/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.28712471]

AVAX FUDDERS BTFO

[Anonymous No.28712648]

>>28712471
Cool. Now all we’re waiting for is acknowledgement of the best DEX on Avalanche, Zero Exchange.

[Anonymous No.28712723]

>>28712471
Then why did they have to burn tokens?
Because tokens that shouldn't exist were minted.
You can play semantics all you want but facts are facts.

[Anonymous No.28712724]

>>28712648
weird way to spell Pangolin

[Anonymous No.28712784]

>investing in turknology
>getting surprised when its buggy garbage

[Anonymous No.28712826]

>>28712471
>it wasn't a double spend
>multiple outputs from a single input

[Anonymous No.28712871]

>>28712471
what an absolute faggot
extra AVAX was created. That means double spend, whether you like it or not. AVAX that used to be on one account got duplicated to another account. Call it mint, call it whatever you want, that's a DOUBLE SPEND.

I hold AVAX but holy shit Emin is insufferable. Just admit that the bug caused a double spend instead of twisting through hoops. Not a good look.

[Anonymous No.28713047]

>>28712871
He's too cocky to admit it, just switch this garbage to ADA on the dip now
you know it's going to dump when alt mania is over

[Anonymous No.28713172]

>>28713047
Or people will adopt the Pangolin exchange. Holding ADA and AVAX.

[Anonymous No.28713233]

>>28713047
the AVAX I have (around 10k, with 10k LINK) is locked in Pangolin
Besides while I do think it was a double spend afaiu it involved the bridge from X to C chain, there's nothing really fundamental about it. Worst case they have to use a multisig or RUNE to swap between chains. That's fine.

[Anonymous No.28713274]

>>28712826
you are low iq

[Anonymous No.28713339]

>>28713274
Nice rebuttal. Multiple outputs, single inputs. Call it what you want, that's what it is.

[Anonymous No.28713345]

>>28712723
>speculates something
>facts are facts
shizo fud

[Anonymous No.28713523]

>>28713339
Explain minting
Explain double spend
Then explain what happened on the chain.

If you can't then shut the fuck up and don't talk about it.

[Anonymous No.28713595]

>>28713523
meant for >>28713274

[Anonymous No.28713623]

IT'S UP
https://medium.com/avalancheavax/preliminary-analysis-of-the-invalid-minting-bug-bee940cbd9e9

[Anonymous No.28713640]

>>28713523
>spoonfeed me
he's absolutely correct, it's you who doesn't understand or you would be able to deliver actual arguments. No one spoonfeed this retard pls.

[Anonymous No.28713680]

>>28713640
The answer of someone who can't explain it.

[Anonymous No.28713687]

>>28712723
wasnt a double spend
I believe the Cornell Professor is smarter than (You).

[Anonymous No.28713748]

The why are half the features of the wallet removed? You cant even do anything with it

[Anonymous No.28713836]

>>28713748
they literally arent, empty your cache

[Anonymous No.28713870]

>>28713748
t. Laggard still living in the past

[Anonymous No.28713987]

>>28713687
>LISTEN TO THE EXPERTS
>WEAR THE MASK
>EAT THE BUGS

cringe

[Anonymous No.28714040]

>>28712471

[Anonymous No.28714181]

>>28713345
>>28713687
No speculation. They had to burn tokens and announced it publicly. I get that you are a Turk and very nationalistic but denying reality won't change it.

[Anonymous No.28714202]

>>28713987
>LISTEN TO THE EXPERTS
made me a millionaire listening to Klaus Schwab, and you?

[Anonymous No.28714279]

>>28714181
read the blog illiterate laggard
https://medium.com/avalancheavax/preliminary-analysis-of-the-invalid-minting-bug-bee940cbd9e9

[Anonymous No.28714484]

>The bug did not affect regular transactions, coin transfers, asset transfers, coin destruction, or smart contract invocations. Avalanche never allowed any user to successfully send the same funds to two recipients.
>This means that absolutely no double-spends happened.

[Anonymous No.28714488]

>>28712471
Stop arguing against fudders. youre just increasing the fud, enjoy the stable 40 coin that's going to hit 60 and shove it in their faces later.

[Anonymous No.28714568]

>>28714484
>Avalanche never allowed any user to successfully send the same funds to two recipients.
They were sent to the same address more than once. That phrasing is some serious pilpuling. Funds sent twice to the same address is still a double spend.

[Anonymous No.28714717]

gonna nut when this his 1k in a year or so

[Anonymous No.28714761]

None of you faggots reading this? Am I the only one giving a shit about what happened on a technical level?
>>28713623

tl;dr
>bug occured specifically due to the different chains interacting incorrectly
>chains operate independently and do not crosscheck each other, which is why this could happen
>i.e. a coding bug that can not be replicated reliably due to nodes being chosen at random
>this is why it is not a fucking double spend
>some nodes in the network accepted an invalid block, some did not and were still processing shit
>https://github.com/ava-labs/coreth/pull/114/files#diff-9a870b1572ea65697aea0a8f959e0ee20efa4ff3370c3e39dcc2f3ec436b4fc3R212 basically makes it so that undecided blocks will be properly treated instead of a chain going fuck wild

someone correct me if im wrong here, im a fucking retard

[Anonymous No.28714882]

>>28712471
I don't really care, when are we mooning?

[Anonymous No.28714891]

>>28714568
read the blog Laggard, can you even read or is this the reason you are invested in Female to Male shitcoin, Pedodot, radicks?
>>28714717
thats going to happen this year.

[Anonymous No.28714951]

>>28714891
I read it. It's a double spend. Explain how SPENDING the same funds more than once, regardless of destination, isn't a double spend.

[Anonymous No.28714998]

>>28713623
holy shit this team is impressive

[Anonymous No.28715019]

>>28714951
>I read it. It's a double spend.
Its not a double spend laggard nigger.

[Anonymous No.28715021]

>>28712871
>As a person of color/as a woman/as a faggot/as an avax holder, folx, this is not a good look!
Go back

[Anonymous No.28715041]

>>28714568
thats the fucking point you dumb fuck, there were no funds "sent", they were converted between chains

this is basically like a ETH <-> AVAX bridge giving you 2 AVAX instead of 1. i.e. the bridge and smart contract fucked up, not the EVM or the AVAX network
you wouldnt fucking call ETH compromised but laugh at the contract writer who held the funds if that happened
same here, what fucked up is the client software not properly vesting blocks

[Anonymous No.28715046]

>>28715019
I made an argument, you did not.

[Anonymous No.28715154]

>>28715041
>sending from one chain in the avalance network to another chain is not sending
ok
the language about minting is pure misdirection, they're minted on one chain and burned on another as a part of sending cross chain

[Anonymous No.28715174]

>>28715046
read the blog illiterate nigger

[Anonymous No.28715225]

>>28715174
I did. You're just too busy guzzling turk cum to respond to the arguments made.

[Anonymous No.28715261]

>>28715154
do you think exchanging 1 EUR for 2 USD because the broker is just as retarded as you are is a double spend too?

[Anonymous No.28715389]

>>28715225
>I did.
no you didnt, you are a dumb illiterate nigger.
take some english classes poojeet and then try again.

[Anonymous No.28715461]

>>28715261
This has nothing to do with exchange rates. AVAX is AVAX idenpendently of which avalanche chain it is on.
>>28715389
>still has absolutely no rebuttal

[Anonymous No.28715508]

>>28714761
>>https://github.com/ava-labs/coreth/pull/114/files#diff-9a870b1572ea65697aea0a8f959e0ee20efa4ff3370c3e39dcc2f3ec436b4fc3R212

Of course you're right, the fudders here don't care about being proven wrong or right, they just want the price to go down. If you present them with facts so untwistable they will just ignore and create a new thread. Simply ignore and move on, WAGMI.

[Anonymous No.28715561]

>>28715461
>still has absolutely no rebuttal
it was already posted twice in the thread you blind nigger
https://medium.com/avalancheavax/preliminary-analysis-of-the-invalid-minting-bug-bee940cbd9e9

[Anonymous No.28715613]

>>28715561
I read it and made an argument as to why it's wrong. You had no rebuttal.

[Anonymous No.28715653]

>>28715461
>AVAX is AVAX idenpendently of which avalanche chain it is on.
no, it technically isn't you dumb nigger, that's the point. the chains are running independent VMs. didnt you say you read the blog? thats literally explained there.

this is not a double spend because you literally cannot transfer between chains to pay someone this way, only within your own wallet(s).

[Anonymous No.28715739]

>>28715508
the fudders are priced out anyway lmao. they will NEVER make it into AVAX.
all they can do is sit on the sidelines with their poverty bags from centralized shitcoins and fling their Poop at AVAX like a monkey.
fucking hilarious seeing these losers squirm.

[Anonymous No.28715741]

>>28715653
I read the blog. Both chains are part of the avax network. Someone sent funds cross chain, and some AVAX were sent once but received multiple times. This is spending the same coins more than once.

[Anonymous No.28715795]

>>28715741
>When someone moves AVAX from one chain to another, the system destroys the AVAX on the source chain, and mints it on the destination chain through a pair of transactions.
didnt you say you read the blog?

[Anonymous No.28715806]

>>28712471
>launch coin
>its IMMEDIATELY SUSPECT
Yeah its dead.

[Anonymous No.28715813]

>>28715613
>I read it
but you didnt read it, stop lying jeet.
you are even too dumb to shit into a toilet and you want to make me believe you understood the words written in that blog?
nigger pls.

[Anonymous No.28715824]

>ITT: megachads that understand a double spend vs. AVAX shills that are over leveraged and staked
*popcorn intensifies*

[Anonymous No.28715841]

Turkroaches desperately defending their shitcoin in this thread

[Anonymous No.28715875]

>>28712471
I want to EMPHASIZE the so called bug was actually Vitamin Buterins fault. The Ethereum bridge didn't work correctly because of ethereums scalability problems and that caused the "double spends"

[Anonymous No.28716014]

>>28715795
Yes. The mint/burn is part of sending funds cross chain. Much like when you send on the same chain, coins are deleted from one address and reappears in another, that's how sending things work on blockchains. In this case the destination and origin are on different chains. This does not change the fact that funds are 1) sent once, 2) received multiple times.

This is laughable, just own up to the fact that it's a double spend bug, fix it and do better in the future.

[Anonymous No.28716082]

>>28715824
>ITT: AVAX megachads that can read vs. curryniggers that are priced out forever with their double digit folios

[Anonymous No.28716116]

>>28715875
Hahahahah nice bait anon

[Anonymous No.28716256]

>>28713687
Thats not Cornell, its Cornell tech in nyc

[Anonymous No.28716281]

>>28716014
> Much like when you send on the same chain, coins are deleted from one address and reappears in another, that's how sending things work on blockchains.
i figured you would make this point, the difference is that the moving between X and C chain is explicitly limited to your own wallet. you literally cannot use this to pay for something and keep your money within the same chain.
you COULD of course transfer back x1 transaction to the x chain and use the remaining x6 to do transactions as you please, and it would be similar to a double spend in its outcome, but so would be the ETH / AVAX chain fucking up its exchange rates. it's not the same issue, and the weak link is the client / broker for the cross-chain transaction.

[Anonymous No.28716312]

>>28716082
Is this baby's first blockchain? You're so emotionally attached to your coin you must be dreaming of escaping poverty. The rest of us have already made it with BTC/ETH/LINK. My sides hurt so much from all this cope. You fuel me.

[Anonymous No.28716432]

>>28712471
If you’re having to have these threads then the game is already over and you’re on your way down. Sorry.

[Anonymous No.28716479]

>>28716256
>he doesnt know what IC3 is
ask me how I know you missed Chainlink in 2017.
>>28716312
you didnt make shit currynigger.

[Anonymous No.28716552]

>>28716432
Everything was fixed and just now waiting for the Bridge.
fudders got BTFO by based Emin.
fudders are priced out forever.
fudders will never make it with their centralized shitcoin bags.

[Anonymous No.28716568]

>>28713623
it's a double spend no matter how you look at it. It doesn't need to go to two different addresses to be a double spend, twice to the same address is also a double spend.

Also this definitely is a soft fork. They are just saying the blocks containing the invalid double mints are the correct ones, and providing code to other validators to roll up to that chain. Technically the other validators could keep validating their version, but luckily for the AVAX team they would eventually run into the same bug so they will switch to the patched code.

Splitting hairs on semantics, but it does look like they succesfully fixed what was in essence a coding bug. Just hope that whatever code they made to accept the "special" invalid blocks doesn't come back to bite them somehow.

[Anonymous No.28716745]

>>28716568
fair point, but then the question comes up what impact a double spend of that kind even could have. originally double spend was a theoretical problem, not a practical one, and this was the latter in terms of code implementation

[Anonymous No.28716748]

>>28716568
>it's a double spend
Its not, read the blog illiterate laggard.
https://medium.com/avalancheavax/preliminary-analysis-of-the-invalid-minting-bug-bee940cbd9e9

[Anonymous No.28716767]

>>28714761
that's completely wrong, jesus.
I'm holding lots of AVAX and they did fix the issue but there definitely was a double spend and a fork, no matter how they phrase it.

Luckily the other side of the fork is unsustainable.

[Anonymous No.28716852]

>>28712471
Just read the analysis. Hyped again now.

[Anonymous No.28716875]

>>28716748
I literally replied to the blog which I read
>dur they said it's not a double spend so it isn't
they are protecting themselves from bad publicity. But it was.

Still, it doesn't matter. Let's move past this fucking incident.

[Anonymous No.28716877]

>>28716479
My 8 figures begs to differ loser

[Anonymous No.28717071]

>>28716875
It wasnt a double spend and the bug was fixed.
>>28716877
cool story shitskin
but 8 figure rupees is like 20 bucks.

[Anonymous No.28717163]

>>28713687
Sure, he can be smarter than me. But the fact is that the team already lied and he has a lot on the line to lose. I don't. Of course he would protect his project as a double spend is disastrous

[Anonymous No.28717224]

>>28717163
wasnt a double spend nigger, try again nigger.

[Anonymous No.28717302]

>>28717224
are you false flagging or literally retarded?

[Anonymous No.28717348]

>>28717071
And this is why you'll stay poor. You'll never understand how the game is played as a whale. I make more from my coins 2xing than if yours 10000xd.

[Anonymous No.28717374]

>>28717302
are you a nigger or just pretending to be a retarded nigger?

[Anonymous No.28717457]

>>28717348
cool headcanon jeet but in reality you live in a sewer and you dig in shit with your hands all day.

[Anonymous No.28717478]

>>28713623
>https://medium.com/avalancheavax/preliminary-analysis-of-the-invalid-minting-bug-bee940cbd9e9
Why are they trying to make it sound like they knew about the invalid mint when they rolled out the patch? If they did that means they just hoped no one noticed, then when the 4chan posts started they tried to cover it up and then wouldn't address it for hours. Realistically they patched the fix without realizing what the bug caused and figured it out when everyone else did. Not that it matters, just not a great look.

Still hoping for a good long-term outlook.

[Anonymous No.28717487]

>>28712471
>>28712724
>>28713687
>>28713870
>>28714202
>>28714279
>>28714484
>>28714891
>>28715019
>>28715174
>>28715389
>>28715561
>>28715739
>>28715813
>>28716082
>>28716479
>>28716552
>>28716748
>>28717071
>>28717224
>>28717374
Lmao, how braindead are you? If you can't make an argument why do you keep writing? You make avax look worse when you can't even give a rebuttal to someone arguing with you. Fucking brainlet avax bagholder hahahaha

[Anonymous No.28717563]

man the avax team is deep with ivy league CS grads that have passed up FAANG for this

18 devs, hiring 10 more right now wew

[Anonymous No.28717630]

>>28717478
how/why would they have patched that specific thing without knowing about the bug? bizarre post

[Anonymous No.28717641]

kek, they are calling the invalid blocks with double mints "bonus blocks"

that's hilarious

[Anonymous No.28717663]

>>28717478
they definitely did, the patch went out on friday that was referenced in the blog
probably planned to address this in the post mortem, i mean it would have been dumb to just randomly point out a mining error / "double spend" without proper PR prep

[Anonymous No.28717678]

>>28717487
will you cry now poojeet?
are those tears forming on your eyes already?
do you have peepee in your eyes yet? boohoo boohooo baby gonna cry now because he was called what he is, an illiterate dumb little nigger aids baby.

[Anonymous No.28717695]

>>28717071
>It wasnt a double spend and the bug was fixed.
cool argument, reread my post

[Anonymous No.28717713]

>>28717641
(unironically based)

[Anonymous No.28717739]

>>28712471
dont care didnt ask already sold.

[Anonymous No.28717749]

>>28717630
I'm saying they realized the bug that caused the chain suspend, but they didn't realize the bug produced the invalid mints.

Assuming what you're suggesting is true: that means they are snakes and liars, which is far fucking worse than just not noticing the particular transactions that glitched as a result. What I'm suggesting is an excuse. If you're pro-AVAX you should embrace what I'm suggesting because what you're suggesting looks really fucking bad, buddy.

[Anonymous No.28717791]

>>28717641
did they fucking hardcode the IDs? i fucking hope they know what theyre doing

[Anonymous No.28717808]

itt brainlets eho dont know what a double spend is

[Anonymous No.28717851]

>>28717630
it was typed by a nigger high from all the fermenting shit around him
>>28717695
go read the blog nigger.

[Anonymous No.28717882]

>>28717678
>23 posts
>Can't make a argument
>Spams meaningless gibberish
Hmm, I wonder what the IQ on this one is, probably close to single digits

[Anonymous No.28717929]

>>28717457
>be me
>10/10 wife
>two kids
>two houses
>early investor in BTC, ETH, and LINK
>bought AVAX at $4, sold at $55
My life is cushy as fuck. Stop projecting shithead. I'll never understand why all you fucks cling to your one true coin like a religion. Fucking cultists.

[Anonymous No.28718043]

>>28717678
u mad bro

[Anonymous No.28718048]

>>28717749
They absolutely knew, see >>28717641

>>28717791
yeah they did kek

>>28717851
Jesus christ you trigger me nigger, not only did I read the blog but I went through the actual patch they made and understood it. See >>28717641
Shut the fuck up and stop being a mindless pajeet who doesn't know what the fuck he talks about while acting cocky. Sit the fuck down.

[Anonymous No.28718108]

>>28717882
>argument was already made
>dumb niggers cant read the blogpost and keep posting disinfo
>dumb poorfag nigger thinks hes smarter than a CS prof

Hmm, I wonder what the IQ on this one is, probably close to single digits

>>28717929
>nigger doubles down on the larp
top kek, nobody believes you bucko.

[Anonymous No.28718140]

>>28713687
>wasnt a double spend
you cannot rewrite blockchain history, it's visible, they just hide it from the guy, but the record is there
visible
it was not just a double spend, it spent seven times which is an absolute record
congrats

[Anonymous No.28718235]

>>28718043
go dilate bro.
you are priced out and AVAX will never come back where you can afford more than 2 of them.

>>28718048
no YOU sit the fuck down you braindead nigger.
>>28718140
wasnt a double spend you nigger.
read the blogpost nigger.

[Anonymous No.28718314]

>>28717749
there are several scenarios possible here and for some reason you're assuming the worst, without any supporting evidence

[Anonymous No.28718413]

>>28717791
lmao

[Anonymous No.28718418]

>>28718108
I don't care if you believe me because it's my reality. Your life must suck to be so bitter.

[Anonymous No.28718595]

>>28718418
>I don't care if you believe me
yes you do otherwise you wouldnt post it.
but you are a larping nigger and a priced out salty loser and you are unable to read the blog because your single digit IQ prevents you from doing it.
hilarious, now please larp some more for my and everyone elses amusement.

[Anonymous No.28718685]

Analysis is out, fudders fully BTFO and buying $ROPE

https://medium.com/avalancheavax/preliminary-analysis-of-the-invalid-minting-bug-bee940cbd9e9

[Anonymous No.28718989]

>>28718595
Cope and seethe. Nothing makes me happier than watching shitheads with their heads so far up their own ass drown in their own shit. Enjoy going down with the ship loser. I already made my gains.

[Anonymous No.28719009]

Impressive that the chain realized it was wrong and slowed down because of lack of consensus amongst participants.

But how can you read that blog post and not think that's a double spend? AVAX holders must literally be braindead to read the words "permitted the generation of 790.2160157 AVAX" and not realize this is a double spend

[Anonymous No.28719131]

>>28717749
>>28717791
>>28718048
>Bonus blocks
Kek holy fuck

Also, the fact they first tried to just edit the block explorer data to cover it up first, then only changed it back and tried to gaslight the narrative into it being a "bug bounty" or something like that just shows how deceitful they are. They wouldn't have said anything if anon's here didn't see them editing the blockchain explorer in realtime. Also saying "no funds were lost" is deceitful because the value of everyone's avax in the avax eth pool decreased by an amount equal to 749avax or whatever the invalid mint amount is. Sure it may only be 0.000001eth worth of loss for each person, but it's still a loss in value.

Then trying to turn it into a semantic argument is the biggest strawman ever. They actually released a whole fucking essay arguing that it was an invalid mint and not a double spend, as if that makes a huge difference in reality. Attacking someone's semantics, grammatical errors, spelling mistakes, etc and ignoring the actual issue is the first thing someone who's frantically scrambling to save face and hide the truth does.

[Anonymous No.28719147]

I don't remember ETH having this exact same issue that hampered the network. No matter which way you slice it, this is the worst case scenario for AVAX and I'm gonna let you in on a secret, I was an original ICO investor, I had high optimism for this project and I've made the decision to move my assets into something safer like DOT or FTM

[Anonymous No.28719257]

>>28718989
the only cope I see here is (You) and the other shitskin fudders, go back to your discord and suck each others dicks you poor retarded niggers.

>>28719009
>But how can you read
kek FUD niggers confirmed for illiterate

[Anonymous No.28719479]

>>28719131
lots of bullshit in that post
>cover-up
that patch was published before the minting / spent was discovered, they'd have to be retarded to think nobody would ever see this.
I'd strongly assume they simply planned to cover it in their detail post instead of rushing a response
>decrease in value
this is literally false, they burned some AVAX from their own account to make up for it
>semantics
honestly, a double spend as a problem to be solved in blockchains was not defined with cross-chain interactions in mind, so just calling this one is not correct either

[Anonymous No.28719522]

>>28719257
You just somehow read my post saying that the blog is clearly avoiding calling a double spend, a double spend, and somehow thought I was saying that the people claiming that it's a double spend can't read.

[Anonymous No.28719557]

>>28719257
I love how your only argument is "stay poor". You do realize that some of us are oldfags right? If you were on /biz/ as early as I was there's literally no way we could be poor. Keep hitting that copium fag.

[Anonymous No.28719595]

>>28719009
Double-spending is defined as where the same money is promised to two parties but only delivered to one. If completed successfully, one of the two recipients will not be paid.

[Anonymous No.28719652]

>>28719147
Avalanche emphasis security over liveness retard, If ETH experienced the same problem it wouldn't "Hamper" the network but it would kill their chain and they would require to fork it.

AVAX just proved how secure it's 4 days ago.

[Anonymous No.28719848]

>>28719652
i mean, if you look at the code this is as close to a fork as you can get without calling it a hard fork. they coded in the block IDs this issue affected to be treated differently across the network

you can see from my posts that i wouldnt call this a double spend and i am still bullish on AVAX because this happened so early, but i'd also consider this a soft fork judging on how they patched it

[Anonymous No.28720085]

>>28719257
How do abominations like this even exist?
I’m calling undercover fudder, there’s no way anyone could possess this lack of self-awareness

[Anonymous No.28720175]

>>28719147
>safer like FTM, pajeet coin with no whitepaper and 37 validators
you ruined what could have been a plausible fud anon

[Anonymous No.28720235]

double spend avax fags

[Anonymous No.28720253]

>>28719557
And yet you somehow managed to stay poor.
Now you stay poor forever you nigger.
You missed this one too.

>>28720085
Keep crying more about a double spend which wasnt one you dumb nigger.
Wish your nigger mother took a trip to planned parenthood.

[Anonymous No.28720265]

>>28712471
turkroach

[Anonymous No.28720388]

>>28717641
I'm going to comment these out on my client

[Anonymous No.28720441]

>>28720253
post hand w timestamp pls

[Anonymous No.28720491]

>>28720441
Posts yours you nigger.

[Anonymous No.28720510]

>>28720388
the network wouldnt accept you if you did, right?

[Anonymous No.28720516]

>>28719131
nah it's just a basic failure of PR

However I pretty much understand now what happened and it does look fixed. The majority of the network accepted the invalid blocks so they decided to fork to that. And it was a code bug in the end.

This is why ETH has multiple code implementations of the consensus btw. Hopefully others will be made for AVAX too.

[Anonymous No.28720663]

>>28720253
>stay poor
>stay poor
>stay poor
Cringe. What don't you get about I literally can't. Stop projecting. How much of your stack is in AVAX to be this big of a cry baby?

[Anonymous No.28720687]

>>28720510
I'm over 60% uptime, so I'll get my rewards no matter what. I'll change my staking cert and key after this stake anyway.
Lets find out what happens.

[Anonymous No.28720705]

>>28720388
that just means you will be broadcasting a state that no one else in the network agrees on and will net no fees. Since you will be unable to progress due to errors being thrown on those blocks.

[Anonymous No.28720716]

>>28717641
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA LOOK AT THIS FUCKING PAJEET HACK

[Anonymous No.28720805]

>>28720663
>poorfag nigger keeps crying
You are priced out FOREVER.

[Anonymous No.28720931]

>>28720705
unless...

huh, unless other people start doing the same. That would effectively cause a fork containing no invalid blocks and rolled back to before that.

You will be a minority though, even smaller than ETH Classic. Don't think you'll be able to get much momentum going.

[Anonymous No.28720963]

>>28717641
is this real? it looks like what i would do, and my code should never be trusted.. i regularly leave hurtful comments to myself, and my repos are always private out of shame

[Anonymous No.28721030]

>>28720963
on the blog post, follow the link to their github patch (I think it's called "diff") and check for yourself.

[Anonymous No.28721056]

>>28720805
>down 25% in 3 days
>priced out
so you’re admitting this is the new ceiling?

[Anonymous No.28721097]

>>28721056
This is the new floor.

[Anonymous No.28721237]

>SIRS IT WAS NOT A DOUBLE SPEND LOOK AT SUPER GENIUS EMIN KEMAL ATATURK EXPLAIN IT IS NOT DOUBLE SPEND IT IS DOUBLE MINT

[Anonymous No.28721252]

>>28721097

[Anonymous No.28721296]

>>28720963
but unironically this is actually the safest way to do it. You want the code to skip atomic tx checks on only those blocks, with no possible loopholes for new blocks, that would be catastrophic

>>28720388
kek, after thinking it over this may be the birth of AVAX Classic. I might unironically do the same, anon.

[Anonymous No.28721453]

[Anonymous No.28721508]

>>28720805
>j-just a UI issue. stay poor! $60
Cool. So your explorers are buggy as hell
>no!! j-just a API issue. stay poor! $55
Cool. So you don't have any tests to catch this sort of stuff
>no!! j-just a client issue. stay poor! $50
Oh. So your consensus protocol allowed a double spend?
>no!! j-just an invalid mint. stay poor! $45
Oh? But wasn't the same UTXO duplicated multiple times and then spent multiple times?
>no!! it's just a bug bounty. stay poor! $40
Oh. So this is business as usual then?
>no!! there's a detailed blog post that describes why everything is okay. stay poor. $35

Were you born this brainlet or did something happen to you?

[Anonymous No.28721521]

>>28721296
You could turn the bug into a feature, call it the "high volume lottery minting function" or something

[Anonymous No.28721622]

Roses are red
Violets are blue
Avax double spends
& March unlock gunna dump on you

[Anonymous No.28721646]

>>28721508
You are priced out forever you cuck, no amount of whining and shitposting will bring AVAX down.
YOU
ARE
PRICED
OUT

[Anonymous No.28721660]

>>28721521
nah that's not what anon is saying. Network wouldn't work with the bug anyway.

He's saying just use the patch but also don't make an exception for the invalid blocks. So that rolls back the acceptable network to before those blocks. If enough people do this you would get a fork of AVAX that is actually sustainable. Similar to ETH classic.

[Anonymous No.28721679]

>>28721508
cogntivie dissonance or actual paid shill
you saw the same thing with Trump people who still believe he's president after biden's inauguration lol
you set the expectation's so high for yourself and fall in love with your bags it's really hard to admit it's over

[Anonymous No.28721715]

>>28721622
Nigger fudders said the same thing about last unlock, it didnt dump and went from 3 to 60 dollars and fudding niggers are priced out forever now.
Keep waiting and hoping for a dump that will never come you nigger.

[Anonymous No.28721766]

>>28721646

[Anonymous No.28721794]

>>28718314
I'm assuming the best you dumb fucking faggot, learn to read. I will not reply to you retarded ass again. Jesus Christ fuck you for wasting my time. Don't ever do it again.

[Anonymous No.28721866]

>>28719009
They lie snakes lie deceit

My validator node did not stop
Theirs did
Avalabs own majority of stake
They took their nodes offline they didnt stop upon this bug

This is worse than illegal mint and double spend 3.5 times in one blocn

The consensus engine failed

[Anonymous No.28721881]

>>28712723
That is not a "double spend". The consensus wouldn't allow a double spend.

[Anonymous No.28721956]

>>28721453
>bonus block

[Anonymous No.28722035]

>>28721679
Avax would be the Democrats preferred voting blockchain.. that way their voters could get a double vote :P

[Anonymous No.28722043]

CAN EVERYONE SHUT THE FUCK UP AND AGREE THAT WE'RE HERE TO MAKE IT, NOT TO HATE ON EACHOTHER AND/OR EACHOTHERS ETHNICITY WHATEVER, WE EITHER MAKE IT OR WE'RE BROKE

[Anonymous No.28722061]

>>28721956
>its not a double spend its buy one get one free! dont you love sales goy?

[Anonymous No.28722167]

>>28720516
Some anon told us im January AVAX node security sucks and AVAX would get exploited

That Anon told AVAX shills a solution exists and the shills berated him instead

You where right white hat anon. You where right

[Anonymous No.28722175]

ONE TRICK QUESTION; WHY ARE SO "MANY" ANONS INTERESTED IN "HELPING" OTHER ANONS ABOUT THIS "DOUBLESPEND" ?

[Anonymous No.28722383]

Why are we even shilling avax? I need more time to accumulate

[Themistocles No.28722400]

>>28722167
I read that thread yeah.
It's a different issue though.

[Anonymous No.28722425]

>>28721646
How am I priced out when I have 8 figures and the price keeps tanking? Do you even understand the words you are saying? Are you 30 IQ?

>>28721679
Truth

[Anonymous No.28722841]

>>28712471
is ava dead yet?

[Anonymous No.28723045]

>>28722841
double dead

[Anonymous No.28724113]

>>28722167
not only was that supposed rce vulnerability entirely unrelated to the shitshow of the past week, that white hat anon also admitted to having made all his fud up so he could further accoomulate
from what i've seen he's doing the same now because he's still going long or he just wants to make a name for himself kek

[Anonymous No.28724159]

>>28722425
I already told 8 figure rupees is not making it ranjeesh

[Anonymous No.28724173]

>>28721622
kek

[Anonymous No.28724233]

>>28724159
Careful. What's left of your brain is leaking out of your mouth.

[Anonymous No.28724235]

>>28721715
yeah it's not like circumstances changed at all since last unlock.
keep coping and holding

[Anonymous No.28724288]

>>28722167
>You where right
>where right
> where

[Anonymous No.28724354]

>>28724233
are you projecting again you worthless nigger?
go shit on a street next to your dad.

[Anonymous No.28724528]

>>28724354
>35 posts of hysterically calling anyone doubting AVAX a nigger pajeet etc.

[Anonymous No.28724649]

>>28712723
I’m sure you know more about Blockchain Technology then he does anon.

[Anonymous No.28724708]

>>28724528
but you are a nigger and a pajeet.
I wish someone would double spend his fist into your nigger lips.

[Anonymous No.28724896]

>>28724354
>36 posts by this ID
>nothing intelligent to say

[Anonymous No.28724922]

https://medium.com/avalancheavax/preliminary-analysis-of-the-invalid-minting-bug-bee940cbd9e9
Finally noticing how incredibly secure avalanche is. The network safely recovered and shut down after noticing that a small portion of the validators had accepted invalid blocks.
Litterally unattackable, all the FUDers are eternally BTFO'd.

[Anonymous No.28725031]

>>28724922
Checked.
They'll just keep pretending to be retarded. They know exactly what they're doing. Just use the extra time they're giving us to accumulate. That's what half of them are doing anyway.

[Anonymous No.28725101]

>>28724922
hmm why couldn't i see that on the avax explorer?

[Anonymous No.28725144]

>>28724896
for some reason the biggest retards are always the loudest

[Anonymous No.28725168]

>>28725101
Because not all nodes accepted the blocks

[Anonymous No.28725257]

>>28721237

[Anonymous No.28725389]

>>28722043
I don't think you realize that in order to make it there needs to be a huge volume of money changing hands in a decentralized and trustless way using avax..
you probably haven't used any dex on chain nor probably will, and you just expect to get rich holding and shilling while others assume the risk of swapping their net worth into a chain which apparently has a random chance of a lottery mint along with a wallet and cex deposit lockup. You should at least try to understand why others might have trust issues, specially considering how badly it all has been handled.

[Anonymous No.28725407]

>>28725101
Also avaxscan are running their own nodes and API endpoints. Maybe the team was the first one to update their node early, and had to update the client to handle the specific cases.

[Anonymous No.28726028]

>shills btfo'd
>thread stop getting bumped
Pure magic.

[Anonymous No.28726101]

>>28712471
it was literally a double spend
coins from chain c were able to be transferred multiple times onto chain x

[Anonymous No.28726152]

>>28726101
>>28725257

[Anonymous No.28726218]

>>28726152
animefag your flowchart is retarded
enjoy your turkish cumcoin

[Anonymous No.28726272]

>>28724922
>Finally noticing how incredibly secure avalanche is. The network safely recovered
>incredibly secure
>safely recovered
>secure
>recovered
you bagholders keep ignoring the fact that an issue was present

[Anonymous No.28726377]

>>28726272
If they said "its recovered" and is now secure thats not failure to admit an issue was present. There was an issue. Its resolved.

[Anonymous No.28726416]

>>28725257
this!

[Anonymous No.28726492]

>>28712471
>it doesn't count because I say it doesn't count
Okay

[Anonymous No.28726547]

>>28726272
Instead of shilling, why attack the network and prove how worthlessly insecure it is? :)
I mean since it's so simple to you, you could literally cash out millions right now. It's much better than working as a shitpost slave imo.
>>28726218
>she is to retarded too understand the retard version

[Anonymous No.28726563]

>>28712871
IF YOU CALL IT SOMETHING ELSE ITS NOT DOUBLE SPEND OK

[Anonymous No.28726635]

>>28726547
*why not

[Anonymous No.28726736]

>>28712471
Why is it still tanking then?

I want to believe in AVAX but I'm getting fudded by this. I only have 68 so I'm not gonna lose everything, but still, down it goes!

[Anonymous No.28726803]

It's free falling now holy shit

[Anonymous No.28726825]

>>28714279
>more semantics will solve it
Also notice the extreme agression yet limited vocabulary of AVAX supporters in this thread. That's how you know they are turkish shills.

[Anonymous No.28727020]

>>28726272
fuck off the team worked relentlessly to fix that problem
I can imagine your fat neckbeard ass thinking he is so smart and sassy for posting a dogshit comment on the internet
you are not even a 20th of the value and briliance of Emir, the only thing you can do is direspect him because you are just a weird sad frustrated troll

hai siktir

*spits on you*

[Anonymous No.28727024]

>>28726736
Why not? Take advantage of a problem to fud the coin, get more of it cheap.

[Anonymous No.28727067]

Hi guys, Im the degenerate who opened an avax short with the absolute last of my food money. Some anons told me I was gonna get rekt. Looks like I'm still alive, kek. I doubled down on my position with the profits made and intend to ride this all the way down to $10

[Anonymous No.28727109]

>>28726803
I think its not, Binance is the biggest exchange AVAX listed on and deposits and withdrawals are still suspended.
CZ is cucking everyone and dumping it artificially to scoop up panic sellers.

[Anonymous No.28727201]

>>28727109
>CZ is cucking everyone
correct
>dumping it artificially
incorrect

kek, he's preventing people from dumping

[Anonymous No.28727314]

>>28727201
Not how it works. Shorting also provides artificial liquidity.

[Anonymous No.28727319]

>>28727109
they were suppressed a while ago, long before this latest development, so I don't think that has much to do with it

[Anonymous No.28727351]

>>28727020
A-Anon, I don't even know what to say to you at this point. Not only did you get the guys name wrong your turkish is also wrong. I would even dare to call you a double fudder.

[Anonymous No.28727403]

>>28727201
>incorrect
the exchange is closed off.
CZ can do with the price whatever he wants, he can paint the chart any way he likes, he has the volume to do it.
there is huge differences in prices across all exchanges.
>>28727067
>and intend to ride this all the way down to $10
better close the short when the bridge reopens which could happen any moment.

[Anonymous No.28727514]

>>28727403
the exchange on binance is fine, I'm on it right now and I did a trade not long ago, sold and bought back in.

I think a lot of whales are staking now tho, and once they're out, they might dump it

[Anonymous No.28727551]

>>28727201
Wrong. Uncertainty is what causes it to keep bleeding, If he opened deposits 3 days ago we would've been on our way back to 60$ or already there.

[Anonymous No.28727864]

>>28727551
I don't get how this is problem because people can just convert it from USDT

[Anonymous No.28727923]

>>28727514
>the exchange on binance is fine
no its not, they dont let any AVAX in or out and they have the most volume and CZ has the deepest pockets. its in his interest to scoop up as much AVAX as he can and thats what he will do and what we have observed over the last months.
>I think a lot of whales are staking now tho
they get cozy staking returns tho
I think they will only dump their profits while maintaining their stake.
the staking ratio is still extremely high, actually it even went up same as validator count.
I see a bullish divergence here.

[Anonymous No.28727969]

>>28727551
If you actually believe that you're retarded. Literally the only thing opening deposits does is allow people to send their AVAX to the exchange to sell it. Exclusively. That's the only thing that can happen. Fuck you're dumb.

[Anonymous No.28728159]

>>28727551
>If he opened deposits 3 days ago we would've been on our way back to 60$ or already there.
basically the idea for centralized exchanges is to buy up as much share in defi as possible.
thats why they were so quick to list UNI or SUSHI or yfi. this defi is a threat to their business, they cant beat it but they have enough money that they can buy a big share of it and then later manipulate the governance and use the protocol to their advantage.
they are doing the same thing with AVAX because its an even bigger threat to their business.
if you used pangolin you will instantly know what I'm talking about.

[Anonymous No.28728228]

>>28727067
based, serves minties right for lying so much

[Anonymous No.28728292]

>>28727067
Careful with that. Turks are retarded. They'll sink their entire savings into a dying shitcoin out of misguided nationalism just to see it pump. I would keep an eye on that short if I was you.

[Anonymous No.28728345]

>>28727923
Bro, I used it a couple hours ago and it was fine.

This could be shopped, but I aint got time for that, and the time/date is New Zealand time

[Anonymous No.28728445]

>>28728345
you think this is real AVAX you are trading when you cant even withdraw it and nobody can deposit?

[Anonymous No.28728467]

>>28728345
Why are you buying when it could dump further?

[Anonymous No.28728525]

>>28728292
I mean... Avax is literally free x20 from this price.

[Anonymous No.28728680]

>>28728445
Um, I don't know, but I can buy and sell it and exchange for USDT so if it's not real, at least it does everything the real shit does for me

>>28728467
I just set a small sell and buy back order before work. I haven't bought any more from fiat or other cryptos.

I only have 68 so I'm not sure what to do, if it massively dumps I won't be homeless or anything, and I bought it at $13ish

[Anonymous No.28728704]

>>28727551
Chinese new year. They're not doing anything till its over.

[Anonymous No.28728799]

>>28728680
I bought 500 at $13. Im re-loading here. Sure it could go down to 35 or so but anything under 45-50 is a major steal.

[Anonymous No.28728816]

>>28728680
you dont understand what I'm talking about.
be careful with your short. they can pull it any way they want and they know all your moves.

[Anonymous No.28728826]

>>28717487
this t.b.h.

[Anonymous No.28728912]

>>28728816
I'm not the guy shorting, I just sold half my stack and set a buy order like 3% less that the current price, and that worked

[Anonymous No.28729002]

>>28728680
>>28728799
There are millions of AVAX stuck on the network that can't be moved to Binance right now
>b-but use a different exchange
This is where all the liquidity is. Return to normal would have this at best case $20 FYI.

[Anonymous No.28729133]

>>28729002
nobody is going to sell them anyway.
most AVAX is actually staked or delegated. look it up on avascan, its directly on the front page.

[Anonymous No.28729199]

>>28714202
I'm almost a billionaire, but you're probably more free than me. Klaus and WEF are just one faction; and not even the strongest one. No one single group has more talented fighting men than mine.

[Anonymous No.28729243]

>>28716745
You faggots sure are dedicated to pushing this doublespend narrative huh?

[Anonymous No.28729420]

>>28729002
you won't get this for $20 anymore, trust me

[Anonymous No.28729620]

>>28729133
Yes... They are. Did you know that the majority of coins right now are ONLY stakeable? As in, you literally can't do anything else with them. These are coins that are vesting over time that VCs and the dev team have. It's also why AVAX is so centralized right now.

Also when you look at the stats and see 80% staked it's a big con. Almost all of the unlocked (vested) tokens are being sold right now and no one is stupid enough to be staking them.

[Anonymous No.28729872]

>>28718140
>If i call it a doublespend enough times it’ll be accepted as true

[Anonymous No.28730093]

>>28729620
>As in, you literally can't do anything else with them.
great returns for that staking tho
>These are coins that are vesting over time that VCs and the dev team have.
they are unlikely to dump that much.
>It's also why AVAX is so centralized right now.
its completely decentralized, the upgrading process to 1.2.0 was proof of that.
>Also when you look at the stats and see 80% staked it's a big con.
Its not, you need at least 2000 AVAX to participate as a Node operator.
>and no one is stupid enough to be staking them.
If that was true Node count wouldnt go up but it is going up and tons of people are interested in running their own node.
With the next upgrade Avalanche gets Governance which nodes can vote on and Node Operator requirement is likely to be lowered soon.
Long term staking will only go up as it has done so since mainnet launched.

[Anonymous No.28730220]

>>28729872
He spent it 7 times you delusional retard

[black star !x8ngkAZjXE No.28730405]

Tis but thy name that is my enemy;
Thou art thyself, though not a Doublespend.
What’s Double Spend ? It is nor hand, nor foot,
Nor arm, nor face, nor any other part
Belonging to a man. O, be some other name!
What’s in a name? That which we call a rose
By any other name would smell as sweet;
So Avax would, were it not Avax call’d,
Retain that dear perfection which he owes
Without that title. Avax, doff thy name,
And for that name which is no part of thee
Take all myself.

[Anonymous No.28730488]

>>28730220
Emin said people who gained can have it as Bug bounty. kinda based.
>>28730405
Amen

[Anonymous No.28730540]

>>28730220
He minted it 7 times.

[Anonymous No.28730542]

double spending, double digit IQ, double in the ass avax fags

[Anonymous No.28730545]

>>28730488
>no sirs is bug bounty i am not pajeet you are pajeet fuk u no double spend u fuking bich

[Anonymous No.28730620]

>>28730093
>unlikely to dump
You don't understand how VCs work. They're already up 100x on their initial investment. They'll be pulling out at the next unlock assuming the price hasn't gigacrashed by then. They still have skin in the game since the vesting is over ~2 years but they'll certainly want to derisk as much as possible.
>completely decentralized
Bro. If the team and VCs have 100% of all stakeable tokens (called LockedStakeable UTXO type) being used to stake today, tell me how the fuck that's not centralized? That's nearly 75% of all 360M tokens. It doesn't get much more centralized then that considering it's proof-of-stake. Sure, there might be 1k nodes or some shit, but the don't have nearly the same weight as the team and VCs.
>node count wouldn't be going up
No one gives a fuck about your 2k node. I'm talking about nodes that have 1+M. Don't you understand that your votes are weighted by total balance?

[Anonymous No.28730624]

>>28727067
>opened an avax short
What exchange is this that allows shorting alt-coins? I'm a nocoiner and I'm curious.

[Anonymous No.28730944]

>>28730620
>You don't understand how VCs work.
its nowhere near done yet, only thing they will dump is their staking rewards.
also you seem to not understand how Avalanche and its Consensus works, I recommend you read the whitepaper first.
there are serious gaps in your education about this protocol.
>I'm talking about nodes that have 1+M
these nodes make more $$$ per month if AVAX price is high.
AVAX is sustainable, low risk and low effort passive income. every node operator has already realized this by now.

[Anonymous No.28731002]

>>28730624
you can margin trade on pretty much every exchange nowadays. if you are a burger you might need to use a VPN to access.

[Anonymous No.28731164]

>>28730944
>only dump staking rewards
no? VCs aren't stupid enough to throw away 100x returns for a possible 11% on a token that could be worthless in an impending bear market
>gaps in education
why don't you spoonfeed me

[Anonymous No.28731407]

>>28731164
not that guy but:
>on a token that could be worthless
AVAX is needed to run nodes and the overall tokenomics are very strong with AVAX so its not worthless at all.
its one of these coins that will decouple from BTC, it even has a chance to dethrone it.

[Anonymous No.28731595]

>>28725257
Rip paid avax fudders

[Anonymous No.28731609]

>>28731407
You're missing the point. VCs aren't going to lock up their unlocked tokens into staking when they are up 100x already. That's an easy business decision.
>0.5 -> 50 * 10M = 500M
>0.5 -> 20 * 1.11% * 10M = 222M
It's really that simple.

[Anonymous No.28731698]

>>28717641
Holy shit I’m one hash collision away from having a trillion AVAX

[Anonymous No.28731702]

>>28721296
>>28721521
>avax classic

[Anonymous No.28731758]

>>28721453
the absolute state

[Anonymous No.28731761]

>>28731609
your numbers are way too low.
why cash out at x100 when you can cash out at x1000+ ?
these VCs know exactly what they bought.
its like with chainlink, they will hoard it.

[Anonymous No.28731852]

I want off

[Anonymous No.28731869]

>>28731698
not with that bug that was patched, the network slows down before it could be that bad (printing trillions).
neat safety feature.

[Anonymous No.28731893]

>>28731852
hmm, I'm seeing $39 on binance

[Anonymous No.28731970]

>check twitter to see what the turkroach "crypto genius" is saying about his AVAX TOKEN SIR

>"YO GUYS WE JUST DID A TRANSACTION ON AVAX AND IT WAS FASTER AND CHEAPER THAN ETHEREUM! ETHEREUM IS FINISHED, AVAX TO THE MOON!"

>>28721453
just another example of "genius turkish man" posting basic blockchain shit (PERMISSIONLESS AND IMMUTABLE!!!) to make himself sound smart

he should also talk about how it's DECENTRALIZED!!!

[Anonymous No.28732051]

>>28731852
still $43 on huobi wtf
https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/avalanche#markets
weird prices on all exchanges.

[Anonymous No.28732089]

>>28731869
There’s literally a whitelist of hashes you can do whatever you want in (not that it’s practical to collide with them)

[Anonymous No.28732174]

>>28731852
It's pumping on binance

[Anonymous No.28732193]

>>28731761
You can't be serious? Have you seen how everything is pumping? Best case scenario we have 6 more months of bull. No one's taking that risk with 100s of millions of dollars. Not when they still need to get their initial investment out. Like I said, they still have other half locked up anyway that they can only stake with.

[Anonymous No.28732271]

falling knife damn

where you think its gonna crash to?

[Anonymous No.28732334]

>>28732193
>No one's taking that risk with 100s of millions of dollars.
they do all the time. you need to think on a bigger scale.

[Anonymous No.28732359]

>>28731002
>if you are a burger you might need to use a VPN to access.
The exchanges still allow you to access and buy coins with a USA bank account but you can't use a USA ip to access the exchanges? Never bought a cryptocurrency in my life so I don't know how any of it works, sorry if that's a stupid question.

[Anonymous No.28732405]

>>28732271
depends on what exchange you are looking at.
seems like there are some good arbitrage opportunities too.
>buy AVAX cheap
>send it to other exchange
>sell it for profit
anyone doing this?

[Anonymous No.28732443]

>>28732051
I don't like this price disparity. I believed in AVAX but I might have to get out for a while

[Anonymous No.28732517]

>>28732405
fuck yeah, buy at $36 and sell at 43 and keep cycling

[Anonymous No.28732586]

>>28732443
something strange is going on for sure
>>28732517
just gotta check out which exchanges have withdrawals enabled and you are set.
sending AVAX is really fast too.

[Anonymous No.28732610]

>>28732334
I have 8 figures homie. If you had anything close you would know that this game is all about derisking. I'm going to take the guaranteed 100x over a possible 1000x every time when I'm playing with millions. You can't seem to comprehend that they can sell their March 9th unlock and STILL have over half their tokens. It's you that needs to think bigger.

[Anonymous No.28732690]

>>28732610
Avalanche is a guaranteed x1000+
DYOR

[Anonymous No.28732788]

>>28732586
I only have an account with binance, so I won't, but I think other anons should, it's a good opportunity

[Anonymous No.28732825]

>>28717641
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[Anonymous No.28732892]

>>28721453
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[black star !x8ngkAZjXE No.28732936]

>>28717641
Coin of the future

[Anonymous No.28732961]

>>28732788
fuck it I'm gonna do this.
>>28732936
unironically

[Anonymous No.28733041]

>>28732690
Sure, it could be. Definitely not this bull run. Maybe the next one. Smart money isn't going to take that bet without pulling out a hefty profit.

[Anonymous No.28733107]

>>28721453
Where can I find this file?

[Anonymous No.28733118]

>>28717641
My fucking university professor wouldn't accept this solution in a 101 class. Absolutely disgusting

[Anonymous No.28733260]

>>28733041
>Definitely not this bull run.
Its happening this one, its the EVM but cheaper and faster.
it has even better tokenomics than Ethereum as its hardcapped.
>Smart money isn't going
to pull out.
you will see

[Anonymous No.28733924]

>>28733260
This will age like milk

[Anonymous No.28734114]

>>28733924
screencap it

[Anonymous No.28734250]

>>28734114
Already did. Isn't it funny that these tokens could have been staked for a year but for some reason are being unstaked at the same time as the unlock of March 9th?? Hmmm really makes you think.

[Anonymous No.28734371]

>>28730540
call it "minted" or call it "double spend" there was a transaction where one output had multiple inputs
and that's a huge fuck up

[Anonymous No.28735122]

https://www.coindesk.com/avalanche-brought-down-by-bug-triggered-by-unusually-high-volume-engineer-says

I'm guessing $5 by Feb 21

[Anonymous No.28735244]

what a piece of shit coin.. zzzzzz

[Anonymous No.28735525]

>>28735122
This shit is dumping harder than my fucking ass after taco bell. WHAT THE FUCK HAPPENED?

[Anonymous No.28735585]

This coin did a 20x recently...

[Anonymous No.28735666]

>>28734250
they will continue to stake

[Anonymous No.28735690]

>>28733118
same

[Anonymous No.28735752]

>>28735666
Oh yeah? Why go through the hassle of re-staking instead of just staking for a longer period? If you think really hard I bet you'll figure it out.

[Anonymous No.28735897]

>>28735752
Just to add to your argument. They now have their tokens unlocked+ now they know the blockchain went offline for days because of the double spend bug

[Anonymous No.28735991]

>>28715225

[Anonymous No.28736180]

>>28735752
Because after every staking period I get my rewards.
I cash some of it out to pay for the node infrastructure and use the profits to stake more to my node or for something else.

[Anonymous No.28736261]

>>28713687
And you think he isn't smart enough to lie to you?

[Anonymous No.28736480]

>>28736180
That doesn't explain why the bulk of stakers are choosing to unlock around March 9th, the date of the next major unlock. Nice try anon. Try again. Call a lifeline if you can't figure it out. Its not that hard.

[Anonymous No.28736591]

>>28713987
Correct, we should be listening to random amateurs who don't even have a basic understanding of the subject. That's the best path to knowledge and becoming an expert on something.

[Anonymous No.28736765]

>>28736261
do you know what IC3 is?
>>28736480
>That doesn't explain why the bulk of stakers are choosing to unlock around March 9th
to sell some of their rewards which is not enough to satisfy the large amount of buyers

[Anonymous No.28736989]

>>28736765
Ahh!! You're so close smooth brain. The distribution of end periods wouldn't be congregated around March 9th if that was the case. Threads almost maxed. You get one more try.

Can anyone help this guy out? Why in the world would a majority of starts chose to unstake around March 9th, the next major unlock?

[Anonymous No.28737302]

>>28736989
To pump the price up, for the newfriends that bought at $60 :)

[Anonymous No.28737372]

>>28712471
Newfag here can someone explain what double-spend means?

[Anonymous No.28737421]

>>28736989
because that is when vc can dump

[Anonymous No.28737438]

>>28736989
So they don't get dumped on by the cohort that started staking earlier than them. AVAX 50c EOY!!

[Anonymous No.28737488]

Damn, I looked away for a bit, now it's at $36 on binance, I should have sold

[Anonymous No.28737507]

>>28737421
>>28737438
Congrats frens. Thanks for playing are you smarter than a smooth brain.

[Anonymous No.28737667]

>>28737507
that doesnt mean they will dump though, I think many people as well as me still believe in the project

[Anonymous No.28738179]

Just sold my small stack (69) at $35.40

[Anonymous No.28738226]

>>28737667
>imagine being those naive
Bro. If they weren't going to dump they would have chosen different unlock dates. Period.

[Anonymous No.28738957]

>>28726825
ngl, your desperation to putdown the AVAXbros is giving me a lot of hope for this project. I'm stuck staking but it might turn out to be what saves my 100X profit afterall.

[Anonymous No.28739237]

>>28712471
Pathetic spin attempt

[Anonymous No.28739641]

>>28717641
oh no avaxbros