iExec RLC: Cerial Question Edition

[Anonymous No.29327627]

Ok broilers, tell me one thing about iExec RLC. So, you have a data marketplace, where everyone can post data. For instance 1 guy is selling 1m lines of cat related data. How do I actually know it's actually cat data and not dog data? And how does one even determine the price for the data if you don't actually know what kind of attributes related to the general theme (cat) you have?

Does iExec RLC have a sort of conflict resolution like Kleros for false data on the data marketplace (enterprise and non-enterprise)?

[Anonymous No.29327770]

>>29327627
DRNSMDO
Binance is suppressing

[Anonymous No.29327867]

You'll never India

[Anonymous No.29327917]

>>29327770
Based, we're gonna make to $1100

[Anonymous No.29327928]

read this my boy!

[Anonymous No.29328077]

I have seen this coin shilled many times.. and now this >>29327928 who is using iexec ?

[Anonymous No.29328098]

>>29327928
Holy shit, years ahead of today's cloud computing. Bullish.

[Anonymous No.29328163]

>>29327928
This has nothing to do with borrowing/loaning data. How do I know that I'm buying cat data when someone tells me it's cat data? The thing that you linked is about confidential executions.

I personally own 21k barrels and I just now asked myself the question I've asked above...

[Anonymous No.29328278]

Who is using iexec ?

[Anonymous No.29328289]

They planned on having a reputation system for apps and data
but basically more people buying the dataset means the data is trustworthy
>you don't actually know what kind of attributes related to the general theme (cat) you have?
for the data details there used to be metadata like a description and preview but I'm not sure if its still implemented

they never really built out the data marketplace because they got sidetracked with the EU projects

[Anonymous No.29328295]

>>29327627
You sell the processing power you donut. nobody ever knows what the data is and no single node or any single cloud will process the whole data parcel. It’s broken up and sent out multiple times and processed then returned. Nodes are paid by success rate and reputation, same for clouds like AWS. People using it to process data pay a flat rate in fiat. The RLC is used by locking it in eRLC to create nodes. This reduces the RLC supply for us and line go up.

[Anonymous No.29328430]

On blockchain level:
The PoCo (proof-of-contribution) consensus protocol

On confidential/tusted computing level:
Attestation

[Anonymous No.29328456]

>>29328295
So who already swapped RLC to eRLC ?

[Anonymous No.29328478]

>>29328077
It’s only just opened the bloody network. It’s working with a lot of clients including the Eu, intel, Bosch and the industrial internet consortium working in web3 which included the world economic forum. Amazon’s AWS is hardly about to start using it weeks after it was finished are they.

[Anonymous No.29328487]

>>29328077
How do partnerships with Intel, IBM, Alibaba, and Google sound? No other tech can do confidential cloud computing like IExec can.

[Anonymous No.29328632]

>>29328278
No one. It's like LINK pre-adoption

>>29328289
>for the data details there used to be metadata like a description and preview but I'm not sure if its still implemented

Fair point, but how could I ever TRUST the meta data?

For intance, even if someone is selling me cat data. Imagine we have a table of 1 million rows and 15 different cat related atributes in each row. Le'ts now imagine that 10 atributed are actually cat related and the other 5 are complete garbage and just thrown in there so it looks like it's more data than there actually is... So you could manipulate people into thinking that you have more cat data than someone else who is also providing a cat data related data set

>>29328295
You obviously don't know what iExec RLC does and can do. NEXT! The question I'm asking has nothing to do with the data processing part

>>29328430
Again, I'm not asking about the execution part. I'm asking about the part where people offer you their data, so you can lend it out. HOW DO YOU KNOW IT'S ACTUALLY CAT DATA, NOT DOG DATA?

[Anonymous No.29328699]

>>29328163
You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of what RLC enables. Iexec is not a data marketplace, it's a computation marketplace. You give the iexec network a job and it performs it. If your task is "compare two data objects for identicality", you can send that job and the objects to the iexec network to be computed securely. But you need to be the one to define the task. Nobody is selling you "cat data", they're computing a cat data related job that you supplied. If you retrieve data from a public API to compute with, you could use a distributed Oracle (also iexec, or link) to verify the data integrity.

[Anonymous No.29328703]

>>29328478
>>29328487
Impressive i swear intel, IBM Alibaba and Google !!! And they are working on using it for..

[Anonymous No.29328756]

It's not on Coinbase...

[Anonymous No.29329005]

>>29328699
I think you didn't see this (https://medium.com/iex-ec/iexec-v5-interoperability-and-privacy-tools-for-defi-3cf674e8cd8c)...)... you can tokenize a cloud assets (which also means data sets) on iExec RLC and loan them out. How do I know what I am loaning if the dev literally writes what they're giving, since he could be lying about it and what attributes are inside (this guy mentioned this, this guy knows what I'm trying to say >>29328289)

[Anonymous No.29329075]

>>29328703
One of the many reasons these companies are working with iExec is to provide security for datasets and machine learning privacy that is leaps and bounds beyond what is out today.

https://medium.com/iex-ec/ibm-iexec-shaping-the-future-of-zero-trust-decentralized-architectures-c555b89add49

[Anonymous No.29329093]

>>29328163
They don’t bloody sell data they sell the processing power for it! It’s your data, nobody else’s, nobody will ever have access to it. Right now you can in theory look at cloud data, iexec means you never can. So sorry, no more fappenings in the future. It’s unhackable except at the data source which is the users responsibility. Once it leaves to be processed on the cloud it is in so many pieces it can never be hacked or read. It works the same way bionic works. The same bionic that mined XRP and that runs seti@home. Iexec will create the worlds biggest supercomputer and it’s quantum computing compatible. Everyone can sell their processing power to it. Even phones probably. This is how you solve the btc mining issues among other things. It will allow computing power for a global internet of things too. The meta cloud is literally the OS for the 4th industrial revolution and a true World Wide Web 3.0. Everything else will be an application on it. This is like a next gen http and it’s monetised and decentralised.

You will live in a pod and eat the bugs! I won’t, my barrels are buying me a farm.

[Anonymous No.29329216]

>>29328456
Nobody important. Why would they when they aren’t switching to the meta cloud yet.
>>29328632
Iexec doesn’t sell data though...

[Anonymous No.29329430]

>>29329075
Very ambitious nice i love it !
>Nov 7, 2018
A two years full collaboration didn't move the price up. It's okay... they are using massively the token...i guess

[Anonymous No.29329432]

>>29328756
They just sent in application this week.

[Anonymous No.29329523]

>>29329093
>>29329216

Again guys, read this >>29329005

You can monetize a cloud asset by tokenizing it and loaning it out on lets say compound. But how the fuck do they check that you actually loan out the thing you're saying you're giving? So before you tokenize the 1m cat data set, how do they check if you actually tokenized a cat data set?

READ THIS BEFORE YOU TELL ME THE SAME SHIT AGAIN: https://medium.com/iex-ec/iexec-v5-interoperability-and-privacy-tools-for-defi-3cf674e8cd8c

[Anonymous No.29329573]

>>29329432
How am I supposed to buy if it's not on Coinbase?

[Anonymous No.29329587]

>>29329430
Just wait until Americans can finally buy the oil. The only big listing is Binance, and the chink is using $10 trades to push the price down.

[Anonymous No.29329617]

>>29329573
Uniswap

[Anonymous No.29329816]

>>29329587
Because it's also for simple user like you and me ? Not only big companies so. Because when you are a multi billion enterprise, if it's just hard to buy and not illegal, buying from a non-american exchange shouldn't be a problem.

[Anonymous No.29329898]

>>29329523
That’s a fucking gimmick app on the god damn network. It’s like getting excited about a cars cup holders. Holy shit. The meta cloud tracks the scattered data to send it back to the user. All the data has to be able to be put back together again. They use the same process to validate shitty cat and dog cards. It’s like having a 1000 piece jigsaw l that is processed by multiple nodes but the protocol remembers which pieces fit in the box, the pieces are sent back to the used and put back together again their end. If someone tries to pretend a dog is a cat it won’t have the right pieces and it can’t be processed.

[Anonymous No.29329930]

>>29329617
No thanks

[Anonymous No.29329966]

>>29329816
If you are not the USA, use Binance and then take your oil to a wallet after you buy.
If you are in the USA, just use uniswap.

[Anonymous No.29330002]

>>29329005
I think that would probably fall under real contract law and the smart contract could be admissible in court

[Anonymous No.29330052]

>>29329930
Well, the billionaire's life isn't for everyone.

[Anonymous No.29330053]

>>29328632
>how do you know the content will contain what you assume it will

good question: I don't know. I would say that isn't wholly possible in any decentralised marketplace. It's like eBay and PS5 scammers in my mind, reputation and metadata (the ad in this example) quality can infer confidence in buying from that seller, but you can never know until you've received your package and it turns out to be packing peanuts and two house bricks.

[Anonymous No.29330087]

>>29328632
you cant trust it if youre the first buyer I guess
but after a while data would get feedback on how good it is

look at https://market.oceanprotocol.com
basically you just trust the seller isnt lying to you based on his past datasets/reputation

[Anonymous No.29330097]

Iexec kills the dojo

[Anonymous No.29330236]

>>29330087
No single seller gets all the data. The reputation is just how reliable that seller is and how much work they will get. It’ll most likely be a flat rate per amount of data processed. Fuck up and you get sent less work in future.

[Anonymous No.29330266]

>>29329898
You simply do not understand the dillema I have. Stop trying to explain to me how the CONFIDENTIAL COMPUTING part works, because I understand it well.

>>29329930
Have fun FOMOing into it at 20$

>>29330002
It can not. Because it's a decentralized app... The only solution I see is a Kleros style resolution, so that If someone believes that the data is not what it's supposed to be...

>>29330087
Yes, exactly that. I believe it's exactly that, but I still think this is an issue that should be addressed. I think this is a real issue and that some form of a solution could be done. Even if not perfect...

[Anonymous No.29330270]

>>29327627
>>29327770
I like new meme pic wave

[Anonymous No.29330293]

>>29329617
>70$ to do a trade
OOF
So they have been working with some big companies closely togheter for the past 2 years, and no one is using their tokens for at least 1 thing.
And the price should go up because....of...

[Anonymous No.29330336]

>>29330097
RLC will be the cloud computing marketplace of the future.

[Anonymous No.29330442]

>>29329966
Checked thank you i will use uniswap despite the fees but look>>29330293

[Anonymous No.29330481]

>>29330293
Well, look at LINKs chart before adoption and look at it after adoption. You don't mean to say you buy coins after they've already been adopted?

>>29330336
That's where you're actually wrong. RLC won't be the cloud computing marketplace of the future, but it'll be the cloud ASSETS (data sets, cloud computing power, dapps, ...)

[Anonymous No.29330593]

>>29330481
Of course not if it was that case i wouldn't buy any coins.

[Anonymous No.29330753]

>>29330053
Yes, exactly. I 100% agree, but we could probably do better. Maybe this is an issue for the future. I'm into computer science and as of right now I don't see a clear solution to this, except having as you already mentioned some kind of trust score, which doesn't prevent anything really, since you can always make a new wallet and scam people from the new wallet

>>29330593
So... What's the problem officer!?

[Anonymous No.29330870]

>>29330266
Is an OS so both ends will have to be using it won’t they
>>29330293
That’s like saying nobody used the first telephone. It’s because nobody else has one. They could but it’s barely entering ‘production’ let alone sales.

[Anonymous No.29330915]

>>29330336
Feels good to be holding 500 RLC. This is one of the only legitimate multi B market cap projects. And this shit currently is sub-200m. Easiest 10x

[Anonymous No.29331031]

>>29330915
Based oiler

[Anonymous No.29331032]

>>29330753
>what's your problem officer
Ngl made me kek
Listen, i'm wondering who are you all expecting the price to increase if some big companies that iExec has been closely working for the past 2 years are not using the token.

[Anonymous No.29331193]

thing i don't get about this coin is : why doesn't it fucking rise?

[Anonymous No.29331287]

>>29330915
BASED

[Anonymous No.29331360]

>>29331193
People dont understand the tech, and we are still pre adoption.

[Anonymous No.29331373]

>>29331032
Tech adoption takes years. Also, most partners of iExec are in America and from a legal perspective they still do not have the green light from SEC. But they are on it... Here, look at the adoption roadmap

https://trello.com/c/QSjkWT4W/28-us-legal-opinion

The lawyer who is handling the US legal opinion said that it's expected by the end of March... Could take a week or two longer, but no worries

>>29331193
This is not normie tech, normies have a hard time grasping BTC and this is far more technical than BTC can ever be. People are stupid and slow

[Anonymous No.29331394]

>>29331193
Not a lot of marketing yet and a single man has control over the main marketplace of RLC, once he's gone we're on the moon mission.

[Anonymous No.29331449]

>>29330870
So...The product that use the token made by iexec is being finished now ? So now, today, by the date 02/21/2021 the product is finished and ready to go right ?
>>29331193
That's what i'm trying to understand...We will find out my fren.

[Anonymous No.29331482]

>>29330753
> No way to verify data integrity
You can provide an auditable app that verifies the data content without exposing it to the outside world. For example with images you can use an ML model that picks out random points in the dataset and tells you what it sees and checks against a manifest. Obviously you'll need different methods to verify diferent datatypes but the point is that you can collect information about the data without anyone being able to peek inside.

[Anonymous No.29331624]

>>29331449
They have 2 phones and a switch board which they have opened up for testing and which they are teaching people how to use. It’s all there but it’s like teaching your granny how to use an iPhone.

[Anonymous No.29331648]

>>29327928
Those that know that RLC is part of HyperLedger, LINK, multiple companies and those are that do not.

[Anonymous No.29331688]

>>29331482

[Anonymous No.29331746]

>>29331449
The product is finished, but not DONE. More technical releases will be pushed out, but there is not technical roadmap, since it would take time to write it up and that would take away development time.

The product is finished, now it's more about them getting the legal stuff done, so burger based companies can use it... Look at this

https://trello.com/c/QSjkWT4W/28-us-legal-opinion

The US legal opinion will be done by the end of March. I've explained in more detail here >>29331373

[Anonymous No.29331837]

>>29331449
Once people realise it gives their company or whatever a competitive advantage or more profit in the case of things like AWS it will snowball into mass adoption. It’ll be greener (in theory as it’s using idle time that’s currently wasted for one) and allow comsci’s to have access to greater processing power than ever before.

[Anonymous No.29331862]

>>29330753
>>29331482
You can verify which docker image is used by a given app, so you can guarantee that the results can't be faked either. So this check can even be performed and payed for by the data provider as long as the participants agree that the data checking app is a good enough proof.

[Anonymous No.29332047]

>>29331193
See
>>29331373
This is not normie tech, normies have a hard time grasping BTC and this is far more technical than BTC can ever be.

The kind of talent you need to dev this is not something you get from a normal CS degree.

[Anonymous No.29332063]

>>29331746
It’s not even done after that. Technology will go from a dial phone (it’s current equivalent) to an iPhone on it and beyond incredibly quickly. The foundation is done though yeah.

[Anonymous No.29332068]

>>29327627
Daily reminder: The tech doesn't matter. There are inferior cloud computing projects that will surpass RLC. If tech actually mattered, the vast majority of home computers would be using Linux instead of Windows.

RLC is a failure. The last four years have proven this.

[Anonymous No.29332334]

>>29331373
I see, so all this years without the SEC green light for american companies, they didn't bought because they weren't able to do it. It did you all a favor, letting you accumulate as much as you can. It's a shame that there only big american enterprises and not a single big one from Europe who could have used it sooner. hmm let's say it's because europoor are slow to react. So expecting a price pump the last 3 years was useless in any cases if it's only to enterprises to use it.
So one more question, will iexec do advertisement to simple users at home to incentive to buy it to increase the price and the "big boat theory" will impeach any manipulation or "price supression".

[Anonymous No.29332412]

>>29332068
Consider that Android is Linux-based.

Also consumers are not entrepreneurs or enterprises. The later always go for the best performance, and are what actually matter.

[Anonymous No.29332436]

>>29332068
Sadly this. Imagine all the normie plebs vastly outperforming us Oilers just because they bought whatever altcoin gets shilled on Reddit.
I don't see RLC gaining ranks on CMC this year.

[Anonymous No.29332630]

>>29332068
> The tech doesn't matter. There are inferior cloud computing projects that will surpass RLC.
Do inferior products have partnerships with IBM and Intel?
> If tech actually mattered, the vast majority of home computers would be using Linux instead of Windows.
This is insainly retarded. Windows and Linux have completely different target users. Why do people get a new phone ever year? Your inferior coins will fall once we get off Binance only and receive real marketing efforts.

[Anonymous No.29332639]

>>29332068
Maybe but it would be edisoning Tesla

[Anonymous No.29332747]

>>29331862
>>29331482
Please explain it to me a bit dumber... So what I don't get from your first post is this. How would a ML model know what it sees if the data is encrypted. The only thing the ML model detects is the relations between the data, because Intel SGX is like hommographic encryption, which keeps the relations between the data, so the ML algorithm can detect them. But I don't really get how the manifest you're talking about would look like? And why the ML algo could see the data?

I'm a bit confused how a machine learning algo checks encrypted data inside the data set and checks it against a manifest (I don't even know what exactly you mean by "manifest"... how would a manifest look if you were checking for cat related data inside the encrypted data set?). But I'm still very interested in your point, since I think you're trying to tell me something smart.

>>29332334
Not 100% true. EDF is from EU and they didn't buy in, which has me scratching my head, because EDFs chief office of blockchain and some other crap actually liked a lot of twitter posts of iexec + they've been working with EDF for 3 years now...

>>29332436
This is called market inefficiency, which gets destroyed with time. The market will sooner or later realize that we NEED off-chain computing, 2nd layer scalability and interopability protocols

>>29332068
Tech does matter, it just doesn't matter in this instance due to the degenerate bull run and because there is A LOT OF NEW STUPID PEOPLE in crypto. Once they leave (they always do after they get destroyed) or get smarter RLC will pump

[Anonymous No.29332991]

>>29332068
This is what's going to happen over the next few years:

1. IPFS and Filecoin improve interoperability with Ethereum.
2. A tech stack is formed that allows you to settle IPFS storage through metamask.
3. This leads to a new wave of simple decentralised apps that use IPFS as web and user content hosting, and Ethereum as the settlement layer.
4.Use cases that require secure computation will start using iExec by requesting iExec workers via ethereum with inputs provided by IPFS and outputs sent back to IPFS which are displayed on the decentralised website back to the user.

User content will be encrypted and stored directly on IPFS and users will pay for this through their metamask wallets or offset by advertising like the old model. Centralised cloud providers start seeing the trend, the only way to capture part of the market is to provide computational power to the ecosystem.

[Anonymous No.29333050]

>>29332747
One more detail..Will iexec do advertisement to simple users/consumers at home to incentive to buy it to increase the price thus the "big boat theory" will impeach even more any form of manipulation or "price supression" ?

[Anonymous No.29333109]

>>29327627
Can niggers tongue my anus?

[Anonymous No.29333200]

Am I gonna be able to stake this shit with BNT. Need to get dat passive income mah mufuggin niggas

[Anonymous No.29333252]

>>29329930
Have fun staying poor

[Anonymous No.29333700]

Iexec is basically trying to industrialize trust...That's huge

[Anonymous No.29333793]

>>29332436
>I don't see RLC gaining ranks on CMC this year.

lmaaaaaao

[Anonymous No.29333868]

>>29329573
Exodus.io

[Anonymous No.29333927]

>>29333200
You need BNC and RLC? Dang

[Anonymous No.29333936]

>>29332747
A docker image (basically a packaged bare OS with your code on it that can be reviewed publicly on github) is published. An app is created on iExec that uses this image - this cannot be faked. The data provider and users review this docker image and agree that it won't leak data outside and it's good enough to verify if the data is what the provider says it is. The data provider then gives permission for that app (the one that has the docker image) to operate on the data and sends it the decryption keys. This means that the app can now decrypt the dataset inside a secure enclave (SGX) and view it. It doesn't use homomorphic encryption - it views the real data in a protected piece of memory.

By manifest I mean something like a list of data points and attributes of each points that allows you to verify it. So for images you have a list of images and a description of what the images are. Then the ML model can randomly pick an image in the list, scan it in the secure enclave and publish the result i.e. "image #1111 is a cat". This result is then checked against the manifest, which also says that "image #1111 is a cat"

[Anonymous No.29334004]

>>29333793
Lost 50 ranks in 3 years. Staying in top 200 can be considered a success for 2021.

[Anonymous No.29334059]

>>29333050
No, because cloud computing isn't meant for a home user.

Example: You use Netflix, but you don't really realize that everything is run by AWS Amazon. If aws fails (which it has multiple times) than Netflix is also down. If you were to run Netflix on iExec RLC this wouldn't happen of course, because Ethereum would have to fail in order for iExec RLC to fail

>>29333109
Yes

>>29333200
Maybe. If the proposal passes, than yes https://gov.bancor.network/t/proposal-whitelist-the-iexec-rlc-token/684

>>29333700
No, that's what ETH is for. iExec RLC is trying to be the super computer this world needs. In order for us to run smart cities and smart homes and smart cars and other related stuff we need all the computing power we can get. All the data centers in the world aren't enough computing power to be able to run every city in the world as a smart city, therefore we need to somehow use the idle compute power to our advance, therefore we need a DECENTRALIZED cloud where anyone can join and provide said compute power for $$$

[Anonymous No.29334130]

>>29333200
If RLC gets a big enough MC I dont see why it would not be whitelisted for single sided staking

[Anonymous No.29334273]

>>29334004
we arent selling nigger

[Anonymous No.29334396]

>>29334059
Thanks anon, you came here to post your question in the end you answered all mines. And yes, i like Colombo and still laughing from the "officer" one.

[Anonymous No.29334424]

>>29333936
Ah yes, now I get you. Yes, that is the (or at least one of) solution to my problem. Very smart, I appreciate the input. Thank you broiler!

Literally /thread because of your comment. Maybe iExec RLC could actually develop this themselves, this would probably be a great feature in order to prevent false data on the marketplace

[Anonymous No.29334637]

>>29334059
I just bought 100k bancor to vote yes

[Anonymous No.29335001]

[Anonymous No.29335144]

>>29334424
I think the data provider could potentially publish these dataset proof "apps" temselves as long as the code is public. The publisher would only need to run the proof once if you can guarantee that the data is sampled randomly. (no one can alter or predict random number generation on the worker) So the cost of the "proof" would be paid by the publisher themselves.

I think they hired new UI engineers recently so hopefully the can make it look nice, so for example show the dataset and link to the app that proves the data is real. The tech to do this is already there.

No worries, as an engineer the technolgoy is mindblowing.

[Anonymous No.29335633]

>>29334004
all the more reason to buy, friendo

[Anonymous No.29335671]

>>29334637
I appreciate the support! Getting RLC on Bancor would help out a lot.

>>29335144
Jp jp, the technology is MIND BLOWING

[Anonymous No.29336281]

>>29335144
Chkd.
My local council should buy into this. They removed from ms cloud as machines that would do the job were to costly. Brought nutanix as it was more cost effective.
Rlc is the one man.

[Anonymous No.29336296]

RLC on BEP20 when

[Anonymous No.29337311]

Based high IQ RLC thread
It makes me comfy

[Anonymous No.29337729]

if this coin is too good why hasn't it mooned yet???
touché

[Anonymous No.29337924]

>>29337729
shut up

[Anonymous No.29337998]

>>29337729
because markets are not efficient in the short term

[Anonymous No.29338091]

>>29337729
Have you even read the thread? By your comment I would presume a big fat NO

[Anonymous No.29338206]

>>29337729
Still trying to onboard as many anons as possible. A new class of 4chan millionaires is inevitable.

[Anonymous No.29338228]

>>29337729
Because with web3.0 the bridge is being built as you drive on it, and the market hasn't realised yet that this is an essential component.

[Anonymous No.29338566]

When DOTB? I'm getting tired and impacient

[Anonymous No.29338695]

Feels good to be rich and btw


Fuck Niggers
Fuck Kikes
and lastly
Fuck Jannies

[Anonymous No.29338769]

>>29338566
It's usually 1-2 weeks after you sell

[Anonymous No.29338836]

>>29338695
*AHEM*
Fuck oilers

[Anonymous No.29338949]

>>29338769
I NEED IT

[Anonymous No.29338979]

Do you want to know what its like to be free?

You'll never really know for sure, unless your purchase RLC and keep diamond hands.

[Anonymous No.29339087]

>>29338836
The Day of the Barrel is close upon us. Tick tock, no oil nigger, tick tock.

[Anonymous No.29339133]

>>29338836
Based noiler

[Anonymous No.29339256]

>>29339133
Keep moving on you no oil nigger.

[Anonymous No.29339291]

How can a brainlet try to understand the tech behind rlc more? Any good youtube videos, or explanations in laymen terms?

[Anonymous No.29339540]

>>29339291
Read through the POCO series

https://medium.com/iex-ec/about-trust-and-agents-incentives-4651c138974c

It's a high level overview of the POCO consensus algorithm they use, which is the core to iexec. Just read the full series, it'll help you understand it in more non-technical terms

[Anonymous No.29339541]

>>29339291
This. I'm trying to understand the tech but I don't get it. It's too hard
And I only buy things that I understand

[Anonymous No.29339573]

>>29330266
>It can not. Because it's a decentralized app...
Why not? You have to know what you're buying, and ideally you'd know who you're buying from right? And it would be for business purposes? And erlc is fully KYC compliant? I'm not seeing why you can't enforce delivery discrepancies in court

[Anonymous No.29339835]

>>29339573
See for another possible solution for anonymous providers.
>>29331482
Another one mentioned earlier in the thread was a reputation system.

[Anonymous No.29339923]

>>29339291
>>29339541
I'm off to bed now, but basically imagine a supercomputer accessible from a smart contract.

[Anonymous No.29339969]

>>29339541
Read this >>29339540

>>29339573
You can't have that on the non-enterprise version.

But yes I agree, and this guy >>29333936 came up with a solution to the problem which doesn't involve messy paper work. Look, we have blockchains in order to circumvent paper work. Adding legal paper work to a blockchain is missing the point of the blockchain. What >>29333936 said in his post is the solution to the problem. Also, you need to remember that no one is telling you trust anyone on the marketplace. Could be dog data, even if it says cat data. It's like Ebay you see, you have a trust score associated with each data provider. If someone has a low score you don't trust him, if someone has a high score you trust him. It's only a problem with a new user really. After the new user provides a few data sets people can decide if they were good or bad and depending on what people vote he gets a trust score.

[Anonymous No.29340603]

>>29339573
And not really, ideally you would never know who you're buying from, since that can lead to corrupt acts which are not optimal. If you only know that the data is what you need and you know it's good data than knowing who you buy from is not needed... It's actually favorable to not know, since knowing might influence your decision

[Anonymous No.29340651]

>>29337729
for the same reason planes are on the ground before takeoff

[Anonymous No.29340797]

What's the suicide stack

[Anonymous No.29340870]

>>29340797
Stacks
87 (village stack) = 1 / 1.000.000th of the supply (1 million can have this many)
870 (suicide stack) = 1 / 100.000th of the supply (100k can have this many)
8700 (make it/upload stack) = 1 / 10.000th of the supply (10k can have this many)

[Anonymous No.29341747]

>>29340870
Shit son, iExec's true potential is about to be released. Nearly got a make it stack myself.

[Anonymous No.29341870]

RLC has potential but it's using some Uniswap code, devs are too lazy and gas fees are too high
Idk If it's worth to trade there

[Anonymous No.29342292]

>>29341870
Hopefully, the dev's application to Coinbase gets accepted soon. Make sure to buy large amounts at once. Be warned, it's a comfy hold.

[Anonymous No.29342767]

>>29327770
Laughed so hard at this. OP comes out with a valid q, oil chad shuts it down. NSMDO

[Anonymous No.29342794]

>>29342292
Coinbase will surely be thrilled to list a token with such incredibly low trading volume.

[Anonymous No.29343043]

>>29342794
You're so fucking dumb and cynical. Check the image that YOURSELF have posted. LINK had like 1 to 5m volume before it got listed on Coinbase

[Anonymous No.29344243]

>>29343043
based fuck noilers

[Anonymous No.29344993]

>>>/tv/146986750
>>>/tv/146986750
>>>/tv/146986750
GET IN HERE OILBROS

[Anonymous No.29345396]

>>29330293
Literally every single project with confirmed partnerships is like this because crypto is a totally worthless market controlled by kikechinks and pumped by pajeet zoomers purely because elon retweets anime girl mascots for particular coins.

>>29329432
Is there a source for that?

[Anonymous No.29345530]

>>29336296
If you ask they'll get mad at you and say people should just buy on uniswap.

[Anonymous No.29345558]

>>29337729
Because binance actively suppresses it through wash trading into pumps and because /biz/ is full of twitter pajeets that think only food shitcoins are a good investment for their rupees.

[Anonymous No.29345650]

>>29343043
Because he's the same faggot who always fuds because he thinks personally posting on /biz/ will cause the price to fall but the joke is on him because most hodlers who would possibly sell just have sell orders for their buy-in price.

[Anonymous No.29346063]

>>29344993
They deleted the thread. Guess we looked like scammers :*(

[Anonymous No.29346071]

RLC is finished

[Anonymous No.29346895]

>>29346063
good not everyone deserves to make it kek, people will unironically fud themselves out of becoming rich

[Anonymous No.29346921]

If RLC doesn't break $2.50 tomorrow i'm gonna jump from a bridge

[Anonymous No.29347061]

you better not scam me you little shits

[Anonymous No.29347221]

>>29347061
>>29346921
>they bought?

[Anonymous No.29347550]

>>29347221
you know what to do.

[Anonymous No.29348009]

Wish I could buy this

[Anonymous No.29349119]

>>29348009
UNISWAPPPPPP YOU FUCKING RETARD

[Anonymous No.29349273]

uhh bros
there's no volume