/XSN/ Stakenet General

[Anonymous No.23537713]

>What is Stakenet(XSN)?
https://pastebin.com/jiMdEAN8

>How do I buy XSN?
https://i.imgur.com/13KzQ3n.jpg

>Whats the easiest way to set up a Masternode?
[YouTube] Stakenet (XSN) - Masternodes-as-a-Service (MNaaS) Setup Walkthrough

>Official Site
https://stakenet.io/

>Whitepaper
https://stakenet.io/Stakenet_Whitepaper.pdf

>Latest Development Update
https://medium.com/stakenet/xsn-core-update-oct-14-2020-8cf651fa688b

>Additional reading

>Quick rundown
https://medium.com/stakenet/multi-currency-wallet-and-lightning-swaps-stakenet-solution-7d0dafe99105
>X9's contributions to LTC
https://medium.com/stakenet/litecoin-foundation-and-x9-developers-announce-collaboration-510ca985b6
>Exertive Proof of Stake
https://medium.com/stakenet/exertive-proof-of-stake-epos-4a999807f9e4
>Great write-up of Cross Chain Proof of Stake (i.e. stake XSN, receive BTC)
https://medium.com/stakenet/posw-weekly-ccpos-cross-chain-proof-of-stake-de1ac87055cd
>The Cypherpunk Standard of Banking
https://medium.com/altcoin-magazine/the-cypherpunk-standard-of-banking-88f84a834180

[Anonymous No.23538536]

>>23537713
dev team can envision but can't execute. 3 years for a XSN .exe vendor. IF the team actually did make a functioning Dex, judging by the pace it would be dead on arrival.

give up you pajeet subhumans. this inorganic shilling is the last breath of a dying scam. pic related.

[Anonymous No.23538586]

>>23538536
>SCAM
Cope harder.

[Anonymous No.23538650]

>>23538586
dead on arrival tech. enjoy your shitty Dex "soon" in 3 more years

[Anonymous No.23538839]

>>23538650
Seethe

[Anonymous No.23539370]

SOON edition

[Anonymous No.23539407]

>>23538536
>>23538650
>>23539370
I ask you Mr pajeet, please address the following questions
>How is Stakenet a scam?
>If Stakenet is a scam, why does it have a genuine product in open beta that the public can use, and continues to being developed?
>If Stakenet is a scam, why is there evidence of the X9 team having collaborated with some of the biggest names in crypto? (Ledger, litecoin)
>Do you have any objective evidence at all that the developers Wont be able to meet their goals?

If you can answer any of these with objective evidence I will market sell and post proof

[Anonymous No.23539428]

It's beginning, public beta, wETH lightning swap proof of concept. Raiden integration on it's way, allowing for ERC-tokens to be integrated and traded on the DEX. Good coins like XMR are starting to implement lightning network, allowing them to be integrated into the dex.
The future is bright faggots, and you'll be kicking yourself in a years time if you don't get the fuck in while you still can. The vision is there, the tech is there, the team is there, the product is there, and the hype will follow, just like with BTC, ETH, and LINK. OG /biz/ knows, which is why the FUD is so insane. Ask yourself this, would someone who's not invested spend hours upon hours fudding a coin because it was fun and to "save their fellow bizlets"? Of course not, don't be naive.

https://streamable.com/lb3quc

[Anonymous No.23539738]

Why can't anyone provide any objective critical arguments against XSN? Is it because they're pajeets with questionable motives?

[Anonymous No.23540248]

>>23539738
Here is an argument:

The team cannot, and has not, for years, delivered a DEX that anyone uses.

[Anonymous No.23540356]

>>23539428
the only fud about this project is the relentless and obviously orchestrated shilling. pointing out that the team has delivered basically nothing in the 3 years of "development" is not "fud", it's just true.

[Anonymous No.23540435]

>>23540248
The DEX is an Enormous undertaking and is in a publicly available beta.

>>23540356
The team has delivered many innovations since they have started work, but you ignore all of them simply because it doesn't fit your agenda

To say that they have achieved 'basically nothing' is so pajeetishly false I wonder if it could convince even the lowest IQ /biz/ anons

[Anonymous No.23540508]

>>23540248
>>23540356
Again, XSN FUD'ers have no proof of their claims.

They scream 'SCAM!', 'THE DEVS HAVEN'T ACHIEVED ANYTHING!' until someone naive enough to believe then comes along. But it's all in vain because the average IQ of stakeholders far exceeds the low levels that are needed to fall for your shitskin tactics

[Anonymous No.23540805]

Fud bros i don't feel so good.

[Anonymous No.23540911]

>>23540356
This.
They've been "DEX soon™" for the past three years. It's kind of sad desu.

[Anonymous No.23541073]

when dex?

[Anonymous No.23541214]

Oh, the fudders sure work around the clock on this one. I've been following the project for a few weeks now and it's blatantly obvious you're coordinated.

[Anonymous No.23541275]

The funny thing is that the project is dying, AND ALL OF YOU FUDDING RETARDS ARE GOING DOWN WITH IT HAHAHAHAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHA. FUCKING PATHETIC
>I'm just fudding because I want more coins
>lmao toppest keeeekekkee
> LMAO this is going to 0
> kekeke plz sell me your coins goyim, the project is dying.
AND NOW THE PROJECT REALLY FUCKING IS DYING HAHAHAHA, FUCKING SUCK IT FUDDING PAJEETS, YOU'RE GOING DOWN WITH US FAGGOTS.
>Fud a project to its demise
>Buy all the way down
This amount of fudders' cope, I can't fucking take it anymore.

Pic fucking related, it's you guys.

[Anonymous No.23541295]

>>23540911
right around the corner guys. very soon!!!

[Anonymous No.23541323]

>>23541275
no, we're not driving the price down to accumulate, no one is even buying anymore. xsn has been bleeding non stop since august

[Anonymous No.23541335]

>>23541323
>Coping this much
Because you're literally a hodling faggot just like the rest of us, you're just coping by acting as fudlets. Otherwise why don't you show me a picture of you having sold high?

[Anonymous No.23541431]

Can someone tell me about Stakenets supposed competitors that will BTFO of Stakenet?