[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 62 KB, 713x420, kim-the-shill.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24887705 No.24887705 [Reply] [Original]

>>reddit seethes

>> No.24887709
File: 73 KB, 716x434, kimbch.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24887709

>>24887705

>> No.24887728

>>24887705
this faggot is 2010 tier

>> No.24887808

>sell signal

>> No.24887815

How does he fuck his hot wife with his big belly?

>> No.24887844

>bag holder shills heavy bags

>> No.24887892
File: 198 KB, 668x663, 1606644460192.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24887892

>>24887815
with his fist, incel

>> No.24888123

>>24887844
perhaps

>> No.24888134

>>24887705
There needs to be a well known crypto, that is good for payments. BTC is not viable, as fees right now are at $5, which is insane for payments. It's only good as a speculative asset. We all know, that SoV is a meme, and in 1 year when this bubble will pop again, BTC will dump 80%.
The problem with BCH is, that this community despises forks. Every single fork is performing worse than it's original. Litecoin could serve that use case, but they'd need to completely lift off the block size limit, but not let on storing useless data on chain.

>> No.24888174
File: 326 KB, 1600x1600, 1600587595190.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24888174

>>24888134
Hold it right there. Did somebody say future currency?

>> No.24888205

>>24888123
Serious question is BCH faster and cheaper than Litecoin or XLM?

>> No.24888207

>>24887705
he never heard of lightning?
if anything gets adopted it's instant trustless transactions. 0-conf is so retarded there are no words.

>> No.24888217

>make one of the thousands upload storage sites (that failed)
>suddenly think you're the internet god
This guy is legit mental. He'll go the McAfee route but with far less glam

>> No.24888271
File: 609 KB, 780x788, 1607545807617.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24888271

>normans are still obsessed with crypto "currency" rather than smartcontracts
we are so fucking early linkbros

>> No.24888349

>>24888205
>>https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/transactionfees-ltc-bch.html#1y
BCH fee is very close to LTC's right now but under heavy stress LTC fees would increase due to limited demand of 1MB blocks. BCH has been stress tested and scaled at extremely high transaction volume.

XLM I don't know enough about the volume or transaction capacity to comment.

>> No.24888371

>>24888349
>limited demand
*limited supply

>> No.24888413

>>24888217
this, he's just a fat mcaffee who's afraid to drink and drug (so he eats instead)

>> No.24888420

>>24887705
Is that BCHABC or BCHN or BCHBSV

>> No.24888476

>>24888134
ETH sidechain with somewhat relaxed security assumptions would be ideal. ERC20 support and could function as a "hot chain" similar to a hot wallet.

>> No.24888759

>>24888205
they are same speed as btc, only difference is bch wastes 10x more traffic than btc. you can absolutely make btc run at the same speed as bch if miners would accept block size/block time change proposition

>> No.24889075

>>24887705
He's right. BCH is better than BTC. Xmr is probably better though

>> No.24889353

>>24888759
the entire reason BCH was created is because bitcoin core will not compromise on the block size. are you fucking retarded or is it just me?

>> No.24889451

>>24888134
>that is good for payments.
Its called fiat loser. No one wants to spend their gold on a fucking overpriced paper cup with dirt in it.

>> No.24889453

>>24889353
miners couldn't agree at that time, doesn't mean they wont change their opinion, technically bch is btc with 2 values changed in its code, everything else is the same

>> No.24889634

>>24888174
Based