Is anyone actually using Iexec?

[Anonymous No.24068279]

So i understand the idea behind Iexec, and it looks good on paper. But if it's as revolutionary as they say, why isn't it being used already? The roadmap is complete right? So if I need offchain computing for my Dapp right now I can use Iexec? Surely there's at least one Dapp out there that would be using it if it was actually a functioning product that performed as advertised?

[Anonymous No.24068311]

i think we're mainly waiting for the enterprise token swap to launch in Q1 2021

[Anonymous No.24068325]

>>24068311
wrong pic

[Anonymous No.24068410]

>>24068325

I'm more talking about Dapps on Ethereum. Isn't Iexec basically the only solution right now for heavy offchain computations that are either too expensive or cant be done on the Eth network? I was under the impression this part of the Iexec protocol was already functioning.

[Anonymous No.24068417]

https://medium.com/iex-ec/crypto-price-feed-by-j48-coinbase-api-secured-by-iexec-dapp-of-the-month-e7eb33042bf5

[Anonymous No.24068602]

>>24068417
I've seen this, but this is a one man job and it's not using the computing marketplace. Cool and all, but if this is all that's been done so far it doesn't give me the warm and fuzzys.

[Anonymous No.24068738]

I've used it to fertilize my front-lawn. That's about it.

[Anonymous No.24068861]

[Anonymous No.24068903]

>>24068738
>>24068861
the fact people go to the effort to make these memes is actually so bullish

[Anonymous No.24068909]

>>24068311
>contract under NDA
A VIETNAMESE COLLEGE HAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAH

[Anonymous No.24068948]

>>24068903
no it is bears sirs it is over gilles

[Anonymous No.24068970]

>>24068903
bullish as fuck

[Anonymous No.24069027]

>>24068970

How is it bullish?

[Anonymous No.24069048]

>>24069027
>plebbit spacing
kek fuck off newfaggot

[Anonymous No.24069118]

>>24069048
I've actually been holding since 2017, but these bags are starting to get pretty heavy...

[Anonymous No.24069175]

>>24068738
Dogshit is a bad fertilizer, attracts lots of parasites and much more harmful bacteria

[Anonymous No.24069253]

>>24068410
It is.

eRLC (e for enterprise) is the regulated version of the protocol.

They are so based that instead of cucking to regulators, they built a parallel protocol that uses the same token supply to allow compliant enterprise adoption.

People who don't fear regulators can still use the unregulated version, which is fully operational. iExec completed everything they set out to build in their whitepaper earlier this year.

[Anonymous No.24069301]

>>24068909
Even if it was, Vietnam is a titanic market with an enormous amount of interest in crypto.
People would be insane to be ignoring Vietnam's explosive growth right now, especially as the western world has fallen into decadent decline.

[Anonymous No.24069368]

>>24069253

I guess I'm just wondering why it isn't seeing any adoption in the crypto community? Is it just that it's not needed at this point in the space, but will be as dapps become more complex and require off-chain computing to function? This is the only logical reason I can think of that it's not being used. Which if this is the case, then it's insanely bullish.

[Anonymous No.24069409]

>>24069368
crypto dev community is small as balls sirs iexzecs time will be soon

[Anonymous No.24069520]

>>24068279
no one uses this garbage 5 versions in
its just a seasonally spammed shitcoin that telegram call groups can easily make money off of

[Anonymous No.24069633]

>>24069520
AMF approved SEC approval on the way fudnigger
DotB soon, stay poor

[Anonymous No.24069700]

>>24069520
>>24069633
yeah stay poor NIGGER sirs, dotb soon sec soon sex soon

[Anonymous No.24069915]

>>24069368
Nothing in crypto is “adopted” yet. We legit still have 20 years ahead of us untill adoption towards all crypto

[Anonymous No.24069940]

>>24069915
goddamn scope out this tranny boys lmao
at what age did you start the hormone blockers that made you this retarded?

[Anonymous No.24070010]

>>24069915

That's fair. I just would have expected something to come from it already.

[Anonymous No.24070465]

No one is even trying to answer your question. He wants to know why smart contract devs have yet to adopt iexecs platform. He is not asking about enterprise adoption.

[Anonymous No.24070522]

>>24070465
Actual programmer here. I tried to deploy a decentralized app on iExec's sidechain and it was a mess.
The documentation is poor as fuck and it's clearly not ready for adoption yet.

[Anonymous No.24070555]

>>24069368
The ball is rolling.

Consider for example Loopring. Best L2 available, has been ready all year. They are still only seeing slow adoption.

These things are exponential. Slowly at first, then all at once. Some time next year Loopring will be fucking insanely large for payments. In fact, if Loopring doesn't achieve mass-adoption, crypto has failed. It's secure scalability is simply necessary, there are no ways around this.

Similar for iExec. A compute layer is simply necessary. There are no ways around this. They will achieve massive adoption.


Early catalysts:

LRC - 3.6 mobile wallet and AMM (December 2020)

RLC - eRLC launch and US reg (February 2021)

[Anonymous No.24070575]

Arbitrum has potential to destroy iExec and "oil baroons" never talk about it.

[Anonymous No.24070588]

>>24070522
yeah seriously, I'm a code programmer M.D. as well, and I can't get anything to run because of the BOOLEAN PROBLEM THEY STILL HAVEN'T SOLVED
also TOKEN NOT NEEDED
kek faggot
>>24070555
digits observed, prophecy witnessed

[Anonymous No.24070822]

>>24070575
not really sirs, explain how arbitrum can do high performance computing

[Anonymous No.24070843]

>>24070555
Is loopring going to 10x from here? I need to breach 7 figures.

[Anonymous No.24071081]

>>24070575
Three points:

1. There doesn't need to only be one compute layer solution.
2. Arbitrum isn't directly competing with iExec, it's competing with other L2s like loopring, sort of. Arb can execute smart contracts, but it is significantly less scalable and secure than loopring. Loopring will be King of payments/transfers, etc where security is no-compromise and withdrawals must be instant. Interactive protocols (like Arb) will compete to temporarily fill the remaining niche. It's also in beta, and currently having its lunch cut by Optimism.
3. LMFAO why are FUD-posters always thick as pigshit? So bullish.

[Anonymous No.24071117]

>>24071081
Is LRC worth buying or are the tokenomics weak in your opinion?

[Anonymous No.24071317]

>>24071081
To re-emphasise my number 2 point for retards:
Arbitrum isn't a compute layer. It's a scalability layer.

>>24070843
lol, 10x from here is only is 2bn market cap. That is extreme FUD.

>>24071117
LRC is deflationary and rewards holders a relative share of protocol fees + some other stuff. The Tokenomics are great. It's better than even traditional company shares. For reference, not a lot of people seem to realise but modern shares are often fucked, particularly in tech, because they don't entitle you to anything. No dividends nothing. Just a piece of paper that the company printed. A total ponzi. One of the many based things about crypto is that it is bring back traditional stock, voting rights, dividends, etc with additional benefits for hodlers (in the case of LRC this includes things like reduced transaction fees for hodlers etc).

[Anonymous No.24071424]

>>24071317
I might just unload some of my 2000 UNI into Loopring, I’ve been interested in it for a while.

[Anonymous No.24071782]

>>24071424
Smart.

Both UNI and LRC will pump, but LRC is better tech, will have mobile payment rails and an AMM by December, already does orderbooks, supply is already fully circulating (20% of UNI is circulating), and Loopring is valued 20x lower. As such, LRC has much more room to grow. Growth that must come if crypto is to be successful because of the scalability component, there are no two ways about that.

UNI is also playing around with Optimism for their own attempt at scaling, which if you know anything about scalability and specifically rollups, is significantly less secure and less scalable than a zk like Loopring. Optimistic roll-ups also have enormous withdrawal times, which they need for security. ZK-rollups are instant withdrawal.

No known launch date for optimistic uniswap either...

I see a lot of paid Twitter "influencers" pretending to be excited about Optimism as if it's the second coming of Christ, but even if they weren't cynical money-grubbing kikes they're all technically illiterate retards who simply don't appreciate the devastating drawbacks of optimistic rollups vs zk rollups in terms of security, scalability and usability.

Who the fuck wants to use a rollup that locks their funds for 7+ hours?!

[Anonymous No.24072276]

>>24068279
>>24068410
>>24069368
https://repositorio-aberto.up.pt/bitstream/10216/128577/2/412428.pdf

This guy built a decentralised app for e-commerce and used iexec as the backbone. A decent amount of people in academia are using/referencing iexec in their papers.

[Anonymous No.24072356]

>>24072276
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHGHHHHHHHHHHH MY RLCIES NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO GIVE THEM BACK

[Anonymous No.24072421]

>>24072276
splendid....