything else they may or may not be doing, essentially "I have nothing to do with other things they may or may not be working on."
2. It is true that there is not information about how much was raised. I've seen some claim that a few million USD was raised, but this is impossible to confirm. It seems reasonable considering the lack of hype and marketing at that time, but it would be nice to know for sure. Here's what we do know: they offered 5000 ZNN per BTC. BTC is returned through XStakes over 24 months as long as it is staked without interruption. In spite of that lack of clarity, this suggests it is not a scam.
3 Where do they call premine a personal investment? I've never seen this and I'd like to. Having context is extremely important here. It could be argued that the developers invest time and deserve to get something back - they have bills, too.
4. Some people on discord ask the same questions over and over and expect everything to be answered in full detail every time. The team clearly doesn't want to disclose every detail, for example about the hacks that occurred. The people who ask over and over about this get banned because it spams the forum. All I will say is if someone doesn't feel comfortable with their answers, they are under no obligation to take on the risk. This does not make it a scam as you claim, just maybe a less friendly experience than other discord channels. I agree that more transparency would be better, but this is how they roll.

[Anonymous No.18917547]

>>18915354

5 Wallet updates indicates a scam? They're using a pivx fork, which is not the greatest as we all know. Updates happen. Other events have happened besides the updates to the wallet, like the pillar lock in and the incubator, whitepaper etc.

6 Stex and Crex24 have plenty of legit coins. Name an exchange that doesn't list a shady coin. I'll wait.

7:
Those 4 addresses received the hacked coins and were sent to an address where they were burned: https://explore.zenon.network/address/ZNNisBurnedHereDoNotSendZNNXZZkEhL

Each address contains about equal amounts which total approximately 800k, which is the developer fund used for various purposes. The

This I'd like to know more about, but it's entirely possible that a whitehat took them back from the hacker and returned them to Zenon. Also, they could have patched the exploit without adding it to github. I don't know for sure. You are correct that they haven't given every detail about the hack. I don't know enough about this situation to say a whole lot, but the coins were burned.

You do raise some good questions, but I personally don't think you've proven that it is a scam. Certain things lack transparency, which is too much for some investors. I completely understand that position. However, I do not see any proof that it is a scam. Hopefully we can find more information and better understand the answers to the questions we both have. I still think it's a strong buy for me personally - as far as risk/reward is concerned, it's well worth having a reasonable position in this. Let's see what happens! Best of luck to you.

[Anonymous No.18917565]

>>18914387
ZNN good token sir