If Link is following the ETH chart from ‘17

[Anonymous No.29000901]

We are about to explode 14x over the next few months. $500 link in June

[Anonymous No.29001027]

>>29000901
top kek

[Anonymous No.29001661]

It is not going to do the same thing.

When altseason started, ETH went from cross its ath below $20 to $60 in 1 week and then to $200 in 2 months.

Now in 2020, altseason has already started 2 months ago and Link has achieved an pathetic profit of 75% from $20 to $35. Even the dinosaur bitcoin has outperformed lmao.

Most alts have already mooned 10x+, just like ETH did too back in the day.

A

[Anonymous No.29001788]

Eth chart for reference

[Anonymous No.29001841]

definitely possible

[Anonymous No.29001913]

And link over the past year

[Anonymous No.29002330]

>>29001661
That eth run is exactly what I’m showing. It didn’t kick off until end of Feb.

Alt season has t started yet, we’ve just been seeing some pump and dumps over the last few weeks. This is the foreshocks before the big quake actually happens

[Anonymous No.29002610]

>>29000901
Eth pumped because people were buying it to speculate on other shitcoin alts. Why will that happen to link?

[Anonymous No.29002678]

>>29000901
Take your meds

[Anonymous No.29003032]

>>29000901
$500 is a bit of an exaggeration, but it's pretty easy to argue $150-$170 based on expected market share and total size of the industry.
You can even see it quite clearly just by looking at the logarithmic all-time price chart.

[Anonymous No.29003076]

>>29002610
Because all of defi will be relying on link for price feeds and layer 2 scaling. This bull run won’t be able to scale without link.

[Anonymous No.29003825]

>>29002330

Thats because altseason and bullrun started later in 2017 than this 2020/2021 bullrun. It is not exactly the same month by month. There is a difference by a little bit more than 1 month.

Just check the trends that most of the altcoins broke ath. Altseason already begun 1 month ago.

[Anonymous No.29004824]

>>29003076
>Because all of defi will be relying on link for price feeds and layer 2 scaling. This bull run won’t be able to scale without link.

Just waiting on Arbitrum. Then it will be like requiring ETH for shitcoins as LINK will be required for off chain computation for reduced gas fees

[Anonymous No.29005100]

link would have to get to 3,000 and btc must stay at 60,000 in order to get to 2017 ETH level of B.05

[Anonymous No.29005571]

>>29000901
If you plot Link price since inception, against Ethereum , Link is holding it's own, which is quite an achievement, given that Link went through a bear market. Keeping up with Eth isn't the problem, it's the fact that we might see the cycle peaking too early.

[Anonymous No.29005865]

>>29001661

>it has to follow eth exactly to the dollar otherwise its not following it

Fucking brainlet

[Anonymous No.29005925]

>>29005571
We haven't even begun to peak

[Anonymous No.29006355]

>>29005925
Wouldn't be so sure about that. Each BTC cycle has two peaks, when the monthly rsi tops 95%. The second peak marks the beguining of a bear market. So far, April13-November 13 ; July 17-December 17. And now, BTC is reaching 90% already. Seems likely we'll see the first peak in March. If that's the case, we won't make it until December, September or October seem most likely.

[Anonymous No.29006428]

>>29005100
first dubs much less double dubs in 16 yrs on this shit site. trips ....now!

[Anonymous No.29006538]

>>29004824
eth was the reserve currency of icos, there was a liquidity crisis
link isn't the same unless a bunch of pools start and charge link to get in

[Anonymous No.29006897]

>>29006538
Arbitrum absorbs part of the Eth network, which means Link absorbs part of the Eth network. Every transaction that doesn't cost $100+ is because of Chainlink. What do you think will happen when one exchange has the cheapest fees because of Arbitrum? The rest will adopt immediately

[Anonymous No.29007105]

>>29003076
It’s a price tracker hahahaha

[Anonymous No.29007254]

>>29005100
I’m not claiming that link will hit the same sat targets, they have different circulating supplies so tracking the total market cap would probably be more accurate. However it can still follow the same pattern and percentage growth. Eth peaked in SATs in June 17 after a 14x from end of feb. A 14 x against current SATs for Link would be about 900k SATs which at current BTC prices would be about $470.

[Anonymous No.29007611]

>>29006355
Yes and those tops have been about 5 months apart, so if we hit 95% in March we would see the second top in Q3, we still have a long way to go

[Anonymous No.29007817]

>>29007105
It's a price tracker now? Last time I checked it was just an alarm clock.

[Anonymous No.29007924]

>>29007611
For Link that's not long enough. The formation we've broke out of, started in August. Took us 22 weeks, and the two previous ones were even longer. If this scenario plays out, we're gonna see one more Link pump before the bear market, a truly big one, but idk if that's enough to get to 1k.

[Anonymous No.29007977]

>>29000901
take your meds retard

[Anonymous No.29008045]

all this talk of "cycles". you faggots have no idea what you're talking about. wtf is a "cycle" and how on earth do you have any idea how long a given cycle will last. you're just guessing

[Anonymous No.29008223]

>>29008045
enterprise accounts on certain exchanges get informed via email.

[Anonymous No.29008373]

>>29007924
It’s plenty of time, if we hit $500 by June and then head into a bear market in SATs, the UsD price will still rise as BTC tops in q3 just like the Eth run in ‘17. Even if the lower high is all the way down at 500k SATs, if that is against a BTC high of $250k based on S2F projections that would be USD price of $1250

[Anonymous No.29008446]

>>29008373
I've thought for the last year we'd hit $1200 this run so it's nice to see someone else calling it too

[Anonymous No.29008451]

>>29000901
except eth is shit and I avoid it like the plague because you cc annoy make any gains with it

[Anonymous No.29008532]

>>29008045
I'm a simple man, I just hold my linkies and watch the numbers go up.

[Anonymous No.29008583]

>>29001788
That decline in Feb 2017 does look a lot like Link's decline vs BTC. But it happened a lot faster for ETH, and ETH spiked up pretty fast after it as well.

[Anonymous No.29008626]

I spent almost my entire life savings buying 500 Link today. When will my stack be worth $100k?

[Anonymous No.29008735]

>>29007254
current prices? btc's guna fly soon enough.
i have 52% of my portfo in link cuz i know i'm not guna know when to sell ...lol

[Anonymous No.29008759]

>>29000901
I bought 50k link at 50 cents, sold all of it 35 cents and never bought back in. I can live with it reaching $50. I can live with it reaching $100. But if it reaches $500, I'll seriously have to start contemplating suicide

[Anonymous No.29008869]

>>29008373
I wish you were right, but here's the thing, Link's weekly rsi is already close to 80%, and the whole twin peaks pattern repeats, in the weekly chart. May 20th- June 24th 2019 ; then the Fev-Mar 2020 pump got btfo due to pool's closed due to aids ; reenacted in July 13th and Aug 10th, and just now, we had the first peak , Jan 18, and going for the second, sometime in early March. We'll then correct, bottom out in April, and go for another one, if the pattern holds, in August.

[Anonymous No.29009003]

>>29008759
Well aren't you just a little lady.

[Anonymous No.29009415]

>>29008869
Fuck man. You really want to make me swing my 1200 stack to get more but I’m too afraid that I’ll fuck myself

[Anonymous No.29009551]

>>29009415
When in doubt, wait for a Portnoy tweet saying he's buying. Best sell signal ever, saved me back in August. I play the rsi strategy , tho.

[Anonymous No.29009586]

>>29008759
anon, im worried for u

[Anonymous No.29009621]

>>29000901
Hahahahah COPE

[Anonymous No.29009705]

>>29008045
you must lurk for three yeats before posting on this subreddit

[Anonymous No.29010415]

>>29008735
I think we probably hit $60k- $70k and then see a 30-40% correction again before we move over $100k

[Anonymous No.29010734]

>>29008869
And weekly RSI was at similar levels for the whole run from Feb-June ‘17 with Eth too. We are just getting started

[Anonymous No.29010914]

Link is the key that brings eth and btc to parity its the ignition switch of the singularity.

[Anonymous No.29010934]

>>29008869
Also weekly RsI for link/btc is nowhere near overheated.

[Anonymous No.29010959]

>>29010734
It's fine, but i'm mostly looking at the usd pairs. BTC rules Crypto, but the dollar rules the world.

[Anonymous No.29010989]

I don’t want to tell you how I’ve found Crop Finance. I’m just gonna tell you the main features of this amazing system, and it will say everything for itself

[Anonymous No.29011052]

>>29003076
Don't worry linklet, API3 has this covered, truly decentralised and trustless

[Anonymous No.29011149]

>>29008869
Oh and if you were taking RSI on link/USD instead of link/btc, the eth/usd chart was even more overheated for that whole period, basically over 80 on weekly for the entire end of Feb to June run up

[Anonymous No.29011248]

>>29002330
Alt season doesn't start until BTC tops out. BTC clearly has not topped out.

[Anonymous No.29011279]

>>29011052
Haha api 3 isn’t decentralized or trustless. APi3 decided a truly decentralized network was too complicated and expensive so you could just trust the API providers to be 1st party oracles and trust API3 to aggregate the fees because they have a “decentralized governance” of which 80% of the governance token supply is owned by 4 people. The project is an absolute joke

[Anonymous No.29011355]

>>29011149
Just look at how Link behaves. It's not like Eth at all, even though the price kinda keeps up with it. Eth rode the bull market, while Link lived most of it's life in a bear cycle. Two different animals, altogether.

[Anonymous No.29011385]

>>29008759

pls don’t

[Anonymous No.29011497]

>>29000901
But we're not in 2017 you retard

[Anonymous No.29011677]

>>29011355
ETH got to where it was because it was a shittoken generator and you needed ETH for the ICO craze with a lot of hype surrounding it. No one really gives a fuck and no one is buying LINK off exchanges to participate in anything right now. Token is only used for paying node operators which they are likely dumping on the market. There simply is no similar buying pressure like ETH unless the fat fuck can get off his ass and put out Arbitrum or staking soon (very unlikely) before this bull run fucking ends. I diversified my folio instead of being all in LINK in early Jan I'm happy as fuck I did so.

[Anonymous No.29011755]

>>29011677
Comparing LINK's price action to ETH right now is like comparing apples to oranges. Completely delusional thinking and you're setting yourself up for disappointment for no reason.

[Anonymous No.29012090]

>>29011052
noone cares about this shitcoin shilled by gaylliotrades

[Anonymous No.29012575]

>>29011677
OCR can be a game changer, he sounded unusually bullish on it. Hope Arbitrum doesn't take too long, agree that staking is very far off. Don't understand how you think i'm comparing Link to Eth, i was making the opposite case.

[Anonymous No.29012668]

Token not needed

[Anonymous No.29012953]

>>29012575
>Don't understand how you think i'm comparing Link to Eth, i was making the opposite case.
That reply was intended for other anons who like to bring up that comparison. LINK wont perform as great as ETH did in the last bull run. I could be wrong and I wish I was wrong but the lower your expectations the better.

>OCR can be a game changer, he sounded unusually bullish on it
I hope so but I really don't expect much.

[Anonymous No.29013191]

>>29007254
But literally WHY would we do what ETH did? Why?
I see link crabbing and dropping in sats and performing worse than Bitcoin this whole bull run

[Anonymous No.29013285]

>>29008626
This is funny. I bought 500 LINK at 60c and now it’s considered a life’s saving

[Anonymous No.29013331]

>>29003076
Jesus Christ you guys are so FUCKING delusional thinking anyone buying crypto as a speculator will connect all the intricate dots like that

[Anonymous No.29013376]

>>29008045

damn, with enough redditors like this flooding into /biz/, there might actually be enough retards to buy LINK bags up to $100+. Bullish.

[Anonymous No.29013394]

>>29000901
why would link follow eth
you marines are braindead

[Anonymous No.29013881]

>>29013394
Because it is one of the only legit project that will see legit consistent usage as everything else pumps and dumps once then never recovers.

[Anonymous No.29014055]

>>29011355
this is a HARD goalpost move lmfao

[Anonymous No.29014379]

>>29012575
Ocr is very bullish. 10x gas reduction, means 10x the data they can push.

[Anonymous No.29014419]

>>29014379
and link's already gone from one integration every couple days to multiple integrations every day.

[Anonymous No.29014548]

>>29008759
you are literally going to be one of those 2011 twitter "missed the boat" on btc idiots just wow

[Anonymous No.29014578]

In 2025 1 LINK will cost $45.

[Anonymous No.29014662]

>>29000901
I really hope not I need more time to sell some limbs in Mexico maybe have a baby that walks away on it’s own down there

[Anonymous No.29015121]

>>29000901
thanks just bought 100k

[Anonymous No.29015534]

>>29003076
The more DeFi coins I discover, the more I find out they rely on LINK. Such an essential part of the ecosystem, maybe the single most important DeFi coin.

[Anonymous No.29015666]

>>29013191
>I see link crabbing and dropping in sats and performing worse than Bitcoin this whole bull run

I'm happy it's not correlated with bitcoin. That means when the corrections come, it won't suffer as much.

In fact, it's mighty difficult to find something that doesn't correlate with bitcoin anymore. Even most DeFi coins are correlating with bitcoin!

[Anonymous No.29015718]

[Anonymous No.29015847]

holy fuck it's actually scary at how similar the charts are

[Anonymous No.29015948]

>>29015534
Link is DeFi, link will then be De-insurance, just like link makes blockchain relevant and usable. You had 3 fucking years retard, grab a stack and work on your life or get a hobby to pass the time

[Anonymous No.29016248]

>>29010914
Martin cabello?

[Anonymous No.29016968]

>>29008373
I have ChainLink pegged to hit $300-$1200 for its ath peak by eoy before popping down to prob 50-100ish during the following bear cycle. The closer we get, the less uncertain the range will be but that’s more or less what I’ve been expecting to play out since mid 2019. Shits gonna be stressful in a few months wondering if I’m selling the right proportion or time or if I should wait or if I should even sell and just stake instead. Decisions decisions decisions
>t. 2017 35k link oldfag

[Anonymous No.29017042]

>>29016968
bruh if it hits 300-500 sell half your stack. millions of dollars. youll still have thousands to stake the rest. jesus christ i was fucking late to this game

[Anonymous No.29017108]

>>29017042
Nigger Alert!

Nigger Alert!

[Anonymous No.29017196]

>>29016968
selling Link, ever
ngmi

[Anonymous No.29017293]

>>29016968
>Selling something that pumps in a bear market when a bear market is coming

bruh if it pumps in a bull and pumps in a bear why the fuck you selling

[Anonymous No.29017436]

>>29017042
>>29017293
Yeah it’s honestly not about the greed, it’s more just figuring out what would be the best to buy the house I want, start a fund, and go into politics while also having enough link to passively make enough money to never care about future cash flow. Basically thinking selling for $10M-$12M would do that with about $200-$750k a year in passive income on the remaining stack. also contemplating selling and buying back a year later. Link is gonna be so valuable though years from now that every decision feels like the wrong one
>>29017196
Faggot, I wrote potentially selling some. I’m always going to have link, never less than 10k link on reserve

[Anonymous No.29017505]

>>29015534
link enables defi

[Anonymous No.29017507]

When it hits $300 I'm pulling 20% of my stack to put in ETFs and I'm done with crypto forever. I'll live off my millions and the 4% meme law, but only 2% so it will continue to grow and I can go about life never thinking about money. When steaking is available I will keep a third of returns in link, a third btc, and a third eth. If it goes to zero I already made it and live off passive income. If it goes on to 4 digits then I will have a shitload of link/btc/eth. If it ever starts to feel like a sinful amount maybe I'll finally move back to the country. I do miss country life and it would be nice, to have a bigger house. About 1,800sqft with a cool basement. Maybe a shop out back since even a desktop mill is loud as fuck and can get messy.
All I want is to quit my job and neet it up, making things, watching shows, and buying dumb shit off ebay.

[Anonymous No.29017516]

>>29001661
This is you while writing all that bulshit

[Anonymous No.29017520]

>>29008759
Do a flip

[Anonymous No.29017651]

>>29017293
>he thinks btc dumps aren't going to drag LINK down -90%
link pumps when btc moves sideways, link is weak when btc moves in any significant way

[Anonymous No.29017661]

>>29017436
Yeah I feel you. I once sacrificed 237 of my linkies to slay the crab spirit and it felt like I was going to die, it was such a bad feeling.

[Anonymous No.29017701]

>>29017651
btc moves sideways most of the time, anon.

[Anonymous No.29017710]

>>29017651
This is correct, our guy Benjamin has chart showing that btc have to be above 20 MA for Link to be bullish

[Anonymous No.29017833]

>>29014578
More like .1 link

[Anonymous No.29018022]

I have exactly 10 LINKies bromephiuses. How long before I get to airdrop my lambos onto my 1500 acre ranch after the 5 LINKies I sell? When do we make it and smash GIGAbitchads out of the market?

[Anonymous No.29018115]

>>29001661
It's 2021 retard

[Anonymous No.29018136]

I have exactly 10 LINKies. Brosephienas when do we absolutely demolish GIGAbitcoin chads off of the face of the market once and for all so that I can get my lambos air dropped onto my 150,000 acre dude ranch that I buy after parting with 1 LINKie

[Anonymous No.29018241]

>>29018136
>>29018022
Fugg it told me my post didnt go through due to captcha error. Apologies for samefagging up the thread

[Anonymous No.29018273]

>>29018241
instead of deleting one of your posts, you made another post...

[Anonymous No.29018303]

>>29000901
Ya well it’s not following that so...

[Anonymous No.29018388]

>>29003076
It’s so different it’s not even funny.

[Anonymous No.29018573]

>>29017507
>>29016968
>>29008373
Pretty surprised about these $300+ predictions and super bullishness among people here. I really see no reason link would do anything notable without staking, and I agree with several anons here who have said staking seems far off, certainly not coming over the next few weeks or months we have left of this bullrun. $120 for me is the absolute top I could imagine we reach this year without staking and the probability we get there is very low. $80 is a more realistic super bull scenario but at this point I'm not holding by breath for $50. Feel free to pass the hopium pipe.

[Anonymous No.29018589]

>>29008373
Are you guys fucking kidding. Hahaha 500 by June? Link can’t even sustain a 5% you guys are literal idiots. Literal fucking idiots.

[Anonymous No.29018681]

>>29018573
you're correct

[Anonymous No.29018683]

>>29018573
Exactly, why the fuck would chainlink get staking just for fucking price feeds?? That’s so fucking as asanine? Would you be running to stake to price price feed data?? Nope. So staking is far fucking. Maybe only bullshit linkpool will be able to stake for years. Non price feed things on link are way the fuck off. Not even the next bull run maybe the one after that

[Anonymous No.29018754]

>>29018683
Honestly can see link falling back to top 15-20 on cmc maybe lower. Just as it came up over 3 down it goes back down over 2-3 years. Will see what’s up w iron hands then

[Anonymous No.29018893]

>>29018754
This is exactly what I am seeing too. Literally anyone can run a bunch of price feeds and there is no reason for Link to reach higher than like $100 when they haven't even begun with their staking model. It is honestly pretty scary seeing all these gullible anons fall for the blatant lies regarding future price performance.

[Anonymous No.29019091]

>>29015948
I did grab a stack. But there are so many other stacks that are looking shiny too.

LINK is already top 10 market cap. There is no point grabbing only LINK now.

[Anonymous No.29019472]

>>29018893
Nice attempt at fud but you're 2 years late on that

[Anonymous No.29019538]

>>29017710
Benjamin who? Show this chart pls

[Anonymous No.29019712]

>>29008759
Why would you sell at a fucking loss let alone not diversify your portfolio

[Anonymous No.29019738]

Is LINK being held back by ETH fees?

[Anonymous No.29019796]

>>29019472
Standard non-comeback fake confidence noted. You hoping someone else who actually has a fully formed opinion comes along for you to hide behind?

[Anonymous No.29019892]

>>29003076
Take your fucking meds

[Anonymous No.29019984]

>>29013331
people have been saying shit like this since link was $1, keep seething poorfag

[Anonymous No.29020054]

>>29011677
>>29011755
Checked and correct. Most sensible posts ITT

[Anonymous No.29020108]

>>29018273
Cannot delet. Something went very wrong and Im all in with an entire 10 LINK. Yes am tard, plz send halp.

[Anonymous No.29020157]

>>29000901
Scam. Paid shill.

[Anonymous No.29020183]

>>29018754
I think it will happen when btc dumps. We're going to dump harder without the preceeding pump to balance it and confidence will be shaken. However second half of this year we'll regain the sats. Has been a painful hold lately for sure.

[Anonymous No.29020302]

>>29016968
You have almost the perfect stack. I’d sell one third at $350 and $1K, then swing back to your original stack (or double it) a couple years later in the bear market. Always keep 10-11K Linkies just in case things go parabolic. Super easy play desu, no matter what you are totally set

[Anonymous No.29020534]

Selling 20 LINK when it hits $1200 to pay next year's rent

[Anonymous No.29020632]

>>29019984
>thinking it’s gonna hit $1200 this year because it got to $35 since 2017
you are a fucking delusional retard and I guarantee you I have more link than you pussy

[Anonymous No.29020762]

>>29019796
Keep posting on the anonymous basket weaving board I'm sure you'll influence someone's buying decisions :^)
I'm confident because LINK has made me seven figures and it will make me more

[Anonymous No.29020768]

>>29011052
>b-but apu2 sirs
lmao fuck off midhav

[Anonymous No.29020877]

>>29020632
It's the worst sign we've been overrrun by pajeets. They'll just stupidly spam that it will be 400 eom despite growing at an average rate of a dollar a month or so.

My prediction of $50-70 eo 2021 i made last summer is looking to be dead on but i got so much seethe when i posted it.

[Anonymous No.29020902]

Does anyone think LINK looks like it's about to pump past $40 this weekend?

[Anonymous No.29020949]

>>29020877
I would love to shit on your face.

[Anonymous No.29021036]

>>29020949
> insult indian
> he gets aroused and flirts

[Anonymous No.29021037]

>>29020762
Not trying to influence anyone's decisions, just trying to peel away all the layers of bullshit retards like you add to the conversation with your blind faith lack of substance and perspective. We don't have shit without staking - it's that simple. No point talking about pie in the sky triple fig valuations this year when there are no real signs we're getting there.

[Anonymous No.29021116]

>>29020632
You have 20k ? Cause I do, newfag.

[Anonymous No.29021315]

>>29021037
Staking is coming soon (early q2).

[Anonymous No.29021397]

>>29018573
Hard to care when I could live off steaking even if I only got 3% returns right now at current price. To clarify I mean regular 3% returns, not implying I think steaking will yield 3% returns per second or week. A surprising number of dipshits seem to think the percentage refers to returns per millisecond or some shit.
Anyway, it would replace my income as a nurse and then some. Literally impossible to lose with link. Kicking myself for getting my second degree in cash instead of loans + buying more link but I've already made it as soon as steaking comes out or I can sell a small percentage and put it in ETFs.

[Anonymous No.29021470]

>>29021315
Extremely unlikely. They need a big user to warrant staking which required a mature network with all the features they've been delaying for months. We'll see some of those features this year but staking will then be dependent on advertising to businesses following that, then testnet. So early next year earliest.

[Anonymous No.29021608]

>>29018573
Staking will do not as much for price as you think even if whole biz is going apeshit over this for some reason
chainlinks price mostly correlates with network usage
so ocr and the scaling solutions like arbitrum will have a big impact on price
the same goes for the number of projects that use chainlink data and the amount of feeds and functionality that chainlink offers
vrf, deco, etc

[Anonymous No.29021653]

>>29017710
Literally who

[Anonymous No.29021729]

>>29000901
the fud is getting to me bros

[Anonymous No.29021793]

>>29019538
>>29021653
Benjamin Cowen
>https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL-094UzhjjyzjadhxP3-iqaZfWijo4C-7

[Anonymous No.29022028]

>>29005571
A bear market is unironically the best scenario for LINK. Yeah it might flash crash with all the others, but when every speculative shitcoin is crashing and they see one single coin holding the line you know god damn well that all of those degenerates will be buying that coin which is LINK. LINK doesn't need a bull market nor it wants it. LINK has its own season.

[Anonymous No.29022517]

>>29013331
You sir...... do not understand it. Good day!

[Anonymous No.29022699]

>>29015666
checked

You know god damn well that when a correction comes, LINK will dump the hardest like it has always dumped. It pumps the weakest and dumps the hardest. It's a piece of shit coin meant to break you mentally.

[Anonymous No.29022852]

I feel like a retard for buying too little. Want to add more now but not gonna pay the vitalik tax again

[Anonymous No.29022915]

>>29018115
Don't be so hard on them, they are having budget difficulties

[Anonymous No.29023142]

Is there a worse feeling than already being all in during march 2020 so you couldn't buy more.

[Anonymous No.29023270]

>>29001661
t. already priced out

[Anonymous No.29023306]

>>29021116
>bragging about 20K

[Anonymous No.29023501]

>>29022699
>You know god damn well that when a correction comes, LINK will dump the hardest like it has always dumped. It pumps the weakest and dumps the hardest. It's a piece of shit coin meant to break you mentally.
Let these newfags learn the hard way. If you were here to witness 2017-2018 you are either cool with holding for 4-5 more years after the forthcoming dump or you are selling at the end of this year. I am probably gonna do the former but if we hit a meme number like $1200 this year I am dumping my entire stack on the newfags and scooping up cheap Linkies in 2023. I myself was a crypto newfag in 2017 and saw anons lose millions just holding eth and btc all the way down. Much less shit like NEO or ICON or XVG. Terrifying desu

[Anonymous No.29023526]

>>29020877
you're the jeet if you think link will only 2x this cycle stop pretending

[Anonymous No.29023555]

>>29021116
>20k

[Anonymous No.29023569]

>>29023306
>Lmao! He only has $650k!

[Anonymous No.29023620]

>>29022699

Link only experienced one bull market prior to this one, but it didn't even have a mainnet back then. We can't draw conclusions about how hard Link will dump when the next bear market comes.

[Anonymous No.29023696]

>>29020877
Yeah I’d still be set for life at those amounts but I’m sure as fuck not selling if that’s the top. I would say $100 perhaps but calling a $1250 top is pants on head retarded. Link is too deep cut it’s not ethereum which you had to buy for so many icos, apples and oranges comparison

[Anonymous No.29023747]

>>29023555
Checked, funniest shit I’ve seen in years

>>29023569
Unironically. Newfag

[Anonymous No.29023846]

>>29023747
>Making fun of a fren for having 2 make it stacks
Definitely not an OG. You sound like some butthurt BTC or ETH maxi

[Anonymous No.29023872]

>>29000901
Of all the things that are a literal physical possibility within our reality, this is certainly one of them. I would by no means go so far as to say thing couldn't equal number.

[Anonymous No.29023877]

>>29023846
Read the thread he came at me for no reason. I am well within my rights to defend and make fun.

[Anonymous No.29024460]

>>29023501
I only got about 18 000 LINKs, but I live in Europe in a country with an average salary of €1500 per month, so if I could hit $1.5m($85 per LINK) in this year, then it would be simply great. I would try to sell parts of my stack during the blow off top mania phase. I'd probably have to buy Benjamin Crowe's subscription for $100 a month since it seems like he knows what he is talking about and keeps things rational. It's also clear as day that the big whales don't want LINK to pump hard at all since they can just play the shitcoin game, slowly buy up LINK, suppress LINK and then maybe let LINK pump a bit only for it to dump down and enter another crab/accumulation phase. It has been so fucking tiring holding LINK these past 8 months while all these DeFi shitcoins have gone up 20x while LINK is at like 3x barely. It's impossible to tell the timelines of when something like OCR or staking will be released since the fat fuck Sergey gives these weird talks and suddenly giving these weird hints while nothing happens. I mean cmon they talked about a Whitepaper v2 back in August. It's fucking February already. Sergey is playing the 10 year long game, the whales are playing the 10 year long game, klaus schwab and those niggers are all playing the long game. It's really time to start being realistic about what to expect from LINK.
>inb4 muh it went from $1.5 to $20!!!!
Comparing the absolute bottom to absolute ATH both that lasted very briefly is fucking retarded. In reality it went from like $3.5 to $12 which is nothing spectacular during a bull market.

Anyway I just hope we hit $70 before June, but that seems like a dream right now.

[Anonymous No.29024794]

>>29006428
That's a legit 10 anon you got sauce?

[Anonymous No.29025039]

>>29024794
got it niggers her name is "Valerie Abou Chacra" she's lebanese apparently.
wish I had these dyor skills when it came to shitcoins

[Anonymous No.29025750]

>$500 per Link

Wish I could have some of that you guys are smoking

[Anonymous No.29025827]

>>29000901
>oh look, another pathetic self-hopium cope chainlink cult thread

[Anonymous No.29026155]

>>29025750
The fact there are legit anons in here that are actually retarded enough to think that link will only 0.5-2x from here the rest of the year shows how many nufags there are. You’re in a bull run year with more money flowing in then ever before. During the bear market, ChainLink went from 0.1 to 20 in three years. That’s 200x during a time when everything is dumping and people were saying crypto is a scam. We are gonna deviate from the regular trend that would’ve had us somewhere between 50-100 at our absolute peak if it was another bear year. It isn’t a bear year though. how have you faggots not realized that yet?

[Anonymous No.29026192]

>>29026155
Link doesn't have pumpamentals. I have new friends to crypto who are fomoing into ADA and Binance Coin, but when we talk about Chainlink they told me that you should have bought it at 20 cents, now it is overpriced

[Anonymous No.29026257]

>>29025750
This, these basement dwellers are all delusional. Newfags stay from this scam.

[Anonymous No.29026393]

>>29026192
I’ve been hearing that though the past three years and it’s funny
>it’s overpriced I have to buy something else (heard this at 60 cents, $2, $3, $4, $7, $10, $12, $14, $20, $25 etc)
>ChainLink only performs well during a bear market
Eventually every single one of those people over the years ended up buying in no joke between 50 cents and $30, depending on when they finally realized it kek. Look I’m not saying moonboi 4eva, I’m just stating the obvious cycle pattern we are about to see before we revert back to the long term trend post bubble pop

[Anonymous No.29026482]

>>29026393
Link would be $70 with Binance Coin's market cap. Link will never flip BNB. Same with Polkadot's Market cap. Link was ahead both of these projects last summer, it just keeps losing sats and will dump harder than anything else when the Bitcoin rally is over. Enjoy holding literal shit

[Anonymous No.29026522]

>>29008045
its the autistic word for "bull market"

[Anonymous No.29026563]

This is the most whale-owned (over 80% owned by whales), the most heavily fudded, the most heavily manipulated literal shit project and the team keeps increasing the circulating token supply every week. This is why it will never succeed, the bot suppression itself will keep it that way

[Anonymous No.29026626]

It's actually funny how it is the only project that has some serious fundamentals in terms of WEF grants, UNESCO grants and many use cases

But this just goes to show that no matter how good and solid your project is in terms of technology: it is all about the pampamentals and the pampadamp action

[Anonymous No.29026651]

>>29000901
imagine still holding link and not moving the gains into band

[Anonymous No.29026701]

>>29026651
Band has good pumpamentals

[Anonymous No.29026705]

>>29026482
So let me get this straight, Link can’t be worth more than BNB because...? You don’t make any sense pleb, everything on the CoinMarketCap ranking fluctuate, it’s not a fixed set thing kek. Just like when we entered top 20 and fell to top 30, you all were screaming it’s over. Now you’re doing the same thing in the top 10

[Anonymous No.29026753]

hello i am never fucking selling

[Anonymous No.29026781]

>>29026705
It's clear you don't understand pumpamentals

[Anonymous No.29026946]

>>29026781
Kek nah I do, but for your lack of argumentation I will be taking you to kleros court sir. good day sirs

[Anonymous No.29026996]

It's funny how you Neets thought you had it all figured out. Swift, Google, Unesco, World Economic Forum, BSN

But you forgot it is all about the pampamenthols HAHAHAHA holy shit imagine being this fucking retarded, meanwhile Reddit is making x1000 with hidden gems that don't even have a whitepaper

Cope. And seethe.

[Anonymous No.29027439]

The effect of pampamenthols on the price:

Elon Musk -tier celebrity tweets a picture of cute Dog that causes +500% price action for Doge in a matter of hours, it even flipped Chainlink

You guys understand that even if Bill Gates himself would be tweeting about Chainlink no one would give a shit? It would just cause cringe

[Anonymous No.29027475]

>>29026996
> gay retard be like "im going to day trade my minimum wage job into a (any) girls heart"

you don't get it and never will faggot

[Anonymous No.29027653]

>>29027439
>9 posts by this ID
Clearly this is an OG LINK holder fudding his own coin, a time honored tradition. Carry on LINKmarine.

[Anonymous No.29027934]

>>29026701
> pumpamentals
fuck off richard

[Anonymous No.29028525]

>>29027653
I mean he is probably right. If Bill Gates tweeted just "Chainlink", then maybe we would get a 5% pump and then a 7% dump. If he tweet "Chainlink oracles", we might get 20% pump with a slow bleed of -25%. All the news and hypes are killed right away. This is to condition people to think that no matter what happens, LINK won't pump.

[Anonymous No.29028590]

>>29028525
you're right anon, just market sold all my link at a 10% discount

[Anonymous No.29028687]

>>29028590
I hold LINK myself since due to the whale demand it just has to creep up in value, but as you already know yourself LINK rarely pumps on any kind of news. The WEF news was the biggest news LINK has had and it literally dumped -2%.

[Anonymous No.29028847]

>>29028687
any other project would 100% overnight with such news

[Anonymous No.29029011]

>>29000901
This would make my LINK stack worth 420k, lol

[Anonymous No.29029027]

>>29008759
Nice, hope the emotional trading is working for you

[Anonymous No.29029070]

>>29008759
It's okay, anon. Just use it as a learning experience and you still have a headstart on most people.
Back when ETH was announced I thought it was all meaningless marketing babble and didn't look further into it because I was a BTC maximalist, but I do recognize the usefulness of DeFi now.
ChainLink and other such mediator services are a good bet because they can adapt to whatever main smart contract chain happens to win out, wether it's ETH 2.0, Polkadot, Cardano, Binance or something else.

[Anonymous No.29029233]

>>29008759
Lol i bought a measly 1500 LINK at 0.17 cent and it's already worth x2 what you sold it for

[Anonymous No.29029332]

>>29002330
>alt season hasnt started yet
It will be over soon, tic toc motherfucker

[Anonymous No.29029448]

Who says Link has to follow ETH past performance form 4 years ago wtf why

[Anonymous No.29029539]

>>29018573
Staking wont happen before Q1, mark my words

[Anonymous No.29029658]

>>29018573
This, this years top will be around $60 AT BEST.

[Anonymous No.29029831]

Curve Finance just added a Link/sLink pool, anyone thinking of using it to get interest on their stacks?

[Anonymous No.29030126]

>>29000901
I think your entire premise and thesis are inherently flawed and based on gross oversimplified assumptions. However, being an experienced creature, I know that this is simply an ounce of Tavistock double-reverse-FUD and that LINK actually will do something magnificent and noteworthy much like the pattern you described.

there are shadows, and there are gates. I see beyond the hills and walls.

[Anonymous No.29030179]

>a make it stack costs 460k AUD
>I have 14k in crypto atm
What the FUCK do I do

[Anonymous No.29030412]

>>29029831
lmao imagine not just LPing on Bancor and getting a 20% APR

[Anonymous No.29030497]

>>29030412
The Bancor pool is full, this pool might have comparable APR anyway.

[Anonymous No.29030623]

>>29018573
nice FUD :^) it's super effective

[Anonymous No.29031896]

To all the newfags and stacklets here, the insane LINK hopium here with absurd predictions like $300-500 EOY is posted mostly by whales who want to keep newfags holding so they can cash out at an average sell of around $80-100.

Look what happened with GME, Reddit was convinced that it would reach $1000 because "the squeeze not been squoze xD" all the meanwhile the WSB mods (whales) were posting this hopium while selling at $300 and have left all the bagholders financially ruined.

Do not let emotions cloud your judgement. Hopium posters want to take your money, this board is inherently predatory. The "pajeet" meme is merely a projection of the fact almost everyone here is an opportunistic scammer, be they American, German, British, whatever

[Anonymous No.29033001]

>>29031896
The predictions are always euphoria based on nothing, but that doesn't mean anybody here has any inside scoop as to why LINK could or could not keep growing.

[Anonymous No.29033189]

>>29031896
fucking this. look at this chart and tell me that you're still fucking bullish on russian-made tax-haven ERC-20 token.

profit taking is never a stupid idea. better than being the next bag holder when bear markets arrive again.

the amount of delusional bag holders in recent link threads makes me wonder that top is near

[Anonymous No.29033394]

>>29016968
based anon
70k 0.15 oldfag
wer're going to make it
Check back here for more talk when to stake when to sell etc

[Anonymous No.29033440]

>>29009003
kek

[Anonymous No.29033496]

>>29030179
All in Link and wait. It’s that simple.

[Anonymous No.29033721]

>>29026482
>>29026563
>>29026626
>>29026701
stop. why are you wasting your own precious time?

[Anonymous No.29034074]

OP is right
nothing to add here
$1000 EOY

[Anonymous No.29034142]

ICOs and dapps couldn't have happened without Eth

Defi can't happen without Link

Cells interlinked

[Anonymous No.29034789]

>>29023696
Yes but eth could be $10k when link hits $1200, it’s not a prediction that link would flip Eth market cap

[Anonymous No.29035121]

>>29029448
Because it has been tracking the chart pretty closely and is seeing similar legitimate usage unlike all these rug pull pump and dump scams you see posted here daily.

[Anonymous No.29035266]

>>29033189
This is how people who bought BTC at $1 behaved. Literally saying when it got to $10 that it was baked and overpriced and telling new people not to buy in. Meanwhile the people who were mining since 10 cents are still in today.

[Anonymous No.29035531]

>>29035266
this isnt BTC anymore. you surely wasnt there on /v/ when they shilled it a decade ago. BTC was already done like 500x if you compare ti to link.

its not fucking 2010 anymore. not even a 2015 like some of you compare link to ETH. this is nothing like it

[Anonymous No.29035628]

>>29035531
>ripple at 25B mc
>link would be $75 with that mc
>bro the top is in
You had three years faggot

[Anonymous No.29035632]

>>29034142
Lol jesus Vitalik is so autistic

[Anonymous No.29035663]

>>29026705
In your view, why is link underperforming relative to the other top 10 for the past month? What is the catalyst for price expansion?

[Anonymous No.29036631]

>>29035628
i sold my link at 18$ and since then, over tripled my money with XRP while shitlink did only 1.5x

link is just an shitty erc-20

token not needed

[Anonymous No.29036920]

>>29025750
I have heard the same when link dumped to 3 dollars.

[Anonymous No.29037031]

>>29008759

[Anonymous No.29037262]

We. Are. Gonna. Be. So. Fucking
. Rich. Lol.

[Anonymous No.29037525]

>>29001913
bro stop, please bro you gotta stop. your making me coooooom

[Anonymous No.29037828]

>>29036631

>selling the backbone of smartcontracts and web 3.0 and the 4th industrial revolution for a kike owned coin with zero users and billions worth dumped every month

You sure showed us lad.

[Anonymous No.29038255]

>>29001788
>>29001913
FUCK ME NOW I REGRET SELLING MY 50 LINK SUICIDE STACK AT $30 AFTER BUYING IN AT $28