Are Radixfags the Zeus capital of Avalanche?

[Anonymous No.26176137]

Everyday few Radix cucks open some random thread fudding AVAX repetitively with blatant lies

[Anonymous No.26176250]

I don't understand why tho? Is it jealousy? Or that Radix always supposed to be a theoretical claims that sound attractive but never materialize thus when a platform that thought to be impossible before come (Avalanche) it destroy the whole Radix philosophy of money grabbing on a goal that'll never be achieved, Avax already has what Radix claim and wish to have thus invalidate all Radix existence.

[Anonymous No.26176436]

>>26176137
>>26176250
>cerberus consensus is only from this year
>They used to have a consensus called tempo but had to cancel it as it wasnt secure due to weak backing and sybil protection problems, so they based it on hot stuff instead.
>Hot stuff is limited to around 100 validators before performance degrades and with Cerberus as it braids multiple instances of hot stuff shards together for certain transactions them this increases the message complexity significantly
>"Notably, this form of parallelization introduces a tunable tradeoff between security and scalability: reducing the number of shards each node covers increases parallelism and scale, but decreases the validator set size of a given shard."
>There is a global shard which every validator needs to validate but is based off hot stuff and whilst they say it doesnt need a lot of tps, with a 1000 validators you are probably looking at less than 1 tps, try scaling that to tens of thousands, or millions to enable more shards for scalability.
>Despite sybil protection being one of the reasons they had to cancel the launch in 2019 and change consensus, theres not a lot of info in the whitepaper
>"Rather than having equal voting power across all nodes, each node will have voting power relative to the amount of stake they have registered in order to compete for selection as a validator"
>If voting power is based on weight within shards (with no limits mentioned), what happens if one shard has a validator with far higher amounts staked than others assigned to the shard? they can just have majority voting power by themself (or small group working together rather than needing usual 2/3 of votes?
>"An in-depth description of the application of PoS to Cerberus within the Radix public network is left for future work."

[Anonymous No.26176867]

>>26176137
You mean Seq enters every single radix thread and posts the same blatant lies about radix spamming up every thread with 20 BS mental problem delusional posts.
Radix is more decentralised than avax it uses randomly selected validators and RPN3 can have 10000+ validators
Radix is faster than avax and has proved this in test
Radix has atomic composability and avax doesn't emin admitted it
Radix has mathematical proof backing all of its claims.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2008.04450.pdf
Your time is up soon your broken blockchain will eventually be exposed and Radix will rule supreme with its superior tech. You are rampantly fudding now because you know soon it will be too late and your scam won't be able to compete, avax is barely better than eth

[Anonymous No.26177017]

>>26176867
>RPN3
DOESNT EXIST THERE IS NO MAINNET RADIX IS AN ERC20

[Anonymous No.26177264]

>>26176867
You mean Ted, the chief protocol architect for Ava Labs, who created hotstuff, decided to drop it because it was shit compared to Avalanche consensus.

But radix comes along and tries to use Ted's invention, not realizing it was shit, and then still after 7 years doesn't have a fucking product.

Radix is the biggest joke in blockchain and the funny thing is avalanche will have atomic composibility before radix even has a blockchain.

[Anonymous No.26177605]

>>26177264
Radix isn't a blockchain you retard its a different type of DLT
Hotstuff is only one piece of the puzzle that is like me saying HURDUR BITCOIN IS SHIT IT USES PROOF OF WORK THAT IS CYNTHIA DWORK AND MONI NAOR's INVENTION HUHUHUHUH BITCOIN IS JUST AN EMAIL SPAM PREVENTION TOOL.
Do you know why these battles are funny? because Avax has the dumbest group of paid third world shills promoting it and the people who support Radix are all high IQ people who are interested in tech, so everytime you morons try to debate you just look stupid.

[Anonymous No.26177619]

>>26177264
>Radix is the biggest joke in blockchain
Its the Star Citizen of Crypto, vaporware

[Anonymous No.26177668]

>>26177605
Radix has no mainnet. its an ERC20 token.

[Anonymous No.26177688]

>>26176867
How much are they paying you to shill for that shitcoin Rajeet?

[Anonymous No.26178144]

Anon small correction coming
>>26176137

[Anonymous No.26178299]

>>26177688
Looks like 4k a month

[Anonymous No.26178444]

>>26178299
>radix jeet cant see the difference between organic memes and forced memes
radix jeet AND NPC

[Anonymous No.26178689]

AVAX chad here not even remotely surprised to see the radix shills arrive to defend their motherland. stay poor I guess

[Anonymous No.26178802]

>>26178299
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA AVAX SHILLS EXPOSED, SEQ EXPOSED I TOLD YOU HE WAS USING PAID SHILLS. I HAVE MY SOURCES SEQ
Do you remember the 100node copy pasta meme?
Do you remember when that avax shill typed the exact same way but switched his IP address up multiple times?
Do you remember when all the Radix fud was long drawn out false information?
Do you remember all the rehashed chainlink pepes the avax shills used? BTFO PAID THIRD WORLD AVAX SHILLS

[Anonymous No.26178949]

>>26178802
radix jeet having another schizo meltdown lmao

[Anonymous No.26179091]

>>26177619
I quite like star citizen at least you can play some of it atm

[Anonymous No.26179320]

>>26179091
but its not the finished product and it will probably never be a finished product.
same with radix, 8 years of development and they have even less than what star citizen has.
there is no mainnet.